Stanley Kubrick is my patron saint. In my mind, he is one of, if not the greatest, filmmaker of all time. My first Kubrick experience occured when I was in high school. I was over at a friend's house, and the film that he was watching was THE SHINING. I had never seen anything like it in my life. Not only was it scary as hell - it was - but the sheer inventiveness of the film making stunned me. I started noticing the tracking shots. Most of the film is a series of long tracking shots and zooms. They were all beautifully executed and framed. The lighting also struck me. It was different than what I had been used to, and I liked it. The beauty of this film was in the simplicity of how it was put together. There was simply no need for the MTV-style editing that had become so popular with the "cut, cut, cut, cut" mentality of the time, which was quite pervasive, and was growing tiresome. Kubrick would simply set up the shot, and let the actors act. There were no distractions, and the story simply told itself. I was hooked, and it instantly became one of my favorite films. I've probably seen it more than fifty times.
Later on, I discovered A CLOCKWORK ORANGE and FULL METAL JACKET. Both of these films resembled THE SHINING in their meticulous attention to detail, and not only that, but the films were rich, not exclusively in a technical sense, but on an intellectual level as well. The best thing about watching a Kubrick film is the thought process that you go through afterwards, when you reflect on what you have just seen. You get to peel back all of the intricate layers, and sometimes you don't even realize what you have just seen until the fifth or sixth viewing...which moves me on to Kubrick's final film, EYES WIDE SHUT.
Principal photography for this film lasted for 400 days, and it was entered into the Guinness Book of World Records as the "longest constant movie shoot". Obviously with this film, as with every other film that Kubrick made, time was no obstacle. Only someone with Stanley's track record could have pulled that off. Furthermore, if he was anything at all, he was a perfectionist. He pushed his crew and his actors, pushed them so that he could get the best that they had to offer. If the performances of some of his actors seem overplayed, it's only because "naturalistic" acting never appealed much to Kubrick, as he would always say, "Natural is good, interesting is better." The "interesting" aspect would come after fifty or sixty takes of the same scene. He would bring his actors to the point where they literally had nothing else to give, and then that was oftentimes the take that he would use. Filming on EYES WIDE SHUT played out like this, and thank the heavens that it did, because the final product was nothing short of another masterpiece.
The thing that separates EYES WIDE SHUT apart from the rest of Kubrick's filmography could be summed up in one word: hope. Yes, you read that correctly! EYES WIDE SHUT is a very hopeful film! Kubrick was often accused of seeing the dark side of human nature. This would be correct. His films are extremely pessimistic, in that they hone in on the dark side of human nature. Humans are portrayed as weak, ignorant, stupid, and beyond redemption. Most of the time, he was just being honest, and that was hard for many to stomach. But here, in his last film, he embraces themes of passion, commitment, loyalty, and even love. The whole film is a cautionary tale about the dangers of marriage, the temptation of adultery, and how important it is to hold tight to your spouse, taking nothing for granted. After all, we are human. Any one of us can be tempted at any given time. No one is exempt from that. Kubrick understood this. He also understood that divorce rates were through the roof, and that close friends of his had cheated on their spouses. All he had to do was turn on the television to see the latest celebrity scandal or divorce drama. These were situations that were very timely, very relevant to 1999, and even more so, today. Stanley Kubrick understood and respected the institution of marriage, and was, as far as anyone knows, faithful to his wife until the end. Somewhere along the line, however, he felt compelled to make this film, particularly after reading "Traumnovelle", a 1926 novella by Arthur Schnitzler.
What we have here is the story of Dr. Bill and Alice Hartford, a upper class, married couple with a young daughter. When the film opens, they are getting dressed and prepared for a prestigious Christmas party that they have been invited to by one of Bill's patients. Alice gets up from the toilet, adjusts her hair, and asks Bill a simple question, "How do I look?", to which Bill replies "It's great". He's not paying her any attention, as he adjusts his tie in the mirror. "You're not even looking at it," she says. Bill turns around, and robotically tells her, "you're beautiful. You always look beautiful". It is here, during the very opening moments of the film, that we are able to see Dr. Bill's major flaw: he doesn't really appreciate his wife. They've been married for years, and, apparently, the act of complimenting his wife has now become routine. On to the party. Once Bill and Alice reach the party, their host comes over to greet them, and we then dissolve to Bill and Alice lovingly dancing together, musing and asking themselves why they were even invited to this overblown party in the first place. Bill sees an old friend of his, and takes off. In the meantime, Alice grabs a glass of champagne and waits by the bar. Out of nowhere, a strange Hungarian man comes over and starts to flirt. It's obvious what he wants from the start. He attempts to wear her down in her drunken state. "Don't you think one of the charms of marriage is that it makes deception a necessity for both parties?", he asks Alice. He has her cornered, and eventually, after several of his advances, she reminds him that she is married and walks away. Meanwhile, in another part of the house, Bill walks down the hall with two models hanging on each arm. Their game of seduction begins. "Don't you want to go where the rainbow ends?", they both ask. Bill isn't quite sure what they are asking, but he catches the hint. At that moment, he gets summoned by someone else, and he leaves the two temptresses to themselves.
So, Bill and Alice have both remained faithful, and resisted temptation, for now. Later on that night, and with the help of a joint, Alice starts questioning Bill about the two women that he was with. He tells her that it was nothing, that they were just two dumb models. She also takes it upon herself to tell him of the Hungarian man that tried to seduce her. Bill tells her that it's only natural for men to feel that way. She's beautiful, after all. There's not much jealousy in his response. This sets Alice off, and she goes into a tirade. Bill, in his ignorance, also makes the statement that women don't think the way that men do, as far as sexual matters. She stops him dead in his tracks, and tells him that when they were vacationing the year before, she made eye contact with a young naval officer. She goes on to say that it was only a glance, but that she would have been willing to give up her family and her life for one night with him. She came to her senses, but the fact remains that the thought of infidelity was on her mind, and she could have acted on it.
From here on, Bill becomes insanely jealous. He realizes that his wife isn't just a prop. She is capable of hurting him, and he sets out to prove that he is just as capable as she is. He goes out on the town, and his journey into the sexual underworld begins. He is faced with temptation the entire night, but every time he is close to giving in, he is interrupted. One interruption happens to come in the form of a phone call from his wife. However, he proceeds and is determined to explore, almost hoping that an opportunity to be unfaithful will present itself. Before the night is over, he ends up at a masked, pagan orgy filled with powerful members of society. Here, he sees just how sick and depraved the idea of infidelity is. It's so fitting that the password to get into the house is "fidelio" - "faithful". It is exactly the opposite. This scene, probably one of the most controversial scenes in film history, is not sexually enticing at all. It's ugly and horrific. It's a picture of hell on earth. It represents the evil that is adultery and sexual debauchery. The scene plays like something out of "Rosemary's Baby".
The core of the film is in the last few moments, where Bill confesses to Alice of his night time journey. His eyes are filled with tears. "I'll tell you everything. I'll tell you everything!", he tells her.
The last scene takes place in a shopping mall. Bill and Alice's daughter runs around looking at dolls, while they talk amongst themselves about recent events. "The fact is that we are both awake now," Alice says, "and I do love you." She then suggests that they go home as soon as possible to have sex. This scene is powerful and brutally raw in it's honesty. In Kubrick's only love story, he has taught us the importance of the covenant of marriage, and how it is important to treasure your husband or your wife. There is such a thing as healthy jealousy, and both Bill and Alice have learned this valuable lesson by the film's conclusion. They will strive to keep each other away from the darkness, to appreciate one another, taking nothing for granted.
The controversy that surrounded this film was predictable. The orgy scene is twenty minutes of Sodom and Gomorrah. It is brutally honest in it's raw portrayal of sexual debauchery. However, I feel that, as repulsive as this scene is, it is a necessary evil which is needed to convey the depravity that we live amongst. Sexual immorality is not pretty. It should not be presented as such on film. Kubrick was never a prude when it came to pulling us out of our comfort zones. He was always honest, no matter how much it hurt or how ugly we thought it was. If you look closely at each one of his films, they all have a moral center. He was not pleased with the way that he saw the world, and like us, he wanted things to change.
"In a modern world that is rife with infidelity, lies, hedonism and sexual decadence Stanley is encouraging us all to throw away our masks and take a good look in the mirror. His final and most underestimated masterpiece is a call for an end to all forms of secrecy, be they personal, social or political." - Rob Ager, from his essay, "Unseen Reflections"
Tragically, Stanley Kubrick died two weeks after the release of EYES WIDE SHUT. He was quite pleased with the final product. Like all of Kubrick's films, it opened to mixed response from the critics. Over time, this film has aged like a fine wine. That's the thing about his films. They get better with age, and as Steven Spielberg said in an interview, "They tend to grow on you." I have personally found this to be true. Every time you watch one, you learn something new, or you see something that you had never noticed before, and who knows, you may learn something about yourself.
It is in this way that Stanley Kubrick left a legacy. He will never be forgotten and his films will live on, decade after decade, and will remain classics. Funny that he has a classic in just about every genre of film that there is.
How many directors can pull that off?
Buy new:
$27.89$27.89
FREE delivery:
Wednesday, Jan 4
Ships from: Steaze Trading Sold by: Steaze Trading
Buy new:
$27.89$27.89
FREE delivery:
Wednesday, Jan 4
Ships from: Steaze Trading
Sold by: Steaze Trading
Save with Used - Very Good
$7.70$7.70
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Jan 4 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: RecordSelectorLV
Save with Used - Very Good
$7.70$7.70
FREE delivery: Wednesday, Jan 4 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon
Sold by: RecordSelectorLV
Other Sellers on Amazon
Added
Not added
$27.84
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by: G&J_books
Sold by: G&J_books
(2153 ratings)
95% positive over last 12 months
95% positive over last 12 months
In stock.
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Shipping rates and Return policy Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Added
Not added
$27.99
& FREE Shipping
& FREE Shipping
Sold by: Donahue sales
Sold by: Donahue sales
(23 ratings)
91% positive over last 12 months
91% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates and Return policy Have one to sell?
Image Unavailable
Image not available for
Color:
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Eyes Wide Shut [Blu-ray]
Rated: Format: Blu-ray
R
IMDb7.5/10.0
$27.89$27.89
$7.70$7.70
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE Returns
Return this item for free
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
How to return the item?
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
| Additional Blu-ray options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
Watch Instantly with
| Rent | Buy |
Enhance your purchase
Frequently bought together
![Eyes Wide Shut [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51-9lHXMfsL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
- +
- +
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Product Description
controversial film which stars tom cruise and nicole kidman.
Product details
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : R (Restricted)
- Package Dimensions : 7.1 x 5.42 x 0.58 inches; 2.88 Ounces
- Media Format : Blu-ray
- Subtitles: : English, French, Spanish
- Studio : WARNER HOME VIDEO
- ASIN : B000Q6ZG6G
- Best Sellers Rank: #257,099 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #56,342 in Blu-ray
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
7,992 global ratings
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
5.0 out of 5 stars
Unrated Two-Disc Special Edition
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2009
I think the Amazon product picture for this DVD is wrong. The Amazon product page shows exactly the same picture as the United States censored version (Eyes Wide Shut (2-disc Special Edition)). I've uploaded images of the DVD box I actually received (click "See customer images").
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2009
Images in this review
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on December 13, 2007
65 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on January 10, 2005
Stanley Kubrick spent the last years of his life working on this film. And by the time Eyes Wide Shut went into general release in the United States, the director was already deceased, giving his final project the cachet of a farewell gesture-or perhaps a Last Judgment, since the Dies Irae from the Mozart Requiem can be heard at one point on the soundtrack. Yet its long awaited appearance turned out to be something of an anticlimax when most of the pre-release gossip turned out to be unjustified. No dazzling spectacle in the vein of 2001: A Space Odyssey nor even A Clockwork Orange, Eyes Wide Shut (made available here as part of Warner Home Video's excellent set of Kubrick's films) was first of all a fable for the approaching millennium, directed with a breathtaking désinvolture that still seems astonishing several years later. One day, I hope, Eyes Wide Shut will be recognized as one of the most beautiful works in the history of the cinema.
Only in bad works of art or the artifacts of pop culture is it possible to make a facile distinction between the periphery of a work and its core. In an imaginative creation like Kubrick's last film, the limits of the core extend to its furthermost boundaries just as what could at first glance seem peripheral penetrates to its innermost recesses. Already, the opening shots of the Harfords in their stylish apartment getting ready to go out for a soiree go far beyond simply establishing a setting. The least that could be said about these powerfully iridescent, Ophulsian compositions set to music by Shostakovitch is how much more than functional they are: rather than simply establishing a particular locale, they serve to introduce us to a perversely enchanted world. The mise en scène is incantatory, but the spirits it is calling up are those of high-tech consumerism.
In these images, the décor glows with a maleficent radiance, making of the Harfords themselves little more than the props of their own property. Small wonder that such a culture finds the culmination of its most refined pleasures in the celebration of a Black Mass at a mansion on Long Island--movie trivia buffs will not fail to notice a visual allusion to Alfred Hitchcock's North by Northwest--attended by the crème de la crème of the rich, famous, and powerful, a ritual which blasphemously travesties the Christmas festivities taking place at the same moment and which has striking parallels to the events of de Sade's The 120 Days of Sodom in both its literary version and its much later screen adaptation by Pier Paolo Pasolini, Salò o le 120 giornati di Sodoma (1975).
In the milieu in which the Harfords move, reified to the last degree, success is all a matter of remaining on the surface of things, and Bill Harford has thoroughly mastered that skill. But the surface begins to crack open one evening when his wife relates a fantasy about sleeping with a Naval officer they had briefly glimpsed at a resort. Bill reacts violently to this confession, insisting that he has never had similar fantasies of his own. But he cannot exorcise the images she has planted in his mind and they soon begin to take shape on the screen. Moreover, this fantasy which increasingly obsesses Harford opens up to a larger world of collective desires underlying the beautiful realm of surfaces in which Bill wishes to remain happily imprisoned. Forced to confront that underworld by series of encounters involving the daughter of a patient, a prostitute, and ultimately a Satanist coven, he can only reject it as a mystery.
The phrase "eyes wide shut" is virtually an etymological gloss on the word "mystery." In the words of Carl Kerényi (in his essay "The Mysteries of the Kabeiroi"), "The source of the term 'Mysteria'--as also of 'mystes' and 'mystikos'--consists in a verb whose ritual significance is 'to initiate' (µυeΐν), developed from the verb µύeιν, 'to close the eyes or mouth.'" He goes on to add, "the Mysteria begin for the mystes when, as sufferer of the event (µυούµeνος), he closes his eyes, falls back as it were into his own darkness, enters into the darkness." And is there anything less enigmatic about an audience sitting in a darkened theater, an audience which also could be said to fall back as it were into its own darkness, to enter its darkness--to borrow Kerenyi's formulation--watching this spectacle being enacted on screen?
It is Bill's friend, the musician Nick Nightingale who tells him of playing at an event whose specifics are unclear to him, since he has to play blindfolded. Nevertheless, the few details he has been able to spy upon after the blindfold slightly fell from his eyes the last time he performed rouse Bill's interest, and he demands to go along to the event. When Harford, the non-initiate, violates this mystery, he not only disrupts its performance, but commits a crime which can only be atoned for by a human sacrifice--that of the young woman whom Harford has previously rescued from a drug overdose at the fancy party the evening before.
Yet there is little mystery about this mystery, which continues in a perhaps more explicit vein the theme of archaic regression that recurs throughout Kubrick's work--perhaps most arrestingly in 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which modern technology is presented as an outgrowth of the anthropoids' fetishization of the black obelisk which has descended to them from the heavens like the stone given by Gabriel to Abraham enshrined in the Kaaba. Civilization is constantly haunted by the specter of the barbaric past it has never been able to overcome, and the cult in Eyes Wide Shut is only a final incarnation of this key motif which Kubrick employed here for last time. After that death had the final word: Acta est fabula!
Only in bad works of art or the artifacts of pop culture is it possible to make a facile distinction between the periphery of a work and its core. In an imaginative creation like Kubrick's last film, the limits of the core extend to its furthermost boundaries just as what could at first glance seem peripheral penetrates to its innermost recesses. Already, the opening shots of the Harfords in their stylish apartment getting ready to go out for a soiree go far beyond simply establishing a setting. The least that could be said about these powerfully iridescent, Ophulsian compositions set to music by Shostakovitch is how much more than functional they are: rather than simply establishing a particular locale, they serve to introduce us to a perversely enchanted world. The mise en scène is incantatory, but the spirits it is calling up are those of high-tech consumerism.
In these images, the décor glows with a maleficent radiance, making of the Harfords themselves little more than the props of their own property. Small wonder that such a culture finds the culmination of its most refined pleasures in the celebration of a Black Mass at a mansion on Long Island--movie trivia buffs will not fail to notice a visual allusion to Alfred Hitchcock's North by Northwest--attended by the crème de la crème of the rich, famous, and powerful, a ritual which blasphemously travesties the Christmas festivities taking place at the same moment and which has striking parallels to the events of de Sade's The 120 Days of Sodom in both its literary version and its much later screen adaptation by Pier Paolo Pasolini, Salò o le 120 giornati di Sodoma (1975).
In the milieu in which the Harfords move, reified to the last degree, success is all a matter of remaining on the surface of things, and Bill Harford has thoroughly mastered that skill. But the surface begins to crack open one evening when his wife relates a fantasy about sleeping with a Naval officer they had briefly glimpsed at a resort. Bill reacts violently to this confession, insisting that he has never had similar fantasies of his own. But he cannot exorcise the images she has planted in his mind and they soon begin to take shape on the screen. Moreover, this fantasy which increasingly obsesses Harford opens up to a larger world of collective desires underlying the beautiful realm of surfaces in which Bill wishes to remain happily imprisoned. Forced to confront that underworld by series of encounters involving the daughter of a patient, a prostitute, and ultimately a Satanist coven, he can only reject it as a mystery.
The phrase "eyes wide shut" is virtually an etymological gloss on the word "mystery." In the words of Carl Kerényi (in his essay "The Mysteries of the Kabeiroi"), "The source of the term 'Mysteria'--as also of 'mystes' and 'mystikos'--consists in a verb whose ritual significance is 'to initiate' (µυeΐν), developed from the verb µύeιν, 'to close the eyes or mouth.'" He goes on to add, "the Mysteria begin for the mystes when, as sufferer of the event (µυούµeνος), he closes his eyes, falls back as it were into his own darkness, enters into the darkness." And is there anything less enigmatic about an audience sitting in a darkened theater, an audience which also could be said to fall back as it were into its own darkness, to enter its darkness--to borrow Kerenyi's formulation--watching this spectacle being enacted on screen?
It is Bill's friend, the musician Nick Nightingale who tells him of playing at an event whose specifics are unclear to him, since he has to play blindfolded. Nevertheless, the few details he has been able to spy upon after the blindfold slightly fell from his eyes the last time he performed rouse Bill's interest, and he demands to go along to the event. When Harford, the non-initiate, violates this mystery, he not only disrupts its performance, but commits a crime which can only be atoned for by a human sacrifice--that of the young woman whom Harford has previously rescued from a drug overdose at the fancy party the evening before.
Yet there is little mystery about this mystery, which continues in a perhaps more explicit vein the theme of archaic regression that recurs throughout Kubrick's work--perhaps most arrestingly in 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which modern technology is presented as an outgrowth of the anthropoids' fetishization of the black obelisk which has descended to them from the heavens like the stone given by Gabriel to Abraham enshrined in the Kaaba. Civilization is constantly haunted by the specter of the barbaric past it has never been able to overcome, and the cult in Eyes Wide Shut is only a final incarnation of this key motif which Kubrick employed here for last time. After that death had the final word: Acta est fabula!
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Ahmed
5.0 out of 5 stars
Illuminati
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on September 15, 2018
Ich finde die Rezensionen hier relativ treffend, doch beim Fazit graut es mir - wenn ich merke wie fehlinterpritiert das ganze werden kann. Stanley Kubrick zeigt durchaus eine gewisse Gesellschaftskritik an dem sexuellen Verhalten der Menschen, doch nicht das hat ihn am Ende sein Leben gekostet. Es wurden 24 Minuten des Films rausgeschnitten, nachdem sich Kubrik nicht einsichtig zeigen konnte. Er wollte das Verhalten der Eliten aufdecken und zeigen welche Macht diese Menschen besitzen. Die Szenen in dem Kostümladen beispielsweise spielen auf Eltern an, die bereit wären ihre Kinder an Ruhm und Reichtum (Hollywood) zu verkaufen. Er hatte wahrscheinlich noch intensiver vorgehabt darauf einzugehen - doch werden wir das ausgeschnitte Material nie zu Gesicht bekommen.
Ich bitte die Leute hier, die den Film und seinen Regisseur ebenso respektieren wie viele andere, die Umstände kennenzulernen um Kubriks WAHRE Botschaft zu verstehen.
Nicht umsonst suchter er sich als Elitenschauplatz das Schloss der Rothschilds aus.
- God bless you all
Ich bitte die Leute hier, die den Film und seinen Regisseur ebenso respektieren wie viele andere, die Umstände kennenzulernen um Kubriks WAHRE Botschaft zu verstehen.
Nicht umsonst suchter er sich als Elitenschauplatz das Schloss der Rothschilds aus.
- God bless you all
Throda tzen
5.0 out of 5 stars
“They did a bad, bad thing!” [menu intro song]
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on July 16, 2017
In this 1999 adult mystery drama Dr. Bill Harford [Tom Cruise] and Alice [Nicole Kidman] are both ‘hit on’ at a Christmas party. After a frank argumentative discussion Alice’ fantasies are revealed causing Tom to question his own fantasies with other people, but where will it end?
Personally, I wouldn’t class this as an erotic movie, it has adult content and lots of nudity but it’s more about controlling desires, sexuality and trust rather than eroticism. Starting off in a warm fuzzy orange this creates a dreamy, affluent and seemingly carefree world where the background colours reflect the current plot mode, green for jealousy etc, as the story unfolds. Well written and directed with amazing camera work [albeit in a TV format], this never really reaches a ‘run’ tending to stroll along at an even pace which is all part of its charm, although many may complain that it is slow and plodding.
The single disc offers play, scene selection, special features [cast & crew, interviews with Cruise, Kidman and Spielburg] and Tv spots [Jealousy, combo] and Languages [English soundtrack (the only option!), subtitles in English, Arabic, Russian, Romanian, English hearing impaired, off]. Rated 18 this has nudity and a woman using a toilet within the first 2 minutes and full frontal in the first 15, and with numerous uses of the F word and much adult discussion, this could easily offend some.
This seems to go nowhere but stick with it and you’ll get sucked in to a shady underworld where no-one is who or what they first appear. Even the end scenes cast doubt on what has really taken place and each individuals involvement in them.
Personally, I wouldn’t class this as an erotic movie, it has adult content and lots of nudity but it’s more about controlling desires, sexuality and trust rather than eroticism. Starting off in a warm fuzzy orange this creates a dreamy, affluent and seemingly carefree world where the background colours reflect the current plot mode, green for jealousy etc, as the story unfolds. Well written and directed with amazing camera work [albeit in a TV format], this never really reaches a ‘run’ tending to stroll along at an even pace which is all part of its charm, although many may complain that it is slow and plodding.
The single disc offers play, scene selection, special features [cast & crew, interviews with Cruise, Kidman and Spielburg] and Tv spots [Jealousy, combo] and Languages [English soundtrack (the only option!), subtitles in English, Arabic, Russian, Romanian, English hearing impaired, off]. Rated 18 this has nudity and a woman using a toilet within the first 2 minutes and full frontal in the first 15, and with numerous uses of the F word and much adult discussion, this could easily offend some.
This seems to go nowhere but stick with it and you’ll get sucked in to a shady underworld where no-one is who or what they first appear. Even the end scenes cast doubt on what has really taken place and each individuals involvement in them.
23 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Roxane
5.0 out of 5 stars
Berauschend, mysteriös, fesselnd.…
Reviewed in Germany 🇩🇪 on June 25, 2019
Dieses erotische, tiefenpsychologische Drama entstand im Jahr 1999 unter der Regie von Stanley Kubrick und war sein letztes Werk, da er leider kurz nach den Dreharbeiten verstarb.
„Eyes Wide Shut” schildert auf wirklich grandiose Art menschliche Ängste, Träume, sexuelle Fantasien und besonders auch die Abgründe zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen.
Der Arzt Dr.William Harford (Tom Cruise) und seine Frau Alice (Nicole Kidman) führen eine ganz normale Ehe... bis sie bei einem Joint auf der Bettkante urplötzlich den klaffenden Abgrund ihrer Ehe vor sich sehen.
Im letzte Sommerurlaub wurde in Alice durch den Anblick eines Marineoffiziers eine brennende Leidenschaft geweckt, die sie, so gesteht sie es geradewegs in das versteinerte Gesicht ihres Mannes, dazu verleitet hätte, alles stehen und liegen zu lassen, nur um eine ungezügelte Nacht mit dem uniformierten Fremden genießen zu können.
Als Reaktion gerät er in eine regelrechte Psychose, sieht sich durch die Offenbarungen seiner Frau in seinem männlichen Selbstverständnis erschüttert . Ständig hat er die Bilder vor dem geistigen Auge, bei welchen seine Frau von einem anderen geliebt wird. Er beschließt also selbst eine Affäre einzugehen bzw. ist sich eigentlich nicht ganz klar wieviel er noch bewusst beschließen kann und nicht von einem Wahn getrieben ist.
In dieser Nacht trifft er einen alten Freund wieder, einen Jazzpianisten, der zu einem geheimen Termin geladen wird. Eine geschlossene Party, bei der ein Passwort zu nennen ist und der Eintritt nur maskiert erlaubt ist.
William verschafft sich Zutritt zum Anwesen und gerät aber dann nicht auf ein Fest, wie er es erwartet hätte. Eine fast schon religiöse Zeremonie mit nackten maskierten Frauen wird abgehalten, die sehr bizarr anmutet, da alle Inkognito sind. Am Ende der Zeremonie beginnt eine Sexorgie. Doch er wird als Fremder in dieser „auserlesenen“ Gesellschaft erkannt, was eine Reihe mysteriöser Vorfälle nach sich zieht....
Fasziniert hat mich dazu auch der antik-ethisch-klassische Scoremix der Jocelyn Pook der die Zeremonie begleitet und diese Atmosphäre so unglaublich wirkungsvoll unterstützt.
Wir begehren. Sich mit jemandem verbunden zu fühlen, so wie mit niemandem sonst. Sowohl mental als auch körperlich. Deshalb lassen wir es auch zu, dass ein Mensch im Besonderen uns näher kommen darf als andere. Doch die meisten stellen leider regelrecht Besitzansprüche, denn niemand sonst sollte zur gleichen Zeit das Recht besitzen diesen Menschen, der unser Innerstes kennt auch so zu berühren, erfolgreich begehrenswert zu empfinden. Und wenn die Eifersucht erwacht hat sie nur Böses im Sinn...
Vielleicht trifft man eines Tages einen fremden Menschen, vielleicht auch nur eine Illusion oder Traum, der in einem etwas auslöst. Etwas, was man nicht in Worte fassen kann. Es bringt einen aus der Fassung und lässt einen nicht mehr los. Vielleicht eine Art von mentaler Berührung. Natürlich verheimlicht man es. Es ist ja bloß ein Gedanke des Begehrens, dem man nicht nachgeht.
Berührungen. Küsse, voll Liebe und Zärtlichkeit. Doch wenn vernebelte Umstände dazu verleiten , diese Fantasieaffäre zu erzählen, entsteht plötzlich ein schicksalhafter Moment, der das Bild der treuen, liebenden Frau völlig erschüttert. Der „Vertrauensbruch“ entfacht eine Welle an Gefühlen, die man(n) nicht einzuordnen vermag. Allein die klare Formulierung von weiblicher Begierde wirkt auf ihn wie ein Angriff. Zweifel kommen auf. Die Fantasie geht durch. Ständig das Bild vor Augen, die Partnerin mit einem anderen Mann.
Es ist angerichtet...
Und nun begeben wir uns auf eine voyeuristische Reise intimer Selbstentdeckung. Gefangen zwischen Realität und Illusion, Eifersucht und Obsession. Steigen wir hinab in die Tiefen der Psyche und wohnen den Veränderungen zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen bei. Erleben wir eine Fülle von psychologischer Metaphorik und Symbolik.
Diese Geschichte fasziniert in jeder Hinsicht, hat auch ein paar verschmitzt angelegte Untertöne. Aber es ist vor allem eine durchweg berührende und betörende Reise voller Emotions-Ästhetik, mit einer geradezu magischen Wirkung.
Auch bei öfterem Ansehen entfesselt der Film in diesen 2,5 Stunden durchweg seine hypnotische Wirkung. Normalerweise hat man bei mehrmaliger Betrachtung eines Films einfach die Erinnerung an dessen Ablauf. Man erinnert sich daran, was als nächstes kommt und freut sich eventuell auf eine bestimmte Szene. Bei „Eyes Wide Shut” fühlt es sich aber an, wie ein Déjà-vu oder ein Traum, den man einmal geträumt hat und man beginnt erst dann zu verstehen, wie sehr sich der Film bereits in das Unterbewusstsein eingenistet hat.
Ein Film, der sich von anderen Kubrickfilmen sehr unterscheidet und meines Erachtens schon sehr stark auf Polanskis Pfaden wandelt. Für mich sein bester Film. Unglaublich sehenswert.
„Eyes Wide Shut” schildert auf wirklich grandiose Art menschliche Ängste, Träume, sexuelle Fantasien und besonders auch die Abgründe zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen.
Der Arzt Dr.William Harford (Tom Cruise) und seine Frau Alice (Nicole Kidman) führen eine ganz normale Ehe... bis sie bei einem Joint auf der Bettkante urplötzlich den klaffenden Abgrund ihrer Ehe vor sich sehen.
Im letzte Sommerurlaub wurde in Alice durch den Anblick eines Marineoffiziers eine brennende Leidenschaft geweckt, die sie, so gesteht sie es geradewegs in das versteinerte Gesicht ihres Mannes, dazu verleitet hätte, alles stehen und liegen zu lassen, nur um eine ungezügelte Nacht mit dem uniformierten Fremden genießen zu können.
Als Reaktion gerät er in eine regelrechte Psychose, sieht sich durch die Offenbarungen seiner Frau in seinem männlichen Selbstverständnis erschüttert . Ständig hat er die Bilder vor dem geistigen Auge, bei welchen seine Frau von einem anderen geliebt wird. Er beschließt also selbst eine Affäre einzugehen bzw. ist sich eigentlich nicht ganz klar wieviel er noch bewusst beschließen kann und nicht von einem Wahn getrieben ist.
In dieser Nacht trifft er einen alten Freund wieder, einen Jazzpianisten, der zu einem geheimen Termin geladen wird. Eine geschlossene Party, bei der ein Passwort zu nennen ist und der Eintritt nur maskiert erlaubt ist.
William verschafft sich Zutritt zum Anwesen und gerät aber dann nicht auf ein Fest, wie er es erwartet hätte. Eine fast schon religiöse Zeremonie mit nackten maskierten Frauen wird abgehalten, die sehr bizarr anmutet, da alle Inkognito sind. Am Ende der Zeremonie beginnt eine Sexorgie. Doch er wird als Fremder in dieser „auserlesenen“ Gesellschaft erkannt, was eine Reihe mysteriöser Vorfälle nach sich zieht....
Fasziniert hat mich dazu auch der antik-ethisch-klassische Scoremix der Jocelyn Pook der die Zeremonie begleitet und diese Atmosphäre so unglaublich wirkungsvoll unterstützt.
Wir begehren. Sich mit jemandem verbunden zu fühlen, so wie mit niemandem sonst. Sowohl mental als auch körperlich. Deshalb lassen wir es auch zu, dass ein Mensch im Besonderen uns näher kommen darf als andere. Doch die meisten stellen leider regelrecht Besitzansprüche, denn niemand sonst sollte zur gleichen Zeit das Recht besitzen diesen Menschen, der unser Innerstes kennt auch so zu berühren, erfolgreich begehrenswert zu empfinden. Und wenn die Eifersucht erwacht hat sie nur Böses im Sinn...
Vielleicht trifft man eines Tages einen fremden Menschen, vielleicht auch nur eine Illusion oder Traum, der in einem etwas auslöst. Etwas, was man nicht in Worte fassen kann. Es bringt einen aus der Fassung und lässt einen nicht mehr los. Vielleicht eine Art von mentaler Berührung. Natürlich verheimlicht man es. Es ist ja bloß ein Gedanke des Begehrens, dem man nicht nachgeht.
Berührungen. Küsse, voll Liebe und Zärtlichkeit. Doch wenn vernebelte Umstände dazu verleiten , diese Fantasieaffäre zu erzählen, entsteht plötzlich ein schicksalhafter Moment, der das Bild der treuen, liebenden Frau völlig erschüttert. Der „Vertrauensbruch“ entfacht eine Welle an Gefühlen, die man(n) nicht einzuordnen vermag. Allein die klare Formulierung von weiblicher Begierde wirkt auf ihn wie ein Angriff. Zweifel kommen auf. Die Fantasie geht durch. Ständig das Bild vor Augen, die Partnerin mit einem anderen Mann.
Es ist angerichtet...
Und nun begeben wir uns auf eine voyeuristische Reise intimer Selbstentdeckung. Gefangen zwischen Realität und Illusion, Eifersucht und Obsession. Steigen wir hinab in die Tiefen der Psyche und wohnen den Veränderungen zwischenmenschlicher Beziehungen bei. Erleben wir eine Fülle von psychologischer Metaphorik und Symbolik.
Diese Geschichte fasziniert in jeder Hinsicht, hat auch ein paar verschmitzt angelegte Untertöne. Aber es ist vor allem eine durchweg berührende und betörende Reise voller Emotions-Ästhetik, mit einer geradezu magischen Wirkung.
Auch bei öfterem Ansehen entfesselt der Film in diesen 2,5 Stunden durchweg seine hypnotische Wirkung. Normalerweise hat man bei mehrmaliger Betrachtung eines Films einfach die Erinnerung an dessen Ablauf. Man erinnert sich daran, was als nächstes kommt und freut sich eventuell auf eine bestimmte Szene. Bei „Eyes Wide Shut” fühlt es sich aber an, wie ein Déjà-vu oder ein Traum, den man einmal geträumt hat und man beginnt erst dann zu verstehen, wie sehr sich der Film bereits in das Unterbewusstsein eingenistet hat.
Ein Film, der sich von anderen Kubrickfilmen sehr unterscheidet und meines Erachtens schon sehr stark auf Polanskis Pfaden wandelt. Für mich sein bester Film. Unglaublich sehenswert.
Ken W
5.0 out of 5 stars
A neglected masterpiece
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on February 8, 2017
A great epitaph for a great director, Stanley Kubrick, who passed away shortly after Eyes Wide Shut was finished. Critics panned what they couldn't understand - a movie, subtly and ingeniously directed, reflecting the lifestyle of the rich and famous, and the influence of paganism in contemporary society, through the worship of Satan. The nudity in the movie emphasises the immorality and depravity that exists among the rich and famous.
Kubrick cleverly chose Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, with links to Scientology, Satanism and the Illuminati, to play the main roles. They performed brilliantly - with an excellent supporting cast.
Kubrick cleverly chose Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, with links to Scientology, Satanism and the Illuminati, to play the main roles. They performed brilliantly - with an excellent supporting cast.
20 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Yeats
3.0 out of 5 stars
Wrong screen ratio
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on May 30, 2022
This DVD was supposed to display the movie in wide screen format "as Kubrick intended" (the intro credits tell us). Strangely, this is not true. The movie only displays in 4:3 ratio. Disappointing. I will seek out a better version.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse

![Barry Lyndon (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/618+vDmzK6L._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
![Lolita (BD) [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51NEsNOiDbL._AC_UL116_SR116,116_.jpg)
![Barry Lyndon (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/618+vDmzK6L._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)
![Lolita (BD) [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51NEsNOiDbL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)
![Clockwork Orange, A (4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray + Digital) [4K UHD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71pXqXycQjL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)
![2001: A Space Odyssey (4K Ultra HD) [4K UHD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81+A2aV5-TL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)
![Full Metal Jacket (4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray) [4K UHD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71QTte23xCL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)
![Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb [4K UHD]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/611JMuSpDOS._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)



