Qty:1
& FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details
Only 2 left in stock.
Sold by HARVEST MOUSE, LLC and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
Fat Man and Little Boy has been added to your Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Replacement DVD case with case artwork and disc both in very good condition. Case was replaced due to cracking and may show very little, if any, shelf wear. This wear may include very light scratches and/or light imperfections. Case artwork shows some mild wear at the bottom where it was mis-placed in original case (so it has some white nicks / rubbing / light wear). Mild wear to disc surfaces which may include: top of disc mild wear / light imperfections. Readable surface may show some very light to light scratches and/or some mild smudging.
Trade in your item
Get up to a $0.69
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Fat Man and Little Boy

3.9 out of 5 stars 157 customer reviews

Additional DVD options Edition Discs
Price
New from Used from
DVD
(Apr 27, 2004)
"Please retry"
1
$34.99
$23.95 $2.50
DVD
(May 21, 2013)
"Please retry"
STANDARD EDITION
1
$49.98 $6.67
DVD
"Please retry"
$65.03
Watch Instantly with Rent Buy

Deal of the Day: "M*A*S*H: The Complete Series + Movie" on DD
Today only, save big on this M*A*S*H bundle, which includes all 11 seasons of the hit television show and the feature film. This offer ends at 11:59 p.m. (PT) on Wednesday, July 27, 2016. Learn more
$34.99 & FREE Shipping on orders over $49. Details Only 2 left in stock. Sold by HARVEST MOUSE, LLC and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

  • Fat Man and Little Boy
  • +
  • Modern Marvels - The Manhattan Project (History Channel)
Total price: $54.98
Buy the selected items together

Editorial Reviews

Fat Man and Little Boy (a.k.a. Shadow Makers in the UK) is a 1989 film that reenacts the Manhattan Project, the secret Allied endeavor to develop the first nuclear weapons during World War II. The film is named after the weapons "Fat Man" and "Little Boy" detonated over Nagasaki and Hiroshima, respectively. The code names, originally Fat Man and Thin Man, were drawn from characters in the works of Dashiell Hammett. However, there's a possible secondary allusion to stout project director Gen. Leslie Groves and the slim scientific director, Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer. The film focuses much attention on the frequently strained relationship between the two men. The film was directed by Roland Joffe and written by Joffe and Bruce Robinson.

Special Features

None.

Product Details

  • Actors: Paul Newman, Dwight Schultz, Bonnie Bedelia, John Cusack, Laura Dern
  • Directors: Roland Joffé
  • Writers: Roland Joffé, Bruce Robinson
  • Producers: John Calley, Kimberly Cooper, Tony Garnett
  • Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DTS Surround Sound, Subtitled, Widescreen, Surround Sound, Digital Sound, NTSC
  • Language: English, French
  • Subtitles: English
  • Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Rated:
    PG-13
    Parents Strongly Cautioned
  • Studio: Paramount
  • DVD Release Date: April 27, 2004
  • Run Time: 127 minutes
  • Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (157 customer reviews)
  • ASIN: B0001EQIJC
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #10,144 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
  • Learn more about "Fat Man and Little Boy" on IMDb

Customer Reviews

Top Customer Reviews

Format: DVD
As much as I admire Paul Newman, this film is so terribly flawed that even his presence can't salvage it. The Manhattan Project is such a critical juncture in recent history that I think it's very important that the story be told realistically. This film is 90% Hollywood formula and 10% history. Only in the broadest brushstrokes does this movie give the viewer any kind of concept of that monumental undertaking. Do yourself a BIG favor; watch the far superior (and very accurate) "Day One" instead. In all respects, it is a much better account and much more interesting film. The main characters are presented as scientists, engineers, and military officers, not goofballs and nutty professors, as they are in "Fat Man and Little Boy."
1 Comment 62 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: VHS Tape
Yes, there was a Manhattan Project and people named Groves, Oppenheimer and Szilard and yes Leo Szilard did like to spend as much time in the bath tub as possible (thinking) but other than that, this film was largely fictional. I was bothered by the historical inaccuracies including: 1. Groves met Szilard at the University of Chicago along with the rest of the scientists that worked there, not in a bathroom in Szilards hotel with Szilard in a tub and Groves on a toilet. 2. The Manhattan Project was much bigger than Los Alamos and Groves dealt with two other major groups that are mostly not even depicted. 3. Groves and Oppenheimer had a very different and more cooperative relationship than is depicted in the movie. 4. Groves was not subject to temper tantrums like Newman's depiction. He was actually very quiet, but extremely sarcastic, socially awkward, pear shaped and somewhat arrogant. He was also smart as a tack, having attended both MIT and West Point, where he was fourth in his class. He created three cities that are now major cities in their states and an industry bigger than the U.S. Automobile industry in just over three years. This was no dummy.
A more accurate movie is "Day One", at least as far as the plot goes, but even that fails to grasp the Manhattan Project's scope. The best film on it, which unfortunately no longer exists, was "The Beginning or the End" which was made in 1946 (Brian Donlevy played Groves). The main people on the project served as technical advisors for that one. Unfortunately, that was never put on video and probably rotted away in some warehouse.
7 Comments 56 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
I'm no movie critic, and I won't try to sound like one. What I can say is that I, personally was a part of the army nuclear weapons program for decades. I know the history behind creating the nuclear bombs that were used in WWII. I even know (or knew) some of the original people involved. For much of my life, I worked in buildings that had no windows and were heavily guarded. Everything was CLASSIFIED. That included much of what you will see in this film. No. No security violations occurred when making this film...everything in it was de-classified first, but the HISTORY behind this film is there for all to see. It is quite accurate. Even the dialogue, you ask? Be reasonable. Even the actual people these actors portray couldn't possible remember exactly what they SAID on any given day, but the things that happened in the film DID happen in the way they were portrayed. Maybe I loved the film because it's "CLOSE TO HOME", but I think anyone with a bent for history would like it.
Comment 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: DVD
This is such an important story, with layer upon layer upon layer of aspects of the modern realities ushered in by the Manhattan Project. C.P Snow in his famous essay regarding The Two Cultures raises implications about the way that the humanities department trains young minds relative to the science and engineering department. If the military approached a group of leading poets and declared that poetry possessed a potential they wanted to transform into a super weapon--how would the poets have responded? Posing a similar question to physicists, they all raced to the blackboard to be the first to solve the equation for the authorities.

So many issues, creativity, authority, diplomacy,secrecy, espionage, urgency...all provide the natural elements to a serious, gripping story. But this screenplay chooses to throw in silly romantic subplots, and alter the facts in the service of their silly Hollywood formula.Ughh. Especially annoying is the distortion of the circumstances surrounding the lab accident that befell Louis Slotkin, the Canadian, now morphed into a hybrid romantic figure in this puerile reworking of history. Maybe someday, someone will do the subject justice in a dramatic structure, until then the excellent documentary, 'The Day After Trinity' will have to suffice.

The screenplay illustrates the powerlessness of acting talent in the face of poor writing. Unfortunately, and maybe this is an inevitable remark, the film ends with a whimper, not a bang.
Comment 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Format: DVD Verified Purchase
"The world is not what we wanted it to be." So says Dr. Oppenheimer to his wife, late in the film. Oppenheimer's optimism and scientific idealism are only one small casualty of the pursuit of the atomic bomb; we see several others through the course of the film. The fears of that time -- especially of Communism -- cause Oppenheimer's own credibility to be always in doubt in the eyes of the military, and his Communist-sympathizing mistress almost inevitably becomes another casualty of these forces.

The scientist Michael Merriman (actually a composite of a few real-life characters; try looking up "Louis Slotin" in your favorite search engine) asks whether it is more instinctive in humans to save life or to destroy it. This becomes one of the central themes of the film. Merriman twice heroically saves the lives of others, but the second time receives a lethal exposure to radiation himself in the process. I have read comments in other reviews that Merriman's (fictional) romance with a nurse at the base hospital was unnecessary and too contrived, but I think that this sort of dramatic element helps provide an emotional context for the bomb's direct and indirect victims; also, Merriman's ultimately tragic romance parallels that of Oppenheimer with his "security-risk" mistress.

This film touches on many of the issues of the creation of the atomic bomb: the logistical challenges, the personal and moral and political challenges. These multiple issues are treated more or less equally, and none is really treated in depth at the expense of the others. Some viewers may regard this lack of depth as a liability, but I think the overall balance is good.

The dramatic quality (acting, writing, etc.) of the film is also generally good, with a few faults.
Read more ›
Comment 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse

Most Recent Customer Reviews


Forums



What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customers Also Watched on Amazon Video