- Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account
Other Sellers on Amazon
$11.16
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
AllPro Books
Have one to sell?
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Family Circle: The Boudins and the Aristocracy of the Left Paperback – November 9, 2004
by
Susan Braudy
(Author)
|
Susan Braudy
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length496 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherAnchor
-
Publication dateNovember 9, 2004
-
Dimensions5.21 x 1.01 x 8.02 inches
-
ISBN-101400077486
-
ISBN-13978-1400077489
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Flying Close to the Sun: My Life and Times as a WeathermanPaperbackOnly 1 left in stock (more on the way).
The Devil and Karl Marx: Communism's Long March of Death, Deception, and InfiltrationHardcoverIn Stock.
Days of Rage: America's Radical Underground, the FBI, and the Forgotten Age of Revolutionary ViolencePaperbackIn Stock.
Special offers and product promotions
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A gripping study. . . . A powerful narrative.” --The New York Times Book Review
“Tough-minded, honest, and thoroughly absorbing.” --The New Republic
“The tensions, conflicts, and eventual downfall of a seemingly confident dynasty of radical tinkers and super-achievers . . . give Susan Braudy’s Family Circle its stunning power. . . . As Braudy tells it, the story attains the epic stature of a genuine American tragedy.” --The Women’s Review of Books
“Fascinating . . . Braudy, who knew Kathy growing up, delves deeply into her family’s crippling psychological games.” –People
“Rethinks what makes a radical tick." --New York Daily News
“Tough-minded, honest, and thoroughly absorbing.” --The New Republic
“The tensions, conflicts, and eventual downfall of a seemingly confident dynasty of radical tinkers and super-achievers . . . give Susan Braudy’s Family Circle its stunning power. . . . As Braudy tells it, the story attains the epic stature of a genuine American tragedy.” --The Women’s Review of Books
“Fascinating . . . Braudy, who knew Kathy growing up, delves deeply into her family’s crippling psychological games.” –People
“Rethinks what makes a radical tick." --New York Daily News
From the Inside Flap
hy Boudin, revolutionary Weatherman, fled the ruins of a town house on West Eleventh Street in Greenwich Village after a bomb that was being made there exploded, killing three people, and Americas sympathy with radicalism fell apart. The Weathermen had started as angry kids who planted stink bombs and emulated the Black Panthers, but the bomb they were building on Eleventh Street was deadly. Kathy, daughter of the celebrated lawyer Leonard Boudin, third generation of the famous Boudin family, emerged naked from the wreckage, was given some clothes by a neighbor, slipped into the night, and went underground for the next eleven years, her name soon appearing on the FBIs 10 Most Wanted List.
Susan Braudy tells the riveting story of the Boudin family circle through four generations. She writes of Kathy Boudins childhood, growing up in Manhattan in an ambitious, liberal New York Jewish family, daughter of a revered left-wing labor and civil liberties lawyer and an intellec
Susan Braudy tells the riveting story of the Boudin family circle through four generations. She writes of Kathy Boudins childhood, growing up in Manhattan in an ambitious, liberal New York Jewish family, daughter of a revered left-wing labor and civil liberties lawyer and an intellec
From the Back Cover
When Kathy Boudin was arrested in 1981 after a botched armed robbery and shootout that left a Brinks guard and two policemen dead, she ended a decade living underground as part of the radical Weathermen underground; she would spend the next 22 years in Bedford Hills prison. In Family Circle," Boudin's former classmate Susan Braudy vividly re-creates the radicalization of this intelligent, privileged young woman who came from one of the most prominent liberal intellectual families in America. She illuminates Boudin's relationship with her parents --and particularly with her father Leonard, a famous leftist lawyer--and shows how Kathy, swept up in the ferment of the late 1960s, moved further and further from the Old Left ideals they embodied.
Based on extensive interviews, court documents, and Boudin family papers, Family Circle is both a rich biography of a family and a intimate window into a turbulent and fascinating time.
Based on extensive interviews, court documents, and Boudin family papers, Family Circle is both a rich biography of a family and a intimate window into a turbulent and fascinating time.
About the Author
Susan Braudy was born in Philadelphia and was educated at Bryn Mawr, the University of Pennsylvania, and Yale. She has written for many magazines, including the New York Times, Newsweek, and The Atlantic Monthly. She is the author of four previous books, among them This Crazy Thing Called Love. She lives in New York City.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
LEONARD BOUDIN-DEEP
BACKGROUND
The refinement of our historical past chiefly means that we keep it properly complicated.
-Lionel Trilling, "The Sense of the Past"
The great labor lawyer and scholar Louis B. Boudin (the initial B. denoting Boudinovitch, the original English translation of the name) cast a long shadow over his nephew Leonard B. Boudin's entire life. While still a small child in the second decade of the twentieth century, Leonard proclaimed that he planned to learn "all the laws in the world and be more famous than Uncle Louis."
For Louis, legal scholarship was holy; he saw the courts as a locus of enormous powers. He wrote the weighty book Government by Judiciary, attacking the Supreme Court during the Depression when the justices of the Court were blocking President Roosevelt's economic reforms. Louis's was a populist message; the people and their elected representatives should make the laws.
The fact that Louis had no sons made his arm's-length relationship with his nephew Leonard more momentous. Louis would be a prime influence on Leonard's children, Kathy and Michael, although they remembered little of his physical presence.
Louis's belief in the greatness of his mission-an intellectual life of legal service to the underclasses-overshadowed the influence of Leonard's far more ordinary father, Joe, a coarse, bellicose man who made a living in real estate law and foreclosing mortgages.
Louis was small and plump and looked like a storekeeper until he opened his mouth often to shout an opinion. And because he was so revered in Europe and the United States as an outstanding labor lawyer, foremost interpreter of Karl Marx and historian of the Supreme Court, his temper tantrums as well as his parsimony prompted fond jokes instead of enmity. He was considered "a great man" and allowances were made.
His nephew Leonard would treasure a European cartoon of Louis scowling disdainfully, under a black cloud. The figure's legs were short, his torso pigeonlike, and under one arm was a volume of the writings of Karl Marx. The caption of the cartoon: "The Hon. Louis Boudin loses his temper."
Louis B. Boudin was born in southeastern Russia in 1874, the oldest of five children. He emigrated to Manhattan in 1891 on his own, where he almost miraculously flourished in just a few years. Louis was too proud to admit that anti-Semitism had forced him to leave Russia. He earned his master's degree from New York University Law School in 1897, while shedding most traces of a Russian accent in his spoken English.
Louis's love for his new country was ever-expanding. He saw no conflict between his belief in both Marxist economics and the genius of the United States Constitution. He felt socialism was fairer than capitalism and should prevail.
Louis's mother longed to emigrate to the United States because she missed her favorite person in the world. On the rare day that a letter from Louis failed to arrive, she wept. Louis soon made arrangements for his parents, two brothers, and two sisters to flee. His brothers Joe and Samuel, and his sisters Sarah and Mary, packed handwoven linens and sateen featherbedding in preparation for their journey.
But when they reached the nearby city of Kiev, a cholera epidemic was raging. Leonard's grandmother's featherbedding was confiscated and burned. She managed to hide one little embroidered silk pillow in a brass samovar, and later bestowed it upon her favorite grandchild, Leonard.
Louis's parents never learned much English. A family story, told as a joke, illustrates that fact. Riding the subway during World War I, Louis's father misunderstood a stranger's remark excoriating pacifists and was almost arrested as a spy. The anthropologist Margaret Mead later observed that nearly all Boudin family problems were grist for jokes.
After graduation from law school, Louis had started a general practice on the Lower East Side, but soon represented almost all of the socialist and communist unions in New York, including the furriers, restaurant workers, united office and professional workers, and the amalgamated utility workers. In the first decades of the twentieth century, emerging labor unions were on the minds of many serious thinkers, politicians, and working people.
A difficult aspect of Louis Boudin's legacy is illustrated by his obdurate attempt to join the first convention of the International Workers of the World, known as the "Wobblies," on June 27, 1905, in Chicago.
Two hundred socialists, anarchists, and union leaders gathered there to create "one big industrial union" to be "founded on the class struggle." The delegates refused to seat Louis, then thirty-one, because as a prosperous lawyer he was "a parasite on the working class." Louis shouted out his commitment to the working man for six long days. But it was no use.
Delegate Lillian Forberg told the assembled group: "It is a well-known fact that no attorney of law could be anything else but a parasite. We are here to fight the whole parasitical class and to organize the working class."
The situation was complex: Louis believed himself to be morally superior to middle-class friends because of his work on behalf of the less fortunate. But Louis's life was buttressed by the objects and security of class privilege and this anomaly led him to sometimes talk as if he were trying to destroy himself. Seventy-five years later, Kathy Boudin claimed to see her birth to a family of well-to-do whites as an agonizing defect to be obliterated by rationalization, violence, and self-deprivation. Kathy wanted above all somehow to discipline her mind and body into being a member of the black working class.
Soon after Louis's humiliation at the convention in Chicago, his brother Joe fell for fair-haired Clara Hessner at the Henry Street Settlement in Manhattan. Founded by Lillian Wald, a shrewd, generous nurse of German-Jewish descent, the center trained volunteers to teach immigrant women like Clara Hessner how to talk back to school superintendents, court clerks, police sergeants, and other public officials who condescended to them.
Although overlooked as a role model for Leonard and his children, Louis and Joe's sister Sarah was a pioneer in the emerging field of social work. As a young woman, Sarah sewed neckties in a sweatshop, the rare Boudin to possess a legitimate if brief membership in the proletariat. Nights she took classes to qualify for law school. She organized coworkers for the International Ladies Garment Workers Union. The hours were long-the harsh cry of management was "If you don't come in on Sunday, don't come in on Monday"-and the male shop foreman had free rein to humiliate female workers.
Sarah retaliated by organizing the women to stop work as soon as he was out of sight. But she was fired after the foreman saw her picture at a strike meeting on the front page of the Forward, the six-page daily Yiddish-language newspaper. She then went to work as a secretary for her favorite brother, Louis, in preparation for law school. But Sarah came to realize that she'd find legal research boring, and she soon married William Edlin, an editor and drama critic at the Forward.
When Louis's wife, Anna, died, his sister Sarah and her husband moved into Louis's big house in Brooklyn, where Sarah tended to Louis's small children. Sarah's husband, William, felt neglected. After a divorce, Sarah thought about going to law school again, rejected the idea, and enrolled instead at the New York School of Social Work, vowing to "make a difference."
After her graduation Sarah took over the Lakeview Home on Staten Island for unmarried mothers sponsored by the Jewish Board of Guardians. Recent immigrants from Russia, the young girls had worked as domestics and factory workers. Her duties for the next fifty years ranged from "statistics to shoveling coal." Sarah insisted the girls see themselves as worthy members of society. She canceled restrictive practices such as locking the girls' clothes in lockers in the basement to keep them from running away. Encouraged by Louis, she wrote a blunt book called The Unmarried Mother in Our Society, replete with common sense and affection.
Following Louis's lead, Leonard's mother, Clara, disdained Sarah's endeavors as not truly intellectual. Clara saved all adulatory reviews of Louis Boudin's ponderous books. Presumably she knew exactly how much her practice irked her insecure husband, Joe. Joe felt more comfortable around his brother Samuel, also a City College graduate, and a highway and tunnels engineer.
Joe screamed that Louis was "selfish" and cared only about famous friends and footnotes in his books. Louis bragged of shouting at Leon Trotsky and of his correspondence with Rosa Luxembourg as well as with Jack London who signed "Yours for the revolution." A founder of the U.S. Socialist Party, Louis was a popular speaker on socialism and democracy at college campus meetings of the LID (League for Industrial Democracy, the precursor to SDS, Students for a Democratic Society).
Leonard B. Boudin (he adopted the "B" in homage to his uncle) was born on July 20, 1912. When he was six, his father moved his family from Brooklyn to a large corner house at Eighty-fifth Avenue and 150th Street in Richmond Hill, Queens. Leonard loved rolling on the big lawns with his collie. He watered the family's acre of cornfields and helped his father grease his automobile on Sundays.
There was perhaps only one person who could have foreseen that the dazed little boy with a lisp would one day be known as "a great man" to judges and legal theorists in England, Chile, Cuba, and the United States. But that person made all the difference. She was Leonard's weepy and fine-featured mother. Throughout his life Leonard would retain the attitude of an adored boy.
Clara saw her own angelic face every time she looked at Leonard. She brushed his fair hair and whispered in his ear that despite Joe's insults, Leonard was "the smartest little boy in America." He seemed unable to stop hugging her. When he lost her full attention he pretended to duck under her skirt. As an adolescent he became sexually aroused for the first time at the sight of her underwear.
Much of Leonard's difficulty as a small child stemmed from his humiliating lisp. Joe berated Leonard for not speaking up in classrooms. Leonard's elementary-school teachers, two of whom lived next door, told Joe that Leonard daydreamed four serial fantasies at once.
In later years Leonard remembered his teachers as "mediocre and dull." He and Joe agonized over Leonard's poor performance in Latin and German. Leonard also had terrible handwriting, despite hours of practicing the Palmer method with Joe. He despaired: his father and uncle wrote beautifully. To please his mother, Leonard played the piano, but not well. Nonetheless Clara dreamed aloud that Leonard might be a concert pianist. To make her smile, Leonard danced while Clara played Chopin.
In 1920, when Leonard was eight, his brother Arthur was born. Athletic Arthur was his father's favorite.
A few years later, Leonard's mother, Clara, told her husband she was leaving him. Joe threw himself on the floor and banged his head against it. Leonard welcomed the silence that followed such fights.
A legendary flirt, Clara practiced Christian Science, influenced by one of Joe's real estate clients who was smitten with her. As a result, she treated Leonard's frequent headaches only with prayer. But she did enroll Leonard in speech therapy classes for his lisp.
After school he cut out editorials for his father from the New York Law Journal, cross-indexing "matrimony and divorce," and pasted bookplates in Joe's law books. Clara wept because her husband "treated Leonard like an enslaved law clerk."
When Joe taught Leonard to play chess, the boy's inability to concentrate vanished. Chess can be a harsh lesson for a child: one player's gain is another player's loss. Joe was thrilled by Leonard's passion for beating him. Mortified by his lisp, Leonard had an immediate affinity for the "silent" war strategies of chess. He enjoyed "quick slaughter." Leonard read book after book about chess champions and decided that arrogance was key.
Clara soon invited Morton Gould, whose father worked with her husband, to perform at one of her musical soirees. Three years older than Leonard, Morton was a piano prodigy and the most famous boy in Richmond Hill. He had written original compositions at the kitchen table before he was five years old. By age eight he'd won one of many scholarshops to music school. Thrilled to have him in her home, Clara flirted with the boy. Sixteen-year-old Leonard was jealous of the older boy's effect on Clara. Leonard began to practice the piano more feverishly than ever. Desperate to bask in Morton's reflected glory, Leonard embarked on a brief and fumbling intimate relationship with the older boy.
In winter 1929, Joe Boudin startled neighbors walking by his home on 114th Street in Richmond Hills, by yelling to one and all, "I'm a failure. I can't buy food to put on the table." Joe cursed his sweeping losses in Florida real estate. Leonard hid in his room where he read novels and daydreamed. Joe refused to listen to "pie in the sky" solutions to the vicissitudes of the Great Depression, espoused by his brother Louis. He jeered at news that a million frightened Americans marched on May 1 in Manhattan to commemorate the Russian Revolution.
Joe was reduced to doing clerical work: he foreclosed mortgages for landlords. He also managed a bail bond agency.
Joe was soon dealt another blow. Leonard's application for admission to City College, Joe's alma mater, was rejected. The humiliating reason: bad grades in geometry, Latin, and German. Joe pulled strings to get Leonard an interview with the college president. Leonard was winning in the interview and was admitted. In later years, Leonard simplified his problems by claiming that he had attended Harvard, where he said that he'd been nothing special as a student.
Life on the City College campus was fervent. The all-male student body was gripped by the political crises of the Depression. Many were fanatically devoted to competing intellectual solutions. They brought lunch from home in brown bags, and the select among them ate in special areas of the cafeteria. Anti-Stalinist students ate in alcove #1; these were socialists and Trotskyists and included Irving Howe, Irving Kristol, Daniel Bell, and Seymour Melman. In alcove #2 were pro-Stalin students who were at times forbidden by the party to talk to members of #1. After shouting at one another until they were hoarse about how best to save the world, the boys scurried off together to afternoon classes.
Leonard helped to run the exclusive alcove of the chess team. Pure intellection was the credo. Leonard gulped down his mother's jelly sandwiches and supervised concurrent combative games of chess. Tryouts for the chess team, advertised in the school newspaper, consisted of playing three games against Leonard. A sly dig in his yearbook caption hinted at Leonard's lifelong fascination with famous men. "Lenny lives on the strength of his uncle's intelligence and his friends' cynicism."
BACKGROUND
The refinement of our historical past chiefly means that we keep it properly complicated.
-Lionel Trilling, "The Sense of the Past"
The great labor lawyer and scholar Louis B. Boudin (the initial B. denoting Boudinovitch, the original English translation of the name) cast a long shadow over his nephew Leonard B. Boudin's entire life. While still a small child in the second decade of the twentieth century, Leonard proclaimed that he planned to learn "all the laws in the world and be more famous than Uncle Louis."
For Louis, legal scholarship was holy; he saw the courts as a locus of enormous powers. He wrote the weighty book Government by Judiciary, attacking the Supreme Court during the Depression when the justices of the Court were blocking President Roosevelt's economic reforms. Louis's was a populist message; the people and their elected representatives should make the laws.
The fact that Louis had no sons made his arm's-length relationship with his nephew Leonard more momentous. Louis would be a prime influence on Leonard's children, Kathy and Michael, although they remembered little of his physical presence.
Louis's belief in the greatness of his mission-an intellectual life of legal service to the underclasses-overshadowed the influence of Leonard's far more ordinary father, Joe, a coarse, bellicose man who made a living in real estate law and foreclosing mortgages.
Louis was small and plump and looked like a storekeeper until he opened his mouth often to shout an opinion. And because he was so revered in Europe and the United States as an outstanding labor lawyer, foremost interpreter of Karl Marx and historian of the Supreme Court, his temper tantrums as well as his parsimony prompted fond jokes instead of enmity. He was considered "a great man" and allowances were made.
His nephew Leonard would treasure a European cartoon of Louis scowling disdainfully, under a black cloud. The figure's legs were short, his torso pigeonlike, and under one arm was a volume of the writings of Karl Marx. The caption of the cartoon: "The Hon. Louis Boudin loses his temper."
Louis B. Boudin was born in southeastern Russia in 1874, the oldest of five children. He emigrated to Manhattan in 1891 on his own, where he almost miraculously flourished in just a few years. Louis was too proud to admit that anti-Semitism had forced him to leave Russia. He earned his master's degree from New York University Law School in 1897, while shedding most traces of a Russian accent in his spoken English.
Louis's love for his new country was ever-expanding. He saw no conflict between his belief in both Marxist economics and the genius of the United States Constitution. He felt socialism was fairer than capitalism and should prevail.
Louis's mother longed to emigrate to the United States because she missed her favorite person in the world. On the rare day that a letter from Louis failed to arrive, she wept. Louis soon made arrangements for his parents, two brothers, and two sisters to flee. His brothers Joe and Samuel, and his sisters Sarah and Mary, packed handwoven linens and sateen featherbedding in preparation for their journey.
But when they reached the nearby city of Kiev, a cholera epidemic was raging. Leonard's grandmother's featherbedding was confiscated and burned. She managed to hide one little embroidered silk pillow in a brass samovar, and later bestowed it upon her favorite grandchild, Leonard.
Louis's parents never learned much English. A family story, told as a joke, illustrates that fact. Riding the subway during World War I, Louis's father misunderstood a stranger's remark excoriating pacifists and was almost arrested as a spy. The anthropologist Margaret Mead later observed that nearly all Boudin family problems were grist for jokes.
After graduation from law school, Louis had started a general practice on the Lower East Side, but soon represented almost all of the socialist and communist unions in New York, including the furriers, restaurant workers, united office and professional workers, and the amalgamated utility workers. In the first decades of the twentieth century, emerging labor unions were on the minds of many serious thinkers, politicians, and working people.
A difficult aspect of Louis Boudin's legacy is illustrated by his obdurate attempt to join the first convention of the International Workers of the World, known as the "Wobblies," on June 27, 1905, in Chicago.
Two hundred socialists, anarchists, and union leaders gathered there to create "one big industrial union" to be "founded on the class struggle." The delegates refused to seat Louis, then thirty-one, because as a prosperous lawyer he was "a parasite on the working class." Louis shouted out his commitment to the working man for six long days. But it was no use.
Delegate Lillian Forberg told the assembled group: "It is a well-known fact that no attorney of law could be anything else but a parasite. We are here to fight the whole parasitical class and to organize the working class."
The situation was complex: Louis believed himself to be morally superior to middle-class friends because of his work on behalf of the less fortunate. But Louis's life was buttressed by the objects and security of class privilege and this anomaly led him to sometimes talk as if he were trying to destroy himself. Seventy-five years later, Kathy Boudin claimed to see her birth to a family of well-to-do whites as an agonizing defect to be obliterated by rationalization, violence, and self-deprivation. Kathy wanted above all somehow to discipline her mind and body into being a member of the black working class.
Soon after Louis's humiliation at the convention in Chicago, his brother Joe fell for fair-haired Clara Hessner at the Henry Street Settlement in Manhattan. Founded by Lillian Wald, a shrewd, generous nurse of German-Jewish descent, the center trained volunteers to teach immigrant women like Clara Hessner how to talk back to school superintendents, court clerks, police sergeants, and other public officials who condescended to them.
Although overlooked as a role model for Leonard and his children, Louis and Joe's sister Sarah was a pioneer in the emerging field of social work. As a young woman, Sarah sewed neckties in a sweatshop, the rare Boudin to possess a legitimate if brief membership in the proletariat. Nights she took classes to qualify for law school. She organized coworkers for the International Ladies Garment Workers Union. The hours were long-the harsh cry of management was "If you don't come in on Sunday, don't come in on Monday"-and the male shop foreman had free rein to humiliate female workers.
Sarah retaliated by organizing the women to stop work as soon as he was out of sight. But she was fired after the foreman saw her picture at a strike meeting on the front page of the Forward, the six-page daily Yiddish-language newspaper. She then went to work as a secretary for her favorite brother, Louis, in preparation for law school. But Sarah came to realize that she'd find legal research boring, and she soon married William Edlin, an editor and drama critic at the Forward.
When Louis's wife, Anna, died, his sister Sarah and her husband moved into Louis's big house in Brooklyn, where Sarah tended to Louis's small children. Sarah's husband, William, felt neglected. After a divorce, Sarah thought about going to law school again, rejected the idea, and enrolled instead at the New York School of Social Work, vowing to "make a difference."
After her graduation Sarah took over the Lakeview Home on Staten Island for unmarried mothers sponsored by the Jewish Board of Guardians. Recent immigrants from Russia, the young girls had worked as domestics and factory workers. Her duties for the next fifty years ranged from "statistics to shoveling coal." Sarah insisted the girls see themselves as worthy members of society. She canceled restrictive practices such as locking the girls' clothes in lockers in the basement to keep them from running away. Encouraged by Louis, she wrote a blunt book called The Unmarried Mother in Our Society, replete with common sense and affection.
Following Louis's lead, Leonard's mother, Clara, disdained Sarah's endeavors as not truly intellectual. Clara saved all adulatory reviews of Louis Boudin's ponderous books. Presumably she knew exactly how much her practice irked her insecure husband, Joe. Joe felt more comfortable around his brother Samuel, also a City College graduate, and a highway and tunnels engineer.
Joe screamed that Louis was "selfish" and cared only about famous friends and footnotes in his books. Louis bragged of shouting at Leon Trotsky and of his correspondence with Rosa Luxembourg as well as with Jack London who signed "Yours for the revolution." A founder of the U.S. Socialist Party, Louis was a popular speaker on socialism and democracy at college campus meetings of the LID (League for Industrial Democracy, the precursor to SDS, Students for a Democratic Society).
Leonard B. Boudin (he adopted the "B" in homage to his uncle) was born on July 20, 1912. When he was six, his father moved his family from Brooklyn to a large corner house at Eighty-fifth Avenue and 150th Street in Richmond Hill, Queens. Leonard loved rolling on the big lawns with his collie. He watered the family's acre of cornfields and helped his father grease his automobile on Sundays.
There was perhaps only one person who could have foreseen that the dazed little boy with a lisp would one day be known as "a great man" to judges and legal theorists in England, Chile, Cuba, and the United States. But that person made all the difference. She was Leonard's weepy and fine-featured mother. Throughout his life Leonard would retain the attitude of an adored boy.
Clara saw her own angelic face every time she looked at Leonard. She brushed his fair hair and whispered in his ear that despite Joe's insults, Leonard was "the smartest little boy in America." He seemed unable to stop hugging her. When he lost her full attention he pretended to duck under her skirt. As an adolescent he became sexually aroused for the first time at the sight of her underwear.
Much of Leonard's difficulty as a small child stemmed from his humiliating lisp. Joe berated Leonard for not speaking up in classrooms. Leonard's elementary-school teachers, two of whom lived next door, told Joe that Leonard daydreamed four serial fantasies at once.
In later years Leonard remembered his teachers as "mediocre and dull." He and Joe agonized over Leonard's poor performance in Latin and German. Leonard also had terrible handwriting, despite hours of practicing the Palmer method with Joe. He despaired: his father and uncle wrote beautifully. To please his mother, Leonard played the piano, but not well. Nonetheless Clara dreamed aloud that Leonard might be a concert pianist. To make her smile, Leonard danced while Clara played Chopin.
In 1920, when Leonard was eight, his brother Arthur was born. Athletic Arthur was his father's favorite.
A few years later, Leonard's mother, Clara, told her husband she was leaving him. Joe threw himself on the floor and banged his head against it. Leonard welcomed the silence that followed such fights.
A legendary flirt, Clara practiced Christian Science, influenced by one of Joe's real estate clients who was smitten with her. As a result, she treated Leonard's frequent headaches only with prayer. But she did enroll Leonard in speech therapy classes for his lisp.
After school he cut out editorials for his father from the New York Law Journal, cross-indexing "matrimony and divorce," and pasted bookplates in Joe's law books. Clara wept because her husband "treated Leonard like an enslaved law clerk."
When Joe taught Leonard to play chess, the boy's inability to concentrate vanished. Chess can be a harsh lesson for a child: one player's gain is another player's loss. Joe was thrilled by Leonard's passion for beating him. Mortified by his lisp, Leonard had an immediate affinity for the "silent" war strategies of chess. He enjoyed "quick slaughter." Leonard read book after book about chess champions and decided that arrogance was key.
Clara soon invited Morton Gould, whose father worked with her husband, to perform at one of her musical soirees. Three years older than Leonard, Morton was a piano prodigy and the most famous boy in Richmond Hill. He had written original compositions at the kitchen table before he was five years old. By age eight he'd won one of many scholarshops to music school. Thrilled to have him in her home, Clara flirted with the boy. Sixteen-year-old Leonard was jealous of the older boy's effect on Clara. Leonard began to practice the piano more feverishly than ever. Desperate to bask in Morton's reflected glory, Leonard embarked on a brief and fumbling intimate relationship with the older boy.
In winter 1929, Joe Boudin startled neighbors walking by his home on 114th Street in Richmond Hills, by yelling to one and all, "I'm a failure. I can't buy food to put on the table." Joe cursed his sweeping losses in Florida real estate. Leonard hid in his room where he read novels and daydreamed. Joe refused to listen to "pie in the sky" solutions to the vicissitudes of the Great Depression, espoused by his brother Louis. He jeered at news that a million frightened Americans marched on May 1 in Manhattan to commemorate the Russian Revolution.
Joe was reduced to doing clerical work: he foreclosed mortgages for landlords. He also managed a bail bond agency.
Joe was soon dealt another blow. Leonard's application for admission to City College, Joe's alma mater, was rejected. The humiliating reason: bad grades in geometry, Latin, and German. Joe pulled strings to get Leonard an interview with the college president. Leonard was winning in the interview and was admitted. In later years, Leonard simplified his problems by claiming that he had attended Harvard, where he said that he'd been nothing special as a student.
Life on the City College campus was fervent. The all-male student body was gripped by the political crises of the Depression. Many were fanatically devoted to competing intellectual solutions. They brought lunch from home in brown bags, and the select among them ate in special areas of the cafeteria. Anti-Stalinist students ate in alcove #1; these were socialists and Trotskyists and included Irving Howe, Irving Kristol, Daniel Bell, and Seymour Melman. In alcove #2 were pro-Stalin students who were at times forbidden by the party to talk to members of #1. After shouting at one another until they were hoarse about how best to save the world, the boys scurried off together to afternoon classes.
Leonard helped to run the exclusive alcove of the chess team. Pure intellection was the credo. Leonard gulped down his mother's jelly sandwiches and supervised concurrent combative games of chess. Tryouts for the chess team, advertised in the school newspaper, consisted of playing three games against Leonard. A sly dig in his yearbook caption hinted at Leonard's lifelong fascination with famous men. "Lenny lives on the strength of his uncle's intelligence and his friends' cynicism."
Start reading Family Circle: The Boudins and the Aristocracy of the Left on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Yo-Yo Ma: Beginner's Mind
Hear an icon's life story, timeless music, and message. Listen free
Product details
- Publisher : Anchor (November 9, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 496 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1400077486
- ISBN-13 : 978-1400077489
- Item Weight : 1.02 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.21 x 1.01 x 8.02 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#2,860,991 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,706 in Radical Political Thought
- #2,169 in Educator Biographies
- #2,305 in Lawyer & Judge Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
18 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2019
Verified Purchase
This book was fun to read and tells a great story. Unfortunately, it's littered with errors large and small, so one can't really trust it for accurate information. But the bizarre part is that the apparently well-educated and previously published author is such a poor wordsmith, routinely using words that aren't quite right, as if she were some otherwise bright tenth grader writing for the school paper. Adjectives and adverbs are not her strong suit, so be warned.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2010
Verified Purchase
This is a very thorough account of the lives of the Boudins and of those connected with them. Some readers may not want all that detail. I personally found it very engaging, especially since I knew (not well) both the author and the book's subject at school. I continue to be fascinated by Kathy Boudin's life, now that she is a professor at Columbia University.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 6, 2014
Verified Purchase
I enjoyed reading this book very much. It brought back a lot of memories of the 60's and a lot of the characters of that time. I had no idea of Boudin's family influence at the time. I find it fascinating one family can produce two children so diametrically opposite as the two Boudin kids.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2012
Verified Purchase
While Leonard Boudin's solipsism and legal chicanery certainly left an indelible impression on the pathetic Kathy, it's all the more remarkable that Michael Boudin - so skilled as a judge he was appointed by Bush 41 to the DC Court of Appeals - has virtually escaped the leftist hellhole.
A remarkable feat, that.
Also, Brody's casual mention of Diana Oughton and Kathy skinning and eating a stray cat was, to put it very mildly, horrific.
A remarkable feat, that.
Also, Brody's casual mention of Diana Oughton and Kathy skinning and eating a stray cat was, to put it very mildly, horrific.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2016
Verified Purchase
Leonard Boudin, my attorney, represented me before the US State Department's Passport Appeals Board in 1958.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 25, 2014
This book is truly must reading for the student of the turbulent 1960s as well as the periods prior to and after, with respect to understanding the 'Old Left' (1930s, 40s, 50s) and 'New Left' (60s, 70s) - and of course today's 'Leftover Left' (80s to present) and what these people are up to. Most of the continue to promote one harmful cause or another and have not matured out of their infantile 'revolutionary' personas of their younger periods. I guess they remain in a state of political arrested development.
The author herself was apparently a protester, albeit non-violent, back in the day, and knew Kathy Boudin personally from their college days. She makes clear, however, that most of the individuals in the infamous 'Weather Underground' were pampered children from very affluent families, with utterly immature and destructive obsessions. The revealed history of the Boudin family takes center stage, her father being a leftist lawyer who supported and defended just about every communist or treasonous group or person that worked to take down America in one form or another. He and her other relatives were big supporters of Cuba and Fidel Castro, Stalin, Che Guevara, and other mass murderers and terrorists who have brought nothing but grief to the world. Of course they claimed to want to make the world a better place, and yet continued supporting that crowd long after their crimes were revealed. This paradox was surely worthy of deeper investigation and analysis in a book of this type, but alas it was not.
It is to the author's credit that all of this is conveyed, even if sometimes indirectly in this book. I think she indulges a bit too much in the trendy psychoanalysis of Kathy as being obsessed with matching or besting her father, winning his approval and respect, or whatever else the author was trying to convey there. One interesting factoid coming through is that the Boudin family and a high percentage of the Weather Underground and related groups leading movers and shakers, are/were Jewish. I am not certain what the significance of that is and the author does not travel down that road other than to simply mention this correlation.
A healthy society would have dealt with these terrorists in a more aggressive prosecutorial way, but America has not been a healthy society for a very long time now. After committing their crimes, some got off on technicalities, others got slaps on the wrists, and still others were not prosecuted or even sought out by the FBI at all. The author does get into that discussion other than to mention their fates in this regard.
Highly recommended and four stars for a great and very interesting read, one star missing because of the light negatives noted above.
The author herself was apparently a protester, albeit non-violent, back in the day, and knew Kathy Boudin personally from their college days. She makes clear, however, that most of the individuals in the infamous 'Weather Underground' were pampered children from very affluent families, with utterly immature and destructive obsessions. The revealed history of the Boudin family takes center stage, her father being a leftist lawyer who supported and defended just about every communist or treasonous group or person that worked to take down America in one form or another. He and her other relatives were big supporters of Cuba and Fidel Castro, Stalin, Che Guevara, and other mass murderers and terrorists who have brought nothing but grief to the world. Of course they claimed to want to make the world a better place, and yet continued supporting that crowd long after their crimes were revealed. This paradox was surely worthy of deeper investigation and analysis in a book of this type, but alas it was not.
It is to the author's credit that all of this is conveyed, even if sometimes indirectly in this book. I think she indulges a bit too much in the trendy psychoanalysis of Kathy as being obsessed with matching or besting her father, winning his approval and respect, or whatever else the author was trying to convey there. One interesting factoid coming through is that the Boudin family and a high percentage of the Weather Underground and related groups leading movers and shakers, are/were Jewish. I am not certain what the significance of that is and the author does not travel down that road other than to simply mention this correlation.
A healthy society would have dealt with these terrorists in a more aggressive prosecutorial way, but America has not been a healthy society for a very long time now. After committing their crimes, some got off on technicalities, others got slaps on the wrists, and still others were not prosecuted or even sought out by the FBI at all. The author does get into that discussion other than to mention their fates in this regard.
Highly recommended and four stars for a great and very interesting read, one star missing because of the light negatives noted above.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2016
Kathy Boudin was not my pal, but I was often in her presence, and I knew her circle, one of whom tried to recruit me into the Weather Underground. Let me attest that what we all had in common was an imperfect (sexism, class-ism) political consciousness which was driven internally by an understanding of our own individual oppression and externally by the genocidal war in Southeast Asia, an inherently racist system, and by all forms of authoritarianism, most often enforced through oppressive institutions.
My point is that we read the world through a political lens, and took principled stances on that basis. We tended to shun the psychological view as too narrow, too reductive, and too distractive. It’s not that our families had no shaping influence in our lives, but that they carried far less determining power than did the enormous political realities that ratcheted our actions, sparked our thoughts, and in many ways, wrenched us from the whole mainstream world.
What’s most lacking, I think, in “Family Circle: The Boudins and the Aristocracy of the Left,” is the above political perspective, namely in regards its pivotal subject, Kathy Boudin. A psychological template, which is both limiting and individualizing is bound to fall short of her lived reality. She and her Sixties allies need to be placed in the historical and social framework which is accountable to their world view. Why, in these pages, is the harrowing Vietnam War made so invisible? Why does an all-pervasive racism seem primarily to reside in white guilt?
But there’s another powerful social force in Kathy’s life which is chiefly absent from Brauder’s account, one that is very central to the shaping of her life. The Women’s Liberation Movement was at its peak in the very years of Kathy’s crises. And so was its opposition. Yes, Brauder notes many incidents of sexism on the left, but she refuses to adopt an anti-sexist perspective. Which has the effect of isolating Kathy as if on a stage--and stereotyping her to boot. Thus she emulates her sexist father, copes or circumvents the sexism of the vanguard left, and easily capitulates to the macho behind the Brinks robbery--which costs her 22 years in prison, and is nary a footnote. And what about Das Oughtan’s death on W.11th St? And Jane Alpert’s long prison sentence? Or Judith Clarke’s? These lives cry out for a feminist perspective. As does that of Eva Blitzstein’s suicide (a virtual footnote) and Jean Boudin’s endlessly repeated shock treatments following an attempted suicide.
So, for Brauder to succeed in her Kathy Boudin portrait, she would need to widen her lens to draw in these two potent perspectives. This would eliminate the free-floating, longwinded, fact-filled, (at times) dubiously written (the baffling overuse of the word “pretty” and “robbers” and the no transition sentences), journalistic commentary in favor of a more cogent analysis which would not only bolster her subjects but also the larger world that they are inseparable from. Yes, a critical perspective would unify, strengthen--and expand, this presentation of a representative Sixties life.
My point is that we read the world through a political lens, and took principled stances on that basis. We tended to shun the psychological view as too narrow, too reductive, and too distractive. It’s not that our families had no shaping influence in our lives, but that they carried far less determining power than did the enormous political realities that ratcheted our actions, sparked our thoughts, and in many ways, wrenched us from the whole mainstream world.
What’s most lacking, I think, in “Family Circle: The Boudins and the Aristocracy of the Left,” is the above political perspective, namely in regards its pivotal subject, Kathy Boudin. A psychological template, which is both limiting and individualizing is bound to fall short of her lived reality. She and her Sixties allies need to be placed in the historical and social framework which is accountable to their world view. Why, in these pages, is the harrowing Vietnam War made so invisible? Why does an all-pervasive racism seem primarily to reside in white guilt?
But there’s another powerful social force in Kathy’s life which is chiefly absent from Brauder’s account, one that is very central to the shaping of her life. The Women’s Liberation Movement was at its peak in the very years of Kathy’s crises. And so was its opposition. Yes, Brauder notes many incidents of sexism on the left, but she refuses to adopt an anti-sexist perspective. Which has the effect of isolating Kathy as if on a stage--and stereotyping her to boot. Thus she emulates her sexist father, copes or circumvents the sexism of the vanguard left, and easily capitulates to the macho behind the Brinks robbery--which costs her 22 years in prison, and is nary a footnote. And what about Das Oughtan’s death on W.11th St? And Jane Alpert’s long prison sentence? Or Judith Clarke’s? These lives cry out for a feminist perspective. As does that of Eva Blitzstein’s suicide (a virtual footnote) and Jean Boudin’s endlessly repeated shock treatments following an attempted suicide.
So, for Brauder to succeed in her Kathy Boudin portrait, she would need to widen her lens to draw in these two potent perspectives. This would eliminate the free-floating, longwinded, fact-filled, (at times) dubiously written (the baffling overuse of the word “pretty” and “robbers” and the no transition sentences), journalistic commentary in favor of a more cogent analysis which would not only bolster her subjects but also the larger world that they are inseparable from. Yes, a critical perspective would unify, strengthen--and expand, this presentation of a representative Sixties life.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 30, 2017Verified Purchase
Excellent.

