This book is unique in its breadth and approach. It is well-written. And it is novel. Gregory Clark draws on centuries of data to explain what made the Industrial Revolution possible.
It is almost a dogma by now among economists that *institutions* explain wealth disparities between nations. And Clark doesn't disagree. But he emphasizes that people both shape and are shaped by the institutions they live under. For example, Clark argues that “private property institutions do play an important role in the escape from the Malthusian Trap, but only in a much more long-run and indirect fashion” (p. 147). What mediates the link between institutions and economic success? Part of the answer Clark proposes depends on the fact that different heritable traits will proliferate under different institutions.
Thus, he argues, “In the institutional and technological context of these [post-agricultural, pre-industrial] societies, a new set of human attributes mattered to accumulate the only currency significant in the Malthusian era – reproductive success. Literacy and numeracy, previously irrelevant, were now both helpful for achieving economic success in agrarian preindustrial economies. And because reproductive success was linked to economic success, facility with numbers and words was pulled along its wake. Patience and hard work had found a new reward in a society with large amounts of capital; thus these characteristics were now also favored” (p. 185).
This is the kind of explanation that can get an academic chased off campus these days, mainly because it challenges the egalitarian desire to believe that institutions exist in a vacuum, that Western nations are only rich because of luck or exploitation of outsiders, and that there can be no biological differences between different groups. Lucky for us, Clark ignores the academic dogmas of the day and offers us an original and fascinating theory of why the Industrial Revolution happened in England first, and why it was centuries in the making.
A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World, 25) Illustrated Edition
by
Gregory Clark
(Author)
|
Gregory Clark
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0691141282
ISBN-10:
9780691141282
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Only 17 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Winner of the 2008 Gold Book Medal in Finance/Investment/Economics, Independent Publisher Book Awards"
"Right or wrong, or perhaps somewhere in between, Clark's is about as stimulating an account of world economic history as one is likely to find. Let's hope that the human traits to which he attributes economic progress are acquired, not genetic, and that the countries that grow in population over the next 50 years turn out to be good at imparting them. Alternatively, we can simply hope he's wrong."---Benjamin M. Friedman, New York Times Book Review
"Clark's idea-rich book may just prove to be the next blockbuster in economics. He offers us a daring story of the economic foundations of good institutions and the climb out of recurring poverty. We may not have cracked the mystery of human progress, but A Farewell to Alms brings us closer than before."---Tyler Cowen, New York Times
"[C]lark is very good at piecing together figures from here and there, including those from isolated groups of hunter-gatherers alive today. He makes a plausible case for the basic pattern: for thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution, there was essentially no sustained improvement in mankind's general material standard of living, nor was there much variation from place to place around the world. The Industrial Revolution made all the difference."---Robert Solow, New York Review of Books
"A Farewell to Alms asks the right questions, and it is full of fascinating details, like the speed at which information traveled over two millennia (prior to the 19th century, about one mile per hour). Clark's combination of passion and erudition makes his account engaging. When a light bulb goes off in my head, the first thing I ask myself is 'Would this be interest if it were true?' Clark's thesis definitely meets that test."---Samuel Bowles, Science
"Mr. Clark...has produced a well written and thought-provoking thesis, refreshingly light on jargon and equations. It could well be the subject of debate for years to come." ― The Economist
"Gregory Clark's A Farewell to Alms is fully as absorbing, as memorable and as well written as [Jared] Diamond's remarkable bestseller. It deserves to be as widely read.... [A]ny book that is as bold, as fascinating, as conscientiously argued and as politically incorrect as this one demands to be read."---Clive Crook, Financial Times
"Obviously, we¹ve got a controversial argument here. But Clark makes a compelling case for the idea that the fruits of industrialization were open to all societies, but only a handful seized the moment."---William R. Wineke, The Wisconsin State Journal
"Gregory Clark's new book A Farewell to Alms is an investigation of both our nasty, brutish, and short past and our more prosperous present. Mr. Clark first makes the case that we owe our current prosperity to the gifts of the Industrial Revolution. He then attempts to explain why that revolution happened in 18th-century England."---Edward Glaeser, New York Sun
"Economic history often conjures images of musty tomes, bygone eras that no one knows about and in general, scholarship that is dry and difficult to relate to. Gregory Clark's new book A Farewell to Alms conveys a different image. Offering a sweep of history from the border between antiquity and the medieval age, the book is an attempt at tackling grand themes."---Siddharth Singh, LiveMint
"For a novel and somewhat dispiriting theory of economic divergence, read A Farewell to Alms, published this year, by Gregory Clark of the University of California at Davis. He doesn't accept the view, common among the utopians, that natural endowments like soil and water explain why rich nations are 50 times as prosperous as poor ones. How can differences in natural resources possibly explain Zimbabwe's misery or Singapore's wealth? Clark amasses an extraordinary collection of historical data to explain why the Industrial Revolution was born in western Europe, not Africa or India."---William Baldwin, Forbes
"Clark's ferociously systematic expounding of an alternative to the institutional explanation does...provide many delightful insights, large and small, along the way. Some of the observations in this very well-written book do make for nice dinner party anecdotes."---Harold James, The American Interest
"Comes now Gregory Clark, an economist who interestingly takes the side of culture. In an important new book, A Farewell to Alms Clark suggests that much of the world's remaining poverty is semi-permanent. Modern technology and management are widely available, but many societies can't take advantage because their values and social organization are antagonistic. Prescribing economically sensible policies (open markets, secure property rights, sound money) can't overcome this bedrock resistance."---Robert Samuelson, The Washington Post
"A Farewell to Alms is a brave new work, rich in both detailed facts and big ideas. Clark clears away much of the tangled brush of theories of long-term economic growth that have grown up in recent decades. This is the most ambitious and far-reaching book on long-term economic history to appear in many years, perhaps since Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel."---Jack A. Goldstone, World Economics
"Clark's book A Farewell to Alms is . . . Ambitious, staking out an entire vision of world history. . . . Clark's Malthusian model is forcefully argued."---Roger Gathman, Austin American-Statesman
"[T]he author's engaging style and (relatively) jargon-free descriptions of the economic principles in play before, during, and after the Industrial Revolution in England turn this rich and detailed account into more of a sprint than a slog. . . . Whatever your reaction to this decidedly un-PC take on economic aid, [A Farewell to Alms] serves as a useful explanation of how we got where we are today and a reminder that new approaches are needed to close the yawning gap between the world's richest and poorest societies."---Roberta Fusaro, Harvard Business Review
"Clark argues the English evolved biologically in ways that created prosperity. Before you dismiss the notion, read this brilliant tour of economic history." ― MoneySense Magazine
"Clark adds substantively to an understanding of perhaps the important questions of this--or any--era: what makes economies grow, and why have some not experienced any success at all?....Alms is provocative, authoritative, insightful, readable, well documented, and an inescapable detour for anyone wanting to tackle economic growth and development topics and enter into these conversations."---A. R. Sanderson, Choice
"Gregory Clark has written a fascinating book which is chock-full of insight and ideas. Clark paints on a big canvas and his deft handling of the puzzles and counterintuitive outcomes is delicious. 'No one,' he says, 'can claim to be truly intellectually alive without having understood and wrestled, at least a little, with these mysteries'. We are indebted to him for revealing more of them in such an electrifying fashion."---Ian R. Harper, The Melbourne Review
"[A Farewell to Alms] is one of the most fascinating, and the most disturbing, historical works I have read. It seems to suggest that the gross inequality of our world has less to do with the inherent unfairness of global capitalism and more with scarcely ineradicable cultural difference. . . . [T]his is economic history as you never read it before."---A.N. Wilson, The Daily Telegraph
"Why do some nations get rich while others stay poor? What are the conditions that allow an economy to take off and grow? These questions have puzzled economists for many years. But no explanation is more startling than the one proposed by Gregory Clark in his book A Farewell to Alms."---Ross Gittins, Sydney Morning Herald
"This is a fine book, bristling with interesting data and opinions, more extensive than this review can possibly convey. Readily accessible to non-fiction readers, this book should fire more debate about a historical episode of unfailing fascination."---Michael G. Sargent, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
"This is . . . a remarkable book, with an unerring focus on the fundamentals of the Malthusian economy and the large-scale economic trends. It is a unique source of factual information, beautifully presented in almost 200 tables and figures, and will make an excellent textbook for college-level courses of history and economics."---Gerhard Meisenberg, Journal of Biosocial Science
"[P]erhaps there is no higher praise for an author than to say that I disagreed with the arguments but liked the book. It made me think in new ways about the course of economic history. I recommend the book to anyone with an interest in the economic history of the world."---Rick Szostak, New Global Studies
"I derived enormous stimulation from this book. At a superficial level, Clark offers a richly documented picture of England's economic history, put into perspective by comparisons with other parts of Europe and with the Far East, and sometimes even by references to amazing facts about ancient forager societies. . . . More fundamentally, the layman gets a good understanding here of what made for the Industrial Revolution and how its preconditions evolved in England over a period of centuries. Clark accuses economists of being undereducated about history. This will be somewhat remedied if they read his provocative book."---Wolfgang Kasper, Policy
"As a self-proclaimed exercise in 'big history' this work succeeds extraordinarily well: it is engaging and readable, and it renders abstruse economic models and empirical results accessible to nonspecialists."---Zorina Khan, Technology and Culture
"A Farewell to Alms is . . . worth scrutinizing. The book offers a distinct line of thought on evolutionary affairs. It is also valuable in historiographical terms as it recalls historical explanation forsaken due to shifting scholarly fashions."---Ian Morley, The History Teacher
"Gregory Clark has written a stimulating, provocative, witty, and ambitious book. It is accessible to the uninitiated and a pleasure to read. Clark's valuable insights are presented with an admirable forcefulness, as are his grievous errors. In short, this is a book very much worth reading for the sake of argument and debate."---Jan De Vries, Journal of Economic History
"Clark has provided a sensible and readable account of important frontier research in economic history."---Peter Howitt, Journal of Interdisciplinary History
"Gregory Clark has given us a very provocative work. It is economic history, but with strong implications for contemporary problems. His quantitative techniques for demonstrating such phenomena as the innumeracy of pre-industrial humanity and the evolution of the speed of information flows are clever."---Arnold Kling, Journal of Bioeconomics
"Right or wrong, or perhaps somewhere in between, Clark's is about as stimulating an account of world economic history as one is likely to find. Let's hope that the human traits to which he attributes economic progress are acquired, not genetic, and that the countries that grow in population over the next 50 years turn out to be good at imparting them. Alternatively, we can simply hope he's wrong."---Benjamin M. Friedman, New York Times Book Review
"Clark's idea-rich book may just prove to be the next blockbuster in economics. He offers us a daring story of the economic foundations of good institutions and the climb out of recurring poverty. We may not have cracked the mystery of human progress, but A Farewell to Alms brings us closer than before."---Tyler Cowen, New York Times
"[C]lark is very good at piecing together figures from here and there, including those from isolated groups of hunter-gatherers alive today. He makes a plausible case for the basic pattern: for thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution, there was essentially no sustained improvement in mankind's general material standard of living, nor was there much variation from place to place around the world. The Industrial Revolution made all the difference."---Robert Solow, New York Review of Books
"A Farewell to Alms asks the right questions, and it is full of fascinating details, like the speed at which information traveled over two millennia (prior to the 19th century, about one mile per hour). Clark's combination of passion and erudition makes his account engaging. When a light bulb goes off in my head, the first thing I ask myself is 'Would this be interest if it were true?' Clark's thesis definitely meets that test."---Samuel Bowles, Science
"Mr. Clark...has produced a well written and thought-provoking thesis, refreshingly light on jargon and equations. It could well be the subject of debate for years to come." ― The Economist
"Gregory Clark's A Farewell to Alms is fully as absorbing, as memorable and as well written as [Jared] Diamond's remarkable bestseller. It deserves to be as widely read.... [A]ny book that is as bold, as fascinating, as conscientiously argued and as politically incorrect as this one demands to be read."---Clive Crook, Financial Times
"Obviously, we¹ve got a controversial argument here. But Clark makes a compelling case for the idea that the fruits of industrialization were open to all societies, but only a handful seized the moment."---William R. Wineke, The Wisconsin State Journal
"Gregory Clark's new book A Farewell to Alms is an investigation of both our nasty, brutish, and short past and our more prosperous present. Mr. Clark first makes the case that we owe our current prosperity to the gifts of the Industrial Revolution. He then attempts to explain why that revolution happened in 18th-century England."---Edward Glaeser, New York Sun
"Economic history often conjures images of musty tomes, bygone eras that no one knows about and in general, scholarship that is dry and difficult to relate to. Gregory Clark's new book A Farewell to Alms conveys a different image. Offering a sweep of history from the border between antiquity and the medieval age, the book is an attempt at tackling grand themes."---Siddharth Singh, LiveMint
"For a novel and somewhat dispiriting theory of economic divergence, read A Farewell to Alms, published this year, by Gregory Clark of the University of California at Davis. He doesn't accept the view, common among the utopians, that natural endowments like soil and water explain why rich nations are 50 times as prosperous as poor ones. How can differences in natural resources possibly explain Zimbabwe's misery or Singapore's wealth? Clark amasses an extraordinary collection of historical data to explain why the Industrial Revolution was born in western Europe, not Africa or India."---William Baldwin, Forbes
"Clark's ferociously systematic expounding of an alternative to the institutional explanation does...provide many delightful insights, large and small, along the way. Some of the observations in this very well-written book do make for nice dinner party anecdotes."---Harold James, The American Interest
"Comes now Gregory Clark, an economist who interestingly takes the side of culture. In an important new book, A Farewell to Alms Clark suggests that much of the world's remaining poverty is semi-permanent. Modern technology and management are widely available, but many societies can't take advantage because their values and social organization are antagonistic. Prescribing economically sensible policies (open markets, secure property rights, sound money) can't overcome this bedrock resistance."---Robert Samuelson, The Washington Post
"A Farewell to Alms is a brave new work, rich in both detailed facts and big ideas. Clark clears away much of the tangled brush of theories of long-term economic growth that have grown up in recent decades. This is the most ambitious and far-reaching book on long-term economic history to appear in many years, perhaps since Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel."---Jack A. Goldstone, World Economics
"Clark's book A Farewell to Alms is . . . Ambitious, staking out an entire vision of world history. . . . Clark's Malthusian model is forcefully argued."---Roger Gathman, Austin American-Statesman
"[T]he author's engaging style and (relatively) jargon-free descriptions of the economic principles in play before, during, and after the Industrial Revolution in England turn this rich and detailed account into more of a sprint than a slog. . . . Whatever your reaction to this decidedly un-PC take on economic aid, [A Farewell to Alms] serves as a useful explanation of how we got where we are today and a reminder that new approaches are needed to close the yawning gap between the world's richest and poorest societies."---Roberta Fusaro, Harvard Business Review
"Clark argues the English evolved biologically in ways that created prosperity. Before you dismiss the notion, read this brilliant tour of economic history." ― MoneySense Magazine
"Clark adds substantively to an understanding of perhaps the important questions of this--or any--era: what makes economies grow, and why have some not experienced any success at all?....Alms is provocative, authoritative, insightful, readable, well documented, and an inescapable detour for anyone wanting to tackle economic growth and development topics and enter into these conversations."---A. R. Sanderson, Choice
"Gregory Clark has written a fascinating book which is chock-full of insight and ideas. Clark paints on a big canvas and his deft handling of the puzzles and counterintuitive outcomes is delicious. 'No one,' he says, 'can claim to be truly intellectually alive without having understood and wrestled, at least a little, with these mysteries'. We are indebted to him for revealing more of them in such an electrifying fashion."---Ian R. Harper, The Melbourne Review
"[A Farewell to Alms] is one of the most fascinating, and the most disturbing, historical works I have read. It seems to suggest that the gross inequality of our world has less to do with the inherent unfairness of global capitalism and more with scarcely ineradicable cultural difference. . . . [T]his is economic history as you never read it before."---A.N. Wilson, The Daily Telegraph
"Why do some nations get rich while others stay poor? What are the conditions that allow an economy to take off and grow? These questions have puzzled economists for many years. But no explanation is more startling than the one proposed by Gregory Clark in his book A Farewell to Alms."---Ross Gittins, Sydney Morning Herald
"This is a fine book, bristling with interesting data and opinions, more extensive than this review can possibly convey. Readily accessible to non-fiction readers, this book should fire more debate about a historical episode of unfailing fascination."---Michael G. Sargent, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
"This is . . . a remarkable book, with an unerring focus on the fundamentals of the Malthusian economy and the large-scale economic trends. It is a unique source of factual information, beautifully presented in almost 200 tables and figures, and will make an excellent textbook for college-level courses of history and economics."---Gerhard Meisenberg, Journal of Biosocial Science
"[P]erhaps there is no higher praise for an author than to say that I disagreed with the arguments but liked the book. It made me think in new ways about the course of economic history. I recommend the book to anyone with an interest in the economic history of the world."---Rick Szostak, New Global Studies
"I derived enormous stimulation from this book. At a superficial level, Clark offers a richly documented picture of England's economic history, put into perspective by comparisons with other parts of Europe and with the Far East, and sometimes even by references to amazing facts about ancient forager societies. . . . More fundamentally, the layman gets a good understanding here of what made for the Industrial Revolution and how its preconditions evolved in England over a period of centuries. Clark accuses economists of being undereducated about history. This will be somewhat remedied if they read his provocative book."---Wolfgang Kasper, Policy
"As a self-proclaimed exercise in 'big history' this work succeeds extraordinarily well: it is engaging and readable, and it renders abstruse economic models and empirical results accessible to nonspecialists."---Zorina Khan, Technology and Culture
"A Farewell to Alms is . . . worth scrutinizing. The book offers a distinct line of thought on evolutionary affairs. It is also valuable in historiographical terms as it recalls historical explanation forsaken due to shifting scholarly fashions."---Ian Morley, The History Teacher
"Gregory Clark has written a stimulating, provocative, witty, and ambitious book. It is accessible to the uninitiated and a pleasure to read. Clark's valuable insights are presented with an admirable forcefulness, as are his grievous errors. In short, this is a book very much worth reading for the sake of argument and debate."---Jan De Vries, Journal of Economic History
"Clark has provided a sensible and readable account of important frontier research in economic history."---Peter Howitt, Journal of Interdisciplinary History
"Gregory Clark has given us a very provocative work. It is economic history, but with strong implications for contemporary problems. His quantitative techniques for demonstrating such phenomena as the innumeracy of pre-industrial humanity and the evolution of the speed of information flows are clever."---Arnold Kling, Journal of Bioeconomics
Review
"What caused the Industrial Revolution? Gregory Clark has a brilliant and fascinating explanation for this event which permanently changed the life of humankind after 100,000 years of stagnation."―George Akerlof, Nobel Laureate in Economics and Koshland Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley
"This is a very important book. Gregory Clark argues that the Industrial Revolution was the gradual but inevitable result of a kind of natural selection during the harsh struggle for existence in the pre-industrial era, in which economically successful families were also more reproductively successful. They transmitted to their descendants, culturally and perhaps genetically, such productive attitudes as foresight, thrift, and devotion to hard work. This audacious thesis, which dismisses rival explanations in terms of prior ideological, technological, or institutional revolutions, will be debated by historians for many years to come."―Paul Seabright, author of The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life
"Challenging the prevailing wisdom that institutions explain why some societies become rich, Gregory Clark's "A Farewell to Alms" will appeal to a broad audience. I can think of nothing else like it."―Philip T. Hoffman, author of Growth in a Traditional Society
"You may not always agree with Gregory Clark, but he will capture your attention, make you think, and make you reconsider. He is a provocative and imaginative scholar and a true original. As an economic historian, he engages with economists in general; as an economist, he is parsimonious with high-tech algebra and unnecessarily complex models. Occam would approve."―Cormac Ó Gráda, author of Jewish Ireland in the Age of Joyce
"This should rapidly become a standard work on the history of economic development. It should start whole industries trying to test, refine, and refute its explanations. And Gregory Clark's views on the economic merits of imperialism and the fact that labor gained the most from industrialization will infuriate all the right people."―Eric L. Jones, author of Cultures Merging and The European Miracle
"While many books on the Industrial Revolution tend to focus narrowly either on the event itself, or on one explanation for it, Gregory Clark does neither. He takes an extremely long-run view, covering significant periods before and after the Industrial Revolution, without getting bogged down in long or detailed exposition. This is an extremely important contribution to the subject."―Clifford Bekar, Lewis and Clark College
"This is a very important book. Gregory Clark argues that the Industrial Revolution was the gradual but inevitable result of a kind of natural selection during the harsh struggle for existence in the pre-industrial era, in which economically successful families were also more reproductively successful. They transmitted to their descendants, culturally and perhaps genetically, such productive attitudes as foresight, thrift, and devotion to hard work. This audacious thesis, which dismisses rival explanations in terms of prior ideological, technological, or institutional revolutions, will be debated by historians for many years to come."―Paul Seabright, author of The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life
"Challenging the prevailing wisdom that institutions explain why some societies become rich, Gregory Clark's "A Farewell to Alms" will appeal to a broad audience. I can think of nothing else like it."―Philip T. Hoffman, author of Growth in a Traditional Society
"You may not always agree with Gregory Clark, but he will capture your attention, make you think, and make you reconsider. He is a provocative and imaginative scholar and a true original. As an economic historian, he engages with economists in general; as an economist, he is parsimonious with high-tech algebra and unnecessarily complex models. Occam would approve."―Cormac Ó Gráda, author of Jewish Ireland in the Age of Joyce
"This should rapidly become a standard work on the history of economic development. It should start whole industries trying to test, refine, and refute its explanations. And Gregory Clark's views on the economic merits of imperialism and the fact that labor gained the most from industrialization will infuriate all the right people."―Eric L. Jones, author of Cultures Merging and The European Miracle
"While many books on the Industrial Revolution tend to focus narrowly either on the event itself, or on one explanation for it, Gregory Clark does neither. He takes an extremely long-run view, covering significant periods before and after the Industrial Revolution, without getting bogged down in long or detailed exposition. This is an extremely important contribution to the subject."―Clifford Bekar, Lewis and Clark College
From the Back Cover
"What caused the Industrial Revolution? Gregory Clark has a brilliant and fascinating explanation for this event which permanently changed the life of humankind after 100,000 years of stagnation."--George Akerlof, Nobel Laureate in Economics and Koshland Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley
"This is a very important book. Gregory Clark argues that the Industrial Revolution was the gradual but inevitable result of a kind of natural selection during the harsh struggle for existence in the pre-industrial era, in which economically successful families were also more reproductively successful. They transmitted to their descendants, culturally and perhaps genetically, such productive attitudes as foresight, thrift, and devotion to hard work. This audacious thesis, which dismisses rival explanations in terms of prior ideological, technological, or institutional revolutions, will be debated by historians for many years to come."--Paul Seabright, author of The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life
"Challenging the prevailing wisdom that institutions explain why some societies become rich, Gregory Clark's "A Farewell to Alms" will appeal to a broad audience. I can think of nothing else like it."--Philip T. Hoffman, author of Growth in a Traditional Society
"You may not always agree with Gregory Clark, but he will capture your attention, make you think, and make you reconsider. He is a provocative and imaginative scholar and a true original. As an economic historian, he engages with economists in general; as an economist, he is parsimonious with high-tech algebra and unnecessarily complex models. Occam would approve."--Cormac Ó Gráda, author of Jewish Ireland in the Age of Joyce
"This should rapidly become a standard work on the history of economic development. It should start whole industries trying to test, refine, and refute its explanations. And Gregory Clark's views on the economic merits of imperialism and the fact that labor gained the most from industrialization will infuriate all the right people."--Eric L. Jones, author of Cultures Merging and The European Miracle
"While many books on the Industrial Revolution tend to focus narrowly either on the event itself, or on one explanation for it, Gregory Clark does neither. He takes an extremely long-run view, covering significant periods before and after the Industrial Revolution, without getting bogged down in long or detailed exposition. This is an extremely important contribution to the subject."--Clifford Bekar, Lewis and Clark College
About the Author
Gregory Clark is chair of the economics department at the University of California, Davis. He has written widely about economic history.
Start reading A Farewell to Alms on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : 0691141282
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; Illustrated edition (January 18, 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780691141282
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691141282
- Item Weight : 1.19 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.7 x 1.3 x 8.7 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#310,540 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #854 in Economic History (Books)
- #1,108 in Economics (Books)
- #2,397 in History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
130 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2019
Verified Purchase
19 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on January 8, 2015
Verified Purchase
In A Farewell to Alms, Gregory Clark takes us on a fascinating journey, revealing the roots of the Industrial Revolution in Europe back to 1200AD. Then he documents just how the IR created modern affluence and why it was nurtured in Northern Europe and flourished in the uniquely fertile culture of 19thC. England. A most welcome element in his approach is his assertion that economic theory cannot explain why some nations rise and others stagnate or fall. Instead. he builds a strong case that economic advances have always come from superior "labor efficiencies," and those are primarily determined within any given population by an empowering combination of culture and genetics.
To understand his position one must recognize that Genetic differences do exist between people, but it is important to recognize that these are based on ancestry, not race. The visual differences we see tell us nothing about a person's fundamental qualities. This is because human variation is non-concordant--that is most traits are inherited independently, not based on race or ethnicity. Group racial characteristics are irrelevant, but the variations within every group are important. And when circumstances have concentrated above average capabilities in a supporting culture there has usually been above average results. As Benjamin M. Friedland explained in the NYT Book Review, "Let's hope that the human traits to which he attributes economic progress are acquired, not genetic, and that the countries that grow in population over the next 50 years turn out to be good at imparting them. Alternatively, we can simply hope he's wrong."
Although Clark concentrates on the impact of the IR from the early 1800's to present days, he explains how that European success was built on a gradual evolution from 1200 to 1800 that advanced in baby steps enabled by many causative factors. But, he concludes near the end of the book that "The West has no model of economic development to offer the still-poor countries. . no simple economic medicine that will guarantee growth. ." That statement, however, belies many of his repeated references to the primary contributing factors of England's success. In brief, he suggests that 1.) the people of a society are its Ultimate Resource (a la Julian Simon); 2.) that the existence of stable and supportive social customs and legal/financial institutions can create an environment in which those citizens are free to act (a la Hernando deSoto); and 3.) that the population's genetic/cultural heritage can further empower their productivity(a la James R. Flynn). But he explains how the first two, merely having people, and empowering legal and political institutions, is not enough--many nations have had that combination, but without a high proportion of people with drive and talent, the Western experience has proven hard to replicate. Modern machinery and a free economy is useless unless the culture and attitudes of the people make efficient use of those advantages. He cites examples of how this factor makes most aid to developing nations problematic, and renders any attempt to solve their problems beyond the expertise of today's economists.
Part of Clark's argument is that the Industrial Revolution was the gradual result of natural selection during the harsh struggle for existence in Medieval times. Before the widespread safety net became a part of Western democracies, economically successful families were also more reproductively successful. They passed on to their children a culture, and perhaps winning genes, that possessed such productive attitudes as thrift and devotion to hard work. This positive fertility effect he refers to as "downward mobility" because it expanded the Middle Class with its successful attitudes and aptitudes. This thesis, which dismisses rival explanations based on natural resources, luck, and good geography makes short shrift of Jared Diamond's and Kenneth Pomerantz' recent popular, politically correct, and totally unsatisfactory explanations for the Rise and Fall of Nations.
I would like to have had more exposition on how this same people-based explanation applies to some of history's most spectacular earlier success stories. In ancient Phoenicia, Venice, and Holland, as well as the original American colonies we have seen the success of wilderness outposts that were "started from scratch" by a voluntary migration of self-selecting individuals seeking freedom and opportunity. Such an economic force of a populace's attitude supporting hard work, private property, and self-reliance can be traced all the way back to the original Greek scientists and philosopher Hesiod around 800AD. The great poet's parents had migrated to a rocky barren land near Ascra, and probably lived on waste land, under pioneer conditions, similar to the rugged individualists who settled New England 2,400 years later! Victor Davis Hanson writes in The Other Greeks how the rise of this "successful independent class of agrarians explains the peculiar Greek approach to politics, war, and the economy, which would form the later core foundations of Western civilization itself." In those days we can safely assume that the survival of the fittest was in full operation. Because Hesiod and most later Greek states only granted full citizenship to the more successful citizens, it appears likely that a positive fertility factor expanded the number of people with the traits that lead to success, the same beneficent social force that Clark points to in explaining England's rapid success in the 19th C.
A great feature of Clark's book is that he uses the lessons of history to address today's problems: Based on that view, he believes that America faces a future burdened by persistent inequalities because the history of American immigration has created a society of wide socio-economic divisions of ability and status. Clark's studies of the history of surname social mobility (another of his books) suggests that we will experience a magnification of the existing class divisions in the U.S. He realistically, but pessimistically, indicates the need to consider how to mitigate the consequences of these forces. Government policies to promote social mobility can help only marginally. So, he posits, we must face the need to accommodate such persistent divergence of fortunes.
He argues that a low rate of social mobility is in itself not a social tragedy. It depends on what is causing the high correlation of status between parents and children--if driven by environmental deprivation, discrimination, or connections, then it would indeed be a disgrace. But he is quick to assert that there is considerable evidence that the biological inheritance of talent and drive is what underlies most of the correlation between the social status of parents and children. Under any social system, be it China or England, families of greater social competence will manage to achieve the higher social positions. This reminded me of the old theory that if we divided all the nation's wealth evenly to everyone, after 40 years roughly the same people would have most of it that had enjoyed it before its redistribution! He suggests we accept these social mobility facts, and seek to provide equal opportunity for everyone and limit the rewards that come from mere social status.
If we project Clark's line of thought, it sheds light also on the eventual decline of history's successful nations-- as caused by a gradually declining contribution from the more productive segment of their population as their portion of the population becomes smaller and becomes suppressed by a populist majority. For example. the recent dysgenic trend in Western democracies represents the exact opposite of the "downward mobility" Clark shows to have helped England's past success. Because we have advanced beyond the harsh reality of survival of the fittest, those individuals with the most positive "attitudes and inherited traits" could become a smaller and less influential group, which illustrates Benjamin Friedland's dire observation noted above.
This book explores a vast and interesting subject for those who have any intellectual curiosity about where did we come from and where are we going. It is written in simple language free of the usual economists' dismal and mind boggling mathematical abstractions. (I obviously enjoyed it, writing the longest review in history!) Clark is more a historian than an economist which is good because economics is not a science and yet most academics seem to believe it is and therefore claim knowledge comparable to the real "scientists" like Pythagorus, Newton and Einstein! Yet, here we find out why economists have not been able to even explain the rise and fall of nations!
To understand his position one must recognize that Genetic differences do exist between people, but it is important to recognize that these are based on ancestry, not race. The visual differences we see tell us nothing about a person's fundamental qualities. This is because human variation is non-concordant--that is most traits are inherited independently, not based on race or ethnicity. Group racial characteristics are irrelevant, but the variations within every group are important. And when circumstances have concentrated above average capabilities in a supporting culture there has usually been above average results. As Benjamin M. Friedland explained in the NYT Book Review, "Let's hope that the human traits to which he attributes economic progress are acquired, not genetic, and that the countries that grow in population over the next 50 years turn out to be good at imparting them. Alternatively, we can simply hope he's wrong."
Although Clark concentrates on the impact of the IR from the early 1800's to present days, he explains how that European success was built on a gradual evolution from 1200 to 1800 that advanced in baby steps enabled by many causative factors. But, he concludes near the end of the book that "The West has no model of economic development to offer the still-poor countries. . no simple economic medicine that will guarantee growth. ." That statement, however, belies many of his repeated references to the primary contributing factors of England's success. In brief, he suggests that 1.) the people of a society are its Ultimate Resource (a la Julian Simon); 2.) that the existence of stable and supportive social customs and legal/financial institutions can create an environment in which those citizens are free to act (a la Hernando deSoto); and 3.) that the population's genetic/cultural heritage can further empower their productivity(a la James R. Flynn). But he explains how the first two, merely having people, and empowering legal and political institutions, is not enough--many nations have had that combination, but without a high proportion of people with drive and talent, the Western experience has proven hard to replicate. Modern machinery and a free economy is useless unless the culture and attitudes of the people make efficient use of those advantages. He cites examples of how this factor makes most aid to developing nations problematic, and renders any attempt to solve their problems beyond the expertise of today's economists.
Part of Clark's argument is that the Industrial Revolution was the gradual result of natural selection during the harsh struggle for existence in Medieval times. Before the widespread safety net became a part of Western democracies, economically successful families were also more reproductively successful. They passed on to their children a culture, and perhaps winning genes, that possessed such productive attitudes as thrift and devotion to hard work. This positive fertility effect he refers to as "downward mobility" because it expanded the Middle Class with its successful attitudes and aptitudes. This thesis, which dismisses rival explanations based on natural resources, luck, and good geography makes short shrift of Jared Diamond's and Kenneth Pomerantz' recent popular, politically correct, and totally unsatisfactory explanations for the Rise and Fall of Nations.
I would like to have had more exposition on how this same people-based explanation applies to some of history's most spectacular earlier success stories. In ancient Phoenicia, Venice, and Holland, as well as the original American colonies we have seen the success of wilderness outposts that were "started from scratch" by a voluntary migration of self-selecting individuals seeking freedom and opportunity. Such an economic force of a populace's attitude supporting hard work, private property, and self-reliance can be traced all the way back to the original Greek scientists and philosopher Hesiod around 800AD. The great poet's parents had migrated to a rocky barren land near Ascra, and probably lived on waste land, under pioneer conditions, similar to the rugged individualists who settled New England 2,400 years later! Victor Davis Hanson writes in The Other Greeks how the rise of this "successful independent class of agrarians explains the peculiar Greek approach to politics, war, and the economy, which would form the later core foundations of Western civilization itself." In those days we can safely assume that the survival of the fittest was in full operation. Because Hesiod and most later Greek states only granted full citizenship to the more successful citizens, it appears likely that a positive fertility factor expanded the number of people with the traits that lead to success, the same beneficent social force that Clark points to in explaining England's rapid success in the 19th C.
A great feature of Clark's book is that he uses the lessons of history to address today's problems: Based on that view, he believes that America faces a future burdened by persistent inequalities because the history of American immigration has created a society of wide socio-economic divisions of ability and status. Clark's studies of the history of surname social mobility (another of his books) suggests that we will experience a magnification of the existing class divisions in the U.S. He realistically, but pessimistically, indicates the need to consider how to mitigate the consequences of these forces. Government policies to promote social mobility can help only marginally. So, he posits, we must face the need to accommodate such persistent divergence of fortunes.
He argues that a low rate of social mobility is in itself not a social tragedy. It depends on what is causing the high correlation of status between parents and children--if driven by environmental deprivation, discrimination, or connections, then it would indeed be a disgrace. But he is quick to assert that there is considerable evidence that the biological inheritance of talent and drive is what underlies most of the correlation between the social status of parents and children. Under any social system, be it China or England, families of greater social competence will manage to achieve the higher social positions. This reminded me of the old theory that if we divided all the nation's wealth evenly to everyone, after 40 years roughly the same people would have most of it that had enjoyed it before its redistribution! He suggests we accept these social mobility facts, and seek to provide equal opportunity for everyone and limit the rewards that come from mere social status.
If we project Clark's line of thought, it sheds light also on the eventual decline of history's successful nations-- as caused by a gradually declining contribution from the more productive segment of their population as their portion of the population becomes smaller and becomes suppressed by a populist majority. For example. the recent dysgenic trend in Western democracies represents the exact opposite of the "downward mobility" Clark shows to have helped England's past success. Because we have advanced beyond the harsh reality of survival of the fittest, those individuals with the most positive "attitudes and inherited traits" could become a smaller and less influential group, which illustrates Benjamin Friedland's dire observation noted above.
This book explores a vast and interesting subject for those who have any intellectual curiosity about where did we come from and where are we going. It is written in simple language free of the usual economists' dismal and mind boggling mathematical abstractions. (I obviously enjoyed it, writing the longest review in history!) Clark is more a historian than an economist which is good because economics is not a science and yet most academics seem to believe it is and therefore claim knowledge comparable to the real "scientists" like Pythagorus, Newton and Einstein! Yet, here we find out why economists have not been able to even explain the rise and fall of nations!
22 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Smith Juliancharles
4.0 out of 5 stars
Makes you think
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 12, 2014Verified Purchase
A good account of how humanity and the economy has got to the place it is now. It centers around the Industrial Revolution and the big differences between the Malthusian pre-revolutionary world and the post-revolutionary world in which we live. The author shows how the Industrial Revolution was not the sudden break that we like to think it is, but rather the result of the accumulation of ideas and, perhaps controversially, genes from previous generations. In the long-term, beyond the scope of our lives, success is all about the number of surviving children we have. It's uncomfortably Darwinian, and that's a good thing, it really makes you think. At the end, the author touches on the current situation in developed countries: what genes are we effectively passing on now? It would have been interesting to see the author speculate more about this.
I think the case for genetic determinism is a little over-stated in this book though. A more thorough examination of the situation in current developing countries would probably indicate that more weight should be given to the problems of institutional failure and kleptocratic power structures than the author allows.
I think the case for genetic determinism is a little over-stated in this book though. A more thorough examination of the situation in current developing countries would probably indicate that more weight should be given to the problems of institutional failure and kleptocratic power structures than the author allows.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
virgilio pellandini
3.0 out of 5 stars
A goldmine of data in a desert of ideas.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 30, 2020Verified Purchase
an excellent collection of interesting and well researched data. Built into an argument that managed to be at the same time unclear and questionable.
P. Mcloughlin
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Alternative Take on Economics
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 19, 2013Verified Purchase
A serious review of how we got to where we now are in the global economy. It shows that economics is truly a Black Art and that the more we know the more we don't know.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
San Patch
3.0 out of 5 stars
The cultural and genetic arguments - again
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 27, 2011Verified Purchase
Why did the industrial revolution happen in Britain? Why not in more populous advanced agrarian societies like India or China? Some economics - the institutionalists - have argued that Britain developed institutions (rule of law, property rights, representative democracy etc) that rewarded private enterprise. British entrepreneurs and inventors then took advantage of the benign social regime and, presto, they produced an industrial revolution. Other thinkers like Max Weber attributed British and North European economic success to the Protestant work ethic, which glorifies labour and the enjoyment of worldly goods (presumably, unlike the vapid, other-worldly post-Tridentine Catholicism that held sway in southern Europe). Yet, other thinkers like David Landes have credited factors like genes, culture, climate and race/ethnicity for Britain's economic development. None of these explanations is likely to be the smoking gun; there is, perhaps, some truth in most of the explanations. Mono-causal explanations of complex social phenomena can be naïve, at best, and irresponsible at worst. I was therefore surprised that in A Farewell to Alms, Professor Gregory Clark, a distinguished professor of economics history at University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), hung his intellectual coattails on the genetic and culture arguments.
RECORDS IN ENGLANDS REALLY IMPRESSIVE
The book is not without merit. I was impressed by the research that Professor Clark presented on economic conditions in pre-industrial Britain, an age he calls the Malthusian age. In this age, population was the main determinant of income per head. Economic productivity in this age was low; any rise in living standards led to a rise in population, which, in turn, led to starvation, disease and subsequent decline in population. Sounds familiar? Life back then must have been nasty, brutish and short.
Citing work from many authors (including his own), Clark shows conclusively that the richer a man was in pre-industrial Britain, the higher the number of surviving children he had: before 1800 (the generally-accepted date of the industrial revolution), the rich in Britain were outbreeding the rest of the population. Huh? Yes, the modern world in the rich have fewer children than the poor bucks this long-run trend. Furthermore, using data from parish records that stretch to 1400, Clark cleverly adduces the literacy rate in Britain using the percentage of plaintiffs and defendants who could sign their names. He demonstrates that rising literacy - a consequence of the Protestant Reformation - correlates with economic output. The volume of economic and social data from pre-industrial Britain is really impressive. It is testament to the relative stability that Britain enjoyed from 1200 to 1800. So far, so good.
AWAY WITH THE INSTITUTIONALISTS?
Professor Clark challenged the institutionalist argument that British society rewarded invention and, therefore, encouraged entrepreneurs like James Watt and Richard Arkwright to invent the steam engine and the cotton mill respectively. Clark showed that almost all notable British inventors of the eighteenth and nineteenth century did not reap massive rents from the productivity increases that their inventions afforded. Most of the surplus was enjoyed, instead, by consumers in the form of cheaper garments. This, according to Clark, suggests that inventors were not "in it for the money". Well, not quite.
Clark's analysis does not distinguish between expectations and outcomes. Perhaps most inventors did not become rich, but there is no telling whether they invested their energies in the hope of becoming rich. And they all had the example of Richard Arkwright who became fabulously wealthy (his estate was worth £0.5million at his death). We, however, have the benefit of hindsight. Expectations of future profit often exceed reality (see the Dotcom boom).
THE GENETIC AND CULTURAL ARGUMENTS - AGAIN
These are the most dubious arguments in the book. Clark argues that upper and middle-class men (the rich) produced more children than the poor. The children of the rich could not maintain the status of their fathers. Hence, they 'downgraded' in status and intermarried with lower classes. In the process, upper class children transferred their superior genes and values to the rest of the society. By 1800, therefore, Britain had become thoroughly bourgeois (hard-working, responsible, inclined to seek profit, loving family etc). Yet, Professor Clark does not give a shred of evidence support this hypothesis. Evidence aside, let's examine this argument. It assumes that: (1) the rich and the rest of society had different values; (2) that the values of the rich were superior to those of the rest of society - at least for wealth generation; (3) that 'downgraded' children of the rich maintained their superior values even as they downgraded in status; (4) The skills needed to prosper in a capitalist system are transferred genetically from parent to offspring. Clark's central thesis rests on these very questionable, eugenist assumptions; yet, he does not produce a single shred of evidence to support his claims.
Clark advances the cultural argument by analysing nineteenth century textile industry in detail. (Like any self-respecting MBA, I love industry analysis.) The textile industry was important in the industrial revolution because it underwent a near sixty-fold productivity increase in the course of the nineteenth century. Indeed, Clark argues convincingly that the textile industry generated most of the productivity growth of the British economy over the argument.
He compares the productivity of Indian and UK textile mills. Even though UK mill workers cost significantly more than their Indian counterparts, investors found the UK textile industry more attractive than India's: using the same inputs as the Indian workers, UK textile workers were considerably more productive than India's. The reason: Indian textile workers were lazier than the UK workers (evidence: high absenteeism). Indian workers seemed to take a more 'relaxed' approach to work than the UK workers. Hmmm.
This comparative analysis is facile. It completely neglects the external environment. Was management style in British mills significantly different from Indian mills? Was there a consistent reflective focus on productivity improvement in Indian mills as there was in UK mills? Clark extrapolates too readily from low productivity to worker attitudes (culture). His data sources here are problematic: He bases his analysis, in part, on (British) accounts of native Indian custom. How unbiased would British accounts of Indian Natives have been?
A Farewell to Alms is incomplete--perhaps necessarily so. I was impressed by the quality of data in England and by how Clark cleverly analysed the data to tell a story of inheritance. Yet, Clark advances a dubious genetic and cultural thesis for which he provided little evidence. This poorly-argued thesis detracts significantly from the quality of the book. The book deserves three stars.
RECORDS IN ENGLANDS REALLY IMPRESSIVE
The book is not without merit. I was impressed by the research that Professor Clark presented on economic conditions in pre-industrial Britain, an age he calls the Malthusian age. In this age, population was the main determinant of income per head. Economic productivity in this age was low; any rise in living standards led to a rise in population, which, in turn, led to starvation, disease and subsequent decline in population. Sounds familiar? Life back then must have been nasty, brutish and short.
Citing work from many authors (including his own), Clark shows conclusively that the richer a man was in pre-industrial Britain, the higher the number of surviving children he had: before 1800 (the generally-accepted date of the industrial revolution), the rich in Britain were outbreeding the rest of the population. Huh? Yes, the modern world in the rich have fewer children than the poor bucks this long-run trend. Furthermore, using data from parish records that stretch to 1400, Clark cleverly adduces the literacy rate in Britain using the percentage of plaintiffs and defendants who could sign their names. He demonstrates that rising literacy - a consequence of the Protestant Reformation - correlates with economic output. The volume of economic and social data from pre-industrial Britain is really impressive. It is testament to the relative stability that Britain enjoyed from 1200 to 1800. So far, so good.
AWAY WITH THE INSTITUTIONALISTS?
Professor Clark challenged the institutionalist argument that British society rewarded invention and, therefore, encouraged entrepreneurs like James Watt and Richard Arkwright to invent the steam engine and the cotton mill respectively. Clark showed that almost all notable British inventors of the eighteenth and nineteenth century did not reap massive rents from the productivity increases that their inventions afforded. Most of the surplus was enjoyed, instead, by consumers in the form of cheaper garments. This, according to Clark, suggests that inventors were not "in it for the money". Well, not quite.
Clark's analysis does not distinguish between expectations and outcomes. Perhaps most inventors did not become rich, but there is no telling whether they invested their energies in the hope of becoming rich. And they all had the example of Richard Arkwright who became fabulously wealthy (his estate was worth £0.5million at his death). We, however, have the benefit of hindsight. Expectations of future profit often exceed reality (see the Dotcom boom).
THE GENETIC AND CULTURAL ARGUMENTS - AGAIN
These are the most dubious arguments in the book. Clark argues that upper and middle-class men (the rich) produced more children than the poor. The children of the rich could not maintain the status of their fathers. Hence, they 'downgraded' in status and intermarried with lower classes. In the process, upper class children transferred their superior genes and values to the rest of the society. By 1800, therefore, Britain had become thoroughly bourgeois (hard-working, responsible, inclined to seek profit, loving family etc). Yet, Professor Clark does not give a shred of evidence support this hypothesis. Evidence aside, let's examine this argument. It assumes that: (1) the rich and the rest of society had different values; (2) that the values of the rich were superior to those of the rest of society - at least for wealth generation; (3) that 'downgraded' children of the rich maintained their superior values even as they downgraded in status; (4) The skills needed to prosper in a capitalist system are transferred genetically from parent to offspring. Clark's central thesis rests on these very questionable, eugenist assumptions; yet, he does not produce a single shred of evidence to support his claims.
Clark advances the cultural argument by analysing nineteenth century textile industry in detail. (Like any self-respecting MBA, I love industry analysis.) The textile industry was important in the industrial revolution because it underwent a near sixty-fold productivity increase in the course of the nineteenth century. Indeed, Clark argues convincingly that the textile industry generated most of the productivity growth of the British economy over the argument.
He compares the productivity of Indian and UK textile mills. Even though UK mill workers cost significantly more than their Indian counterparts, investors found the UK textile industry more attractive than India's: using the same inputs as the Indian workers, UK textile workers were considerably more productive than India's. The reason: Indian textile workers were lazier than the UK workers (evidence: high absenteeism). Indian workers seemed to take a more 'relaxed' approach to work than the UK workers. Hmmm.
This comparative analysis is facile. It completely neglects the external environment. Was management style in British mills significantly different from Indian mills? Was there a consistent reflective focus on productivity improvement in Indian mills as there was in UK mills? Clark extrapolates too readily from low productivity to worker attitudes (culture). His data sources here are problematic: He bases his analysis, in part, on (British) accounts of native Indian custom. How unbiased would British accounts of Indian Natives have been?
A Farewell to Alms is incomplete--perhaps necessarily so. I was impressed by the quality of data in England and by how Clark cleverly analysed the data to tell a story of inheritance. Yet, Clark advances a dubious genetic and cultural thesis for which he provided little evidence. This poorly-argued thesis detracts significantly from the quality of the book. The book deserves three stars.
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Glen Brumby
4.0 out of 5 stars
Explaining the great divergence
Reviewed in Australia on September 25, 2020Verified Purchase
Clark provides an immense amount of quality data, analysis and commentary on a hugely important topic. He contrasts the divergent income per capita paths of the groups of countries that have broken free of the Malthusian population trap with those that haven’t after about 1800. Essentially, one group has become rich and then sustainably more so with ongoing growth while the other largely ‘third world’ group has not only not captured any benefits from industrialisation but they have gotten steadily poorer. Clark’s explanation is a blend of culture and genetics. He says the complexity of economic life in some places gave an advantage to economically able people who bred more and whose offspring spread through poorer classes until the features that made them successful were fairly widespread. He points to evidence that this process began well prior to the so called industrial revolution and that it also explains why poorer countries that did not have the same circumstances were unable to benefit in a ‘productivity’ sense from importing better machines even when they also imported managers. The populations were not tuned into the fine grained requirements of the new style of production. Well, it’s certainly a big theory and he argues it well although I would have liked him to expand on the cognitive and cultural advantages more so that his evolutionary argument could be better understood from the point of view how specific attributes conferred advantages, and indeed whether this explanation works. Still, it is a great work and worthy of attention, particularly if you are interested in understanding the great divergence and hoping to help fix it.
Explore similar books
Tags that will help you discover similar books. 6 tags
in a serieseconomicsworldhistorybusiness & moneyeconomic history
Results for:
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Where do clickable book tags come from?
Book tags are created from a variety of sources, some of which are customer-generated. Amazon is not legally responsible for the accuracy of the tags represented. If you are an author or publisher and would like to remove a tag associated with your title, please contact your vendor manager or publisher support team.
Pages with related products.
See and discover other items: international economics, accounting theory, economics history, business history
