Eugene Rogan, “The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East.” The best book on the subject I have read – which isn’t really very high praise.
* Chiam Weitzman is in the book, but not in the index
* Palestine is referred to as a nation-state
* There is no mention of the Donme-Sabbateans and their connection to the Young Turks
* The only Jewish claim to land cited is the British Balfour declaration – no mention of Jewish habitation for circa three millennia – as contrasted with historic occupation by Kurds, Armenians, Azeris, Arabs, Bedouin, and Turks, all of which are cited.
Aside from that: he generally tells the narrative clearly, albeit with almost zero mention of Jews, one mention of Druze, and zero Donme.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Added
Not added
$23.74
FREE Shipping
on orders over $25.00
shipped by Amazon.
FREE Shipping
Get free shipping
Free shipping
within the U.S. when you order $25.00
of eligible items shipped by Amazon.
Or get faster shipping on this item starting at $5.99
. (Prices may vary for AK and HI.)
Learn more about free shipping
Sold by: Amazon.com
Added
Not added
$25.66
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by: Virginia Bookmen
Sold by: Virginia Bookmen
(7291 ratings)
98% positive over last 12 months
98% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates and Return policy Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Authors
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East Hardcover – March 10, 2015
by
Eugene Rogan
(Author)
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $37.69 | — |
Enhance your purchase
The thrilling and definitive history of World War I in the Middle East
By 1914 the powers of Europe were sliding inexorably toward war, and they pulled the Middle East along with them into one of the most destructive conflicts in human history. In The Fall of the Ottomans, award-winning historian Eugene Rogan brings the First World War and its immediate aftermath in the Middle East to vivid life, uncovering the often ignored story of the region's crucial role in the conflict. Unlike the static killing fields of the Western Front, the war in the Middle East was fast-moving and unpredictable, with the Turks inflicting decisive defeats on the Entente in Gallipoli, Mesopotamia, and Gaza before the tide of battle turned in the Allies' favor. The postwar settlement led to the partition of Ottoman lands, laying the groundwork for the ongoing conflicts that continue to plague the modern Arab world. A sweeping narrative of battles and political intrigue from Gallipoli to Arabia, The Fall of the Ottomans is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the Great War and the making of the modern Middle East.
By 1914 the powers of Europe were sliding inexorably toward war, and they pulled the Middle East along with them into one of the most destructive conflicts in human history. In The Fall of the Ottomans, award-winning historian Eugene Rogan brings the First World War and its immediate aftermath in the Middle East to vivid life, uncovering the often ignored story of the region's crucial role in the conflict. Unlike the static killing fields of the Western Front, the war in the Middle East was fast-moving and unpredictable, with the Turks inflicting decisive defeats on the Entente in Gallipoli, Mesopotamia, and Gaza before the tide of battle turned in the Allies' favor. The postwar settlement led to the partition of Ottoman lands, laying the groundwork for the ongoing conflicts that continue to plague the modern Arab world. A sweeping narrative of battles and political intrigue from Gallipoli to Arabia, The Fall of the Ottomans is essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the Great War and the making of the modern Middle East.
- Print length512 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBasic Books
- Publication dateMarch 10, 2015
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-10046502307X
- ISBN-13978-0465023073
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Sign up now
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A remarkably readable, judicious and well-researched account of the Ottoman war in Anatolia and the Arab provinces."―Mark Mazower, Financial Times
"Rogan has written an impressively sound and fair-minded account of the fall of the Ottoman Empire."―Max Hastings, Sunday Times (UK)
"[An] assured account.... The book stands alongside the best histories."―Economist
"The book is not only exact and readable but also has the elements of a thriller and thus is all the more remarkable in view of its thoroughness in covering a linguistically and historically difficult subject."―Wall Street Journal
"This engrossing history unfolds in the Middle Eastern theatre of the First World War, capturing the complex array of battles, brutalities, and alliances that brought down the six-hundred-year-old Ottoman Empire.... Rogan argues that the empire's ultimate demise was the result not of losing the war but of a clumsily negotiated peace. His balanced narrative unearths many seeds of current conflicts."―New Yorker
"Admirable and thoroughly researched.... A comprehensive history of World War I in the Middle East."―New York Review of Books
"[An] intricately worked but very readable account of the Ottoman theocracy's demise.... This is an extraordinary tale and Rogan recounts it well."―New York Times
"To have written a page-turner as well as an accurate and comprehensive history of the Ottoman struggle for survival is a remarkable achievement."―Wall Street Journal
"As the Middle East is collapsing all around us, if you wanted to know where it all began and when, read this great book by a great Oxford historian."―Fareed Zakaria, Fareed Zakaria GPS, Book of the Week
"[Rogan's] account is geopolitical and military writing at its best - taut, anecdotal and extraordinarily researched. A tangled story, to be sure, one that both commands and rewards the reader's attention."―Washington Times
"A comprehensive, lucid and revealing history.... This book will surely become the definitive history of the war."―The Times (UK)
"The Fall of the Ottomans is a remarkably lucid and accessible work of history, involving a large cast of contradictory and complex characters.... Telling quotations from diplomats, field commanders, and ordinary soldiers of all the combatants lend the narrative a powerful sense of immediacy."―The Daily Beast
"Eugene Rogan has given us an absorbing history of the war's principal military and political battles in the Middle East through the eyes of those who fought them."―Mustafa Aksakal, chair of Modern Turkish Studies and associate professor of history at Georgetown University
"[A] masterly history of the Ottoman empire in its final years.... Eugene Rogan has written a meticulously researched, panoramic and engrossing history. The book is essential reading for understanding the evolution of the modern Middle East and the root causes of nearly all the conflicts that now plague the area. The Fall of the Ottomans is an altogether splendid work of historical writing."―Ali A. Allawi, The Spectator (UK)
"A fantastic, readable, and much needed study of the most chronically neglected of all of the Great War's participants: the Ottoman Empire. Informative and enlightening."―Alexander Watson, author of Ring of Steel: Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I
"This is a gripping, masterful account of World War One in the Middle East from the vantage point of the Ottoman Empire.... Combining magisterial scholarship with a keen sense of drama and lively narrative style, it tells a grim story but a fascinating one.... If you want to understand the underlying causes of conflict and violence in the Middle East in the last century, you will not find a better book."―Avi Shlaim, authorof The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World
"This book opens up a window on vital chapters in the shaping of the Middle East as well as the history of the Great War, bringing together vivid personal details with a broad historical panorama of human suffering and heroism, the incompetence and folly of the general staffs, and the scheming of the great powers."―Rashid Khalidi, authorof Resurrecting Empire: Western Footprints and America's Perilous Path inthe Middle East
"Thoroughly researched and elegantly written by one of the leading experts on the region, The Fall of the Ottomans reminds us that the 1914-18 conflict was truly a world war with huge and continuing consequences. No one is better equipped than Eugene Rogan to handle the course and impact of the war in the Middle East and he does a superb job, telling a complex and multifaceted story with great clarity, understanding, and compassion. This timely and important work restores the Middle East to its rightful place in the history of the Great War."―Margaret MacMillan, author of The War That Ended Peace: The Road to1914
"Thrilling, superb, and colorful, Eugene Rogan's The Fall of the Ottomans is brilliant storytelling. Filled with flamboyant characters, impeccable scholarship that illuminates the neglected Near Eastern theater of WWI--showing how the Ottomans managed repeatedly to defeat the Allies--and revelatory analysis that explains the modern Mideast, The Fall of the Ottomans is truly essential but also truly exciting reading."―Simon Sebag Montefiore, authorof Jerusalem: The Biography
"Rogan has written an impressively sound and fair-minded account of the fall of the Ottoman Empire."―Max Hastings, Sunday Times (UK)
"[An] assured account.... The book stands alongside the best histories."―Economist
"The book is not only exact and readable but also has the elements of a thriller and thus is all the more remarkable in view of its thoroughness in covering a linguistically and historically difficult subject."―Wall Street Journal
"This engrossing history unfolds in the Middle Eastern theatre of the First World War, capturing the complex array of battles, brutalities, and alliances that brought down the six-hundred-year-old Ottoman Empire.... Rogan argues that the empire's ultimate demise was the result not of losing the war but of a clumsily negotiated peace. His balanced narrative unearths many seeds of current conflicts."―New Yorker
"Admirable and thoroughly researched.... A comprehensive history of World War I in the Middle East."―New York Review of Books
"[An] intricately worked but very readable account of the Ottoman theocracy's demise.... This is an extraordinary tale and Rogan recounts it well."―New York Times
"To have written a page-turner as well as an accurate and comprehensive history of the Ottoman struggle for survival is a remarkable achievement."―Wall Street Journal
"As the Middle East is collapsing all around us, if you wanted to know where it all began and when, read this great book by a great Oxford historian."―Fareed Zakaria, Fareed Zakaria GPS, Book of the Week
"[Rogan's] account is geopolitical and military writing at its best - taut, anecdotal and extraordinarily researched. A tangled story, to be sure, one that both commands and rewards the reader's attention."―Washington Times
"A comprehensive, lucid and revealing history.... This book will surely become the definitive history of the war."―The Times (UK)
"The Fall of the Ottomans is a remarkably lucid and accessible work of history, involving a large cast of contradictory and complex characters.... Telling quotations from diplomats, field commanders, and ordinary soldiers of all the combatants lend the narrative a powerful sense of immediacy."―The Daily Beast
"Eugene Rogan has given us an absorbing history of the war's principal military and political battles in the Middle East through the eyes of those who fought them."―Mustafa Aksakal, chair of Modern Turkish Studies and associate professor of history at Georgetown University
"[A] masterly history of the Ottoman empire in its final years.... Eugene Rogan has written a meticulously researched, panoramic and engrossing history. The book is essential reading for understanding the evolution of the modern Middle East and the root causes of nearly all the conflicts that now plague the area. The Fall of the Ottomans is an altogether splendid work of historical writing."―Ali A. Allawi, The Spectator (UK)
"A fantastic, readable, and much needed study of the most chronically neglected of all of the Great War's participants: the Ottoman Empire. Informative and enlightening."―Alexander Watson, author of Ring of Steel: Germany and Austria-Hungary in World War I
"This is a gripping, masterful account of World War One in the Middle East from the vantage point of the Ottoman Empire.... Combining magisterial scholarship with a keen sense of drama and lively narrative style, it tells a grim story but a fascinating one.... If you want to understand the underlying causes of conflict and violence in the Middle East in the last century, you will not find a better book."―Avi Shlaim, authorof The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World
"This book opens up a window on vital chapters in the shaping of the Middle East as well as the history of the Great War, bringing together vivid personal details with a broad historical panorama of human suffering and heroism, the incompetence and folly of the general staffs, and the scheming of the great powers."―Rashid Khalidi, authorof Resurrecting Empire: Western Footprints and America's Perilous Path inthe Middle East
"Thoroughly researched and elegantly written by one of the leading experts on the region, The Fall of the Ottomans reminds us that the 1914-18 conflict was truly a world war with huge and continuing consequences. No one is better equipped than Eugene Rogan to handle the course and impact of the war in the Middle East and he does a superb job, telling a complex and multifaceted story with great clarity, understanding, and compassion. This timely and important work restores the Middle East to its rightful place in the history of the Great War."―Margaret MacMillan, author of The War That Ended Peace: The Road to1914
"Thrilling, superb, and colorful, Eugene Rogan's The Fall of the Ottomans is brilliant storytelling. Filled with flamboyant characters, impeccable scholarship that illuminates the neglected Near Eastern theater of WWI--showing how the Ottomans managed repeatedly to defeat the Allies--and revelatory analysis that explains the modern Mideast, The Fall of the Ottomans is truly essential but also truly exciting reading."―Simon Sebag Montefiore, authorof Jerusalem: The Biography
About the Author
Eugene Rogan is professor of modern Middle Eastern history at the University of Oxford and the director of the Middle East Centre at St. Antony's College, Oxford. The author of numerous books, including the international bestseller The Fall of the Ottomans, Rogan is the recipient of the Albert Hourani Prize. He lives in Oxford, England.
Start reading The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; 1st edition (March 10, 2015)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 512 pages
- ISBN-10 : 046502307X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0465023073
- Item Weight : 1.73 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.25 x 1.5 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #107,327 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #29 in Egyptian History (Books)
- #29 in West African History
- #37 in Turkey History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
1,036 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Must Read for Thinkers
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2015
This was an insightful account of a little known part of the history of the great war. Well written.
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2015
Images in this review
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2021
Verified Purchase
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2015
Verified Purchase
Having read quite a few books this past year on World War I and Scott Anderson's excellent book on Lawrence of Arabia, this book offered a chance to read through many events, but from the Ottoman perspective. As the author mentions, he visited Gallipoli and realized that the Turkish losses at that epic battle are not widely known.
Thus, the roots of the author's efforts to address this neglected area of history. The book is very well-written and gives a wide lens to the beginning of the end of the Ottoman Empire through the War itself. Some of the events described herein are pretty well-known, but otherwise I was blown away by how much I had no clue had really taken place. Examples include the Balkan Wars and the Ottoman effort against Italy in 1912-1913. These events influenced later decisions from both the Ottoman and Allied perspective and are well integrated.
This is a well-written and easily read history. I found myself many times considering events from an alternate view of the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and reading about battles only heard of from the perspective of the victor. This is not juts about Turkish losses, but of Arabs, Armenians, Greeks and others. Even though I am pretty knowledgeable about World War I history, there were many events I had really never heard of before. Even seeing many pictures of Ottoman soldiers in battle was revelatory and unexpected. The First World War was in many ways more cataclysmic than WWII in terms of the changes in the world and this book is a great expository on how that happened.
This is an important book and well worthwhile to read for the general reader interested in the subject as well as the academic or policy specialist looking for more information to add to the body of knowledge of even present day Eastern Europe and the Near East.
This book is recommended. An excellent companion book is by David Fromkin, A Peace to End All Peace, to read after this book.
Thus, the roots of the author's efforts to address this neglected area of history. The book is very well-written and gives a wide lens to the beginning of the end of the Ottoman Empire through the War itself. Some of the events described herein are pretty well-known, but otherwise I was blown away by how much I had no clue had really taken place. Examples include the Balkan Wars and the Ottoman effort against Italy in 1912-1913. These events influenced later decisions from both the Ottoman and Allied perspective and are well integrated.
This is a well-written and easily read history. I found myself many times considering events from an alternate view of the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and reading about battles only heard of from the perspective of the victor. This is not juts about Turkish losses, but of Arabs, Armenians, Greeks and others. Even though I am pretty knowledgeable about World War I history, there were many events I had really never heard of before. Even seeing many pictures of Ottoman soldiers in battle was revelatory and unexpected. The First World War was in many ways more cataclysmic than WWII in terms of the changes in the world and this book is a great expository on how that happened.
This is an important book and well worthwhile to read for the general reader interested in the subject as well as the academic or policy specialist looking for more information to add to the body of knowledge of even present day Eastern Europe and the Near East.
This book is recommended. An excellent companion book is by David Fromkin, A Peace to End All Peace, to read after this book.
54 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2015
Verified Purchase
This is a very well written and good book on the topic. However, it is primarily a political study of the fall of the Ottoman Empire in World War I. It is not so much a military study.
The author, who teaches at Oxford, has looked at the Ottoman Empire and how it handled World War One. He works in Turkish and Arabic. There are many individual vignettes from individuals at ALL levels of society, from political policy carried on at the highest levels, to the various campaigns and the fighting that resulted. It is well-illustrated volume but includes only a handful of strategic maps of the Empire’s battlefields.
The political history is excellent. The author has a firm grasp of the Young Turk movement, the JIHAD aspect of the Turkish war effort and the impact of the Arab on the Turk (and vice-versa). His discussion of the Armenian genocide is balanced and accurate and unlike many studies, does NOT ignore the brutal killing of thousands of Assyrians. An entire chapter is devoted to this and will inhibit sales in Turkey!
But it is not so much a military study. The German battlecruiser GOEBEN & British battlecruiser INFLEXIBLE become battleships. The small old French battleship REQUIN becomes a cruiser, HMS AMETHYST becomes French (p137) and Ottoman losses are often based on old Allied accounts. German Admiral Souchon is mentioned once in the book, ignoring his large impact in the Black Sea. Edward Erickson’s I ORDER YOU TO DIE is in the bibliography but seemingly not consulted in some of the areas covered in the book. The Turkish Official military studies appear to be completely missing as well.
The author does NOT note that after the Allied naval assault at the Dardanelles, in which they suffered major losses, the Turks were virtually out of artillery ammunition. One of the major postwar hindsight laments was that a second naval assault was not quickly made. The Allied losses could easily be made up while the resupply of vital ammunition was difficult in the extreme.
This is a very good book, worth the read, much from the Turkish and Arab point of view. Definitive – no. Would a definitive study be longer – yes (and hence probably not published . . . )
The author, who teaches at Oxford, has looked at the Ottoman Empire and how it handled World War One. He works in Turkish and Arabic. There are many individual vignettes from individuals at ALL levels of society, from political policy carried on at the highest levels, to the various campaigns and the fighting that resulted. It is well-illustrated volume but includes only a handful of strategic maps of the Empire’s battlefields.
The political history is excellent. The author has a firm grasp of the Young Turk movement, the JIHAD aspect of the Turkish war effort and the impact of the Arab on the Turk (and vice-versa). His discussion of the Armenian genocide is balanced and accurate and unlike many studies, does NOT ignore the brutal killing of thousands of Assyrians. An entire chapter is devoted to this and will inhibit sales in Turkey!
But it is not so much a military study. The German battlecruiser GOEBEN & British battlecruiser INFLEXIBLE become battleships. The small old French battleship REQUIN becomes a cruiser, HMS AMETHYST becomes French (p137) and Ottoman losses are often based on old Allied accounts. German Admiral Souchon is mentioned once in the book, ignoring his large impact in the Black Sea. Edward Erickson’s I ORDER YOU TO DIE is in the bibliography but seemingly not consulted in some of the areas covered in the book. The Turkish Official military studies appear to be completely missing as well.
The author does NOT note that after the Allied naval assault at the Dardanelles, in which they suffered major losses, the Turks were virtually out of artillery ammunition. One of the major postwar hindsight laments was that a second naval assault was not quickly made. The Allied losses could easily be made up while the resupply of vital ammunition was difficult in the extreme.
This is a very good book, worth the read, much from the Turkish and Arab point of view. Definitive – no. Would a definitive study be longer – yes (and hence probably not published . . . )
303 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Legal Vampire
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good book on the Ottomans' last, fatal crisis
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 13, 2018Verified Purchase
Good book about the once mighty Ottoman Turkish Empire’s last, fatal crisis: the First World War and its aftermath.
‘Fall of the Ottomans’ contains often dramatic stories of marches and battles but goes well beyond military history, telling us about the countries, characters and wider issues involved, drawing on accounts by people of many nations, from generals and ambassadors to corporals and priests.
I use the terms Ottoman and Turkish partly interchangeably below but ‘Ottoman Empire’ (named after the ruling dynasty) was the country’s official name. The core of the Empire was Turkish but it covered much of the Middle East.
In the English speaking world, we tend to hear of aspects of the Ottoman role in the 1914-1918 War in isolation: Gallipoli, Lawrence of Arabia & the Arab revolt, the Armenian massacres, General Allenby's army conquering the Holy Land, the awful fate of British Empire troops besieged at Kut-el-Amara, and the often forgotten Turkish-Russian front, but we are rarely told which of these was most important or how they affected each other. This is the first work I have read to pull all these together. It also mentions aspects of the war I didn’t know existed. To give a couple of examples out of many:
-In 1916 a Russian army advanced through Persia to within 100 miles of Baghdad, threatening to capture it before the British;
-Hundreds of thousands died of famine in Syria during the war, caused by drought, locusts, disruption by war and Allied naval blockade.
Unlike some historians, the author gives fair prominence to the French and French Empire forces at Gallipoli as well as British Empire forces there.
In the earlier part of the war, the Dardanelles, including Gallipoli [Gelibolu in modern Turkish], the straits guarding the approach by sea to the Ottoman capital Constantinople/ Istanbul, were the main front for the Turks, who sent more than half their army there.
When the Allies withdrew from Gallipoli in January 1916 several Turkish divisions should have been freed to take the initiative on other fronts. However, much of this advantage was neutralised by a daring surprise Russian attack. In apparently impossible winter conditions in the South Caucasus Mountains, the Russians under General Yudenitch outflanked and destroyed the majority of the Turkish Third Army, advanced deep into Eastern Turkey, and caused shock across the Ottoman Empire.
The breakdown of the Russian army's discipline and spirit after the 1917 Revolutions relieved the pressure on the Ottoman Empire’s eastern front. This could have allowed the Turks to reinforce their by then hard-pressed other fronts and perhaps hold out for longer. However, once again the Ottomans lost their chance, committing large forces to a vain attempt to recover territory lost in the 19th Century in the Caucasus.
One limitation of this book is that it does not explain how the Ottoman government and constitution worked. We are told there was a Sultan and a Parliament, but little else about them or what they did. All important decisions seem to have been made by a group of three key ministers, who had come to power by violence rather than election, and who all died violently within a few years of the war's end. We are also not told why the Empire was unable to mobilise as many troops as the European powers, despite what must have been a large population if the Empire's Arab lands are included.
A puzzle for the Allies was the unpredictability of Ottoman resistance. In 1915-16 the Allies’ unsuccessful Gallipoli campaign and disastrous advance up the River Tigris to Kut el-Amara were in hindsight dangerously over-ambitious. However, that was not obvious beforehand because in earlier encounters Ottoman forces showed little fight.
The Ottoman army could be ferocious, courageous and tenacious, as at Gallipoli defending their capital, led by an effective general like Mustafa Kemal [later called Atatürk]. Yet morale could be brittle. After 200 years of almost continuous defeats by Western countries, most recently in 1911-1913 by Greece, Serbia and Italy, Ottoman confidence was shaky. [Another historian wrote that the First World War showed the Ottoman Empire was old and rotten and spent, but that the Turkish people were not.]
Across the Empire the Ottoman army conscripted Muslim Turks, Arabs and Kurds; Christian Greeks and Armenians; and Jews. Such a diverse army’s loyalty to the Ottoman cause naturally varied.
Even before the officially sanctioned murder and starvation of the Empire’s Armenian Christians in 1915-16, Armenians in the Ottoman army were being murdered by Turks and Kurds serving with them, who mistrusted them. This was both the cause and the consequence of the willingness of Armenians to desert to the Allies, often bringing useful information about the numbers and position of Ottoman troops.
Legalistic arguments about whether the Turkish atrocities against Armenian and Assyrian Christians during the First World War were ‘genocide’ can be a pointless distraction from the fact that they were horrifyingly cruel. However, ‘genocide’ is accurate. The intention was that even if not all shot or bayoneted, most Armenians would die from the harsh conditions on their supposed re-settlement marches. (The author does not deal with the argument in A. Bostom ‘The Legacy of Jihad’ that forced re-settlement marches under conditions in which many were bound to die deliberately revived a medieval Muslim tactic against conquered unbelievers.)
In the aftermath of the war, the then Turkish government admitted that massacres of Armenians had occurred and put several officials on trial for ordering them. This was reported in the Turkish press. The government hoped that singling out individuals for blame would avoid the victorious Allies holding the Turkish nation as a whole responsible.
Once the Turks recovered their confidence and military power in the early 1920s under Atatürk, that was no longer necessary. Successive later Turkish governments
refused to admit that the massacres occurred, presumably to try to protect the reputation of Turkey.
This may have had the opposite effect. In denying that there were massacres of Armenians at all, the Turks are unable to explain the context. Armenian terrorists had killed Muslim civilians as well as vice versa. Armenians in the Ottoman capital Constantinople / Istanbul, foolishly, openly celebrated the Allied landings at Gallipoli, and openly hoped Constantinople would fall to the British and French. That does not justify the Turks’ terrible revenge, but it does show that the fault was not entirely on one side.
Some of the British and Empire troops surrounded and starved into surrender at Kut el-Amara in Mesopotamia later wrote about their hardships in the siege, but could not bear to write about what happened after they surrendered. As prisoners of the Turks they endured ‘death marches’ similar to those recently inflicted on Armenian civilians, whose bones could sometimes be seen by the roads along which British, Indian and Australian Prisoners of War were made to march.
During the War, most interested parties plotted how they might gain if the Ottoman Empire fell. Armenians and some Arabs wanted independence. The Allies secretly agreed to share out Ottoman territory between themselves after the war. Yet Britain also promised a largely independent state or federation of states for the Arabs; and to the Jews a national homeland, although not necessarily an independent state, in Palestine, although most of the then population of Palestine were Arabs.
Those who like to blame the West and especially Britain for everything therefore single out Britain’s hard to reconcile promises to different parties at different stages in the war as making Britain the real villain, to blame for the current woes of the Middle East.
Well, yes and no. I am uncomfortable reading about the partly broken promises of Arab independence made by Britain to the Hashemite family (Sharif Hussein of Mecca and his sons such as Feisal) to encourage them to lead an Arab revolt.
On the other hand I cannot help feeling that Britain is sometimes held to a different standard than everyone else, and no allowance made for circumstances. The British were hardly the only ones to make hard to reconcile promises to different parties in pursuit of their own interests, under the pressure of fighting the biggest war in history up to that time. Sometimes survival trumps principles.
The Turks on the outbreak of war offered their support (at a price) to both sides until Germany made them the better offer. The Germans sought to strengthen their alliance with Turkey by spreading false rumours there that Kaiser Wilhelm II had converted to Islam. The future leaders of the Arab revolt pledged loyalty to the Ottoman Empire even as they secretly schemed with Britain to overthrow it. They later agreed to recognise French rule in Syria after the war while privately intending to forcibly drive the French out as soon as the opportunity arose.
The often awful history of Lebanon, Syria and Iraq under independent Arab rule since the 1940s hardly suggests that independent Arab rule was always a good thing anyway.
While the Hashemites were badly disappointed at the peace settlement, they still got the kingdoms of Iraq and Jordan out of it and reign in Jordan to this day. Mecca and most of the Arabian Peninsula, for the first time for hundreds of years, ended up under Arab rule, even if mainly by the rival Saudi dynasty rather than the Hashemites.
‘Fall of the Ottomans’ contains often dramatic stories of marches and battles but goes well beyond military history, telling us about the countries, characters and wider issues involved, drawing on accounts by people of many nations, from generals and ambassadors to corporals and priests.
I use the terms Ottoman and Turkish partly interchangeably below but ‘Ottoman Empire’ (named after the ruling dynasty) was the country’s official name. The core of the Empire was Turkish but it covered much of the Middle East.
In the English speaking world, we tend to hear of aspects of the Ottoman role in the 1914-1918 War in isolation: Gallipoli, Lawrence of Arabia & the Arab revolt, the Armenian massacres, General Allenby's army conquering the Holy Land, the awful fate of British Empire troops besieged at Kut-el-Amara, and the often forgotten Turkish-Russian front, but we are rarely told which of these was most important or how they affected each other. This is the first work I have read to pull all these together. It also mentions aspects of the war I didn’t know existed. To give a couple of examples out of many:
-In 1916 a Russian army advanced through Persia to within 100 miles of Baghdad, threatening to capture it before the British;
-Hundreds of thousands died of famine in Syria during the war, caused by drought, locusts, disruption by war and Allied naval blockade.
Unlike some historians, the author gives fair prominence to the French and French Empire forces at Gallipoli as well as British Empire forces there.
In the earlier part of the war, the Dardanelles, including Gallipoli [Gelibolu in modern Turkish], the straits guarding the approach by sea to the Ottoman capital Constantinople/ Istanbul, were the main front for the Turks, who sent more than half their army there.
When the Allies withdrew from Gallipoli in January 1916 several Turkish divisions should have been freed to take the initiative on other fronts. However, much of this advantage was neutralised by a daring surprise Russian attack. In apparently impossible winter conditions in the South Caucasus Mountains, the Russians under General Yudenitch outflanked and destroyed the majority of the Turkish Third Army, advanced deep into Eastern Turkey, and caused shock across the Ottoman Empire.
The breakdown of the Russian army's discipline and spirit after the 1917 Revolutions relieved the pressure on the Ottoman Empire’s eastern front. This could have allowed the Turks to reinforce their by then hard-pressed other fronts and perhaps hold out for longer. However, once again the Ottomans lost their chance, committing large forces to a vain attempt to recover territory lost in the 19th Century in the Caucasus.
One limitation of this book is that it does not explain how the Ottoman government and constitution worked. We are told there was a Sultan and a Parliament, but little else about them or what they did. All important decisions seem to have been made by a group of three key ministers, who had come to power by violence rather than election, and who all died violently within a few years of the war's end. We are also not told why the Empire was unable to mobilise as many troops as the European powers, despite what must have been a large population if the Empire's Arab lands are included.
A puzzle for the Allies was the unpredictability of Ottoman resistance. In 1915-16 the Allies’ unsuccessful Gallipoli campaign and disastrous advance up the River Tigris to Kut el-Amara were in hindsight dangerously over-ambitious. However, that was not obvious beforehand because in earlier encounters Ottoman forces showed little fight.
The Ottoman army could be ferocious, courageous and tenacious, as at Gallipoli defending their capital, led by an effective general like Mustafa Kemal [later called Atatürk]. Yet morale could be brittle. After 200 years of almost continuous defeats by Western countries, most recently in 1911-1913 by Greece, Serbia and Italy, Ottoman confidence was shaky. [Another historian wrote that the First World War showed the Ottoman Empire was old and rotten and spent, but that the Turkish people were not.]
Across the Empire the Ottoman army conscripted Muslim Turks, Arabs and Kurds; Christian Greeks and Armenians; and Jews. Such a diverse army’s loyalty to the Ottoman cause naturally varied.
Even before the officially sanctioned murder and starvation of the Empire’s Armenian Christians in 1915-16, Armenians in the Ottoman army were being murdered by Turks and Kurds serving with them, who mistrusted them. This was both the cause and the consequence of the willingness of Armenians to desert to the Allies, often bringing useful information about the numbers and position of Ottoman troops.
Legalistic arguments about whether the Turkish atrocities against Armenian and Assyrian Christians during the First World War were ‘genocide’ can be a pointless distraction from the fact that they were horrifyingly cruel. However, ‘genocide’ is accurate. The intention was that even if not all shot or bayoneted, most Armenians would die from the harsh conditions on their supposed re-settlement marches. (The author does not deal with the argument in A. Bostom ‘The Legacy of Jihad’ that forced re-settlement marches under conditions in which many were bound to die deliberately revived a medieval Muslim tactic against conquered unbelievers.)
In the aftermath of the war, the then Turkish government admitted that massacres of Armenians had occurred and put several officials on trial for ordering them. This was reported in the Turkish press. The government hoped that singling out individuals for blame would avoid the victorious Allies holding the Turkish nation as a whole responsible.
Once the Turks recovered their confidence and military power in the early 1920s under Atatürk, that was no longer necessary. Successive later Turkish governments
refused to admit that the massacres occurred, presumably to try to protect the reputation of Turkey.
This may have had the opposite effect. In denying that there were massacres of Armenians at all, the Turks are unable to explain the context. Armenian terrorists had killed Muslim civilians as well as vice versa. Armenians in the Ottoman capital Constantinople / Istanbul, foolishly, openly celebrated the Allied landings at Gallipoli, and openly hoped Constantinople would fall to the British and French. That does not justify the Turks’ terrible revenge, but it does show that the fault was not entirely on one side.
Some of the British and Empire troops surrounded and starved into surrender at Kut el-Amara in Mesopotamia later wrote about their hardships in the siege, but could not bear to write about what happened after they surrendered. As prisoners of the Turks they endured ‘death marches’ similar to those recently inflicted on Armenian civilians, whose bones could sometimes be seen by the roads along which British, Indian and Australian Prisoners of War were made to march.
During the War, most interested parties plotted how they might gain if the Ottoman Empire fell. Armenians and some Arabs wanted independence. The Allies secretly agreed to share out Ottoman territory between themselves after the war. Yet Britain also promised a largely independent state or federation of states for the Arabs; and to the Jews a national homeland, although not necessarily an independent state, in Palestine, although most of the then population of Palestine were Arabs.
Those who like to blame the West and especially Britain for everything therefore single out Britain’s hard to reconcile promises to different parties at different stages in the war as making Britain the real villain, to blame for the current woes of the Middle East.
Well, yes and no. I am uncomfortable reading about the partly broken promises of Arab independence made by Britain to the Hashemite family (Sharif Hussein of Mecca and his sons such as Feisal) to encourage them to lead an Arab revolt.
On the other hand I cannot help feeling that Britain is sometimes held to a different standard than everyone else, and no allowance made for circumstances. The British were hardly the only ones to make hard to reconcile promises to different parties in pursuit of their own interests, under the pressure of fighting the biggest war in history up to that time. Sometimes survival trumps principles.
The Turks on the outbreak of war offered their support (at a price) to both sides until Germany made them the better offer. The Germans sought to strengthen their alliance with Turkey by spreading false rumours there that Kaiser Wilhelm II had converted to Islam. The future leaders of the Arab revolt pledged loyalty to the Ottoman Empire even as they secretly schemed with Britain to overthrow it. They later agreed to recognise French rule in Syria after the war while privately intending to forcibly drive the French out as soon as the opportunity arose.
The often awful history of Lebanon, Syria and Iraq under independent Arab rule since the 1940s hardly suggests that independent Arab rule was always a good thing anyway.
While the Hashemites were badly disappointed at the peace settlement, they still got the kingdoms of Iraq and Jordan out of it and reign in Jordan to this day. Mecca and most of the Arabian Peninsula, for the first time for hundreds of years, ended up under Arab rule, even if mainly by the rival Saudi dynasty rather than the Hashemites.
21 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Edward B. Crutchley
5.0 out of 5 stars
Wonderfully readable
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 25, 2016Verified Purchase
This is a wonderfully readable referenced account of the demise of the Ottoman Empire under the Young Turks as a result of the First World War. Britain and France were afraid that German and Ottoman efforts to encourage a jihad against them would envelope their colonies in Africa and India and swallow up precious troops desperately needed for the western front. They wrongly expected that the Ottomans would be more easily beaten on the fronts that developed in the Caucasus, Dardanelles and the Middle East and Mesopotamia. Their humiliations experienced at places like Gallipoli and Kut, and serious challenges faced in Gaza and elsewhere, proved them wrong. Attention is paid to the plight of the Ottoman Christians, notably the Armenians, seen as fifth columnists. The author points out the exaggerated blame placed on Churchill rather than Kitchener for Gallipoli, and the fact that Turkish state documents written during the trials at the end of the war clearly pointed to an Armenian genocide. Also included of course is the role played by TE Lawrence and the subsequent betrayal of Arab independence by avaricious Britain and France.
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Kindle Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars
A history I never knew....
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 29, 2017Verified Purchase
I came to this book to try to understand a number of issues. WW1 was not only fought in Western Europe and I needed to see the implications of the war further East. The conclusion the author comes to that the war with the Ottomans delays the final resolution of the overall war is a very powerful argument. But further a series of events are set in motion the consequences of which are still not resolved and which still cause violence and bloodshed. At best you could argue Britain and France acted with the short term in mind. The counter argument is that we continue to harvest pain, violence and mistrust from the actions of a century ago.
Mr Ronan writes with great clarity and an obvious command of his subject.
Mr Ronan writes with great clarity and an obvious command of his subject.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Paddy Briggs
5.0 out of 5 stars
This is a magnificent and very readable book. Much of the research is original and Rogan puts the story together very skilfully.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 13, 2016Verified Purchase
One hundred years on from the Great War it is right that we should be commemorating the great tragic events that characterised it. Most of the attention is understandably on the Western Front with its five years of gruesome, deadly struggle. But whilst the battles in Europe are the ones we most remember we should not forget that this was a World War and that there was plenty of action away from France and Belgium. Nor should we forget that the consequences of the War were profound as three great empires fell along with their monarchs and that the seeds of later horrors were sewn as the politicians failed catastrophically to create the conditions for lasting peace.
The three fallen Empires were the Russian (consequence: 70 years of totalitarianism), the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman. It is how the latter fell that this fine book is about. The empire was shaky well before the outbreak of war with pressure from Arab Nationalism, Russian expansionism and from a changing leadership in Istanbul itself. The “Young Turks” were modern challengers to the hegemony of “Divine Right” Ottoman rule and whilst their lust for power was the main driver they nevertheless also wanted to modernise a State rather lost in its past. When the war broke out there was a brief flirtation with Britain and the Allied Powers but the logic, as they saw it, of joining Germany and Austro-Hungary was stronger. That was certainly what the Germans wanted and the military alliance that they established was strong with some German officers running Ottoman units. The Ottoman military record was actually quite good with Gallipoli, that mad and deadly Churchillian adventure, being a triumph for them – albeit a horrendously costly one in respect of loss of life. Gallipoli was not the only Ottoman win against the Allies and the latter needed to reinforce their Armies in the region as well as building their own alliance with the Hashemite (Arab Nationalist) forces. This latter story (Lawrence of Arabia and all) is wonderfully and illuminatingly well told.
In the end a combination of their own internal contradictions, venality (especially the Armenian massacre) and the overwhelming force of a strong opposition was to defeat the Ottomans and in the post war peace negotiations the Empire was forcibly broken up. In the post war period Mustafa Kemal Atatürk created a modern State of Turkey and the imperial dream disappeared. It would not have happened without the Great War, at least not so quickly
This is a magnificent and very readable book. Much of the research is original and Rogan puts the story together very skilfully. You cannot really understand the Great War without understanding the part the Ottomans played in it – and the consequences were profound.
The three fallen Empires were the Russian (consequence: 70 years of totalitarianism), the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman. It is how the latter fell that this fine book is about. The empire was shaky well before the outbreak of war with pressure from Arab Nationalism, Russian expansionism and from a changing leadership in Istanbul itself. The “Young Turks” were modern challengers to the hegemony of “Divine Right” Ottoman rule and whilst their lust for power was the main driver they nevertheless also wanted to modernise a State rather lost in its past. When the war broke out there was a brief flirtation with Britain and the Allied Powers but the logic, as they saw it, of joining Germany and Austro-Hungary was stronger. That was certainly what the Germans wanted and the military alliance that they established was strong with some German officers running Ottoman units. The Ottoman military record was actually quite good with Gallipoli, that mad and deadly Churchillian adventure, being a triumph for them – albeit a horrendously costly one in respect of loss of life. Gallipoli was not the only Ottoman win against the Allies and the latter needed to reinforce their Armies in the region as well as building their own alliance with the Hashemite (Arab Nationalist) forces. This latter story (Lawrence of Arabia and all) is wonderfully and illuminatingly well told.
In the end a combination of their own internal contradictions, venality (especially the Armenian massacre) and the overwhelming force of a strong opposition was to defeat the Ottomans and in the post war peace negotiations the Empire was forcibly broken up. In the post war period Mustafa Kemal Atatürk created a modern State of Turkey and the imperial dream disappeared. It would not have happened without the Great War, at least not so quickly
This is a magnificent and very readable book. Much of the research is original and Rogan puts the story together very skilfully. You cannot really understand the Great War without understanding the part the Ottomans played in it – and the consequences were profound.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Kevin Botting
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very readable
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 3, 2019Verified Purchase
This book clearly explains the progress of the 1st World War in the Middle East, which most Great War books give minimal attention. The Entente powers were in continual fear of triggering Jihad by attacking the Caliph (the Turkish Sultan) and Moslem arabs and causing religious rebellion in French and English Colonies in North Africa and India.
It never happened but it did shape Entente war planning to be more cautious and reduced the pressure on the Ottomans.
Neither did it prevent Britain and France from planning a carve up of the Ottoman Empire long before the prospect of actually defeating the enemy, and encouraging Arab rebellion whilst still planning to take over most of the Arab regions and allow a homeland in Palestine for Zionist Jews. We live with the tragic consequences of the post war settlement today, so this period of history remains relevant.
It never happened but it did shape Entente war planning to be more cautious and reduced the pressure on the Ottomans.
Neither did it prevent Britain and France from planning a carve up of the Ottoman Empire long before the prospect of actually defeating the enemy, and encouraging Arab rebellion whilst still planning to take over most of the Arab regions and allow a homeland in Palestine for Zionist Jews. We live with the tragic consequences of the post war settlement today, so this period of history remains relevant.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse






