- Hardcover: 256 pages
- Publisher: Oxford University Press; 1 edition (March 16, 2011)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0199765332
- ISBN-13: 978-0199765331
- Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 1 x 6.3 inches
- Shipping Weight: 5.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,947,198 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Executive Unbound: After the Madisonian Republic 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
There is a newer edition of this item:
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers who bought this item also bought
"A refreshingly straightforward case that the modern presidency is unconstrained by law--and that you should like it that way. Even those who...disagree vehemently with the latter proposition will find Posner and Vermuele's arguments provocative and challenging." --American Conservative
"Powerfully argued, this book is an important part of the debate over presidential power in the present world." --Choice
"Provocative." --American Prospect.org
"A thought-provoking book." -- Library Journal
"This is a book that will, for many readers, both illuminate and infuriate. It is the most full-throated embrace in recent years of the very important (and always controversial) jurisprudential theories associated with Carl Schmitt, particularly with regard to the accretion of power in the Executive Branch. If their views become widely accepted, American law--or at least the American legal academy--will never be the same again." --Sanford Levinson, author of Our Undemocratic Constitution
"This exciting, contrarian, and learned book challenges the core of liberal legalism." --Jack Goldsmith, author of The Terror Presidency
"In a relentlessly challenging attack on Madisonian pieties, Posner and Vermeule use contemporary examples to argue with verve and style that only politics can realistically check the inevitable dominance of the modern executive." --Charles Fried, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
"Opponents of presidential power may be discomfited by Posner and Vermeule's argument that the imperial presidency is unavoidable in the modern world. Proponents of presidential power may be equally discomfited by the authors' argument that presidential power is constrained in practice by politics. Both sides will find it difficult to identify the cracks in a provocative argument with which everyone interested in the twenty-first century Constitution must contend." --Mark Tushnet, Professor of Law, Harvart Law School, and author of Why the Constitution Matters
"The title of Posner and Vermeule's book is as provocative as its argument, since the executive is, on their view, bound--but by politics, not law. If they are right, then standard courses in law school should be re-titled 'Constitutional Politics' and 'Administrative Politics', not to mention 'International Politics', and perhaps even moved out of the law schools and into political science departments. For that reason alone, there will be strong resistance to their book's central thesis, which is the mark of a highly successful work." --David Dyzenhaus, Professor of Law and Philosophy, University of Toronto, and author of Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems
About the Author
Eric A. Posner is Kirkland and Ellis Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School, and is the author of The Perils of Global Legalism, Terror in the Balance (written with Vermeule), and Climate Change Justice, among other books.
Adrian Vermeule is John H. Watson Jr. Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, and is the author of Law and the Limits of Reason, Mechanisms of Democracy, and Judging Under Uncertainty, and is the co-author with Posner of Terror in the Balance.
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
What I liked the most of it is not the position itself, but the novel (and in my mind extremely insightful) way in which they propose to look at standard topics in constitutional law and theory, such as separation of powers, checks and balances, etc.
I'm offended that these people teach law - and in such noble institutions to boot.
If you would like to see a government ruled by the fickle nature of the people (and mainstream ideals), while the minorities (which were the purpose of having checks and balances, rather than flighty knee-jerk actions in leaders) suffer from majority rule, then by all means, read this drivel.
Laws that govern a land should take time to change. There needs to be a balance and not one person making such important decisions. Civil and World Wars may have their exceptions, bu they need to be just that, exceptions - not the rule.