- Series: New International Commentary on the New Testament
- Hardcover: 240 pages
- Publisher: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.; Revised edition (November 15, 1976)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 080282515X
- ISBN-13: 978-0802825155
- Product Dimensions: 9.6 x 6.5 x 0.9 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
- Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,755,633 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Epistle of James (New International Commentary on the New Testament) Hardcover – November 15, 1976
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
I find it amazing how different the material is in these three volumes. After 1800 years of commentary, one would expect a fair amount of uniformity in thinking about this short letter, but there is a remarkable range of differences in emphasis among the three.
Those of you who are familiar with the world of biblical commentary will recognize that all three are part of major series of commentaries. Adamson and Moo belong to series dedicated to the New Testament, while Martin's volume is an offering of a larger series on both Old and New Testaments. And, each volume is organized in a way to match the editorial style of their series. This is most clearly seen in Martin's volume, as his work is organized in virtually the same way as the much larger work on Paul's Epistle to the Romans by the distinguished scholar, James D. G. Dunn. This is no surprise, as Martin is the New Testament editor for his series, the Word Biblical Commentary.
Ranked by scholarly detail, Martin has the most and Adamson has the least, with Moo somewhere in between; but don't take from this that Martin is heavy on the Greek and Adamson has no original Greek. All three are specifically written for the scholar and assume that the reader either knows classical Greek or is willing to slog through all the Greek words and expressions.Read more ›
While at first glance the letter of James may appear to be fairly straightforward, upon investigation it is clear that many passages in the epistle are open to a variety of interpretations (the most obvious of which is the exact connection between faith and works in the mind of James). Adamson does a good job of dealing with these interpretations and making consistent sense of what James is saying.
As is true of most of the volumes in the NICNT, Adamson places the more technical materials, including commentary on the Greek text, in footnotes, or, in this case of this volume, various "Excursuses." This helpful practice permits the general reader, who may not be interested in such issues, to focus on the verse-by-verse commentary itself.
Adamson's volume also has an introductory section of some 27 pages in which he discusses matters such as authorship, purpose, teaching, etc.
He outlines, "The Epistle of James comes from the center and head of the Christianity of its day, and speaks with all the pastoral authority of its source. It is necessary, however, to recognize not only that pastoral quality... With few exceptions... there is nothing in the Epistle of James that is not thoroughly applicable and relevant to today. The one important exception is the intense apocalyptic expectancy of an almost imminent end to the present world. The author… definitely assumes that his days are the last days, and that the ‘first generation’ of Christians, the Apostolic Age, is also to be the last.” (Pg. 21) He observes, “The belief of some that the parousia is a hidden cataclysmic event in the invisible spiritual world is clearly not that of James… James shows no fear of delay, or anxiety about the interim state of the dead. If, in fact, he mistimed the Second Advent, we must adapt ourselves, and his teaching, to the delay; but on his relation to the truth we must remember how much of messianic prophecy James had seen fulfilled, in the birth and resurrection of Christ.” (Pg.Read more ›
The Reverend Doctor James Adamson, a Presbyterian minister in Santa Rosa, California, writes in the Introductin that one of the chief goals of this commentary is to prove that James carefully plotted out his epistle, and that it was not (as many commentators believe) an unstructured collection of random thoughts. This goal and the scholarly way in which it is pursued makes this commentary fairly confusing and did not do much to strengthen either my faith in Christ or my understanding of James' epistle in general.
Adamson employes two techniques frequently. One is his habit of finding a word or theme in the text of the epistle, then connecting it to the same word or theme elsewhere in the epistle to prove its structure and unity. The second technique is to introduce and explain what other (disagreeing) scholars say about a particular section of James, then (once the oppornent is fully explained) Adamson presents his own view, explaining why his view is superior. I found myself quite frustrated with these techniques. In the first technique, I found myself agreeing that a structure exists, but Adamson doesn't draw any conclusions from these connections as far as the overall message of James is concerned. ("Sure, he talks about the evils of uncontrolled speech earlier as well. Yes, it shows unity in the epistle, but so what?Read more ›