Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

  • Apple
  • Android
  • Windows Phone
  • Android

To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.

The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality 1st Edition

3.4 out of 5 stars 5 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0195340990
ISBN-10: 019534099X
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Buy used On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
$37.88 On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
Buy new On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
$47.60 On clicking this link, a new layer will be open
More Buying Choices
15 New from $30.32 16 Used from $37.88
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Prime Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

$47.60 FREE Shipping or choose faster FREE Shipping with Amazon Prime In Stock. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
click to open popover

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
New York Times best sellers
Browse the New York Times best sellers in popular categories like Fiction, Nonfiction, Picture Books and more. See more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 424 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (September 25, 2008)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 019534099X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195340990
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 0.9 x 6.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,652,489 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

5 star
60%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
40%
See all 5 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
Typically, we wouldn't comment on a review of our own book. But Professor Dixson's review calls for exception, as he misrepresents arguments of our book, in some ways badly. Here, we clarify what we did write, and refer readers to pages or chapters where we wrote it.

1. Prof. Dixson implies that we claimed that women's estrus (and associated preferences) evolved as a strategy for seeking extra-pair copulation (EPC; see his pt. 3). We didn't. Human estrus, we argued, has a deep-time evolutionary origin dating to early vertebrates (chapter 8). Early humans hence possessed estrus prior to the evolution of human pair-bonding; estrus could not have originally evolved FOR EPC. Most of the evidence for homology in female preference during the fertile phase across mammalian species (including humans) we discuss has nothing to do with EPC (chapters 8, 9).

2. Nonetheless, human estrus, in some form (even if in some ways diminished), has been maintained since the evolution of pair-bonding (chapter 10). The question of whether estrous adaptations have been modified in the context of biparental care in humans is an open one. We propose that in some ways they have (chapters 10-12). We never suggest, however, that EPC is or has been rampant in human history (his pts. 2, 4), and our views don't imply it (pp. 239-241, 293-295). Indeed, we explicitly discuss evidence that it's rare (pp. 311-314), which leads us to question Prof. Dixson's statement that he read our book "carefully."

3. Relatedly, we explicitly emphasize the importance of paternal care to women's fitness (chapter 4) and, hence, the costs of EPC (e.g., pp. 307-311). In fact, we repeatedly argue that EPC rates are low precisely because of these costs (pp. 293-295, 311-314, 327). We're stunned that Prof.
Read more ›
2 Comments 41 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
I light of keeping this brief, Dixson doesn't know what he's talk about and misrepresents the views of these authors consistently.

This is a must have for any serious student of evolution.
Comment 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Great resource for scholars of human mating strategies (including both short-term mating and long-term mating strategies).
Comment 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
In 1900 Walter Heape wrote an influentual article about oestrus in mammals. He remarked that " it is during oestrus, and only at that time,that the female is willing to receive the male." The term thus came to be associated with the limited period of sexual receptivity or "heat" shown by females of many mammals, around the time of ovulation. In rats, dogs, or sheep, as examples, ovarian hormones ( oestrogen and progesterone) control the onset and duration of female receptivity. Removal of the ovaries renders the female unreceptive to males, and unlikely to invite mating. Women do not have such a limited period of sexual receptivity, and nor do the monkeys and apes in general. The anthropoid primates do not exhibit oestrus, therefore, as they are not rigidly dependent upon ovarian hormones for the expression of sexual behaviour.

Yet, according to Thornhill and Gangestad, women DO exhibit oestrus. Thus, these authors propose that women shift their mating preferences during the fertile (peri-ovulatory) phase of the menstrual cycle, to favour men with more masculinized faces (or other traits) indicative of superior genes. The reason for this, we are told, is that women seek partners with "better genes" when they are likely to conceive, and they will engage in extra-pair copulations (EPCs) to obtain them for their offspring, should their long-term (eg marriage) partner lack "good genes" in sufficient degree.

I have read this book carefully, and I reject its conclusions for the following reasons.

1. Cyclical changes in women's sexual thoughts, feelings and behaviour do occur during menstrual cycles, but they are subtle, and subject to enormous individual and situation-dependent variations.
Read more ›
2 Comments 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: Paperback
As a student using this textbook to understand the evolutionary biology of human female sexuality, I find this book to be a "hard" read. There are many misuse/ unnecessary uses of words, typos, and incomplete sentences or thoughts.

I would not recommend this book to anyone.

I love to learn and research new information, this textbook leaves me utterly irritated.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Set up an Amazon Giveaway

The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality
Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Learn more about Amazon Giveaway
This item: The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality