Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

The Ethics and Politics of Speech: Communication and Rhetoric in the Twentieth Century 1st Edition Edition

5.0 out of 5 stars 1 customer review
ISBN-13: 978-0809329489
ISBN-10: 0809329484
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
$29.54 On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
Buy new On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
$38.00 On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
More Buying Choices
20 New from $35.40 19 Used from $6.99
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Prime Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


Best Books of the Year So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the Best Books of the Year So Far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
$38.00 FREE Shipping. Usually ships within 1 to 3 weeks. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

Frequently Bought Together

  • The Ethics and Politics of Speech: Communication and Rhetoric in the Twentieth Century
  • +
  • Democracy as Discussion: Civic Education and the American Forum Movement (Lexington Studies in Political Communication)
  • +
  • A Voice and Nothing More (Short Circuits)
Total price: $104.00
Buy the selected items together

Editorial Reviews

Review

"What connection does living well actu-ally have with speaking well? The Roman rhetorician Quintilian defined the orator as a good person speaking well. But because it's unclear that virtue actually "does "breed eloquence, or eloquence virtue for thatmatter, Quintilian evades what Richard Lanham calls the Q Question: "Is the""good speaker necessarily a good person?'"Gehrke locates places in liberal demo-cratic discourse where the Q Question makes incongruous appearances--such as the federally sponsored "Four-Minute Men" making congenially propagandisticspeeches to U.S. theatergoers. The connec-tion between supposedly hygienic rhetoric and military action became especially troubling when Allied rhetorical strategies against fascism proved nearly impossibleto distinguish from fascist rhetoric against democracy (hence Gehrke's renaming the Q Question as the Hitler Question).Despite our hopes for speech communica-tion to foster mental hygiene and moral excellence, Gehrke writes, "we always seem deep in examples of rhetorical skill void of such excellence."


The intractability of the Q Question has made speech communication a discipline both restless and resourceful. After theearly decades of the 20th century, speech teachers shifted emphases from public oratory to group discussion on the grounds that discussion was more balanced, more objective, arid less triumphalist--only to bump, once again, into the ethics/efficacy dualism. As it turned out, mental hygiene, not to mention rational group discussions, provided little stay against the coerciveness of mass-mediated messaging. The result was a shift in speech communicationfrom the quasi-scientific approach of the 1920s and 1930s to the existen-tialist philosophy of the 1950s and 1960s. But even while challenging essentialist accounts of speech--especially those treating communication as the transfer of mean-ing from self to self--existentialism ran into its own variant on the Q Question. For all their ethical sophistica-tion, existentialist-inflected speech theories proved just as preoccupied with efficacy as their essentialist counterparts. The final decades of the 20th century only sharp-ened the irony as philosophical relativists in speech communication behaved more and more like political absolutists.


Gehrke's story makes no claim to be the Authorized Version: "The point is not whether this work is "a "comprehensive or synoptic account of the history of a field of thought-- it is not--but rather whether it carefully documents the possibility of conceiving of that field of thought or the particular questions within that field in a compelling and viable way." In the final chapter of the book, Gehrke shows how the discipline has deployed aggressively postmodern idioms to wrestle yet again with perennial questions of ethics and politics.


First, the ethics. If it is true that speech does not come from the self, but rather the self from speech--and Gehrke believes the discipline's conversations bear out that contention--then such a speaking self must negotiate an "ethics that cannot privi-lege oneself or what is common between oneself and others but must privilege something that comes before anything that might be shared or common." He calls what "comes before anything" the eventof "being-communicating," an ongoing encounter with the Other that is always bringing the self into existence: "However, it is not any specific or particular relation-ship that brings the 'I' into being but rather the sheer fact that there is any relation at all." Accordingly, being-communicating occurs in encounter after encounter in which the Other enlivens and confronts the self with an endless series of ethical choices for which no certain criteria obtain. This ethic has political conse-quences: we should not "seek to achieve an end state or to realize an ideal vision" but rather make "small moves within the gaps and ruptures in existing political sensibilities."


Compelling and viable the book proves to be, even for those who disagree with Gehrke's immanentist ethical and political sensibilities. Not least, the book suggests that the routinely despised basic speech course belongs in the curriculum. Simply learning how to deliver a speech well, it turns out, confronts us with vital questions about agency arid otherness. Further, Geh-rke's history offers a welcome alternativeto the worn cardiocentric trope, "It's what in your heart that counts." Shifting moral analysis from the heart to the tongue, he weaves ethics as closely to speech as St. James does. Finally, the book serves as a corrective to those whose "just do it" approach to cul-tural engagement collapses ethics into efficacy. Gehrke's small moves" may evokefor some readers what James Davison Hunter calls 'faithful presence.'" --#160;
--Craig Mattson"Books & Culture" (01/01/2012)

"What connection does living well actually have with speaking well? The Roman rhetorician Quintilian defined the orator as a good person speaking well. But because it's unclear that virtue actually "does "breed eloquence, or eloquence virtue for thatmatter, Quintilian evades what Richard Lanham calls the Q Question: "Is the""good speaker necessarily a good person?'"Gehrke locates places in liberal democratic discourse where the Q Question makes incongruous appearances such as the federally sponsored "Four-Minute Men" making congenially propagandisticspeeches to U.S. theatergoers. The connection between supposedly hygienic rhetoric and military action became especially troubling when Allied rhetorical strategies against fascism proved nearly impossibleto distinguish from fascist rhetoric against democracy (hence Gehrke's renaming the Q Question as the Hitler Question).Despite our hopes for speech communication to foster mental hygiene and moral excellence, Gehrke writes, "we always seem deep in examples of rhetorical skill void of such excellence."


The intractability of the Q Question has made speech communication a discipline both restless and resourceful. After theearly decades of the 20th century, speech teachers shifted emphases from public oratory to group discussion on the grounds that discussion was more balanced, more objective, arid less triumphalist only to bump, once again, into the ethics/efficacy dualism. As it turned out, mental hygiene, not to mention rational group discussions, provided little stay against the coerciveness of mass-mediated messaging. The result was a shift in speech communicationfrom the quasi-scientific approach of the 1920s and 1930s to the existentialist philosophy of the 1950s and 1960s. But even while challenging essentialist accounts of speech especially those treating communication as the transfer of meaning from self to self existentialism ran into its own variant on the Q Question. For all their ethical sophistication, existentialist-inflected speech theories proved just as preoccupied with efficacy as their essentialist counterparts. The final decades of the 20th century only sharpened the irony as philosophical relativists in speech communication behaved more and more like political absolutists.


Gehrke's story makes no claim to be the Authorized Version: "The point is not whether this work is "a "comprehensive or synoptic account of the history of a field of thought it is not but rather whether it carefully documents the possibility of conceiving of that field of thought or the particular questions within that field in a compelling and viable way." In the final chapter of the book, Gehrke shows how the discipline has deployed aggressively postmodern idioms to wrestle yet again with perennial questions of ethics and politics.


First, the ethics. If it is true that speech does not come from the self, but rather the self from speech and Gehrke believes the discipline's conversations bear out that contention then such a speaking self must negotiate an "ethics that cannot privilege oneself or what is common between oneself and others but must privilege something that comes before anything that might be shared or common." He calls what "comes before anything" the eventof "being-communicating," an ongoing encounter with the Other that is always bringing the self into existence: "However, it is not any specific or particular relationship that brings the 'I' into being but rather the sheer fact that there is any relation at all." Accordingly, being-communicating occurs in encounter after encounter in which the Other enlivens and confronts the self with an endless series of ethical choices for which no certain criteria obtain. This ethic has political consequences: we should not "seek to achieve an end state or to realize an ideal vision" but rather make "small moves within the gaps and ruptures in existing political sensibilities."


Compelling and viable the book proves to be, even for those who disagree with Gehrke's immanentist ethical and political sensibilities. Not least, the book suggests that the routinely despised basic speech course belongs in the curriculum. Simply learning how to deliver a speech well, it turns out, confronts us with vital questions about agency arid otherness. Further, Gehrke's history offers a welcome alternativeto the worn cardiocentric trope, "It's what in your heart that counts." Shifting moral analysis from the heart to the tongue, he weaves ethics as closely to speech as St. James does. Finally, the book serves as a corrective to those whose "just do it" approach to cultural engagement collapses ethics into efficacy. Gehrke's small moves" may evokefor some readers what James Davison Hunter calls 'faithful presence.'" --;br>
--Craig Mattson"Books & Culture" (01/01/2012)"

About the Author

Pat J. Gehrke is an associate professor of communication at the University of South Carolina and has served as chair of the communication ethics division of the National Communication Association. He has published articles on communication ethics and other topics in a range of journals, including the Quarterly Journal of Speech, Argumentation and Advocacy, Philosophy and Rhetoric, and Philosophy Today.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 224 pages
  • Publisher: Southern Illinois University Press; 1st Edition edition (October 20, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0809329484
  • ISBN-13: 978-0809329489
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.7 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,203,807 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This is one of the most important pieces I have read in my study of social justice and communicative engagement. Grab a pen and a highlighter - notes will be a natural impulse.
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse