
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Evolution of Christs and Christianities Paperback – March 7, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length650 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMarch 7, 2006
- Dimensions6 x 1.47 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101413497918
- ISBN-13978-1413497915
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Product details
- Publisher : Xlibris, Corp. (March 7, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 650 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1413497918
- ISBN-13 : 978-1413497915
- Item Weight : 1.95 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.47 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #12,494,645 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #18,380 in General History of Religion
- #24,167 in History of Religions
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star34%33%33%0%0%34%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star34%33%33%0%0%33%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star34%33%33%0%0%33%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star34%33%33%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star34%33%33%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2014I read this book a few years ago, as I was looking for authors who were trying to discern just what Eusebius did; what mischief did he set to pen in arguably the most important "history" ever written (due to the impact its legacy as an authentic, actual, history has had on the world).
I found in this work an excellent and long overdue analysis of Eusebius one that I hope Dr. Raskin or someone else can continue to flesh out.
Nothing but the outright rejection of E.H, as reliable history, and the relegation of it to a category or a "type" such as empire propaganda, just as the lists of martyrdoms and saints that serve only the churches purposes, will allow us to begin to see it as it should be seen.
And Jay opened that door wide and well.
Then he opened many doors wide, all well, some he may not have closed sure but that's what makes this so important.
Hes trying to get to the bottom of these mysteries in any way possible.
Lets hope he can write a book on Tertullian if he has time: there is a nut that really needs to be cracked.
Jay, your book changed my thinking and your style of writing will do that for others as well.
May life bring you the time to examine Tertullian.
It would be absurd not to. ;)
- Reviewed in the United States on July 30, 2006Jay Raskin analyzes the gospels through the lens of his background in film studies. Raskin's knowledge of film makes him more keenly aware than most that cuts and changes in film sequences are evidence that those film sequences were filmed at different times and later edited together for special narrative effects. So when Raskin sees what he takes to be similar types of narrative cuts and breaks in the gospel texts, he explores the idea that such narrative 'intercutting' is likewise evidence that those different story sections were originally composed at different times and subsequently woven together for the special narrative effect of the whole.
These original scenes that are so often disjointed, even contradictory, lacking a plausible narrative sequence, he argues, would originally have been composed within earlier narratives in such a way that would have made better sense than they currently do in our gospels. Later editors have selectively chosen some of these episodes and rearranged them over time to produce the gospels we know today.
By analyzing and deconstructing the 'intercut' narrative breaks and each narrative chunk Raskin believes that he can deduce the most likely original connections between these disjointed episodes. He writes: "I am doing narratological archaeology.... I use the jumps, contradictions and unusual constructions in sections of the narrative to reconstruct the earlier layers of that narrative." By thus reviewing then reconstructing these story elements into what are argued to be more plausible narratives settings, contexts and sequences, Raskin arrives at some astounding conclusions about the original stories from which the Christianity emerged:
-- early stories of John the Baptist were adapted into stories about Jesus
-- a crucified Samaritan magician named Simon was the source of the gospel crucifixion scenes
-- there existed a "proto-Christian" church led by James the Just who was esteemed as a martyred "christ-like" figure.
Raskin also builds on his "film deconstruction" technique with modern feminist literature studies (alongside references to Nag Hammadi gnostic texts) to argue that a woman (Mary?) wrote an early Christ play that may have been loosely based on real events
So from where did the current very different view of Christian origins derive? Raskin argues in an interesting opening chapter on the possibility of Eusebius being "the master constructor of the still dominant paradigm of Christian history." This is probably the most persuasive section of the work.
Raskin is approaching biblical studies as an outsider bringing new paradigms (derived from film and feminist literature studies) and asking fresh questions and arriving at radically different answers. His sources are predominantly web-based, and these are not inconsiderable with such a wealth of ancient documents now available on the internet.
Readers more familiar with much scholarship not available online that deals with many of these sources will wish Raskin took time to address its conclusions as well. By presenting new methods and answers without addressing longer established methods and solutions (explored most thoroughly offline), and arguing their comparative inadequacy, Raskin's book lacks full persuasiveness.
Raskin nevertheless admits many of his reconstructions "are problematical because we have no outside evidence for them." He counters, however, that "if we do not assume that such earlier narratives existed, we are left with a multitude of narratological problems....." (p.36)
Readers can expect to be challenged with original solutions to these 'narratological problems', with fresh paradigms for deconstructing and reconstructing the gospels, and with the implications these have for our understanding of Christian origins.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 30, 2006Bertrand Russell once stated that "Common sense leads to science and science shows that common sense is false."
Jay Raskin has taken apart a number of "common sense" ideas that have ruled the world of Biblical Scholarship for centuries. This book, extremely well written and extensively footnoted, traces a line of thought from a well documented alignment of critical analysis to an understanding of the gospels not seen before.
Dr. Raskin looks at Eusebius, commonly seen as the "writer of the early history of the church", and sees, not a writer of history, but a master forger, intent on guiding the future development of the Church as THE future development of THE Church.
This realization leads to a profound realization: "Once we see the unreality of Eusebian history, we lose many of our traditional sources for reconstructing Christian histories." (p. 20)
This leads to two striking parts to Dr. Raskin's book. The first is the use of the Internet as a resource for study. This book is an early user of this new tool and when the history of Biblical Scholarship is written, Dr. Raskin's book will be seen as an example of how this tool could be used to further scholarship.
The second part of Dr. Raskin's scholarship is the use of a tool to re-construct the stories of the gospels. It would be easy (and has been) to look ruefully to the sky when confronted by a falsified Eusebius and complain that we can never know now what the New Testament stories or the early history of the church are about.
It could be trivially stated that what follows is "A blending of science and art." This would certainly minimize what Dr. Raskin has done. The "art" of a master craftsman comes long after the craft has been mastered. Here is where Dr. Raskin has opened a new section for study.
Dr. Raskin looks at the gospel stories - and Josephus and others as well - as stories that have been rewritten to support the purposes seen in Eusebius. Using almost every methodologically sound technique around, Dr. Raskin reconstructs the stories, sometimes rewriting them, to arrive at what is both plausible and consistent.
In short, Dr. Raskin has given us a rubric, an objective guide using subjective judgements, to reconstructing the gospels and their true original intent.
For example (p. 384 - 385), Dr. Raskin looks at the "...days of John the Baptist" (a critical part of the thesis that Jesus is a construct) after the reconstruction of a particular first passage:
"The second passage here is more difficult to reconstruct. We may guess what has been changed by taking out the phrases that do not make sense if John is speaking:
"For the days of __________ until now, the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and men of violence take it by force..."
Dr. Raskin continues the quote and invokes a section of Malichi. He then continues:
"We may take it that the original writer had this passage in mind when he was talking about violence and Elijah. We can now fill in the blanks:
"From the days of Moses till now the kingdom of heaven has suffered violence, and men of violence take it by force..."
Obviously, this technique, like juggling scalpels, could lead to severe injury. Yet, this is where Dr. Raskin has seen where others before have not. He is a scholar of first rank and he has given his art in the form of first rate scholarship. His method is there to see. Those who disagree are more than able to use his own techniques in an attempt to undermine him. They do so at their own peril.
Dr. Raskin leads himself to several conclusions:
1. As earlier stated, Eusebius is history falsified for a particular end.
2. The role of Mary has been submerged in an attempt to wipe out the role of the female main character, this character being both involved in the story and to a major degree writing the story as a play.
3. The deconstruction of Mark and the other gospels discloses the origins of the stories about John being rewritten as the stories of Jesus, to the detriment of John.
4. The writers of the later material betray their surroundings to the detriment of the original ideas as Eusebius did.
I could list points for a much longer time - I even worry that I have compressed too much as it is - but Dr. Raskin's ideas are sound.
This book is not an attempt to give new meaning to old ideas, if "old ideas" are a pejorative for "if it is old it cannot be good". We have had far too many books that look at the New Testament with an idea towards rehabilitating discredited theory. The "old ideas" Dr. Raskin looks at are the "old ideas" of the original stories that have been hidden for over two thousand years.
This book is a fascinating road to travel, using a technique that has been in front of us for a long time. Dr. Raskin has performed a valuable service in writing this very useful book.
Charles Wilson






