Included with a Kindle Unlimited membership.

As an alternative, the Kindle eBook is available now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app. Want to listen? Try Audible.

Share <Embed>

Flip to back Flip to front

Listen Playing... Paused You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

See this image

Follow the Author

Erich Fromm

Escape from Freedom Paperback – Bargain Price, September 15, 1994

by Erich Fromm (Author)

472 ratings

See all formats and editions

Price

New from

Used from

Kindle

"Please retry"

$11.01

—

Audible Audiobook, Unabridged

"Please retry"

$0.00

Free with your Audible trial

Hardcover

"Please retry"

$56.00

—

$27.50

Paperback

"Please retry"

$11.59

$6.17

Paperback, Bargain Price, September 15, 1994

$9.35

$21.07

$9.35

Mass Market Paperback

"Please retry"

$9.00

—

$2.64

Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $11.01 to buy
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial
Hardcover
$56.00

8 Used from $27.50 1 Collectible from $47.00
Paperback
$9.35

13 Used from $9.35 12 New from $21.07
Mass Market Paperback
$9.00

31 Used from $2.64 3 Collectible from $4.98

Great on Kindle

Great Experience. Great Value.

Enjoy a great reading experience when you borrow the Kindle edition of this book with your Kindle Unlimited membership. Learn more about Great on Kindle, available in select categories.

View Kindle Edition

Print length

320 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Henry Holt & Co
Publication date

September 15, 1994
See all details

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Customers who bought this item also bought

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Product details

ASIN ‏ : ‎ B000GQLCR8
Publisher ‏ : ‎ Henry Holt & Co; Owl Book Ed edition (September 15, 1994)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 320 pages
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 9.6 ounces

Best Sellers Rank: #8,338,100 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,230 in Behavioral Psychology (Books)
- #3,368 in Fascism (Books)
- #11,566 in Popular Psychology Psychoanalysis

Customer Reviews:
472 ratings

Customer reviews

5 star		75%
4 star		14%
3 star		7%
2 star		1%
1 star		2%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

William B. Radl

78 Year Old Manual to Understanding Now

Reviewed in the United States on January 16, 2019

Verified Purchase

The character of authoritarianism is of urgent interest to everyone now, in this world of ambitious new tyrants. How can we understand Trump, Duterte, Putin, Kim, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, and others? Fromm’s ideas about the essential nature of authoritarianism come from his firsthand experience of Nazism and Fascism in Europe. His insights remain compelling and, taken as warnings, frightening. Read with Masha Gessen’s, The Future is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia.

65 people found this helpful

Helpful

JEFFREY B

So relevant for today!

Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2017

Verified Purchase

So you think you're free just because you have the freedom to do and say whatever you want? Erich Fromm shows how this idea of freedom comes as a result of many illusions. Human beings shaped now in modern capitalist democracies are at risk because they are attached to the results that they get within the systems limitations. They have become cogs in a big machine and function only as such. The "gears" psychologically turn us into automatons. All we think about is money. The more the elite can deceive, the more the masses work to please them. Is this this price of progress, or is it sacrificing the beauty of one life, multiplied over and over, for the sake of a few? Oh, this is a worthy read because Fromm really writes well and follows psychological intricacies of awareness and shows historically what happened to lead us to escape from freedom and struggle to embrace it socially and politically.

110 people found this helpful

Helpful

Collin O'Donnell

Criminally Underrated

Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2015

Verified Purchase

Published in 1941, Escape from Freedom is considered the masterpiece of the German social psychologist, Erich Fromm. Fromm, who fled Germany during the Nazi uprising in the 1930s, contends in his book that the more 'modern man' becomes independent, self-reliant, and critical, the more he becomes isolated, alone, and afraid.

Essentially, he views the rise of capitalism in the late Middle Ages/Early Renaissance to be the beginning of man's conflict with the modern sense of freedom. Within the Feudal system of the Middle Ages, man was shackled to his social position for his entire life. This was before the idea of economic competition was introduced, and man of the Middle Ages had not to worry about climbing the ladder of success. Although the restriction is obvious, Fromm argues that there was also much security in this system that allowed for man to live a life unburdened by the idea of prosperity. However, by the end of the Middle Ages, "the unity and centralization of the medieval society became weaker...In Italy, for the first time, the individual emerged from feudal society and broke ties which had been giving him security and narrowing him at one in the same time." The Renaissance was a splendid time for those who profited, but it also gave birth to the frustrated masses. "The masses who did not share the wealth and power of the ruling group had lost the security of their former status and had become a shapeless mass, to be flattered or threatened - but always to be manipulated and exploited." Although the economic freedom allowed one the ability to gain as much capital as their efforts rewarded, the very idea of capitalism cheapened life. "All human relationships were poisoned by this fierce life-and-death struggle for the maintenance of wealth and power. Solidarity with one's fellow men - or at least with the members of one's own class - was replaced by a cynical, detached attitude; other individuals were looked upon as 'objects' to be used and manipulated, or they were ruthlessly destroyed if it suited one's own ends. The individual was absorbed by a passionate egocentricity, an insatiable greed for power and wealth." Man is inseparable from his possessions. He is willing to betray his own moral standings in order to continue in the game of capital. The middle and lower classes have become a mere fake smile to sell their services.

Whereas capitalism only covers freedom in the economic sense, Fromm also devotes a great deal of his book to the relationship between freedom and authoritarianism. This idea can be broken down into two sub-groups: religion and fascism. Although these deal more with the death of individuality in a spiritual sense, they too are intertwined with economic status. In the Feudal system of the Middle Ages, before all of the competition and unrest, Catholicism reigned supreme. "There was much suffering and pain [in the Middle Ages], but there was also the church which made this suffering more tolerable by explaining it as a result of the sin of Adam and the individual sins of each person. While the church fostered a sense of guilt, it also assured the individual of her unconditional love to all her children and offered a way to acquire the conviction of being forgiven and loved by God." However, during the rise of capitalism in the Renaissance, money became the new God in a sense, the supra-personal force that determined personal fate. This left the middle and lower classes dissatisfied, disillusioned, and in search of meaning beyond capital. Thus began the period of reformation, when Calvinism and Lutheranism came into popularity. "The new religions were not the religions of a wealthy upper class but the urban middle class, the poor in cities, and the peasants. They carried an appeal to these groups because they gave expression to a new feeling of freedom and independence as well as to the feeling of powerlessness and anxiety by which their members were pervaded." Martin Luther, described by Fromm as a hate-filled man, championed a religion based on total submission to the authority of God, one widely adopted by persons of similar woe. Luther's ideology offered salvation "by giving up every vestige of individual will, by renouncing and denouncing [one's] individual strength." John Calvin took submission to a new level, introducing a God based in the idea of predestination. In Calvinism, one is destined to Heaven or Hell before birth, accentuating the helplessness exhibited in Lutheranism. Both religions are based in the feelings of vulnerability of their founders, and both took power away from the dollar and placed it back in the hands of a much more cruel and indifferent God. "This picture of a despotic God, who wants unrestricted power over men and their submission and humiliation, was the projection of the middle class's own hostility and envy." Ever since the rise of capitalism over 500 years ago, religion and economic struggle have gone hand in hand. In a world of personal gains, why praise God if you have all of the worldly possessions you could ask for?

Fascism, the other half of authoritarianism, is essentially the same as religion, except man takes the place of God. Fromm, who fled the Nazi's, chose to make them and Adolf Hitler the face of his chapter on fascism. He describes Hitler as the epitome of the sado-masochistic character, someone who loved and despised the German masses. He hungered for complete control of Germany (and eventually the world), and this hunger stemmed from anger and frustration. "He felt very intensely the role of being an outcast. He often speaks in Mein Kampf of himself as the 'nobody,' the 'unknown man' he was in his youth." As a young man, he played the role of the masochist until the submission became too much to bear. Hitler took on the role of the sadist and promoted himself as the savior of the German masses who were shattered by the loss of WWI. His Nazi ideals are shockingly similar to that of Luther or Calvin. "The masochistic side of the Nazi ideology and practice is most obvious with respect to the masses. They are told again and again: the individual is nothing and does not count. The individual should accept this personal insignificance, dissolve himself in a higher power, and then feel proud in participating in the strength and glory of this higher power." Naziism wasn't based solely on submission, however; Hitler created a hierarchy in which "everybody has somebody above him to submit to and somebody beneath him to feel power over." His racism and anti-Semitism gave the members of the Nazi party a false sense of superiority that religions didn't offer. This aspect is what sold the German masses on Naziism. It offered them the confidence they sorely needed, but in exchange for their individual identity and sense of universal brotherhood.

Religion and fascism were overtly obvious ways to escape the hells of freedom and all of the anxieties that come along with it, but Fromm also investigates how the 'modern man,' with all his freedom, conforms to more hidden forms of authority. In his segment entitled 'Automaton Conformity,' he sheds light on just how highly suggestible humans are to outside opinion. In earlier chapters, he explained how what we view as our conscience, or moral compass, is made up entirely of what authorities around us deem to be acceptable. In saying that, Fromm refutes the ideas that humans are born inherently good or bad, instead stating that any morality that exists within us was instilled in us at a young age. If our individual ethics are a sham, why not all of our thoughts and opinions? Fromm compares the size of the Democratic and Republican parties to that of 'mammoth organizations of industry.' People are frightened of the magnitude and impersonality of the candidates up for election, yet are pressured by the system to vote for one or the other. He refers to the relationship between the candidate and the voter as 'abstract.' Political propaganda misinforms and shapes how the voters think. "[T]hey flatter the individual by making him appear important, and by pretending that they appeal to his critical judgment, to his sense of discrimination. But these pretenses are essentially a method to dull the individual's suspicion's and to help him fool himself as to the individual character of his decision." Fromm likens this kind of manipulation to hypnosis, the implantation of ideas or feelings thought to be genuine to each person. "Ask an average newspaper reader what he thinks about a certain political question. He will give you as 'his' opinion a more or less exact account of what he has read, and yet - and this is the essential point - he believes that what he is saying is the result of his own thinking." Fromm goes so far as to say "for many people an experience which they have had, an artistic performance or a political meeting they have attended, becomes real to them only after they have read about it in the newspaper." Replace 'newspaper' with 'online' or 'television' and he's right on the money. Adopting opinions from outside sources begins in the suppression of critical thinking in a person's youth. We are taught what is right and wrong with no room for doubt. A major problem in the school system is that it teaches students to retain random, disjointed facts in favor of critical thinking. Because the mind becomes so bloated with all of these little pieces of information, it clouds the child's ability to use independent reason. Also in a person's journey to becoming an automaton, our sexuality and emotions are suppressed as well. Children are taught to be ashamed of their bodies and urges, and "[t]o be 'emotional' has become synonymous with being unsound or unbalanced. By the acceptance of this standard the individual has become has become greatly weakened; his thinking is impoverished and flattened." Although the trend of shaming sexuality is at an all-time low, the suppression of emotion has debatably worsened as time has passed. As he points out in a section about the bastardization of serious news, we see dire political situations interrupted for advertisements of soap or wine. "Because of all this we cease to be genuinely related to what we hear. We cease to be excited, our emotions and our critical judgment become hampered, and eventually our attitude to what is going on in the world assumes a quality of flatness and indifference." In summation, Fromm, while still pointing out the small points of why we Americans are free in the popular sense (wide varieties of choices in almost every aspect of our lives), focuses on how our actions, emotions, opinions, and thoughts are either consciously or subconsciously ruled by our feeling of isolation and will to conform. Although he offers a solution to our sense of hopelessness ("Only if man masters society and subordinates the economic machine to the purpose of human happiness and only if he actively participates in the social process, can he overcome what now drives him into despair."), it comes off as an impossibility that not even Fromm believes is feasible.

Escape from Freedom is a seriously thought-provoking work by a great mind, but I actually hesitated in giving it a five-star rating. While the only aspect that bothered me about the actual book was its repetition, I couldn't ignore the fact that much of what he had to say has become typical, almost trite, over the years. We as a species have moved into the postmodernist phase where essentially everything has become a joke or a 'meme.' Fromm's once revelatory ideas are now being spouted out of the mouths of every fedora-tipping Redditor or the stereotypical first-year psychology majors. To avoid allowing my judgment to be clouded by my prejudices, I chose to rate this book on its relevance in the year 1941 when it was published. Although it's still an informative read in the year 2015, Escape from Freedom must have been quite a jolt to the armchair thinkers of the 1940s.

182 people found this helpful

Helpful

Jacqueline Simon Gunn

Timeless wisdom. A book I wish everyone would read!

Reviewed in the United States on September 6, 2019

Verified Purchase

Fromm is one of my favorite psychoanalytic thinkers. I love the way he examines psychological distress outside of the therapy room, widening the scope of individual psychology to include societal norms and corresponding (maladaptive) adaptations. If the world is sick, what does it mean to adapt? What happens if we repress the very parts of us that make us feel alive? How much of ourselves do we sacrifice to belong?

In this book, in particular, he looks at our flee from the freedom we believe we want and why and what that means. He distinguishes between "freedom to" and "freedom from." This is a must read for anyone concerned with the cultural climate. Although published in 1941, its continued relevance speaks to Fromm's ABSOLUTE brilliance.

I cannot praise this book enough. I wish everyone would read it and ask of themselves the questions he poses. I highly recommend this and all of Fromm's work.

25 people found this helpful

Helpful

Lillian Moss

Important book!

Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2018

Verified Purchase

This was one of hundreds of books published in the mid 20th-century that struggled to understand the rise of fascism, and how world events got out of control. First published in 1941, Fromm takes a common-sense approach to social psychology and comes up with answers stunningly applicable to the current political situation.

21 people found this helpful

Helpful

Top reviews from other countries

DoesReviews

Fantastic psychological insight, poor application of theory

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 16, 2018

Verified Purchase

Freedom is a burden on man, and he must find meaning in a chaotic world or he shall resort to authoritarianism. This is the simple argument of Erich Fromm, who expands on this strain of thought in a psychoanalytic/sociological thesis. The idea of freedom being a burden, and that man must find a purpose or shall resort, unconsciously, to psychological defence mechanisms in order to escape the insecurities that freedom offers, is a fascinating, very coherent and highly plausible theory. Fromm talks of freedom from (negative freedom) and freedom to (positive freedom) as having different psychological impacts on individuals. Those unable to stand freedom shall unconsciously form a persona of sorts (perhaps I am too Jungian!) that seeks to deal with the insecurity by either submitting to, superficially becoming, or attempting to destroy authority. The alternative is to become everyone else – to erase the self through conformity. In addition, as modern man submits to life as a cog of part of the machine of modern society (with economic productivity and material gain having religious importance), modern man is plagued with uncertainty in a life devoid of meaning, claims Fromm. This is why he chooses to escape from freedom.

Unfortunately, whilst the thesis is fantastically insightful psychologically, Fromm oversimplifies history and even his own psychological analysis to fit his sociological analysis. Fromm is too keen to implement a Marxist view of the social classes where it is quite simply inapplicable (or at least far less relevant), in order to conduct his analysis. For example, there was no middle class identity (and practically no middle class, certainly in the modern sense) in 16th century Europe. As for later discussions of the (particularly lower) middle class, Fromm appears to completely forget his prior emphasis on the individual, using the phrase “petty bourgeois” to describe what is likely to be several million people, giving them a character structure of rage and uncertainty that appears to have been placed upon them to make his theory to work. Indeed, the strong terminology used is based off assumptions used as psychodynamic explanations for historical events that would have been far more complex for each and every individual involved. Clearly Marxist class paradigms and assumptions take priority over a genuine discussion of the individual in a historical context, although the appendix goes some way to redeeming this oversimplification. Similarly, his analysis of Nazism ignores clear historical facts as Fromm attempts to impose his psychoanalytic philosophy onto historical events. Quotes such as “Nazism never had any genuine political or economic principles” showcase historical ignorance that damages the quality of his work.

As for the economic discussion, there are some bizarre assertions and linguistic games going on. Fromm is certain that a corporatist economy equates to capitalism (in its monopolistic phase). This is a question that will likely never cease to generate debate, the question being whether or not this is capitalism (as the markets are not free). Fromm, however, is clearly in error when he states that the Nazi regime “did not really interrupt the development of German monopolistic capitalism but furthered it with the means at her disposal.” A centralised economy and capitalism are clearly two different economic structures. Fromm is even more confused when he later states that many of these economic problems faced by free peoples “must be replaced by a planned economy that represents the planned and concerted effort of society as such.” So was the Nazi system the correct system? Was the Soviet system correct? Well, according to Fromm, neither is genuine socialism (no true Scotsman?), and the Soviet system is in actual fact “a powerful bureaucracy that manipulates the vast mass of the nation.” Surely Fromm should recognise that centralising the economy may end up conflicting against the desires and wishes of an individual seeking “freedom to?” The answer is sort of. He admits that creating a benevolent centralised economy would be very difficult, but still maintains his utopian vision, as if, despite all that has been said before, only he knows and can guide others to true liberation of the self.

Overall, the main aim of this work, from what I can tell, was to provide a psychological analysis into the effect of freedom on individuals. From this perspective the book is a resounding and fantastic success, but Fromm’s attempts to apply his theory into the real world see him use glaring methodological flaws and contradictions which unfortunately limit the insight of his thesis. Nevertheless, it is a fine work from a fine mind, and I would recommend to anyone interested in the subject.

14 people found this helpful

Lm

Excellent from Erich Fromm

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 15, 2020

Verified Purchase

An excellent book by Erich Fromm.
It is relevant still today with the further alienation from our true nature. I would recommend it as a book we should all read.

3 people found this helpful

Mrs.S.M.Holyoak

Great read .... this could change your whole way of being and living

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 27, 2019

Verified Purchase

Thought provoking , challenging our prejudices and encouraging us to think again

One person found this helpful

Amazon Customer

Background knowledge helpful.

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 30, 2019

Verified Purchase

Great book, Erich Fromm is very erudite on his subject and able to explain his theory using, fairly, simple language. However, the quality of the print by ishi press was very poor.

pat neale

Enjoyable. Not dated.

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 27, 2012

Verified Purchase

The summary as written on line prepared one for this book. No great surprises. Enjoyable to read if this is your taste in literature

See all reviews