| Sold by: | Hachette Book Group Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon Kindle Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $29.74 | $3.69 |
- Kindle
$12.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your 3-Month Audible trial - Hardcover
$28.2896 Used from $0.22 24 New from $12.99 3 Collectible from $15.00 - Paperback
$11.99117 Used from $1.42 52 New from $5.88 - Audio CD
$29.745 Used from $3.69 1 New from $29.74
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Amazon.com started off delivering books through the mail. But its visionary founder, Jeff Bezos, wasn't content with being a bookseller. He wanted Amazon to become the everything store, offering limitless selection and seductive convenience at disruptively low prices. To do so, he developed a corporate culture of relentless ambition and secrecy that's never been cracked. Until now. Brad Stone enjoyed unprecedented access to current and former Amazon employees and Bezos family members, giving readers the first in-depth, fly-on-the-wall account of life at Amazon. Compared to tech's other elite innovators -- Jobs, Gates, Zuckerberg -- Bezos is a private man. But he stands out for his restless pursuit of new markets, leading Amazon into risky new ventures like the Kindle and cloud computing, and transforming retail in the same way Henry Ford revolutionized manufacturing.
The Everything Store is the revealing, definitive biography of the company that placed one of the first and largest bets on the Internet and forever changed the way we shop and read.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLittle, Brown and Company
- Publication dateOctober 15, 2013
- File size27965 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Bezos’s counterintuitive point was that coordination among employees wasted time, and that the people closest to problems were usually in the best position to solve them.Highlighted by 3,844 Kindle readers
They agreed on five core values and wrote them down on a whiteboard in a conference room: customer obsession, frugality, bias for action, ownership, and high bar for talent. Later Amazon would add a sixth value, innovation.Highlighted by 3,477 Kindle readers
“Jeff, one day you’ll understand that it’s harder to be kind than clever.”Highlighted by 2,233 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Review
Chosen as a Best Book of the Year by the Washington Post, Forbes, The New Republic, The Economist, Bloomberg,and Gizmodo, and as one of the Top 10 Investigative Journalism Books by Nieman Reports
"Mr. Stone tells this story with authority and verve, and lots of well-informed reporting.... A dynamic portrait of the driven and demanding Mr. Bezos." -- Michiko Kakutani, New York Times
"Engrossing.... Stone's long tenure covering both Bezos and Amazon gives his retelling a sureness that keeps the story moving swiftly." -- New York Times Book Review
"Jeff Bezos is one of the most visionary, focused, and tenacious innovators of our era, and like Steve Jobs he transforms and invents industries. Brad Stone captures his passion and brilliance in this well-reported and compelling narrative." -- Walter Isaacson, author of Steve Jobs
"Stone's account moves swiftly and surely." -- New York Times Book Review, "Editor's Choice"
"The Everything Store is a revelatory read for everyone--those selling and those sold to--who wants to understand the dynamics of the new digital economy. If you've ever one-clicked a purchase, you must read this book." -- Steven Levy, author of Hackers and In the Plex
"A deeply reported and deftly written book.... Like Steven Levy's "In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives," and "Gates: How Microsoft's Mogul Reinvented an Industry -- and Made Himself the Richest Man in America" by Stephen Manes and Paul Andrews, it is the definitive account of how a tech icon came to life." -- Seattle Times
"Stone's book, at last, gives us a Bezos biography that can fit proudly on a shelf next to the best chronicles of America's other landmark capitalists." -- Forbes
"Stone's tale of the birth, near-death, and impressive revival of an iconic American company is well worth your time." -- Matthew Yglesias, Slate
"An engaging and fascinating read.... An excellent chronicle of Amazon's rise.... A gift for entrepreneurs and business builders of the new generation." -- Business Insider
"Outstanding.... An authoritative, deeply reported, scoopalicious, nuanced, and balanced take that pulls absolutely no punches." -- Adam Lashinsky, Fortune
"Fair-minded, virtually up-to-the-minute history of the retail and technology behemoth and the prodigious brain behind it.... Stone's inside knowledge of a company ordinarily stingy with information is evident throughout the book.... Stone presents a nuanced portrait of the entrepreneur, especially as he sketches in Bezos' unusual family history and a surprising turn it took during the writing of the book. His reporting on the Kindle's disruption of traditional publishing makes for riveting reading. A must-add to any business bookshelf." -- Kirkus
"Brad Stone has done a remarkable job in The Everything Store, in a way that Bezos would appreciate...." -- The Financial Times
"An immersive play-by-play of the company's ascent.... It's hard to imagine a better retelling of the Amazon origin story." -- The New Republic
"The meticulously reported book has plenty of gems for anyone who cares about Amazon, Jeff Bezos, entrepreneurship, leadership just the lunacy it took to build a company in less than two decades that now employs almost 90,000 people and sold $61 billion worth of, well, almost everything last year." -- Washington Post
"Stone has broken new ground, demonstrating the massive influence Amazon exercises not only in the retail sector, but also throughout society, including government regulation or the lack of it." -- Neiman Reports
"Offers absorbing management insights... Insiders will get a serious glimpse at an industry behemoth." -- San Francisco Chronicle
"A tome that paints a fascinating picture of a remarkable tech entrepreneur." -- The Economist
"Illuminating." -- Salon
"Stone's shoe-leather reporting is what makes the book stand out." -- GeekWire
"As fine a profile of a secretive, fast-growing company as you are likely to encounter." -- Michael Moritz, Chairman, Sequoia Capital, LinkedIn.com --This text refers to the audioCD edition.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Everything Store
Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon
By Brad StoneLittle, Brown and Company
Copyright © 2013 Brad StoneAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-316-21926-6
CHAPTER 1
The House of Quants
Before it was the self-proclaimed largest bookstore on Earth or the Web'sdominant superstore, Amazon.com was an idea floating through the New York Cityoffices of one of the most unusual firms on Wall Street: D. E. Shaw & Co.
A quantitative hedge fund, DESCO, as its employees affectionately called it, wasstarted in 1988 by David E. Shaw, a former Columbia University computer scienceprofessor. Along with the founders of other groundbreaking quant houses of thatera, like Renaissance Technologies and Tudor Investment Corporation, Shawpioneered the use of computers and sophisticated mathematical formulas toexploit anomalous patterns in global financial markets. When the price of astock in Europe was fractionally higher than the price of the same stock in theUnited States, for example, the computer jockeys turned Wall Street warriors atDESCO would write software to quickly execute trades and exploit the disparity.
The broader financial community knew very little about D. E. Shaw, and itspolymath founder wanted to keep it that way. The firm preferred operating farbelow the radar, deploying private capital from wealthy investors such asbillionaire financier Donald Sussman and the Tisch family, and keeping itsproprietary trading algorithms out of competitors' hands. Shaw felt stronglythat if DESCO was going to be a firm that pioneered new approaches to investing,the only way to maintain its lead was to keep its insights secret and avoidteaching competitors how to think about these new computer-guided frontiers.
David Shaw came of age in the dawning era of powerful new supercomputers. Heearned a PhD in computer science from Stanford in 1980 and then moved to NewYork to teach in Columbia's computer science department. Throughout the earlyeighties, high-tech companies tried to lure him to the private sector. InventorDanny Hillis, founder of the supercomputer manufacturer Thinking MachinesCorporation and later one of Jeff Bezos's closest friends, almost convinced Shawto come work for him designing parallel computers. Shaw tentatively accepted thejob and then changed his mind, telling Hillis he wanted to do something morelucrative and could always return to the supercomputer field after he gotwealthy. Hillis argued that even if Shaw did get rich—which seemedunlikely—he'd never return to computer science. (Shaw did, after he becamea billionaire and passed on the day-to-day management of D. E. Shaw to others.)"I was spectacularly wrong on both counts," Hillis says.
Morgan Stanley finally pried Shaw loose from academia in 1986, adding him to afamed group working on statistical arbitrage software for the new wave ofautomated trading. But Shaw had an urge to set off on his own. He left MorganStanley in 1988, and with a $28 million seed investment from investor DonaldSussman, he set up shop over a Communist bookstore in Manhattan's West Village.
By design, D. E. Shaw would be a different kind of Wall Street firm. Shawrecruited not financiers but scientists and mathematicians—big brains withunusual backgrounds, lofty academic credentials, and more than a touch of socialcluelessness. Bob Gelfond, who joined DESCO after the firm moved to a loft onPark Avenue South, says that "David wanted to see the power of technology andcomputers applied to finance in a scientific way" and that he "looked up toGoldman Sachs and wanted to build an iconic Wall Street firm."
In these ways and many others, David Shaw brought an exacting sensibility to themanagement of his company. He regularly sent out missives instructing employeesto spell the firm's name in a specific manner—with a space between theD. and the E. He also mandated that everyone use a canonicaldescription of the company's mission: it was to "trade stocks, bonds, futures,options and various other financial instruments"—precisely in that order.Shaw's rigor extended to more substantive matters as well: any of his computerscientists could suggest trading ideas, but the notions had to pass demandingscientific scrutiny and statistical tests to prove they were valid.
In 1991, D. E. Shaw was growing rapidly, and the company moved to the top floorsof a midtown Manhattan skyscraper a block from Times Square. The firm's strikingbut sparely decorated offices, designed by the architect Steven Holl, included atwo-story lobby with luminescent colors that were projected into slots cut intothe expansive white walls. That fall, Shaw hosted a thousand-dollar-a-ticketfund-raiser for presidential candidate Bill Clinton that was attended by thelikes of Jacqueline Onassis, among others. Employees were asked to clear out ofthe office that evening before the event. Jeff Bezos, one of the youngest vicepresidents at the firm, left to play volleyball with colleagues, but first hestopped and got his photo taken with the future president.
Bezos was in his midtwenties at the time, five foot eight inches tall, alreadybalding and with the pasty, rumpled appearance of a committed workaholic. He hadspent five years on Wall Street and impressed seemingly everyone he encounteredwith his keen intellect and boundless determination. Upon graduating fromPrinceton in 1986, Bezos worked for a pair of Columbia professors at a companycalled Fitel that was developing a private transatlantic computer network forstock traders. Graciela Chichilnisky, one of the cofounders and Bezos's boss,remembers him as a capable and upbeat employee who worked tirelessly and atdifferent times managed the firm's operations in London and Tokyo. "He was notconcerned about what other people were thinking," Chichilnisky says. "When yougave him a good solid intellectual issue, he would just chew on it and get itdone."
Bezos moved to the financial firm Bankers Trust in 1988, but by then, frustratedby what he viewed as institutional reluctance at companies to challenge thestatus quo, he was already looking for an opportunity to start his own business.Between 1989 and 1990 he spent several months working in his spare time on astartup with a young Merrill Lynch employee named Halsey Minor, who would latergo on to start the online news network CNET. Their fledgling venture, aimed atsending a customized newsletter to people over their fax machines, collapsedwhen Merrill Lynch withdrew the promised funding. But Bezos nevertheless made animpression. Minor remembers that Bezos had closely studied several wealthybusinessmen and that he particularly admired a man named Frank Meeks, a Virginiaentrepreneur who had made a fortune owning Domino's Pizza franchises. Bezos alsorevered pioneering computer scientist Alan Kay and often quoted his observationthat "point of view is worth 80 IQ points"—a reminder that looking atthings in new ways can enhance one's understanding. "He went to school oneverybody," Minor says. "I don't think there was anybody Jeff knew that hedidn't walk away from with whatever lessons he could."
Bezos was ready to leave Wall Street altogether when a headhunter convinced himto meet executives at just one more financial firm, a company with an unusualpedigree. Bezos would later say he found a kind of workplace soul mate in DavidShaw—"one of the few people I know who has a fully developed left brainand a fully developed right brain."
At DESCO, Bezos displayed many of the idiosyncratic qualities his employeeswould later observe at Amazon. He was disciplined and precise, constantlyrecording ideas in a notebook he carried with him, as if they might float out ofhis mind if he didn't jot them down. He quickly abandoned old notions andembraced new ones when better options presented themselves. He already exhibitedthe same boyish excitement and conversation-stopping laugh that the world wouldlater come to know.
Bezos thought analytically about everything, including social situations. Singleat the time, he started taking ballroom-dance classes, calculating that it wouldincrease his exposure to what he called n+ women. He later famously admitted tothinking about how to increase his "women flow," a Wall Street corollary todeal flow, the number of new opportunities a banker can access. JeffHolden, who worked for Bezos first at D. E. Shaw & Co. and later at Amazon, sayshe was "the most introspective guy I ever met. He was very methodical abouteverything in his life."
D. E. Shaw had none of the gratuitous formalities of other Wall Street firms; inoutward temperament, at least, it was closer to a Silicon Valley startup.Employees wore jeans or khakis, not suits and ties, and the hierarchy was flat(though key information about trading formulas was tightly held). Bezos seemedto love the idea of the nonstop workday; he kept a rolled-up sleeping bag in hisoffice and some egg-crate foam on his windowsill in case he needed to bunk downfor the night. Nicholas Lovejoy, a colleague who would later join him at Amazon,believes the sleeping bag "was as much a prop as it was actually useful." Whenthey did leave the office, Bezos and his DESCO colleagues often socializedtogether, playing backgammon or bridge until the early hours of the morning,usually for money.
As the company grew, David Shaw started to think about how to broaden its talentbase. He looked beyond math and science geeks to what he called generalists,those who'd recently graduated at the tops of their classes and who showedsignificant aptitude in particular subjects. The firm also combed through theranks of Fulbright scholars and dean's-list students at the best colleges andsent hundreds of unsolicited letters to them introducing the firm andproclaiming, "We approach our recruiting in unapologetically elitist fashion."
Respondents to the letters who seemed particularly extraordinary and who hadhigh enough grade point averages and aptitude-test scores were flown to New Yorkfor a grueling day of interviews. Members of the firm delighted in asking theserecruits random questions, such as "How many fax machines are in the UnitedStates?" The intent was to see how candidates tried to solve difficult problems.After the interviews, everyone who had participated in the hiring processgathered and expressed one of four opinions about each individual: strong nohire; inclined not to hire; inclined to hire; or strong hire. One holdout couldsink an applicant.
Bezos would later take these exact processes, along with the seeds of other Shawmanagement techniques, to Seattle. Even today, Amazon employees use thosecategories to vote on prospective new hires.
DESCO's massive recruitment effort and interview processes were finely tuned toBezos's mind-set; they even attracted one person who joined Bezos as his lifepartner. MacKenzie Tuttle, who graduated from Princeton in 1992 with a degree inEnglish and who studied with author Toni Morrison, joined the hedge fund as anadministrative assistant and later went to work directly for Bezos. Lovejoyremembers Bezos hiring a limousine one night and taking several colleagues to anightclub. "He was treating the whole group but he was clearly focused onMacKenzie," he says.
MacKenzie later said it was she who targeted Bezos, not the other way around."My office was next door to his, and all day long I listened to that fabulouslaugh," she told Vogue in 2012. "How could you not fall in love withthat laugh?" She began her campaign to win him over by suggesting lunch. Thecouple got engaged three months after they started dating; they were marriedthree months after that. Their wedding, held in 1993 at the Breakers, a resortin West Palm Beach, featured game time for adult guests and a late-night partyat the hotel pool. Bob Gelfond and a computer programmer named Tom Karzesattended from D. E. Shaw.
Meanwhile, DESCO was growing rapidly and, in the process, becoming moredifficult to manage. Several colleagues from that time recall that D. E. Shawbrought in a consultant who administered the Myers-Briggs personality test toall the members of the executive team. Not surprisingly, everyone tested as anintrovert. The least introverted person on the team was Jeff Bezos. At D. E.Shaw in the early 1990s, he counted as the token extrovert.
Bezos was a natural leader at DESCO. By 1993, he was remotely running the firm'sChicago-based options trading group and then its high-profile entry into thethird-market business, an alternative over-the-counter exchange that allowedretail investors to trade equities without the usual commissions collected bythe New York Stock Exchange. Brian Marsh, a programmer for the firm who wouldlater work at Amazon, says that Bezos was "incredibly charismatic and persuasiveabout the third-market project. It was easy to see then he was a great leader."Bezos's division faced constant challenges, however. The dominant player in thespace was one Bernard Madoff (the architect of a massive Ponzi scheme that wouldunravel in 2008). Madoff's own third-market division pioneered the business andpreserved its market lead. Bezos and his team could see Madoff's offices in theLipstick Building on the East Side through their windows high above the city.
While the rest of Wall Street saw D. E. Shaw as a highly secretive hedge fund,the firm viewed itself somewhat differently. In David Shaw's estimation, thecompany wasn't really a hedge fund but a versatile technology laboratory full ofinnovators and talented engineers who could apply computer science to a varietyof different problems. Investing was only the first domain where it would applyits skills.
So in 1994, when the opportunity of the Internet began to reveal itself to thefew people watching closely, Shaw felt that his company was uniquely positionedto exploit it. And the person he anointed to spearhead the effort was JeffBezos.
D. E. Shaw was ideally situated to take advantage of the Internet. Most Shawemployees had, instead of proprietary trading terminals, Sun workstations withInternet access, and they utilized early Internet tools like Gopher, Usenet, e-mail, and Mosaic, one of the first Web browsers. To write documents, they usedan academic formatting tool called LaTeX, though Bezos refused to touch theprogram, claiming it was unnecessarily complicated. D. E. Shaw was also amongthe very first Wall Street firms to register its URL. Internet records show thatDeshaw.com was claimed in 1992. Goldman Sachs took its domain in 1995, andMorgan Stanley a year after that.
Shaw, who used the Internet and its predecessor, ARPANET, during his years as aprofessor, was passionate about the commercial and social implications of asingle global computer network. Bezos had first encountered the Internet in anastrophysics class at Princeton in 1985 but hadn't thought about its commercialpotential until arriving at DESCO. Shaw and Bezos would meet for a few hourseach week to brainstorm ideas for this coming technological wave, and then Bezoswould take those ideas and investigate their feasibility.
In early 1994, several prescient business plans emerged from the discussionsbetween Bezos and Shaw and others at D. E. Shaw. One was the concept of a free,advertising-supported e-mail service for consumers—the idea behind Gmailand Yahoo Mail. DESCO would develop that idea into a company called Juno, whichwent public in 1999 and soon after merged with NetZero, a rival.
Another idea was to create a new kind of financial service that allowed Internetusers to trade stocks and bonds online. In 1995 Shaw turned that into asubsidiary called FarSight Financial Services, a precursor to companies like E-Trade. He later sold it to Merrill Lynch.
Shaw and Bezos discussed another idea as well. They called it "the everythingstore."
Several executives who worked at DESCO at that time say the idea of theeverything store was simple: an Internet company that served as the intermediarybetween customers and manufacturers and sold nearly every type of product, allover the world. One important element in the early vision was that customerscould leave written evaluations of any product, a more egalitarian and credibleversion of the old Montgomery Ward catalog reviews of its own suppliers. Shawhimself confirmed the Internet-store concept when he told the New York TimesMagazine in 1999, "The idea was always that someone would be allowed to makea profit as an intermediary. The key question is: Who will get to be thatmiddleman?"
(Continues...)Excerpted from The Everything Store by Brad Stone. Copyright © 2013 Brad Stone. Excerpted by permission of Little, Brown and Company.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- ASIN : B00BWQW73E
- Publisher : Little, Brown and Company; Illustrated edition (October 15, 2013)
- Publication date : October 15, 2013
- Language : English
- File size : 27965 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 386 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #170,756 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #6 in Retailing Industry (Kindle Store)
- #14 in Business Operations Research (Books)
- #66 in Company Histories
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Brad Stone is senior executive editor for global technology at Bloomberg News and the author of Amazon Unbound: Jeff Bezos and the Invention of a Global Empire. The book, to be published in May 2021, continues the story that he began with The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon, a New York Times bestseller that won the 2013 Business Book of the Year Award from the Financial Times and Goldman Sachs and has been translated into more than 35 languages. He is also the author of The Upstarts: Uber, Airbnb, and the Battle for the New Silicon Valley. He is a twin, and the father of twins, and lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
That's what this book reminds me of...full of stories that have some piece of reality, but most of the key pieces are either fiction or skewed to meet the author's thesis.
Let me start by saying I respect Brad. I've been interviewed by him a couple times, and found him professional. His stories have been pretty straight down the middle, so the content of this book surprised me because it was so skewed. Not sure if this was because Brad didn't speak in depth to the senior leaders at the Company or because he wanted the book to be more compelling so he spiced it up. But, I've been at Amazon for 16 years, worked for Jeff directly for nearly 12 years, worked on all of Amazon's businesses, and either have first-hand knowledge or pretty good visibility to many of the topics in the book, and the book presents a distorted and often inaccurate perspective.
Here are a few examples:
- the Quidsi acquisition: did Amazon have to compete with other companies for that acquisition? Sure. This is pretty typical in acquisitions. Did Amazon plan to announce Amazon Mom while the founders were in a meeting at Amazon so they couldn't respond immediately? Come on. Really? That's pretty absurd. Who did Brad speak with who was deeply involved that confirmed that? Was it Jeff Blackburn or Peter Krawiec, the guys who managed the deal? Or, Doug Herrington, who managed Amazon Mom? No. Apparently, Brad asked Jeff Blackburn whether this was planned and Jeff told him unequivocally it was not. This is a keystone anecdote in the book and the punch line is made up. Girl scout attacked...by dog!
- The 2001 story about when Amazon decided to lower prices is inaccurate. It wasn't some grand announcement in a s-team (Jeff Bezos’s senior leadership team) meeting. Like most things at Amazon, it was through a series of meetings where we were discussing the business and what we wanted to change to drive growth and customer experience. It sounds more dramatic that it came after meeting Former Costco CEO Jim Sinegal and in a grand announcement thereafter at s-team. Problem is, it just isn't true. And, I know because I was in the meeting where we made this call as I was running the Music business at the time.
- When Alan Brown left the Marketing leadership role, it was Lance Batchelor and I that co-led marketing. Not Jeff Holden and me (as the author reports).
- The comments about the TVs given away for the person who came up with the most bureaucratic process in the company, once again, was only half right. Yes, there was the award. But, we never ran out of the TVs or morphed it into the Door Desk Award. We stopped giving out the bureaucracy award well before the TVs were all given out (the program wasn't quite accomplishing what we'd intended), and the Door Desk Award was an independent idea that was conceived and started.
- Several parts of the AWS origin story are inaccurate, and I won't list them all here, but a couple examples: (1) Brad talks about iterating fast by layering services like Flexible Payments Service and Amazon CloudSearch alongside EC2 and S3...while it's accurate that we layered on new services, the key services that we launched that meaningfully expanded the breadth of AWS were Elastic Block Store (EBS) in 2008, CloudFront (our Content Distribution Network) in 2008, and Relational Database Service (RDS) in 2009 (CloudSearch wasn’t launched until 2012); (2) the vision document proposing the AWS business and outlining the initial set of services for AWS (including our compute service, EC2) was finished and presented to the executive team in September 2003. I wrote the document and was lucky to have the help of several people in putting it together. This was about a year before Chris Pinkham moved to South Africa to build the initial version of EC2. Chris played an integral role in the definition, team-building, and product-building of EC2 (despite leaving before EC2 was launched). There are several errors in this section, and at the end of the day, you could debate how much they matter. But, an impeccably, well researched account it's not.
- "Jeff Bots": In 16 years, I have never heard this term once (and I sponsor several cultural events that attract people from all levels of the organization-- like Tatonka, our buffalo wing eating club). Further, I know the people Brad calls "Jeff Bots" very well. I can't tell if Brad is just badly informed or making this up for drama, but I can tell you that calling people like Steve Kessel or Russ Grandinetti robots is ignorant and another sure sign that this author didn't get inside the Amazon culture closely. I've sat in countless meetings with Steve and Russ where they've come up with strikingly inventive ideas, and fought hard and challenged peers and Jeff Bezos. You don't get far at Amazon by being a robot and caving on what you think is important. "Have Backbone" is an important part of one of our key leadership principles ("Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit"), and the people Brad dismissively calls "Jeff Bots" have backbone in spades. I took this section either as Brad trying to make the book more interesting or his being frustrated that he doesn't get more interesting press interviews with Amazon leaders because they stay on message. Having a strong culture that the leadership team really buys into is very different than having a group of robots who do what they're told. The former is part of what's made Amazon successful the last 18 years (and especially the last 10); the latter is an interesting, but nearly impossible way to be successful in the breadth of businesses Amazon's pursuing-- and plain wrong.
- The Culture: Of all the things in the book, this is arguably the most inaccurately stated. The notion that most "Amazon employees live in perpetual fear" is bizarre. Do some? Maybe. Suspect that's the case at any company that has high standards. But, do most? No way. The manner in which Brad characterizes Jeff Bezos and the culture is like dissecting Lebron James' career and saying that he's a bad shooter because you mostly detail his missed shots or that he can't win the big game because he didn't win the championship in his first few years in the NBA. In 18 years, if you want to tell the story that Amazon can be tough on people who don't meet the standards, or Jeff can get impatient and frustrated, it's easy to do. But, just like you need to look at Lebron's total body of work that includes four MVP awards, regular season and playoffs MVP awards the last couple years, and a second straight championship (while making a bevy of clutch, difficult plays along the way), to get the right picture of Amazon's culture, you need to look at the collective body of work. I've been the subject of Jeff's frustration at times through the years, and seen him get frustrated with others, but in the thousands of meetings I’ve attended with Jeff over the last 16 years, I can tell you that this has happened a tiny fraction of the time. Jeff is quite inventive and smart, but also collaborative, an amazing brainstormer, a long-term thinker, not one to give up on an initiative easily, and fun. He's also the single best learner I've met, and like many, has continued to evolve his leadership style over the last 10 years. It's clear to me that this author over-relied on interviews with people who had difficult interactions or endings with Jeff, and mostly in the first half of the Company's history.
In my own case, my plan was to come to Amazon for 2-3 years, and then head back home to NYC. I'm still at Amazon in substantial part because of the culture and Jeff. I can't think of another place that starts and ends with the customer the way Amazon does, or that thinks long-term rather than optically for a quarter, or that looks at an area of business (or customer experience) and doesn't let itself get blocked by existing convention, or that gives people who deliver a chance to try any new entrepreneurial venture that makes sense regardless of their experience level in that area, or that hires builders who are unleashed to go change the world, or has such a sharp, inventive, big-thinking, high bias for action, collegial, hungry, and delivery oriented culture. It's why I'm still here 16 years later, Charlie Bell is still here 15 years later, Jeff Blackburn 15 years later, Russ Grandinetti 15 years later, Steve Kessel, 14 years later, Jeff Wilke 14 years later, David Zapolsky 14 years later, Paul Kotas 14 years later, Diego Piacentini 13 years later, Tom Szkutak 11 years later, and the list goes on. There are plenty of opportunities to work elsewhere. We all get the calls. And, you can argue that the start-up scene in Seattle hasn't gotten its "fair" share of new entrepreneurs from Amazon. That's because people are staying at Amazon for an inordinately long time. We work hard here, but Amazon is a builder's dream, and if you want a chance to change the world in a pervasive way, there's no better place.
There are many other examples I could cite (my Kindle is marked with about 30 places that are highlighted as inaccurate or misrepresented), but you get the idea.
This is the problem when you write a book and don't talk in depth (i.e. many hours) to the principal players who have the full detail. People argue that this book is really well-researched. I disagree. Just because you conduct 300 interviews doesn't make it well researched. That's like giving credit to a book for the number of pages or footnotes it contains. It's not the number of interviews as much as who you talked to, what access they have to the true details of what's going on, whether you can represent the way the company evolves over time, and what the author then chooses to weave together as his story arc. I find it nearly impossible to tell an accurate and representative account of Amazon and its culture over the last 18 years if you haven't spent lots of hours with people like Jeff Bezos, Rick Dalzell, Jeff Wilke, Tom Szkutak, Jeff Blackburn, Diego Piacentini, Steve Kessel, Russ Grandinetti, Charlie Bell, David Zapolsky, myself, and other long-time senior folks who know these stories you're trying to write about and understand the culture deeply. Brad didn't talk to Jeff Bezos at all, and spent about an hour with a few of those other people but in a pretty high level way (not really trying to get deep at the core of what makes the culture tick or what have been the defining chapters in the Company). They were light questions (e.g. “Is it true you hit Jeff with a canoe paddle in your first month?”) or cursory questions that didn't seem to be considered very deeply in the writing. You can ask these people above and they'll tell you the same thing. Would they have told Brad the inner workings of Amazon? I don't know. Amazon is quiet in that respect. But, I do suspect they would have been happy to help Brad avoid getting the culture wrong, or the Quidsi story wrong (in this case, they tried), or several other of the errors.
Further, just because it might be frustrating that you can't get the primary characters to tell you everything you want doesn't mean you do your best to make it up yourself. That doesn't lead to an accurate or definitive non-fiction book. It might mean that you don't get to do the non-fiction book you’ve had your heart set on doing. But, that's a more noble path than getting it wrong like this.
So, the mantle is still open to tell the real story of Amazon. I’m not baiting people to fill the void, but do know this book isn't it.
As I write this review, Amazon just announced a partnership with the US Postal Service to start delivering on Sundays for Prime members in key cities. This backs up the best description I have heard of Amazon and its founder -- which, amusingly, comes from the blog of ex-Amazon employee Eugene Wei, someone who was not interviewed in this book.
"Amazon has boundless ambition," Wei writes. "It wants to eat global retail... there are very few people in technology and business who are what I'd call apex predators. Jeff [Bezos] is one of them, the most patient and intelligent one I've met in my life. An apex predator doesn't wake up one day and decide it is done hunting."
Stock valuation aside -- you either believe or you don't, and as of this writing Bezos is clearly having a messianic moment -- "The Everything Store" is an excellent chronicle of Amazon's rise.
In the book -- and I don't mean this as a criticism -- Bezos comes off as the lead character in an Ayn Rand novel. A real world John Galt or Hank Rearden, with an e-commerce twist. The immigrant step-father who taught him the value of hard work... the maternal grandfather who instilled a deep do-it-yourself attitude... the flashes of extraordinary competitiveness from an early age... the burning desire to conquer space... it all coalesces into a sense of destiny (though, of course, a good portion of this could be narrative hindsight).
Steve Jobs was the last great business figure, the hero entrepreneur of our time. I think that, reputationally, Bezos will ultimately surpass Jobs -- leave him in the dust, really -- because while, what Bezos is doing is unsexy, the fundamental nature of "hard problems" that Amazon approaches and solves (on its way to eating global retail) is adding to the free market knowledge base at a tremendous evolutionary rate.
One of the most intriguing and powerful things about Amazon, in my opinion, is the sheer logistical prowess of what they do behind the scenes. The coordination of supply chains, manpower, algorithmic decision making, and countless other unseen problems they have had to solve on the way to delivering "everything" in a two-day shipping window is off-the-charts impressive.
To a certain degree Apple accomplished a similar behind-the-scenes feat, in that Apple's masterful ability to implement and coordinate global supply chains made it the most profitable company in the world for a time. But Apple's breathtaking profit margins always had a slightly ephemeral feel to them. You knew that someone (like Samsung or Google's Android) would eventually come along and take a bite of the Apple so to speak... whereas with Bezos' strategy, staking out the hard, grinding, low-nutrient territory of thin margins, the next competitor is going to have to get bloody in the toughest octagon of all (logistics and scale). As Bezos likes to say, "Your margin is my opportunity," which should scare the hell out of any large retailer, perhaps save Wal-Mart (and maybe even Wal-Mart too).
Those who doubt Amazon's business model (myself among them in the past) have been prone to use the "switch flip" criticism, e.g. bullish investors assume Amazon will one day be able to "flip a switch" and become profitable. But I agree with Eugene Wei that this is an overly simplistic characterization of a more subtle process. In reality, Amazon is less like a company with one switch to flip and more like one with tens of thousands of individual switches, each of which can be incrementally adjusted to swing from loss to profit when the time is right. This seems far less fantastical when you picture thousands upon thousands of instances where, say, a 2% margin mark-up creates profit where previously there was break-even, and/or a simple slowdown in the prodigious rate of ongoing capital expenditure spending lets more cash flow spill over into the profit column.
As for the prodigious capital expenditures, Amazon's most recent quarterly revenue figure, as of this writing, was roughly $17 billion. Bezos no doubt foresees the day when that quarterly number will hit $100 billion. On the way there, it only makes sense for him to exploit every inch of leeway he can get from Wall Street -- in terms of taking all the money and opportunity he can for long-term investment -- with the goal of scaling up the infrastructure to serve and support an order-of-magnitude larger sales base. If investors get loopy with their valuation assessments in the meantime, so be it. The vision is the thing for Bezos... just as it has always been.
But getting back to "The Everything Store," my favorite thing about this book was the brutally honest nature of the flaws and the messiness of Amazon's evolution (and the evolution of Bezos himself) in the first 5-10 years or so of the company's existence.
Through an excellent weave of facts, narrative anecdotes and storytelling, you get a clear picture of how Amazon surged out of the gate in the late 1990s, and then almost choked to death on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of bad acquisitions it made with "bubble money." Many dumb mistakes were made, some deservedly fatal... but Amazon survived them all, and managed to learn from them too.
The evolution of Bezos as a CEO is fully apparent as well. While those who ponder Bezos today are likely to assume he stepped on the world's stage as a wise genius fully formed, in actuality he picked up many of his strong core beliefs along the course of Amazon's existence, learning through intense study of rivals and mentors from afar, like D.E. Shaw (early on) and Sam Walton and Jim Sinegal of Costco.
The book is really a gift for entrepeneurs and business builders of the new generation -- like myself, ahem cough cough -- in the manner it lays bare the luck, the guts, and the serious mistakes that are inevitably made on the way to forming a world-class enterprise.
The other thing that really came through is the sheer ruthlessness of Bezos. (No doubt this is what got Mackenzie Bezos riled up -- what spouse wants to see their husband portrayed as a tyrant?) But as the book points out, there is a reason why so many of the great builders in tech -- Gates, Ellison, Jobs and so on -- all had that same ruthless character to them. Building and scaling a world-dominating business is hard. As in really, really hard. When you are trying do something on that kind of scale, with that level of competitiveness, you are not just fighting against cut-throat competitors. You are also fighting against entropy and mediocrity, that pull of ordinary results, ordinary outcome (as opposed to extraordinary) that holds back every ambitious endeavor in the same manner the NASA shuttle is held back by gravity. It takes something special to get off the launching pad, let alone into orbit.
The fact that Bezos can be extremely ruthless, even cold-blooded, in pursuit of his vision, will not gain extra points with much of his audience. (No doubt a reason Amazon itself wants to tone that side down.) But investors should be glad for this trait, and it's a trait that benefits capitalism on the whole too. When a strong player legitimately uses skill and efficiency to best a weaker player in the marketplace, costs are lowered as such that customers benefit, and other businesses can learn from the strong player's pioneering example.
The final chapters of the book showed Amazon at its most ruthless by far. I had no idea the level of wargame strategy that had occurred in the purchase of Zappos. The Quidsi (diapers.com) acquisition was simultaneously even more brilliant and brutal. You do not, not, not want to be in head-to-head competition with Amazon. It is here where I stop and whisper a small prayer of thanks to the free market gods that my own career path does not involve selling commodity-type retail products.
I had reason to examine my own motives as to why I enjoyed this book so much. I am a trader, not a retailer. While I have plans to lead and scale a business to large (perhaps even very large) size, it has nothing to do with traditional retail really. So why was this book so fascinating? Perhaps for the sheer cultural value of what Bezos represents and what he has accomplished. Here is a guy who started out smart, talented and exceptionally bold, and had the chutzpah to act on a wildly ambitious vision and see it through every step of the way. Learning and stumbling as he went, sometimes screwing up royally, but always pulling in the errors and coming back from the brink... having laid the architecture more than a dozen years ago to sustain a vision ten times bigger (or maybe even 100 times).
The broader inspirational lesson from the Amazon story, I think, is the reaffirmation of what's possible when motivated dreamers decide to work harder, work smarter, and break traditional molds all at the same time. You really can execute on a compelling vision. You really can get a team together and, with the help of that team, accomplish a hundred or a thousand times more than you ever could running solo. You really can practice patience and boldness -- no coincidence "bold" is one of Bezos' favorite words -- and in so doing apply an Art-of-War like strategic nous to flanking and beating your rivals. Big and exciting things can be done in this world.
Top reviews from other countries
“Relentless” also sums up the character of the CEO. This readable account of Amazon has its limitations – there is virtually nothing about how Amazon expanded outside the US, for example. The book is really about Jeff Bezos (pronounced “Bay zos” not “Bee zos”) its driven, charismatic CEO. His character (probably fortunately) is one of a kind. Aged 12 he was already highly competitive and driven, working long hours to try and build a cheaper “infinity cube”. He tried to organize a programme at his school to assess and rank all his teachers on how they taught (sound familiar?) He is “relentless” in driving his employees to work harder. He used to drive his staff on “death marches” in the early days to achieve key project goals. Like a lot of Internet pioneers he moved out (there is a less polite word for this) the people who started the company with him, a number of whom felt incredibly bitter about the way they were treated. If you want another example of this, watch “The Social Network” about Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook and the way he pushed out and treated his fellow founder, Eduardo Saverin. He also regularly humiliated his staff. One of the most famous stories about Amazon is about a senior manager who was telling Bezos something that he didn’t think was true (that the customer service line was picking up the phone in time). So in the middle of the meeting Bezos put the phone on loudspeaker, and dialled. And waited. And waited. And waited. Bezos, like Steve Jobs, regularly had screaming fits at his employees, or at least that’s what the author tells us. Then there’s the seemingly cavalier way Amazon treats issues which impact society as whole like tax, as has been well documented recently in the UK. Finally there’s the wreckage of shattered businesses, starting with all kinds of independent booksellers and ending up, if trends continue, with most retail in most categories being if not swallowed then certainly damaged by Amazon.
So far so bad. “Behind every great fortune is a great crime” is a well known saying. That was certainly true of the C19th titans of business like John D Rockefeller who were utterly ruthless in the way they bulldozed anyone in their way. (A great if long read on Rockefeller is “Titan” by Ron Chernow). These oligarchs acquired the nickname “Robber Barons” and it took a great crusading President, Teddy Roosevelt, to reduce them to size. However, with Amazon I think in fairness – and this comes out to a certain extent in the book – that there is a lot one can learn. The book overstates the impact of one man. How much business success is really about “amazing personalities” is an interesting question. When the author of the book, Brad Stone, interviews Bezos he is asked by Bezos at the end “How are you going to avoid the narrative fallacy” The narrative fallacy was popularized by the author of “The Black Swan” Nassim Nicholas Taleb. It describes our limited ability to look at history without tending to force all the myriad events into a simplistic explanation or framework to try and make sense of what happened. An example would be books with titles like “The 10 habits of successful people” or “Manage money the Warren Buffet way” that imply if you follow a few simple rules you will be automatically successful. Having said that, if you want to build a great business there are definitely things that can be learned from Bezos.
I would summarize what they are by quoting Bezos – “We are genuinely customer centric, genuinely long term orientated and genuinely innovative”. All three are true, I think. Amazon is relentless about (most) of its customer service. That’s why it gains business. The best customer service is about putting yourselves in the customers shoes and thinking “what would I want”? Things like Amazons “1 Click” are taken for granted but those of us old enough to remember the early internet (yes I am that old) will recall how convoluted it was to place even a simple order. Long term, absolutely. From day one, Bezos had a vision of what was going to happen and drove to reach it. He didn’t care at all about making money and kept his margins low to drive out the competition. He nearly bust the company at several times and in the early 2000s in particularly was very narrowly saved by his CFO, whom he promptly fired. But, Bezos has been successful because he knows (so far) anyway where the business world is going. The great Canadian ice hockey player Wayne Gretzky said “A good hockey player plays where the puck is. A great hockey player plays where the puck is going to be”. Bezos was incredibly far sighted. Thirdly Amazon is genuinely innovative. The Kindle is a very well known example, but much less well known is AWS – Amazon Web Services. This has been a pet project of Bezos and is about building up huge mounts of server capacity to allow Amazon to be the leader in offer cloud hosted computing services. This is a poorly understood area by most people (including me!) but means that Amazon has quietly built up a leading position in an area of great potential. After all, you don’t buy a cow if you want a glass of milk so why own your own computing capabilities if you can rent it? Bezos is certainly a highly successful CEO, but not I think a model of how CEOs should behave. For more on how to be a good CEO see an exciting new concept - “School for CEOs” http://www.schoolforceos.com/ .
What’s a Christian view on all this?. Repelled by rampant “uber capitalists” should Christians become “milksops” and sit around looking out the window waiting for eternity? Should Christians try and achieve business greatness? Is Bezos’s drive for “retail world domination” intrinsically wrong? Personally, I don’t think that ambition to build a great company or provide customer service or revolutionize the Internet is at all bad and may actually be a legitimate human desire. But, only if this drive to build a business doesn’t destroy the rest of our lives. Prioritization is the key – God first, family second, work (which is basically for most of us very tied to ego) third. The natural tendency in hard charging capitalism is the third (i.e. your own ego) at the top, distantly followed if at all by the second, while the first is totally absent. Not only that, Christians should certainly aim to treat our colleagues as we would wish to be treated – love your neighbour as you love yourself. I think the single most depressing characteristic of Jobs and Bezos (assuming the books on them are true) is their routine humiliation of their underlings. So the Christian certainly should not to become like Jeff Bezos, though I think as a businessman we can learn many things from him. But the Christian is called to follow another man, who was humanly speaking one of the greatest “failures” who ever lived. Deserted by his "staff" he ended up nailed to a cross. He humiliated Himself, yet when he met his "staff' again after his resurrection, the first thing He said to them was "Peace be with you". Not "Shame on you" which would have been quite fair given they had all fled and left Him. Now, 2000 years later 1/3rd roughly of the world regard him as God. What the world in 4015 thinks of Jeff Bezos we shall have to see but I think that’s an unlikely status!
Non nego che temevo un po’ quell’effetto autoreferenziale tipico di questo genere di libri (considerando questo nello specifico poi!) ma, nel raccontare la storia di Amazon, l’autore non si esime dal descrivere anche i lati meno positivi del carattere del suo fondatore: estremamente determinato nel realizzare la sua visione e nel migliorarmento costante dei propri risultati ma anche piuttosto intollerante nei confronti dell’umanita’ e delle necessita’ dei suoi collaboratori, nonostante il loro impegno e devozione per l’azienda.
Interessanti poi sono i molti retroscena dell’universo Bezos, dagli albori di Amazon (anzi Cadabra...) fino a Blue Origin... letto in inglese perche’ credo sia il genere di libri da leggere assolutamente in lingua originale, direi scorrevolissimo per un livello medio.
Consiglio ovviamente di leggerlo in lingua originale, alcuni spunti interessanti non sono tradotti in modo correttissimo. A partire dal titolo in italiano leggermente differente
Reviewed in Italy 🇮🇹 on March 6, 2021


















