Enter your mobile number below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Fanaticism: On the Uses of an Idea Hardcover – May 4, 2010
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
“A tour de force in every sense—Toscano wipes the smug smiles off the self-righteous faces of the New Philosophers.”—Mike Davis, author of Planet of Slums
About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
First, writers such as Badiou, and definitely Zizek are not some marginal figures only enjoyed by some sort of 'sect'. In fact, one might argue, for example, in the case of Zizek, that one would be hard-pressed to find a more popular living philosopher, who enjoys almost a rock-star status across a number of disciplines and even in the public at large, regardless of what people think of his work. Likewise, if not already familiar with Badiou, a quick wikipedia search, and you'll discover that not only is he widely translated into a number of languages, but he is also an extremely influential and prominent French thinker in both the intellectual and artistic world, if not the political. In other words, by no means 'cult' figures, and in fact quite the contrary - Toscano is dealing with some of the most well-known, if albiet polarizing, figures on the intellectual landscape today in philosophy.
Second, in my own understanding, the whole thesis of 'fanaticism' is to get us away from thinking about these bipolar visions of the world as 'armed prophets' (e.g., the Islamic terrorists) versus global policies (e.g.Read more ›
This book has a very important message: Fanaticism, in the sense of total commitment to a cause, is important for the progress of humanity. This thesis is all the more important because of contemporary trust in "reasonableness," "compromises," etc., which often cannot bring about the required radical changes. Therefore, designating an actor as "fanatic" is not enough for judging him as wrong and evil. I will take this point into account in my next book ISRAELI STATECRAFT: CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE.
However the book has a major weakness, shared by books written by the author's reference group. A lot of space is devoted to scholastic debates with Badiou, Sloterdijk, Zizek and other authors which are of limited interest to other than "sect" members. And even more space is going to show that Marx was right on some main points, which may be relevant in a book on the history of ideas but is irrelevant for the main valid point of the author.
Instead of engaging in hermeneutics on various texts, the author should have taken the real novel issue posed by fanaticism, namely the dangers posed by it when combined with modern and foreseeable mass killing weapons. These dangers require global policies against "armed prophets." However this fateful issue is not taken up in the book.Read more ›