Buy New

$34.94

$34.94 + $16.95 shipping

Only 1 left in stock - order soon.

Ships from and sold by #e-paper.

Turn on 1-Click ordering for this browser

This item ships to France.

Select delivery location

Buy Used

$30.94

FREE Shipping

Select delivery location

Used: Good | Details

Sold by Iguana4Life

Fulfilled by Amazon

Turn on 1-Click ordering for this browser

Added to

Unable to add item to List. Please try again.

Other Sellers on Amazon

Add to Cart

$34.95
+ $24.95 shipping

Sold by: The Anthropologists Closet

Add to Cart

$40.73
& FREE Shipping on eligible orders. Details

Sold by: Roli Services LLC

Add to Cart

$36.75

Sold by: Eagle's View

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Flip to back Flip to front

Listen Playing... Paused You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

See this image

The Ethics of Memory Hardcover – November 19, 2002

by Avishai Margalit (Author)

9 customer reviews

See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions

Price

New from

Used from

Kindle

"Please retry"

$17.54

—

Hardcover

"Please retry"

$34.94

$1.50

Paperback

"Please retry"

$23.58

$10.51

Much of the intense current interest in collective memory concerns the politics of memory. In a book that asks, "Is there an ethics of memory?" Avishai Margalit addresses a separate, perhaps more pressing, set of concerns.

The idea he pursues is that the past, connecting people to each other, makes possible the kinds of "thick" relations we can call truly ethical. Thick relations, he argues, are those that we have with family and friends, lovers and neighbors, our tribe and our nation--and they are all dependent on shared memories. But we also have "thin" relations with total strangers, people with whom we have nothing in common except our common humanity. A central idea of the ethics of memory is that when radical evil attacks our shared humanity, we ought as human beings to remember the victims.

Margalit's work offers a philosophy for our time, when, in the wake of overwhelming atrocities, memory can seem more crippling than liberating, a force more for revenge than for reconciliation. Morally powerful, deeply learned, and elegantly written, The Ethics of Memory draws on the resources of millennia of Western philosophy and religion to provide us with healing ideas that will engage all of us who care about the nature of our relations to others.

Frequently bought together

Total price: $71.65

These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers. Show details

Buy the selected items together

This item:The Ethics of Memory by Avishai Margalit Hardcover $34.94
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Ships from and sold by #e-paper.
$3.99 shipping
War and Genocide: A Concise History of the Holocaust (Critical Issues in World and International… by Doris L. Bergen Paperback $36.71
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
FREE Shipping. Details

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

This shopping feature will continue to load items. In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading.

Avishai Margalit

3

Paperback
42 offers from $4.98
Avishai Margalit
Hardcover
$19.92
Avishai Margalit

5

Paperback
$17.56
Paul Ricoeur

7

Paperback
$25.44
Moshe Halbertal

6

Paperback
$32.47
Edna Ullmann-Margalit
Hardcover
$50.42

Special offers and product promotions

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Plato taught that the search for knowledge is tied up with memory, the effort to recall something we collectively knew. Freud took memory even further, positing that repressed memories are the key to shaping us as individuals and as a society. Margalit, a professor at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and author of The Decent Society, takes up these issues in respect to an idea of communal memory. Acknowledging that historical religions "can make a bid on moral memory," he instead poses a question: "Is there an ethics of memory?" His answer is a qualified yes, but it's the exegesis that is most compelling. Discussing memory's relation to emotions, morality, ethics and forgiveness, Margalit reads the Bible, writers (such as Wordsworth, Edward Albee and E.M. Forster), myths and other philosophers (Kant and Max Weber) in order to make his finely nuanced argument.
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

Margalit (philosophy, Hebrew Univ., Jerusalem) maintains that people sometimes have ethical obligations to remember past persons and events, but he is anxious to guard his own thesis from over-expansion. He distinguishes his position from religious doctrines that are bound up with the past, holding that an ethics of memory has secular sense. Further, he does not support traditionalism, that is, the retention of past institutions as a value in itself. He also warns of "moralism," by which he means "the disposition to cast judgments of a moral kind on what is unsuitable to be so judged." To counter moralism, he distinguishes between ethics and morality. The former deals with our relations to those with whom we have special ties; the latter, our obligations to humanity as a whole. Margalit maintains that we have ethical obligations to remember particular people and, more controversially, that a community can have, and ought to have, collective memories. The stricter obligations of morality involve issues of memory only in unusual circumstances. We are, for instance, obligated to remember the evils of the Nazis, since they endeavored to undermine morality altogether. This illuminating study is highly recommended. David Gordon, Bowling Green State Univ., OH
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product details

Hardcover: 240 pages
Publisher: Harvard University Press; First Edition edition (November 19, 2002)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 067400941X
ISBN-13: 978-0674009417
Product Dimensions: 5 x 7.5 inches
Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review: 9 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,865,409 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #565 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Sociology > Social Theory
- #7746 in Books > Politics & Social Sciences > Philosophy > Ethics & Morality
- #15376 in Books > Medical Books > Psychology > General

Would you like to tell us about a lower price?
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Customer Reviews

1 star (0%)

Write a customer review

See all 9 customer reviews

Top customer reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

donald a davison

news from: [...]

June 18, 2012

Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

Avishai Margalit's Ethics of Memory has done an excellent job of making a case for the absolute need for us to appropriate a sense of respect for, as well as a responsibility of, an in-depth understanding of human history. The fact that we are because others were, brings with it a spiritual commitment to an appreciation of what the journey of the ethics of humanity is all about. A must read for all those who choose to really know what being human truly is.

One person found this helpful

Comment

March 23, 2015

Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

I love this mans writing style and the subject is deeply appreciated. I will refer to this book many times to come.

Comment

January 9, 2018

Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase

A very insightful presentation with credible arguments about the (underestimated) importance of memory in our day-to-day lives.

Comment

July 20, 2017

Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase

One has to read to appreciate

Helpful

Not Helpful

Comment

Well, expected a little bit more...

April 20, 2017

Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase

Well, not the most fascinating stuff to read. Repeats itself endless times. Thick relationships ethics, the thin one morals. The most intriguing thing, the book's title. Add to it, no hyper links, checking out footnotes, a real drag. Typographic just ridiculous....

Comment

October 28, 2010

Format: Paperback

Memory accompanies us on the temporal path: it explains to us imperfectly how we got where we are and, in so doing, informs our choices. Our actions as individuals or members of a group are all strung along the temporal path: if society or a group is to endure, the past has practical implications for the future. Thus contracts endure, laws apply over time - in limiting our choices the past makes the future - and social life - predictable, hence possible. These are all practical issues, and for the good of society. Their justification is essentially rational and consequential.

Prof MARGALIT, however, asks a different kind of question: to what extent, however, do memories obligate us in a deontological way? Do we "owe" something unconditionally to the past, as an individual or member of a group? The question is difficult: for memories are in the realm of the contingent and particular, not the universal. If we accept that deontological obligations arise from memory, we may need to break with universal obligations, or rank them lower. And this notwithstanding the fact that memory is such a weak link to the past - memory is a place where fiction turns to self-serving myth.

The author attempts to demonstrate that next to (or better, higher than) unconditional obligations of a universal character (he calls this "morals") there are also unconditional obligations within a group (he calls this "ethics") - and if anything, they take priority. The reason being, says Prof. MARGALIT, that relations at the universal level are "thin", while relations at the group level are "thick" - like "blood is thicker than water". Shared memories commit those who hold them to each other in ways that shared humanity does not.

In ancient times heroes would sacrifice themselves for the group, asking to be remembered in return, or that their will be respected. How binding are such "contracts" with the dead"? This is no idle question, for the original contract may no longer suit the current context, or may reflect past errors in judgement. Are we to be bound today by the memory - even if the memory is no longer useful? The author's discussion of these questions is often rambling and confused, conflating what are social and personal obligations. It also mixes myth and history, leaving one perplexed as to the scope of such inter-temporal commitments.

The problem with "memory" is that it introduces an element of inconditional obligation into the moral choice. If good memories obligate, so do bad memories - in the latter case memory becomes an obligation for revenge. This, we'd agree, is not permissible.

Values are a blunt instrument: they are beyond rational argument. They brook no comparison among each other (should we save the mother or the child?). They adjust poorly to context (if a hospital has one bed and two critically ill people, who shall get preference?). To add group values to universal values would seems to me overloading the boat - we have enough value conflicts as it is, without adding to them. More pragmatically: "group memory" is inherently subject both to factual and political bias - I'd question its operability. Nationalism - which has roots in "group memories" has been seen, on closer inspection, to be an empty concept. Would memory do? A duck by any other name is still a duck.

3 people found this helpful

Comment

May 29, 2007

Format: Paperback

This has been a great book, full of insight and interest, the terms are well defined and easy to pick up at any time on almost any level. An interesting and captivating treatise on how important memory is, and how it relates to engaging in and caring for our world and each other. A great read that captivates and provokes thought on deeper levels.

Amazingly related to the authors heart is humanity and humanitarianism in everyday life, his humanitarianism though, does not detract from his capability but adds to it, as he rationalizes and attempts to make sense of one of the most personally overlooked aspects of life.

4 people found this helpful

Helpful

Not Helpful

Comment

Dr. Jeremy Rosen

A philosophical and cultural delight.

June 18, 2003

Format: Hardcover

For someone who loves Philosophy and Judaism this book was a real delight. Margalit draws on Jewish and European cultural sources to examine both the nature of ethics as opposed to morality and the meaning and obligations of memory.
Usually cross cultural afficionados are caught in a philosophical world that has no use for religious traditions or vice versa. Here is a unique opportunity to revel in both.
Regardless of ones political or religious background or inclinations this book will resonate and stimulate.

17 people found this helpful

Helpful

Not Helpful

Comment

Most recent customer reviews

ANGELA

dilemmas of memory

great perspective about the dilemmas of memory. Margalit shows that the moral dimensions of memory have not yet been properly thinking

Published on February 18, 2013

Customers who bought this item also bought

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

This shopping feature will continue to load items. In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading.