Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Instant streaming of thousands of movies and TV episodes with Prime Video
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$28.35$28.35
FREE delivery:
Thursday, May 11
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $19.19
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City Hardcover – March 1, 2016
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
In Evicted, Princeton sociologist and MacArthur “Genius” Matthew Desmond follows eight families in Milwaukee as they each struggle to keep a roof over their heads. Hailed as “wrenching and revelatory” (The Nation), “vivid and unsettling” (New York Review of Books), Evicted transforms our understanding of poverty and economic exploitation while providing fresh ideas for solving one of twenty-first-century America’s most devastating problems. Its unforgettable scenes of hope and loss remind us of the centrality of home, without which nothing else is possible.
NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY President Barack Obama • The New York Times Book Review • The Boston Globe • The Washington Post • NPR • Entertainment Weekly • The New Yorker • Bloomberg • Esquire • BuzzFeed • Fortune • San Francisco Chronicle • Milwaukee Journal Sentinel • St. Louis Post-Dispatch • Politico • The Week • Chicago Public Library • BookPage • Kirkus Reviews • Library Journal • Publishers Weekly • Booklist • Shelf Awareness
WINNER OF: The National Book Critics Circle Award for Nonfiction • The PEN/John Kenneth Galbraith Award for Nonfiction • The Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in Nonfiction • The Hillman Prize for Book Journalism • The PEN/New England Award • The Chicago Tribune Heartland Prize
FINALIST FOR THE LOS ANGELES TIMES BOOK PRIZE AND THE KIRKUS PRIZE
“Evicted stands among the very best of the social justice books.”—Ann Patchett, author of Bel Canto and Commonwealth
“Gripping and moving—tragic, too.”—Jesmyn Ward, author of Salvage the Bones
“Evicted is that rare work that has something genuinely new to say about poverty.”—San Francisco Chronicle
- Print length432 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateMarch 1, 2016
- Dimensions6.62 x 1.36 x 9.58 inches
- ISBN-100553447432
- ISBN-13978-0553447439
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest rated | Lowest Pricein this set of products
A WORKBOOK FOR POVERY BY AMERICA: Overview, Analysis And Definitions. A Guide to Matthew Desmond's BookLARRY NEVILLEPaperback
Today, the majority of poor renting families in America spend over half of their income on housing, and at least one in four dedicates over 70 percent to paying the rent and keeping the lights on.Highlighted by 4,506 Kindle readers
To Sammy, Pastor Daryl, and others, Larraine was poor because she threw money away. But the reverse was more true. Larraine threw money away because she was poor.Highlighted by 3,105 Kindle readers
From the Publisher
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
Through both personal stories and data, Desmond proves that eviction undermines self, family, and community, bearing down disproportionately hard on women with children. In Milwaukee, being behind on rent gives landlords the opening to serve an eviction notice, which leads to a court date. On the face of it, it may seem easy to side with the landlords—of course tenants should pay their rent. But as Evicted pulls back layer after layer, what’s exposed is a cycle of hurt that all parties—landlord, tenant, city—inflict on one another. Whether readers agree with Desmond’s conclusions for how to break this cycle in order to strengthen families and neighborhoods, it’s obvious by the end of Evicted that there is no easy fix, and that people—some addicts, some criminals—will slip through the cracks. But it should be just as obvious that we must still try.
—Adrian LiangReview
“After reading Evicted, you’ll realize you cannot have a serious conversation about poverty without talking about housing. . . . The book is that good, and it’s that unignorable.”—Jennifer Senior, New York Times
“This book gave me a better sense of what it is like to be very poor in this country than anything else I have read. . . . It is beautifully written, thought-provoking, and unforgettable.”—Bill Gates
“Inside my copy of his book, Mr. Desmond scribbled a note: ‘home = life.’ Too many in Washington don’t understand that. We need a government that will partner with communities, from Appalachia to the suburbs to downtown Cleveland, to make hard work pay off for all these overlooked Americans.”—Senator Sherrod Brown, Wall Street Journal
“My God, what [Evicted] lays bare about American poverty. It is devastating and infuriating and a necessary read.”—Roxane Gay, author of Bad Feminist and Difficult Women
“Written with the vividness of a novel, [Evicted] offers a dark mirror of middle-class America’s obsession with real estate, laying bare the workings of the low end of the market, where evictions have become just another part of an often lucrative business model.”—Jennifer Schuessler, New York Times
“In spare and penetrating prose . . . Desmond has made it impossible to consider poverty without grappling with the role of housing. This pick [as best book of 2016] was not close.”—Carlos Lozada, Washington Post
“An essential piece of reportage about poverty and profit in urban America.”—Geoff Dyer, The Guardian
“It doesn't happen every week (or every month, or even year), but every once in a while a book comes along that changes the national conversation. . . . Evicted looks to be one of those books.”—Pamela Paul, editor of the New York Times Book Review
“Should be required reading in an election year, or any other.”—Entertainment Weekly
“Powerful, monstrously effective . . . The power of this book abides in the indelible impression left by its stories.”—Jill Leovy, The American Scholar
“Gripping and important . . . [Desmond's] portraits are vivid and unsettling.”—Jason DeParle, New York Review of Books
“An exquisitely crafted, meticulously researched exploration of life on the margins, providing a voice to people who have been shamefully ignored—or, worse, demonized—by opinion makers over the course of decades.”—The Boston Globe
“[An] impressive work of scholarship . . . As Mr. Desmond points out, eviction has been neglected by urban sociologists, so his account fills a gap. His methodology is scrupulous.”—Wall Street Journal
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Business of Owning the City
Before the city yielded to winter, as cold and gray as a mechanic’s wrench, before Arleen convinced Sherrena Tarver to let her boys move into the Thirteenth Street duplex, the inner city was crackling with life. It was early September and Milwaukee was enjoying an Indian summer. Music rolled into the streets from car speakers as children played on the sidewalk or sold water bottles by the freeway entrance. Grandmothers watched from porch chairs as bare-chested black boys laughingly made their way to the basketball court.
Sherrena wound her way through the North Side, listening to R&B with her window down. Most middle-class Milwaukeeans zoomed past the inner city on the freeway. Landlords took the side streets, typically not in their Saab or Audi but in their “rent collector,” some oil-leaking, rusted-out van or truck that hauled around extension cords, ladders, maybe a loaded pistol, plumbing snakes, toolboxes, a can of Mace, nail guns, and other necessities. Sherrena usually left her lipstick-red Camaro at home and visited tenants in a beige-and-brown 1993 Chevy Suburban with 22-inch rims. The Suburban belonged to Quentin, Sherrena’s husband, business partner, and property manager. He used a screwdriver to start it.
Some white Milwaukeeans still referred to the North Side as “the core,” as they did in the 1960s, and if they ventured into it, they saw street after street of sagging duplexes, fading murals, twenty-four-hour day cares, and corner stores with wic accepted here signs. Once America’s eleventh-largest city, Milwaukee’s population had fallen below 600,000, down from over 740,000 in 1960. It showed. Abandoned properties and weedy lots where houses once stood dotted the North Side. A typical residential street had a few single-family homes owned by older folks who tended gardens and hung American flags, more duplexes or four-family apartment buildings with chipping paint and bedsheet curtains rented to struggling families, and vacant plots and empty houses with boards drilled over their doors and windows.
Sherrena saw all this, but she saw something else too. Like other seasoned landlords, she knew who owned which multifamily, which church, which bar, which street; knew its different vicissitudes of life, its shades and moods; knew which blocks were hot and drug-soaked and which were stable and quiet. She knew the ghetto’s value and how money could be made from a property that looked worthless to people who didn’t know any better.
Petite with chestnut skin, Sherrena wore a lightweight red-and-blue jacket that matched her pants, which matched her off-kilter NBA cap. She liked to laugh, a full, open-mouthed hoot, sometimes catching your shoulder as if to keep from falling. But as she turned off North Avenue on her way to pay a visit to tenants who lived near the intersection of Eighteenth and Wright Streets, she slowed down and let out a heavy sigh. Evictions were a regular part of the business, but Lamar didn’t have any legs. Sherrena was not looking forward to evicting a man without legs.
When Lamar first fell behind, Sherrena didn’t reach automatically for the eviction notice or shrug it off with a bromide about business being business. She hemmed and hawed. “I’m gonna have a hard time doing this,” she told Quentin when she could no longer ignore it. “You know that, don’t you?” Sherrena frowned.
Quentin stayed quiet and let his wife say it.
“It’s only fair,” Sherrena offered after a few silent moments of deliberation. “I feel bad for the kids. Lamar’s got them little boys in there. . . . And I love Lamar. But love don’t pay the bills.”
Sherrena had a lot of bills: mortgage payments, water charges, maintenance expenses, property taxes. Sometimes a major expense would come out of nowhere—a broken furnace, an unexpected bill from the city—and leave her close to broke until the first of the month.
“We don’t have the time to wait,” Quentin said. “While we waiting on his payment, the taxes are going up. The mortgage payment is going up.”
There was no hedging in this business. When a tenant didn’t pay $500, her landlord lost $500. When that happened, landlords with mortgages dug into their savings or their income to make sure the bank didn’t hand them a foreclosure notice. There were no euphemisms either: no “downsizing,” no “quarterly losses.” Landlords took the gains and losses directly; they saw the deprivation and waste up close. Old-timers liked recalling their first big loss, their initial breaking-in: the time a tenant tore down her own ceiling, took pictures, and convinced the court commissioner it was the landlord’s fault; the time an evicted couple stuffed socks down the sinks and turned the water on full-blast before moving out. Rookie landlords hardened or quit.
Sherrena nodded reassuringly and said, almost to herself, “I guess I got to stop feeling sorry for these people because nobody is feeling sorry for me. Last time I checked, the mortgage company still wanted their money.”
Sherrena and Quentin had met years ago, on Fond Du Lac Avenue. Quentin pulled up beside Sherrena at a red light. She had a gorgeous smile and her car stereo was turned up. He asked her to pull over. Sherrena remembered Quentin being in a Daytona, but he insisted it was the Regal. “I ain’t trying to pull nobody over in the Daytona,” he’d say, feigning offense. Quentin was well manicured, built but not muscular, with curly hair and lots of jewelry—
a thick chain, a thicker bracelet, rings. Sherrena thought he looked like a dope dealer but gave him her real number anyway. Quentin called Sherrena for three months before she agreed to let him take her out for ice cream. It took him another six years to marry her.
When Quentin pulled Sherrena over, she was a fourth-grade teacher. She talked like a teacher, calling strangers “honey” and offering motherly advice or chiding. “You know I’m fixing to fuss at you,” she would say. If she sensed your attention starting to drift, she would touch your elbow or thigh to pull you back in.
Four years after meeting Quentin, Sherrena was happy with their relationship but bored at work. After eight years in the classroom, she quit and opened a day care. But “they shut it down on a tiny technicality,” she remembered. So she went back to teaching. After her son from an earlier relationship started acting out, she began homeschooling him and tried her hand at real estate. When people asked, “Why real estate?” Sherrena would reply with some talk about “long-term residuals” or “property being the best investment out there.” But there was more to it. Sherrena shared something with other landlords: an unbending confidence that she could make it on her own without a school or a company to fall back on, without a contract or a pension or a union. She had an understanding with the universe that she could strike out into nothing and through her own gumption and intelligence come back with a good living.
Sherrena had bought a home in 1999, when prices were low. Riding the housing boom a few years later, she refinanced and pulled out $21,000 in equity. Six months later, she refinanced again, this time pulling $12,000. She used the cash to buy her first rental property: a two-unit duplex in the inner city, where housing was cheapest. Rental profits, refinancing, and private real-estate investors offering high-interest loans helped her buy more.
She learned that the rental population comprised some upper- and middle-class households who rent out of preference or circumstance, some young and transient people, and most of the city’s poor, who were excluded both from homeownership and public housing. Landlords operated in different neighborhoods, typically clustering their properties in a concentrated area. In the segregated city, this meant that landlords focused on housing certain kinds of people: white ones or black ones, poor families or college students. Sherrena decided to specialize in renting to the black poor.
Four years later, she owned thirty-six units, all in the inner city, and took to carrying a pair of cell phones with backup batteries, reading Forbes, renting office space, and accepting appointments from nine a.m. to nine p.m. Quentin quit his job and started working as Sherrena’s property manager and buying buildings of his own. Sherrena started a credit-repair business and an investment business. She purchased two fifteen-passenger vans and started Prisoner Connections LLC, which for $25 to $50 a seat transported girlfriends and mothers and children to visit their incarcerated loved ones upstate. Sherrena had found her calling: inner-city entrepreneur.
Product details
- Publisher : Crown; 1st edition (March 1, 2016)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0553447432
- ISBN-13 : 978-0553447439
- Item Weight : 1.54 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.62 x 1.36 x 9.58 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #48,362 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #27 in Sociology of Urban Areas
- #36 in Poverty
- #68 in Sociology of Class
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Matthew Desmond is social scientist and urban ethnographer. He is the Maurice P. During Professor of Sociology and the Director of the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. He is also a Contributing Writer for The New York Times Magazine.
Desmond is the author of over fifty academic studies and several books, including "Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City," which won the Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction, National Book Critics Circle Award, Carnegie Medal, and PEN / John Kenneth Galbraith Award for Nonfiction.
"Evicted" was listed as one of the Best Books of 2016 by The New York Times, New Yorker, Washington Post, National Public Radio, and several other outlets. It has been named one of the Best 50 Nonfiction Books of the Last 100 Years and was included in the 100 Best Social Policy Books of All Time.
Desmond's research and reporting focuses on American poverty and public policy. He is the recipient of a MacArthur Fellowship, the American Bar Association’s Silver Gavel Award, and is an elected member of the American Philosophical Society. He has been listed among the Politico 50, as one of “fifty people across the country who are most influencing the national political debate.”
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviewed in the United States on April 21, 2016
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
So, with evictions on my mind, I found this book, thinking that it might be a good overview of the subject, and, in general, have some historic perspectives and data, give some examples of specific evictions, and on and on in this vein. That is not how the book goes. But that does not mean that I did not appreciate the book, for my purposes, in the end. I did and do. I found the book to be a compelling read.
Most of the book takes place between May 2008 and December 2009. And the author points out that most poor households pay up to 50% or more for their rent. He also tells us that landlords are the ones that decide who lives where, racially, financially, socially.
But, in fact, the first 300 pages of the book pretty much only involve the details of the lives of eight tenant households in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All of them are very familiar with evictions. Most will face them, over and over again.
In many ways, the eight tenant households featured in the book are their own worst enemies. These are not the typical working-class households, who, because of periodic hard times, find themselves behind on rent. No, most of these folks have problems with drugs, mental illness, and all kinds of issues. They are, for the most part, adults who are going nowhere in life, mainly due to no fault but their own.
Weaved into all this are details of a landlord couple, who are very good at what they do, are making a ton of money doing it, and love the business they are in. And along the way, there are dozens of gotchas in the book, which, in some ways, is written as a mystery novel that emits clues to its outcome, as it goes.
The author devoted several years of his life to the subject of evictions and writing the book. In kind of a Barbara Ehrenreich thing (“Nickel and Dimed”), he actually lived in the trailer park, named the College Home Mobile Park, for several months, where much of the action takes place. He describes the area as “the part of Milwaukee where poor white folks lived.” Milwaukee at that time was on the list of one of the most segregated cities in the U.S.
He drove some of the renters around the city, looking for new apartments to rent, as they lacked cars or other vehicles. He got to know them, and they came to trust him. Actually, they, for the most part, were so up to their ears in drama and personal issues that they did not have any time to wish him harm or really figure him out. They knew he was writing a book, and that they were the subjects. They knew that he came from another world. They also had no time to try to figure out inequality. They only knew it for a fact.
Also in the mix of the first 300 pages is the owner of the trailer park. He, like the landlord couple featured, is making a ton of money, and his relationships with his tenants is of interest. They know that he is rich, off their backs, but they seem to wish him no ill will. They respect him for who he is and what he has to do. The owner prides himself on being able to make good money off his tenants, in one of the city’s poorest trailer park. Somewhat frequently, tenants would leave their trailers behind, as they left, one way or the other. The owner would then reclaim them, as “abandoned property,” and be free to rent them to others, which he did.
This owner found himself, as a result of his business, in the top one percent of earner households, knowing that most of his tenants were in the bottom ten percent. He earned roughly $500,000 after all expenses.
Looking back through the book, I can remember the various tenants that have been introduced. Most live in the trailer park, but not all. Some know each other, but not all know each other. Most have kids, which makes the stress of keeping a roof over one’s head more stressful. Most with kids fear losing their kids to Protective Services.
There are several evictions detailed. On the day of the event, the Sheriff would arrive with a gun, as the moving guys pulled up, this all being done by court order. If the tenant was present, the tenant would be given a choice: truck or curb. Truck meant taking the furniture and other goods to a storage place, where the tenant would have to pay monthly for storage, then a good hunk of money to get the stuff out of storage. Per the author, about 70% of those having items sent to storage never get it back. They are not allowed to take some things out, unless they are fully paid up on the storage unit.
At the eviction site, the tenant has he choices of what to have removed and what to be sent to storage, or what is to be left behind. The landlord, then, has the choice of removing or retaining the remaining items. Many times, the tenants would already have left the unit, and would not be there when the eviction was in progress. What they left behind would be salvaged by the landlord or the moving company, or just sent to the dump. No questions asked.
One story told was that of a man who asked the movers to give him a last minute inside his house. Once inside, he shot himself to death.
I told you there were gotchas.
The moving guys could do several moves per day. They could clean out a place within an hour. Again, they would commonly not be on the hook to take everything. The landlord would be involved in those decisions, because, in many cases, she would have already the unit rented to another group. One of the rules of the trade, per one of the moving guys, was to never open the refrigerator. You do not want to know what might be inside, or how it smelled.
Many times, after the eviction, the tenants had only a shelter to go to. There, they would try to get themselves together and to start the process of finding their next home. Sometimes, tenants would meet other tenants there in the shelter and decide to combine incomes in their search for a new place to rent.
At that time, in Milwaukee, there was a dwindling supply of very low-cost rentals, so tenants might have to make up to 100 calls and look at dozens of units before finding their next home. Landlords always asked about prior evictions, but sometimes chose to ignore these. Sometimes the tenants just plain got lucky. But, most of the time, the group featured in the book would find a way to face eviction again.
There are also many stories about how tenants needing money would lean on friends or family. But they could not always go after the same persons. And, at times, they decided they would rather be evicted that beg for money, again. In one case, a woman decided to be evicted, rather than sell her jewelry, even though she knew that would raise enough money to avoid eviction. And then there were always the stalling techniques, like that money was coming soon to enable the tenant to pay the rent, even when that was not true.
There is also the story of how neighbors might bring lawn chairs out to witness the eviction, to not miss the details of the event. And after an eviction at the trailer park, it was common for other tenants to go to the then-vacant unit to scavenge what was left.
To the credit of the landlord couple in the book, they had no interest, for the most part, in evicting anyone. They would come for their rent, in person, so they got to know their tenants well. They would accept partial payments, at times, hear the hardship stories, but remain firm, like a parent to a child, in warning the tenants of their fate, if they screwed up or got too far behind in rent.
Evictions commonly resulted following police calls and/or incidents with other tenants. Many of the rental sites had multiple units. If one tenant caused disturbances with another, one had to go. If there were too many police calls, or if city inspectors found the unit to be uninhabitable, due to conditions caused by the tenants, they probably had to go.
At the same time, the landlords in the story had their flaws. They were not always quick to respond to complaints, a common one being of water not draining. In some cases, this was due to old pipes; in other cases, the plumber would blame the stoppage on grease or other food debris being poured down a sink. Sometimes there would be no hot water. But the landlord couple had money, and they frequently took trips, like to Jamaica. They would be out of town. They also liked to gamble, to spend money. Like I said above, they were good at what they did. They liked to think that they had the right to enjoy the profits.
In some cases, it was disclosed that the landlord would move ahead with an eviction, knowing that she may be on the brink of selling the property, and wanting the current tenants out, before she sold. One property had a huge fire. The landlord simply used the fire-insurance money to buy another place.
Landlords hate code violations and city inspectors. They cost landlords money. And tenants know that they risk an eviction if they call for inspections.
This landlord couple prided themselves on buying rental property that would yield a positive cash flow from the start. In one case, they actually sold a property, at an inflated price, to a tenant, who was under a first-time-buyers’ program. When the new owner defaulted, the landlords bought the place back, at a nice discount.
In the process of an eviction, there is, of course, a court proceeding. In most cases, the tenants do not show up, so the landlord wins by default. And there are other ways to get tenants out, like paying them to leave, or taking off the front door, or sending some goons over to threaten them, if they do not leave on their own.
The name of the evil, successful landlord, who is Black, is Sherrena, which made me think of the evil Cruella De Vil of Disney fame. She sees evictions as a regular part of her business. Her story reveals that she bought her first rental in 1999, when prices were low, refinanced it some years later, to have a down payment for the next rental. Four years later, she owned 46 units. She found the banks more than willing to lend her to buy more and more But, she was always ready to tenants who were having trouble paying their rents that she had “mortgages to pay.”
She and her husband called themselves “inter-city entrepreneurs.”
The book points out that the profession of property managers has exploded over the past 40 years, and that the number of books on the subject was very limited before about 1975, after which it exploded, as well. In line with this, the book follows Sherrena to some property manager association meetings, where she is very active in giving advice to other landlords. She is seen as one of them who they can learn the latest tricks of the trade from.
An interesting historical disclosure in the book is that it was common after WWII for landlords to turn away families with children and to evict when someone was pregnant. The Fair Housing Act in 1968 set many of the rules we now find common, but, per the book, it did not define families with children as a “protected” class.
Also, after WWII, the federal government made homeownership for white families a priority, but not for Blacks. Landlords were quick to discover that profits could be made from rental units in slums. And even today, rental prices may not differ much between “good” areas and “bad” areas. Again, it is the landlords who decide who lives where, as well as what the prices for the rentals in each area should be.
Near the end of the book, the author makes the points that “The home is the wellspring of personhood” and that “The home remains the primary basis for life.” He goes on to say that this is the basis of “civic life.” But low-income families, commonly, move much more frequently than those with higher incomes. This is disruptive in many ways, including that their kids change schools, frequently. One woman featured in the book, with her kids, moved, on average of about once per year for many, many years.
Color is also involved. Black households are the most likely to be evicted, followed by Hispanics. And most who are evicted have children in the household. The author says that much of this is unnecessary. He points out that about 1/3 of renter households receive some form of government financial help; 2/3 do not. And, he says, legal assistance to the poor has been dwindling for at least a decade.
He says, “In theory, you could solve the problem by expanding public housing, tax credits, homeowner initiatives, or developer incentives.” But, he says, each of these have their limitations. He is clearly for reasonable rent controls and reasonable returns on investments for landlords.
The author says that he studies the subject of poverty as a graduate student. He was fascinated on poverty and its relationships to other things. This led him to focus on evictions. He soon moved into the trailer park, where he lived in a trailer without hot water. He could never get the landlord to fix the problem.
He found himself to be a bit of a field worker, one who was constantly overanalyzing things. He found a surprising lack of data or research to help him with the subject of evictions. He found he was needing to come up with such data on his own, by living among those who he could extract the data. He assumes what he learned in Milwaukee is applicable to most other American cities.
In summary, I think that this may prove to be an important book, historically and culturally. It tells many of us a great deal about a subject we do not know much about. I recommend that others read it, as well.
Do you really think that people with money will stand by while dopr addicts and other low life invade their neighborhoods. I have money enough to move away if my middle class neighborhood shows the first hint of going down hill. Socialogists and others can talk all they want about giving everyone a home but you can't force people with different incomes and values to live together. People with money can always just up and move away. Money always finds a way to protect itself better next time after every setback.
Also this book does a dis-service to the poor as well because it confirms so many horrible stereotypes. The illiterate uneducated un refined english of black folk the book strives so hard to shove down the readers throats. The white trash people in the trailer park stereotype was played up with equal zeal so the book is not racist.
Much as I don't want to admit it this book is abosolutely right and I can prove it in my own life. I'm black, I grew up in a stable home my family owned. My family owned its home paid off in full, had a car and my parents both had stable jobs. Growing up I never even saw an eviction so I did not even know what an eviction was. We always had lots of food in the house, the electricity, phone and water were never turned off because we did not pay. I was always clothed well. My shoes were always in good condition. Where I lived all black men went to work in the morning and it was fun to watch all the cars start up and zip off to work. I went to one school each in elementary, junior high and high school.
My parents taught me how to budget money, save and discipline myself in all things. My parents also taught me not to do bad things like kick teachers, do drugs or even hang with people who abused drugs. I don't feel the least bit sorry for the mom of the two bad boys who kicked the teacher and threw things out of the third floor windows of their nice apartment. She and her nasty kids got just what they deserved when tossed out like garbage. My parents taught me better than to kick teachers and toss things out of third floor windows. I wasn't beyond hurting teachers but only if they violently laid hands on me first as one shop teacher tried to do. Also the stereotype where poor folk are buying lobster and steak on food stamps \ SNAP was put out there.
I ride the #44 bus home from work at times because; being disabled I can't drive yet I make good money. I'd see so many bad kids who act like they are animals \ monsters but never understood why till now. This book showed me how bad kids are created. When I was a kid the worse thing we saw was the occassional drunk adult thats it. I did not even know what pot smelled like till I rode the #22 bus home from high school. I did not know my first IV drug addict till I met a poor high school friends step father who was a needle freak. Much of what these kids see today in this book was totally foriegn to me growing up.
Finally in my own life my parents gave me some rules for living on my own. FIRST ALWAYS PAY THE RENT FIRST... Why because you never want to be evicted. You can live without electricity, gas and phone. Building up after an eviction is extremely hard. Next pay the light then the phone bill. Pay gas & electricity next because you don't want the pipes to freeze which could get you evicted. Finally pay the phone so you can try to get yourself out of the bad situation by calling people and having a way for help to find you.
I lived on Section 8 for 14 years and I always paid my rent, gas, electricity and never got evicted. This book helps me understand why so many of my black friends tell me I took the white path to success. I have never been arrested, never been to prison or jail, never been evicted. I even had a little jive $500 limit creidt card living on disability. When I was looking for apartments I could move to the better parts of town because, I did not have any strikes against me. Oh Baltimore City Police stopped me often for the crime of being black in public as an autistic adult but I'm not into the druggie criminal scene and never was. So when programs had tight requirements like no criminal, eviction or drug abuse history I was undeterred. I never will forget there was a program that helped with college funding but it had a no dope addicts, no ex con cause so I applied since I wasn't a dope addict or an ex con. The guy taking the applications felt he'd have a bit of fun with me by saying theire would be a drug test that looked back a year. He lost all his joy when I gladly stepped forward rolling up my sleeve saying where do I go for the test. He was so sure I'd run away.
The reason I share my own life history here is this book opened my eyes. The reason I did well and so many black folk don't is because; growing up my parents gave us a stable home, lots of great food to eat, ample clothes and a good many luxuries by this books painful grinding poverty standards. My parents with their good jobs and stable hom purchased the luxury of being able to spend time with us teaching us budgeting, good citienship, manners, business sense, investing, the importance of education, job readiness skills, courtesy, proper written \ spoken english and so much more. I can talk with intelligence on most subjects because; my parents taught us to read about everything. I brought this book because; I honestly don't know what it is like for poor black and white people today. Reading this book will hurt your heart however. I had to put the book down a few times when some of the people made bad choices. No on made me madder than Scott who is white was a nurse and had EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!
Scott blew his life up because he wanted to and I find that amost unforgivable. I just don't understand Scott who had everything a LPN job making good money, nice home with all the trimmings and he just chooses to start abusing drugs what I putz. White men like Scott make me mad because; they choose to fail. A black man often gets arrested just because he is poor ignorant and black. A black lady gets evicted just because; she often has children & no money. But Scott he is WHITE, WELL EDUCATED, LPN NURSING DEGREE by black standards Scott was rich. Scott did not have his life taken away as most poor black folk do. Scoot threw his life away and while I hurt for him it is not the same.
Oh yeah this book will open your eyes because; this book keeps it real. Now the Epilogue is just a bunch of liberal garbage advocating for an Obamacare solution to the housing problem. Yeah as if giving every bum and bum-ette a house will magically make them into model citizens, it won't! It was not my parents house that made me a black autistic success story. My parents took the time to make me a quality educated, empowered person able to shape my own destiny by the grace of Almighty God. I am great only because my family invested time into making sure I stayed away from drugs, drug addicts, ex cons and other low life. The book is awesome and mostly right Eviction Poverty and Profit are a devils dance that destroy families, neighborhoods and lives but a house alone is not the answer. Many of the problems the people in this book face are the result of stupidity \ ignorance and lack of strategic \ tactical planning on a scale I would not have felt possible.
Top reviews from other countries
People on welfare should not be able to blow their entire month of food stamps on lobster. If you have a job you shouldn't be taking time off to help someone move and then you lose your job. If a child kicks a teacher the family should not be evicted because of that. Many times I let out an enormous sigh of frustration at the sheer stupidity and arbitrary actions. 'Crystal' needed serious intervention, not be left to cause mayhem and chaos.
I don't claim to know the answer to this massive social problem but providing basic needs, removing the threat of eviction, holding landlords to account, structured drug counseling - it would go a long way with a complete overhaul of the current system. It can be done with money that is currently being wasted.
Hard to believe that this book was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction 2017.
Although the author did his research in the USA, I could see correlations with experience of people in the UK.
















