- Hardcover: 302 pages
- Publisher: Verso; 1 edition (February 1, 2012)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1844677370
- ISBN-13: 978-1844677375
- Product Dimensions: 5.8 x 1 x 8.5 inches
- Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 5 customer reviews
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,540,924 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
The Faith of the Faithless: Experiments in Political Theology 1st Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) is a service we offer sellers that lets them store their products in Amazon's fulfillment centers, and we directly pack, ship, and provide customer service for these products. Something we hope you'll especially enjoy: FBA items qualify for FREE Shipping and Amazon Prime.
If you're a seller, Fulfillment by Amazon can help you increase your sales. We invite you to learn more about Fulfillment by Amazon .
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Critchley's academic work among would-be anarchists and postcolonialists at the University of Essex and the New School responds to a gauchiste Left consumed with a ressentiment toward liberal democracy that he partly shares. His entanglements in that idiom mar this rich if loopy survey of efforts to bridge the abysses separating Western religion from philosophy, and both from politics. —Jim Sleeper
“[A] movingly optimistic work ... ’Everything to be true must become a religion,’ Wilde says, and Critchley, poetically and persuasively, suggests ways in which this might be accomplished.”—Stuart Kelly, The Guardian
“A a sustained and fascinating reflection on the place of religion in political discourse.”—Giles Fraser, New Statesman
“A thoughtful, illuminating exploration ... erudite and measured.”—Publisher's Weekly
“This version of a faithless faith that Simon is fleshing out in this book is a radical break in his own thinking ... in this new book Simon’s insights arrive in their most brilliant splendor: Unlike Derrida’s version of truth (and its political important) that keeps deferring and is always different, here the breakthrough happens precisely when we are able to confront our own toxic void and in the suffering of this confrontation we are able to connect with the immanent other in an act of love in the horizon of a broken embracement. Like Christ’s brokenness on the cross he opens up a way through suffering that does not cancel out the void and lack that grounds us, but unites us in the very brokenness itself.”—Creston Davis, Political Theology
“[T]he book amply demonstrates Critchley’s many strengths as a thinker and teacher. Where the book is exegetical, it is strikingly clear ... Even better, the book displays Critchley’s skill as one of the very best close readers of philosophical texts we have ... this fascinating and important book traces, as it were, a trajectory of his thought and is not an end in itself.”—Robert Eaglestone, Times Higher Education
“The Faith of the Faithless provides a powerful vision of what our politics ought to look like.”—David Winters, Los Angeles Review of Books
Top customer reviews
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book is a scholarly study that opens with a detailed examination of Rousseau's political philosophy and closes with Critchley's tussle with Zizek over the place of violence in politics. What can be found in between is what I find most intriguing. Among other things, Critchley examines the resurgence of interest in Paul's epistles and adds his own analysis. He uses a close reading of Heidegger's THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF RELIGIOUS LIFE The Phenomenology of Religious Life (Studies in Continental Thought) that then suggests an additional interpretation of BEING AND TIME's Being and Time concept of "thrown projection." It clarifies many of MH's comments for me.
To summarize my best grasp of what MH means would be to accept Critchley's characterization of thrown projection as a double nullity. That is, to be thrown is a nullity (Dasein is "there" if only we knew where that is) and to rely on projection is an additional nullity (Dasein acts as if we know what is coming even though we don't). Dasein finds itself always already somewhere in between those nullities. Heidegger characterizes that position as one of "guilt," which would seem to harmonize with St. Paul's reliance on sin. But the devil is always in the details, and Critchley examines MH's position, instead, as an assertion of the openness of human freedom.
From that I draw the provisional conclusion that there is a slight but profound discrepancy between Paul and MH's Luther-influenced interpretation. We must allow the necessary systemization required for philosophy of religion, in which case, for Paul, we live in a closed system; for MH we live in an open system. So that hair's breadth makes a whole lot of difference.
The current debate over Post Atheism is whether openness can prove more philosophically and theologically useful (although Critchley denies expertise in the latter) than a closed context. Critchley does not cite Jean-Luc Marion or Jean-Luc Nancy in this study, and I am only familiar with the latter, but they both represent (along with Foucault, Klossowski, and Derrida) the open interpretation. Agamben and Badiou somewhere in between.
This debate has gotten increasingly hot and heavy since the latter part of the last century. It may well remain unsettled for the balance of the new term. Yet we can expect the interest to continue and grow with the globalization of the debate, despite all the New Atheism nay-sayers. Critchley writes wonderfully, so he offers an opportunity to jump in if you are still on the shores. Happy splashes!
Note: I have since this review read Critchley's magnum opus: Ethics-Politics-Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas & Contemporary French Thought (Radical Thinkers) published in 1999. It supplies his justification for a determination of ethics as a matter of faith. While his commendations of Levinas shift direction and his distance from J-L. Nancy increases, the place that opens vibrates intensely.
For example, in the first section of "The Faith of the Failthless" he proceeds with an analysis of Rousseau that depends on ferreting out the differences between the published manuscript and "The Geneva Manuscript." I understand how this guides his interpretation of Rousseau's "The Social Contract," but for me fails to make "The General Will" and the role of the lawgiver a substantive base to build on. Of course, he notes in the text that the reader should refer to his previous work on "infinite demand" and this would add clarity. Nonetheless, he builds on Rousseau's desire for the catechism of the citizen and then adopts Stevens supreme fiction to place the mystical anarchism of Marcion as further support for the need for a religious faith for a commonly held politcal view point. Then it really gets messy, because all the problems of Rousseau are not resolved but instead overlayed with Heideggerean terminology and philosphy even though the basic premises in his argument about Rousseau remain as weak ground. I sense that his work on Rousseau is probably ground breaking interpretation, but like Rousseau Critchley sees applicablity only in small or local groups not even as big as Corsica.
So I don't know if his overarching argument that faith must once again become a component of the progessive wing of western democracies succeeds. From a common sense stand point I would give it an approving nod. But I think the most incisive insight is his interpretation of Paul through the vantage point of Marcionism. Here he explains 1Corinthians in terms of a "double meontology" to explicate the powerless power of the call of conscience and why it is from nothing that all something comes to be. The congruence here between "The Snowman" and "the annihilation of ego" has deepened my reading of the poem and for that I am greatful. Perhaps reading Rousseau, Marx, and the other intrepreters whom Critchley relies on or takes to task would provide refuge from the avalances and the quakes.