- Paperback: 384 pages
- Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company; Reissue edition (October 4, 2010)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0393339289
- ISBN-13: 978-0393339284
- Product Dimensions: 5.4 x 1 x 8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 10.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (82 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #162,484 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity Reissue Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
See the Best Books of 2017 So Far
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for the best books of the year so far in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Before discussing the merits of David Foster Wallace's Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity, it is essential to define what the book is not. This volume in the "Great Discoveries" series is not a history of the personalities and social conditions that led to the "discovery" of infinity. Nor is it a narrative fixated on the cultish fear of--and obsession with--the infinite that has seemingly driven mathematicians insane over the centuries. Rather, Everything and More is a surprisingly rigorous march through the 2000 plus years of mathematical research that began with Aristotle; continued through Galileo, Isaac Newton, G.W. Leibniz, Karl Weierstrass, and J.W.R. Dedekind; and culminated in Georg Cantor and his Set Theory. The task Wallace (author of the bestseller Infinite Jest and other fiction) has set himself is enormously challenging: without radically compromising the complexity of the philosophy, metaphysics, or mathematics that underlies the evolving concept of infinity, present the material to a lay audience in a manner that is entertaining. To propel his narrative, Wallace even develops a style that mirrors the mathematical language he probes. One difficulty in his focus on concepts and not a strict human chronology, though, is that his structure is dependent on frequent digressions (especially early on). Patience is required. Wallace demands that his reader walk through the equations, study the graphs and charts, and relearn college-level concepts to follow along on the exploration. Indeed, after one wrenching dip into Zenos paradoxes, Wallace spouts at his imagined complaining audience: "Deal." But the book should be deemed a success. If one grants him the attention he requires, Wallace has made the trip richly rewarding. --Patrick OKelley --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Publishers Weekly
The subject of infinity would probably strike most readers familiar with Wallace as perfectly suited to his recursive style, and this book is as weird and wonderful as you'd expect. There are footnotes galore, frequently prefaced by the acronym IYI ("If You're Interested"), which can signal either pure digression or the first hint of an idea more fully developed in later chapters. Among other textual idiosyncrasies is the constant use of the lemniscate instead of the word "infinity," emphasizing that this is "not just an incredibly, unbelievably enormous number" but an abstraction beyond what we normally conceive of when we contemplate numbers. Abstraction is one of Wallace's main themes, particularly how the mathematics of infinity goes squarely against our instinct to avoid abstract thought. The ancient Greeks couldn't handle infinity, he points out, because they loathed abstraction. Later mathematicians fared better, and though the emphasis is on Georg Cantor, all the milestones are treated in turn. Wallace appreciates that infinity can be a "skullclutcher," and though the book isn't exactly easy going, he guides readers through the math gently, including emergency glossaries when necessary. He has an obvious enthusiasm for the subject, inspired by a high school teacher whose presence is felt at irregular intervals. Had he not pursued a career in literary fiction, it's not difficult to imagine Wallace as a historian of science, producing quirky and challenging volumes such as this every few years.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Browse award-winning titles. See more
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top customer reviews
As I was reading this book I thought, "This guy must be bipolar." It wasn't until afterward that I learned he suicided because of an untreatable affective disorder. How sad, totally sad.
Along the way I realized the importance of stuff I had been taught (but hadn't really absorbed) in my Fundamental Concepts of Math class at college (like, Oh, wow, that's why Professor M. kept saying that...) ; and some important concepts that I didn't really learn because, well, you know, I'm a layman.
So, this was fun (for me at least).
I was also amused that Wallace calls his book a "booklet." It is organized around concepts and sections and paragraphs (and his footnotes, also a couple of Emergency Glossaries), not around chapters. I guess chapters implies a book, sections implies a "booklet." Some booklet.
I also really like how the author traced the history of math through the greeks and into modern math, showing deep connections between Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle, and how they influenced (and continue to influence) math today. Many topics from school came back and seemed much more alive as the metaphysical impact was explained.
If you survived college calculus and still retain some basic understanding of it, then you probably won't struggle to get through this book. If you stopped after high school math then you'll struggle.
I'm a computer scientist by trade, and I found many interesting connections between computability, decidability, complexity theory, recursion, induction, countable vs. uncountable, etc. It was a great way to further my education in my spare time.
The only thing that drove me nuts is the author's chapter/section writing style. Why can't he just use normal chapters like the rest of the world? ...And a table of contents. If he had been a little more conventional then it would have been perfect.
I'm not super thrilled about the writing style, favouring aberrations such as parentheses inception and overly long paragraphs. As a mathematical paper, the style is quite OK. As a novel, it's kind of an eye sore.
In any case, I enjoyed it plenty and wish more literary authors were as passionate about mathematics as DFW, or more mathematicians were inclined to share about their subject and create pieces such as this one. Math history is a gripping, wonderful area not nearly enough covered, and set theory is one of its more fascinating topics.
He almost succeeds in writing a popular book on this branch of math but it doesn't actually succeed in that I think most people will leave this book, if they even get through it at all, still confused about much of this topic and not really understanding a lot of his proofs or the full significance of many of the ideas. That being said, he still does a really good job. I think his goal is basically unachievable because math requires you to read like 1 line of information, then think for a while, and probably write some stuff down to make sure it makes sense, and then read another line. This is a tall order for people reading a popular book and I think these ideas can only be absorbed at a normal reading pace, which is what people expect of a popular book, if you can think of really clever examples that make each unit of information obvious so that the reader doesn't need to stop to think, so that the reader just understands and absorbs the information as they're understanding the words. That's not what happens here. What's impressive is that DFW describes the whole history of ideas, includes the proofs, and fits the parts of the story together so that they lead to the bigger ideas.
I'd recommend this book to people who enjoy DFW's writing style, know high school level math, are wiling to put thought into the ideas that he goes through or are willing to just accept his assertions of various ideas being true. I do not recommend this book to people who want something easy to read and don't have the time or the patience to invest in being pretty active about understanding some complicated ideas. I think the ideal audience for this book is people who would describe themselves as loving both DFW and math, or someone who already knows all of these ideas really well and just wants an amusing little recap.