Amazon.com: Customer reviews: Feed (Newsflesh, Book 1)
Skip to main content
.us
Delivering to Lebanon 66952 Update location
All
EN
Hello, sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Disability Customer Support Medical Care Groceries Best Sellers Amazon Basics New Releases Prime Today's Deals Music Customer Service Registry Books Pharmacy Amazon Home Fashion Gift Cards Luxury Stores Find a Gift Sell Toys & Games Smart Home Automotive Beauty & Personal Care Coupons Home Improvement Computers Household, Health & Baby Care Works with Alexa Video Games Pet Supplies Sports & Outdoors

  • Feed (Newsflesh, Book 1)
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
2,871 global ratings
5 star
57%
4 star
27%
3 star
10%
2 star
4%
1 star
2%
Feed (Newsflesh, Book 1)

Feed (Newsflesh, Book 1)

byMira Grant
Write a review
How customer reviews and ratings work

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
See All Buying Options

Top positive review

Positive reviews›
Karen B
5.0 out of 5 starsA book to sink your teeth into
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2013
When going on holidays recently, I asked FaceBook friends for some reading recommendations (this was despite having about forty books in my “to-read” pile). Feed, by Mira Grant was one of them and, why I chose it from the many other wonderful suggestions I received was the way it was “sold” to me by another writer, the lovely Mandy Wrangles. I still remember. She wrote something along the lines of, “It’s a zombie book, only, it’s not. It’s so much more. Don’t let the zombie thing put you off. This is an amazing book, dystopian and about communication, the media and politics and it’s just incredible…”
To be fair, Mandy said it far more eloquently than that, but that’s how I absorbed it and was intrigued. Much preferring zombies on the screen than on the page, I’d resisted anything remotely zombified before, but I was going on a holiday, why not challenge myself? Take a holiday from my usual genres? Am I glad I did. Oh. Boy. Mandy was right, this book was not what I expected – even with Mandy’s wonderful affirmations, it thoroughly exceeded my expectations.
Set in the very near future, after a zombie plague has basically wiped out a great deal of the civilised world, facilitated the establishment of gated communities, serious and constant health checks, and armed protection services, and seen the mainstream media not replaced, but in healthy competition with bloggers (the reason being that when the uprising of zombies began, the media were in denial and, due to government control and censorship, inclined to perpetuate fallacies – it was bloggers who told the truth and won reader loyalty and trust), this tale centres around prominent blogger, Georgia Mason, who along with her brother Shaun and their IT specialist, win a contract to accompany a political candidate throughout the drawn-out US presidential election. Overjoyed at such a coup, they quickly accept and join the convoy, travelling throughout parts of the US, being given insights into not just the political machinations of the party and those who belong, but the media and the plots and cunning of desperate men, including the biggest secret of all – the terrible conspiracy behind the infected....
This is a wild, hold-on-to-the-edge-of-your-seat book that, after an ETesque opening (but with zombies, death and destruction on the protagonists’ bicycle tail), immerses you in this post-apocalytpic reality of a country/world torn apart by a mass infection and its consequences. Orphaned at a young age, brother and sister Georgia and Shaun, though they’ve been adopted, have to survive on their wits and intelligence and neither of these are in short supply. Nor is their sense of justice and determination to see it meted out.
Though the zombies (the infected) hover at the edges of the story the entire time, bursting into the narrative at opportune and sometimes unexpected moments, the real story here is the politics – not simply Republican versus Democrat, though that’s there, but personal politics as well. How individuals manoeuvre themselves into positions of power, the politics around the stories we tell, about ourselves, each other – what’s omitted, what’s included, the impression we strive to give and maintain- and the strength of meta-narratives to colour and infect the smaller ones. It’s also about belonging, connectivity, being an outsider – of family, society and beyond. It’s about truth, lies and everything in-between. It’s about when to compromise – morally, physically, intellectually – and when it’s appropriate not to.
As story-tellers with credibility, Georgia and Shaun know how important their job is, how much the surviving masses rely on them to keep the lines of communication open, to spread the “truth” and to provide informed opinion. But story-telling in this world is also big business, and ratings are important. Hence, risks must be taken, not with the truth, never with that, but with reputations, uncovering relevant information and, for Georgia and Shaun, it also means putting their lives (and that of others) on the line.
This never becomes more important or real than when they discover the truth about the zombies…
This is such an original and compelling book. Alternately shocking and heart-wrenching, capable of blood-thirsty scenes and great pathos, the characters are strong, purposeful to a fault, but also ever-so vulnerable, the combination is intoxicating and nerve-wracking. You invest so heavily in both Georgia and Shaun, shout at and with them from the sidelines, revel in their ingenuity and disingenuousness. The narrative twists and flows in ways that are never predictable but always true to the overall arc and intentions of the book – you believe in everything that’s happening and the rationale behind it. An example of this is the reasoning behind why there are zombies in the first place. An interview with Grant (at the end of the book) reveals that she was always frustrated by films and other books that took zombies for granted, that is, the writer/s never explained how they became that way, except to point to biting and contagion through other means as the answer. The origins of the infection and what happens in the body of a human who becomes a zombie is rarely if ever dealt with. Feed addresses this in a scientific and acceptable but never dull way. The explanation simply feeds (excuse the pun) into the logic of the setting and time the author has created. I thoroughly enjoyed this aspect as well.
Whether or not you like “zombies” (what’s NOT to like ☺), whether or not you enjoy dystopian narratives, this is a great book. But, if you’re looking for well-crafted, tightly written, imaginatively conceived stories that take you on an incredible, high-octane adventure while simultaneously exploring some serious ethical and philosophical issues and offering a critique of modern media with kick-arse, wonderful rich and complex characters and a plot dripping with intrigue, this is the book for you.
Touted as young adult, it’s not. It’s for anyone who loves astonishing novels.
I have bought the second and (er um) can’t wait to sink my teeth into it.
Read more
8 people found this helpful

Top critical review

Critical reviews›
LA in Dallas
3.0 out of 5 starsJournalism, Politics, and Zombies
Reviewed in the United States on June 16, 2022
This is a novel about journalism and politics, with zombies thrown in as The Gimmick. The central characters are Georgia Mason, her brother Shaun Mason, and their friend Buffy Meissonier. Most of the story is told in the first person by Georgia. Georgia, Shaun, and Buffy are bloggers. (That's the journalism.) They are invited to join the campaign of Republican presidential candidate Peter Ryman. (That's the politics.) All the action takes place in a post-apocalyptic hellscape, a police state in which the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) exercise dictatorial powers, imposing harsh restrictions on residence, movement, hygiene, etc in the effort to keep most people safe from zombies. (That's the gimmick McGuire uses to transform politics and journalism into an action flick.)

It is, I am sorry to say, not a very good action flick. The whole zombie thing is stupid. McGuire admits that her entire concept of zombies (except for an embarrassing scientific backstory she manufactures) is based on a slavish adherence to George Romero zombie movies. She also failed, for the first half of the book, to write anything that interested me much. Nothing much happened, and I didn't care at all for Georgia, Shaun, and Buffy. Fortunately, this gets better after about the 50% point. Georgia becomes more likeable, and the action picks up. The book ends well, and I will go on to read the next book, hoping that, having finally hit her stride, McGuire will manage to keep it up.

While I say, "The book ends well," I'm pretty sure that many readers are going to be unhappy with the ending. So, consider yourself warned, but no spoilers here!

Feed had the misfortune that awaits most novels set in the future: being overtaken by events. Feed is based on assumptions about the future of journalism, politics, and the zombie apocalypse, all of which have been now (that is 16-Jun-2022) invalidated. The last, obviously, is pretty surprising, but I will explain.

First, about journalism. McGuire presents a world in which the current troubles of journalism have been rescued by bloggers. That hasn't happened. Maybe it will by 2039, when the book begins, but at this point it seems pretty unlikely. McGuire assumed (correctly) that blogging would go mainstream, that bloggers would take original reporting over from the legacy media, that bloggers would be dedicated to the Truth, regardless of politics, and that readers would seek out those source of information that were best at revealing the Truth.

Here in 2022 original reporting is still almost entirely the province of the legacy media -- TV, newspapers, and magazines, although everyone now has a major web presence -- while bloggers are mostly opinion commentators, often attached to legacy news organizations. Second, bloggers are at least as political as anyone else in journalism. They may tell the Truth as they see it, but that qualifying clause covers an entire inferno's worth of sins. Third, it transpires that readers don't select the most truthful sources of information -- they select the ones that tell them what they want to hear.

Second, about politics. McGuire assumed that US politics in 2039 would be essentially the same as politics in 2010. That assumption had been demolished by 2017, and has continued to self-destruct in the years since. For instance, Georgia Mason (the main point-of-view character) writes, "Few people are willing to stand for both the death penalty and an overturning of Roe v. Wade these days". At this point in 2022 it seems very unlikely that Roe v Wade will be a live issue in July, 2022, let alone 2039.

Third, about zombies. McGuire assumes the world will survive a zombie apocalypse and be living with it by 2039. Living with it, in the world of Feed, means living in a police state that restricts freedom in order to keep most people safe. Although McGuire fails to emphasize this, that effort has been largely successful: Georgia mentions that 2,653 deaths were attributed to zombies in the past year in the USA. That is not a large number. 42,915 people are estimated to have died in traffic accidents in the USA in 2021. That is the level of death we are willing to tolerate for the convenience of personal mobility. So the zombie problem is under control. Roughly a million Americans have died of Covid-19 in the last two years, and we Americans have made it very clear that harsh restrictions on freedom of movement or hygiene cannot be imposed or enforced with the goal of reducing Covid-19 transmission.

Well, as Yogi Berra told us, "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." It was just unfortunate for McGuire that the assumptions of Feed fell apart so fast.
Read more
5 people found this helpful

Sign in to filter reviews
2,871 total ratings, 870 with reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

Karen B
5.0 out of 5 stars A book to sink your teeth into
Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2013
Verified Purchase
When going on holidays recently, I asked FaceBook friends for some reading recommendations (this was despite having about forty books in my “to-read” pile). Feed, by Mira Grant was one of them and, why I chose it from the many other wonderful suggestions I received was the way it was “sold” to me by another writer, the lovely Mandy Wrangles. I still remember. She wrote something along the lines of, “It’s a zombie book, only, it’s not. It’s so much more. Don’t let the zombie thing put you off. This is an amazing book, dystopian and about communication, the media and politics and it’s just incredible…”
To be fair, Mandy said it far more eloquently than that, but that’s how I absorbed it and was intrigued. Much preferring zombies on the screen than on the page, I’d resisted anything remotely zombified before, but I was going on a holiday, why not challenge myself? Take a holiday from my usual genres? Am I glad I did. Oh. Boy. Mandy was right, this book was not what I expected – even with Mandy’s wonderful affirmations, it thoroughly exceeded my expectations.
Set in the very near future, after a zombie plague has basically wiped out a great deal of the civilised world, facilitated the establishment of gated communities, serious and constant health checks, and armed protection services, and seen the mainstream media not replaced, but in healthy competition with bloggers (the reason being that when the uprising of zombies began, the media were in denial and, due to government control and censorship, inclined to perpetuate fallacies – it was bloggers who told the truth and won reader loyalty and trust), this tale centres around prominent blogger, Georgia Mason, who along with her brother Shaun and their IT specialist, win a contract to accompany a political candidate throughout the drawn-out US presidential election. Overjoyed at such a coup, they quickly accept and join the convoy, travelling throughout parts of the US, being given insights into not just the political machinations of the party and those who belong, but the media and the plots and cunning of desperate men, including the biggest secret of all – the terrible conspiracy behind the infected....
This is a wild, hold-on-to-the-edge-of-your-seat book that, after an ETesque opening (but with zombies, death and destruction on the protagonists’ bicycle tail), immerses you in this post-apocalytpic reality of a country/world torn apart by a mass infection and its consequences. Orphaned at a young age, brother and sister Georgia and Shaun, though they’ve been adopted, have to survive on their wits and intelligence and neither of these are in short supply. Nor is their sense of justice and determination to see it meted out.
Though the zombies (the infected) hover at the edges of the story the entire time, bursting into the narrative at opportune and sometimes unexpected moments, the real story here is the politics – not simply Republican versus Democrat, though that’s there, but personal politics as well. How individuals manoeuvre themselves into positions of power, the politics around the stories we tell, about ourselves, each other – what’s omitted, what’s included, the impression we strive to give and maintain- and the strength of meta-narratives to colour and infect the smaller ones. It’s also about belonging, connectivity, being an outsider – of family, society and beyond. It’s about truth, lies and everything in-between. It’s about when to compromise – morally, physically, intellectually – and when it’s appropriate not to.
As story-tellers with credibility, Georgia and Shaun know how important their job is, how much the surviving masses rely on them to keep the lines of communication open, to spread the “truth” and to provide informed opinion. But story-telling in this world is also big business, and ratings are important. Hence, risks must be taken, not with the truth, never with that, but with reputations, uncovering relevant information and, for Georgia and Shaun, it also means putting their lives (and that of others) on the line.
This never becomes more important or real than when they discover the truth about the zombies…
This is such an original and compelling book. Alternately shocking and heart-wrenching, capable of blood-thirsty scenes and great pathos, the characters are strong, purposeful to a fault, but also ever-so vulnerable, the combination is intoxicating and nerve-wracking. You invest so heavily in both Georgia and Shaun, shout at and with them from the sidelines, revel in their ingenuity and disingenuousness. The narrative twists and flows in ways that are never predictable but always true to the overall arc and intentions of the book – you believe in everything that’s happening and the rationale behind it. An example of this is the reasoning behind why there are zombies in the first place. An interview with Grant (at the end of the book) reveals that she was always frustrated by films and other books that took zombies for granted, that is, the writer/s never explained how they became that way, except to point to biting and contagion through other means as the answer. The origins of the infection and what happens in the body of a human who becomes a zombie is rarely if ever dealt with. Feed addresses this in a scientific and acceptable but never dull way. The explanation simply feeds (excuse the pun) into the logic of the setting and time the author has created. I thoroughly enjoyed this aspect as well.
Whether or not you like “zombies” (what’s NOT to like ☺), whether or not you enjoy dystopian narratives, this is a great book. But, if you’re looking for well-crafted, tightly written, imaginatively conceived stories that take you on an incredible, high-octane adventure while simultaneously exploring some serious ethical and philosophical issues and offering a critique of modern media with kick-arse, wonderful rich and complex characters and a plot dripping with intrigue, this is the book for you.
Touted as young adult, it’s not. It’s for anyone who loves astonishing novels.
I have bought the second and (er um) can’t wait to sink my teeth into it.
8 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Pam D
4.0 out of 5 stars One of the best zombie novels I've read
Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2012
Verified Purchase
I find myself unable to pass up a good zombie novel. This turned out to be one of the best I've read, though it's not really about zombies.

Feed tells the story of Georgia "George" Mason and her adopted brother Shaun, a pair of news bloggers who join a presidential candidate on the campaign trail and uncover a vast conspiracy. Unlike most zombie books, the story does not take place at the beginning of the outbreak but rather 20 years later. This puts a unique spin on things. Zombies are something people have more or less learned to live with. They are not the antagonists of the story, people are. Rather than a collection of chase scenes, disembowelments and zombie head shots, the book focuses on the characters' pursuit of truth and how that truth is spread in the post-apocalyptic world: blogs.

When I picked up this book I was concerned about the blogging angle. I'm a bit old-fashioned and I don't appreciate having social media shoved down my throat. However, I found the use of blogging as large element of the story quite palatable because there was a good reason for it. Knowledge represents both power and survival. The mainstream media failed when the zombie outbreak happened; they were too slow to believe rumours about the walking dead and give people the information they needed to survive. Since then, people have turned to instant, uncensored blogs to get the news. It makes sense. Each chapter was punctuated with a blog post by one of the main characters which was a nice touch.

One of the real stand-outs in this book was the explanation of how the zombie outbreak occurred. Most books and movies gloss over the subject or attribute it to something completely outlandish. In Feed it is a virus that turns people into zombies, this isn't a new idea but the detail given about how the virus came about and how it replicates was quite extensive and almost believable.

The post-apocalyptic world the book takes place in was very well-drawn. The influence of the zombie infection is seen throughout the book: fences and security checkpoints are everywhere, vehicles are armoured, people are subject to constant blood tests to prove they aren't infected, everyone and their little sister carries a gun. More interesting than the environment is the way the people are portrayed. Even the strongest of the characters has an innate sense of sadness and fear about them. The narrative really drove home the fact that everyone would become a zombie one day. You could go your whole life never coming into contact with a zombie, but one day you would die and immediately wake up with a hunger for flesh. It's a rather frightening thought that each character must live with everyday, and it's obvious how it affects them.

I found the book quite captivating; it seemed much shorter than its 600+ pages. It moved swiftly from introducing the characters and the world to uncovering the conspiracy that would become the focus of the story. I enjoyed all the characters. What I particularly liked was how they reacted to all the terrible events happening around them (and to them). It was realistic and that elicited a deeper reaction from me.

The book did have a few negative points. The plot fell apart a little when I found out who the "bad guys" were. There seemed to be a disconnect between their motives and their actions. There was also an event near the end of the book I found rather unnecessary and cheap, but I won't go into specifics for fear of spoilers.

Overall, I really enjoyed Feed. It was a fresh take on the genre with compelling main characters and a terrific setting.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Lineola
5.0 out of 5 stars don’t be put off by the zombies
Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2024
Verified Purchase
This is one of those books I wish I could reread immediately for the first time. Despite the zombies, fresh and new approach and thrilling emotional story. Loved it.

Clean language, no sex, no romance
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Christina (A Reader of Fictions)
5.0 out of 5 stars About So Much More Than Zombies
Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2013
Verified Purchase
Shaun and Georgia Mason are adopted siblings and well-respected bloggers. Georgia's a newsie, meaning that she tells the truth without bias, only the facts. Shaun's an Irwin (as in Steve), which means he likes to poke zombies with sticks. Oh right, did I not mention the zombies? There are zombies. And they do want to eat your brains or any other part of you they can get a hold of. Anyway, back to Shaun and Georgia. They, along with their fictional/techno-genius friend Buffy get selected to follow along on Senator Ryman's presidential campaign, which is super amazing, because the government has never taken bloggers seriously before. They're thrilled, until mysterious and awful things start happening around them.

My description of Feed kind of sucks, but I can't really think of how to improve it. Suffice it to say that there are zombies, mayhem, politics and sarcasm. What more does one need? It really is harder sometimes to summarize a really good book, because they tend to be a little deeper, making it hard to put all of the awesomeness into a summary. Thankfully, I can mention all of that in my review.

Zombies are ridiculous. We all know this, even those of us who rather like to read about them. There's not really any scientific reason to believe zombies possible; personally, I would more readily believe in pretty much any paranormal creature before I would believe in zombies. Unicorns? Sure, my young self is delighted and says they exist! Vampires? Why not? People can be cannabalistic, besides Catholics already drink their saviors blood. Back to pseudo-seriousness, though, Feed has the best explanation of zombie-fication that I have seen thus far. Grant also does a good job of giving a description and then doing the authorial equivalent of shrugging her shoulders and telling the audience to suspend disbelief, but in a good way.

I absolutely loved Feed from the first page. Why? Georgia/George. She is fantastically snarky and grumpy and sarcastic. She's like me, only with worse eyes (mine suck, but at least I can go out on a sunny day). Not every other character feels fully dimensional, but they are all built out in a believable way, to the degree that George understands/cares about them. George is standoffish and only bothers to learn about certain people, so everyone wouldn't be distinct in her world.

The writing is pretty fantastic. I always know an author has talent when he/she can write distinct voices and you can tell who's who without necessarily needing to be told. Grant achieved this. The little snippets from the various characters' blogs so obviously correspond to one or the other, even before you reach the part telling the author's name.

The format was pretty great, too. The bulk of the story was told from George's perspective, with only well-integrated background. The quotes from blogs enabled Grant to put in some more back story, which might not have fit in the flow of a characters every day thoughts without making the novel feel forced.

One thing that really amazed me about Feed was that it wasn't a dystopia the way you would expect. You would generally think that the zombies were the problem, right? Not really. I mean, they are a concern, but society has figured out how to live with the problem. The United States really is much the same as it has ever been, which is why the fact that it's a dystopia is even more of a creepy reflection on our current lifestyle.

In some ways, the society in Feed is the one I would least be willing to live in of all of the dystopias I've read. Okay, only in one way. But still. What's my problem with this rather-better-than-most vision of the near future (2040)? Needles. These people get blood tests approximately 85,000 times every day, to ensure that they are not in the process of becoming zombies. As a person who refuses to get the flu shot every year because I'd rather take my chances, this is not a future I want to be a part of. Needles are the worst.

Oh, and, less seriously, you may have noticed in my less-than-inspired description that there's a character called Buffy. She's actually named Georgette, but she figured, hey, I'm short and blond and cute...what else would my name be? Loving the reference so hard. And I'm fairly certain that Joss Whedon would appreciate it and the book as well. (I could be wrong, but this is my guess.)
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


LA in Dallas
3.0 out of 5 stars Journalism, Politics, and Zombies
Reviewed in the United States on June 16, 2022
Verified Purchase
This is a novel about journalism and politics, with zombies thrown in as The Gimmick. The central characters are Georgia Mason, her brother Shaun Mason, and their friend Buffy Meissonier. Most of the story is told in the first person by Georgia. Georgia, Shaun, and Buffy are bloggers. (That's the journalism.) They are invited to join the campaign of Republican presidential candidate Peter Ryman. (That's the politics.) All the action takes place in a post-apocalyptic hellscape, a police state in which the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) exercise dictatorial powers, imposing harsh restrictions on residence, movement, hygiene, etc in the effort to keep most people safe from zombies. (That's the gimmick McGuire uses to transform politics and journalism into an action flick.)

It is, I am sorry to say, not a very good action flick. The whole zombie thing is stupid. McGuire admits that her entire concept of zombies (except for an embarrassing scientific backstory she manufactures) is based on a slavish adherence to George Romero zombie movies. She also failed, for the first half of the book, to write anything that interested me much. Nothing much happened, and I didn't care at all for Georgia, Shaun, and Buffy. Fortunately, this gets better after about the 50% point. Georgia becomes more likeable, and the action picks up. The book ends well, and I will go on to read the next book, hoping that, having finally hit her stride, McGuire will manage to keep it up.

While I say, "The book ends well," I'm pretty sure that many readers are going to be unhappy with the ending. So, consider yourself warned, but no spoilers here!

Feed had the misfortune that awaits most novels set in the future: being overtaken by events. Feed is based on assumptions about the future of journalism, politics, and the zombie apocalypse, all of which have been now (that is 16-Jun-2022) invalidated. The last, obviously, is pretty surprising, but I will explain.

First, about journalism. McGuire presents a world in which the current troubles of journalism have been rescued by bloggers. That hasn't happened. Maybe it will by 2039, when the book begins, but at this point it seems pretty unlikely. McGuire assumed (correctly) that blogging would go mainstream, that bloggers would take original reporting over from the legacy media, that bloggers would be dedicated to the Truth, regardless of politics, and that readers would seek out those source of information that were best at revealing the Truth.

Here in 2022 original reporting is still almost entirely the province of the legacy media -- TV, newspapers, and magazines, although everyone now has a major web presence -- while bloggers are mostly opinion commentators, often attached to legacy news organizations. Second, bloggers are at least as political as anyone else in journalism. They may tell the Truth as they see it, but that qualifying clause covers an entire inferno's worth of sins. Third, it transpires that readers don't select the most truthful sources of information -- they select the ones that tell them what they want to hear.

Second, about politics. McGuire assumed that US politics in 2039 would be essentially the same as politics in 2010. That assumption had been demolished by 2017, and has continued to self-destruct in the years since. For instance, Georgia Mason (the main point-of-view character) writes, "Few people are willing to stand for both the death penalty and an overturning of Roe v. Wade these days". At this point in 2022 it seems very unlikely that Roe v Wade will be a live issue in July, 2022, let alone 2039.

Third, about zombies. McGuire assumes the world will survive a zombie apocalypse and be living with it by 2039. Living with it, in the world of Feed, means living in a police state that restricts freedom in order to keep most people safe. Although McGuire fails to emphasize this, that effort has been largely successful: Georgia mentions that 2,653 deaths were attributed to zombies in the past year in the USA. That is not a large number. 42,915 people are estimated to have died in traffic accidents in the USA in 2021. That is the level of death we are willing to tolerate for the convenience of personal mobility. So the zombie problem is under control. Roughly a million Americans have died of Covid-19 in the last two years, and we Americans have made it very clear that harsh restrictions on freedom of movement or hygiene cannot be imposed or enforced with the goal of reducing Covid-19 transmission.

Well, as Yogi Berra told us, "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future." It was just unfortunate for McGuire that the assumptions of Feed fell apart so fast.
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


JM
4.0 out of 5 stars FEED for thought.
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2011
Verified Purchase
The last few years have seen an explosion in the number of books about zombies. Most of these books never really get beyond the limitations of the genre, which is really just a new spin on an old favorite (albeit problematic) American archetype: what Michael Parenti calls "the wagon circle." In short, the cowboys are surrounded, and the Indians are attacking. Only, we have gone from covered wagons on western Plains to shopping malls (Dawn of the Dead) and pubs (Shawn of the Dead), and the proverbial Indians are now the undead.

I was expecting more of the same when I picked up Mira Grant's FEED; instead, I was pleasantly surprised. It is almost as if the genre itself has had to come to terms with the zombie plague.

Hence, for the majority of the protagonists of FEED zombies are not a new phenomena, but something they have grown up with. The Masons, a brother and sister duo in their early 20s, and their crew are bloggers trying to make a living in the post-apocalyptic world. The zombie threat abounds, but it is only after they are selected to cover the upcoming presidential elections that their lives get truly dangerous. Indeed, theirs is a difficult and dangerous world, but ultimately it is all too similar to our own.

For most of the book our heroes have a sort of comic-bookish aura about them. Sure, there are close calls, but you know that they are ultimately going to come through it all fine. This changes in the last hundred pages of the book, however, and just when you think you know where Grant is headed, out of nowhere--like a hungry zombie--comes a biting turn of events.

This book reads a bit like a Young Adult novel. Despite the ages of the characters, generational conflict is prevalent throughout. In fact, I was reminded a bit of Scooby Doo ("those meddling kids"), but not merely because of the characters. The plot, too, centers around a stumbled upon mystery, a conspiracy really. Yet, whereas Scooby Doo's predicament is usually reassuringly simple, here the situation is more complex. One is reminded of the television series X-FILES, with its smoke-filled rooms full of corrupt politicians, shady technocrats and potential assassins.

While some of the characterization falls flat (Shawn Mason is the lovable daredevil, reckless and heroic; Georgia Mason is the intrepid reporter, uncompromising and intimidating), and while some of the conflicts are cliche, Grant does manage to be thought-provoking on more occasions than you might think possible in a zombie book. We are told, for example, that "we are a nation accustomed to being afraid ... fear justifies everything. Fear makes it okay to have surrendered freedom after freedom, until our every move is tracked and recorded in a dozen databases the average man will never have access to" (428).

Though the book is not overtly political, equating zombies with terrorists in this post-9/11 age is all too easy, and her point is well-taken.

I am reading this book with my high school students' book of the month club, and already the FEEDback has been positive. There is some foul language, but none of it is gratuitous, and overall there is less gore than a book of this genre usually has. It is not a perfect book, but it is certainly entertaining, and one you can easily sink your teeth into.
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Kat Mayor
5.0 out of 5 stars 5 amplification stars
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2017
Verified Purchase
5/5 Amplification stars!

This is one of those, "why haven't I read this sooner" moments. I love a good zombie story, and this one is a winner. The year is 2040. In 2014, a zombie outbreak called "The Rising", destroys life as the world knows it. After the Rising, people are far less likely to congregate in large groups, must take a blood test for entrance into any building, and entire areas (Alaska) are declared uninhabitable and given over to the infected. Traditional news sites failed miserably at reporting the original outbreak. The government tried to keep it silent and the media was complicit. A lot of needless deaths were caused because they reported it as a hoax, or cos play. It wasn't until a doctor spoke to the people directly through his eleven year old's blog that the truth was revealed. It was a turning point for independent bloggers. Now, they were the trusted name in news.

Now it's 2040. One of these independent news sites, After the End Times, is invited to follow a presidential candidate around during the primaries and up to the election for the first time. We meet Georgia and her brother Shaun, our intrepid reporters. Imagine trying to run a campaign and stump in a post-Rising world. The threat of zombies limits your ability to talk to the people, and the need for power leads some to go to extreme lengths to destroy their political opponents.

Ms. Grant did her research and it shows. The explanations and the world-building really give the reader a sense that this could happen. She uses some other zombie lore, but puts her own spin on it. The virus that causes amplification into a zombie, Kellis-Amberlee came about through a cure for cancer and the common cold colliding. (Think <em>I am Legend</em>). Everyone has the virus, (Think the Walking Dead) but it's not until you go through amplification that it becomes a problem. Whether you get bit by the infected or you die from a heart attack the result is the same.

Everyone has the virus, but some people experience concentrated levels in certain organs that doesn't spread to the rest of the body. Georgia has retinal KA (Kellis-Amberlee) affecting only her eyes making her eyes permanently dilated. Rick's wife had it in her ovaries, causing her newborn to be born with an increased viral load and undergo spontaneous amplification at age nine.

What I loved is how this book made me think about what it was like after the Rising. The author touches on some things, like a political candidate who would want to eradicate all the infected and take back Alaska (Tate). But I could also imagine an opposing political group, who fight for the Infected's rights. I could see a group of protesters who would put everyone in danger in the name of political correctness. If you didn't want to coexist with the infected you would be labeled a zombieist, or something along those lines. Others would be prosecuted for shooting a zombie trying to bite them or their family.

It also made me think about the medical aspect. How would cardiac arrest be handled? Do you try to resuscitate a person who goes down, or let them amplify? I wouldn't want to get close enough to a person who has dropped to perform CPR or even hook-up an AED. And what about the terminally ill or nursing home residents? Could you come up with some sort of device hooked up to your heart monitor that will kill you once your heart stops? (Like the doctor in Saw III). Maybe I think about things too much. Anyway, it's a great book. If you love zombie stories, give this one a try.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Cheryl Stout
5.0 out of 5 stars Don't play with the dead things - they might bite!
Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2010
Verified Purchase
It has been a LONG time since I had so much fun reading a book. It's always great when you discover a new author that really seems to resonate with your tastes in reading. It is so much better when you weren't expecting it at all.

I like post-apocalyptic books - a lot. But zombies have always been at the bottom of my food chain (har har). I read zombie books - some of them. And I watch zombie movies - some of them. But I don't rush right out and throw down my bucks as soon as a new book or movie in the genre comes out.

So I stumbled across "Feed" and thought - zombies, politics, journalists. NONE of those sound like my idea of a great afternoon of reading. But guess what? I consider "Feed" to be one of the most enjoyable books - any genre - that I have ever read. And I conservatively read probably 3-5 books a week and have for 45+ years. It goes to show you that if the writing is first calibre, the author can make you forget that you don't like the subject matter.

The lead characters - the blogging team that is reporting on the presidential candidate - are all very well developed. The storyline, while not totally new, had enough quirks to keep me interested from page one to the very last sentence of the book. I liked that the story took place at a future time because then the author was able to throw in some funny little historical asides (Cruise for President anyone?). I liked the detail given to the surroundings and living conditions, to electronics, to changes in mass media, to politics (although it seems politics stays fairly static with the same intrigues and obsessions).

Did I love 100% of this book? No - there was some repetition and some minor distractions. But on the whole, this book is a keeper for my library and I am giving out copies as Christmas presents.

I will be trying the author's other books, too, written under her real name of Seanan McGuire (October Daye series). They do not look like books I would normally read but ahhh...check comments earlier in this review. I also found out, as I researched a little, that the author can really sing - a genre called filk which I had never heard of before. But her clear, piercing voice, songwriting skills, and the quirky albums caused me to order two at another site - "Pretty Little Dead Girl" and "Red Roses and Dead Things". Her first album "Stars Fall Home" really caught my interest, too, after hearing snippets of the songs but it is out of production and I was unable to track down a copy.

For those of you out there that want a over-the-top blood and guts zombie book, "Feed" might not fit what you are looking for. There are definitely some stomach rolling moments in the book but it has more than zombies and gore. If you want a true gorefest but also one of the best post-apocalyptic books I have read, try 
BIOHAZARD  by Tim Curran.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


John T. Leckie
3.0 out of 5 stars Not a zombie novel, but may be worth a read
Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2022
Verified Purchase
Disclaimer: this is not a novel about zombies, it's about bloggers masquerading as journalists in a post-outbreak world. If you're into gore-bathed Norman Reedus mowing down hordes of infected, then "Feed" by Mira Grant will bore you to tears. Fortunately, I was drawn in by the unusual angle to the tired genre, and Grant delivers something different. It's not always good, but it kept me reading.

To provide some context, "Feed" takes place in a world ravaged by "The Rising of 2014," a zombie apocalypse triggered by the rise of the Kellis-Amberlee virus. A third of the human population was wiped out practically overnight, every living person was eventually infected with an inactive version of the virus, and now society has changed forever. The story takes place in 2039 and follows Georgia "George" Mason, her adoptive brother Shaun Mason, and their friend Buffy. They're three news bloggers operating out of California, reporting anything related to zombies for ratings. When they're invited to follow a presidential campaign, the three start their own blog site and build their virtual empire on the road. In the process, they discover a deadly conspiracy surrounding the campaign and the Kellis-Amberlee virus.

Let's start with the bad stuff: Mira Grant needs to add some color to her writing. There were at least three separate lines which drew a mocking laugh out of me. In one scene, the protagonist Georgia Mason is arguing with the two-dimensional villain in a poorly written feud, so Mira added this little nugget to make Georgia seem intimidating, "I turned to look him in the eyes, unblinking. One of the few handy side effects of retinal [Kellis-Amberlee] is the lack of a need for repeated ocular lubrication—or, in layman’s terms, I don’t blink much." Why didn't Mira's editors slap her upside the head with her draft? The novel is riddled with clunky, repetitive descriptions and wooden dialogue. There's another instance where one of the presidential candidates gets angry and blurts out a threat that is far too long-winded for anyone to actually say.

Another weakness lies in the characters themselves, specifically the presidential candidates that are the focus of the campaign. The Masons follow Senator Peter Ryman, the typical "boy scout" Midwest Republic candidate with a winning smile and sparkling eyes. He's painted in such a bright light, you wonder if there's some darkness to reveal in him; nope, what you see is what you get. Then there's Governor David Tate, the absolute personification of Christian fundamental extremist. Three guesses who the villain is here? Lastly, there's passing references to a congresswoman that uses her body to win votes, a thinly veiled jab at Sarah Paylin (and a bad one, if I might add). These characters deflate the entire political arc of the novel and left me wondering why it was even necessary.

Lastly, I was disappointed in the narrative structure. If your novel centers on bloggers reporting the news, then the story should be told through posts, recordings, and transcripts from multiple perspectives. And if you feel compelled to use a stream of consciousness narration, why would you only use one character when you have three major characters? I understand that some might compare it to Max Brook's "Zombie Survival Guide," but there's a seven-year gap between the two books! It was just a wasted opportunity.

Now that we've aired out the weaknesses, let's highlight the good stuff. Mira Grant does an excellent job with world building, from the breakdown of technology and protocols to historical events and legal factors. It's rare that anybody explores a civilization that survived a zombie apocalypse, so it was interesting to see how Mira Grant explored it. The world feels lived-in to an extent. And while Grant failed to add much political intrigue or zombie viscera, she excels in presenting an insider's view of news reporting, particularly from a blogger's lens. We see the administration involved, the technological hurdles, the legwork necessary to keep it rolling. I was really invested in the success of "After The End Times" by the novel's end. So, Mira Grant certainly did her research on that front.

Overall, I wasn't pleased with the novel's flaws - honestly, if you're going to write a book with zombies, then you had better make a point of writing them better. Still, the last third of the novel was intriguing, particularly the final stretch. So, I'll rate "Feed" a Three out of Five. Perhaps Grant's other two "Newsflesh" novels will grow better with experience.
3 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Amazon Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars Characters Are One Step Above Zombies
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2012
Verified Purchase
Other reviews have covered the basic plot synopsis. Here's my one sentence: Georgia and Shaun, two intrepid bloggers, follow a promising presidential campaign in a zombie-afflicted world, experience various tragedies and stumble upon a political conspiracy.

Now, to the reason I decided to write a review. There are great things about this book. The world they inhabit is well thought out and engrossing. Grant's take on the Zombie mythology- everybody's infected and further exposure or death triggers zombification- feels real and the nature of this mythology affects the world in an intriguing and logical way. I didn't think it was too long; I read the book when I should have been doing other things and still finished within a few days. I enjoyed the experience. However, after I finished the book several things started to really bother me and I thought I'd share them. While the world may be somewhat multi-faceted, characters are not and the problems with characterization led to other cracks in what could have been a really great work.

Firstly, the main character Georgia never goes under any transformation. She begins the novel flinty and devoted to the truth and success. She ends it that way too. She never undergoes a trial by fire. She never faces a dilemma that forces her to question herself or her beliefs. She never changes, which is one of the fundamentals of character development. I expect character development in a novel. This may be horribly Western of me but if a work is without it, I feel it a bit lacking. It's one of the many things that makes her unrealistic and flat as a main character. Real human beings have doubts and change. So should George, especially since she is supposed to be fairly young.

The fact that she didn't have doubts just reflects how black and white the book's perspective is, on the plot and on George. Not to spoil, however, her opponents' main motivations were portrayed as fear. This was treated as cowardly and stupid. There was never any sympathy for the traumatized. Moreover, George and Shaun's zombie baiting for blog hits was treated as necessary and brave, "To Get the Truth Out" and be "real reporters." Yet, it put them at risk and I imagine it wasn't news to viewers that zombies are dangerous. The surface motivation was that George would do anything to get the truth out and Shaun enjoyed the thrill but it was never fully explained why they wanted those things. Not to mention, these kinds of motivations feel overly simplistic. I had to wonder if they weren't just acting out for attention because their parents, cardboard evil step-parents didn't love them enough. This was never addressed, making it one note. George and Shaun are heroes. Period. Their candidate is great. Period. (The fact that he's a politician and would have to face a multitude of ambiguous choices in the face of donors and public opinion is ignored). The villains are religious zealots. Period. That's such cheap motivation. It ignores why people become religious zealots (no one is born thinking, "kill the infidel" or in this case "the zombie infection was sent by god to purify America"). Moreover, without getting into too much spoilers, it also is just too weak for the actions it's supposed to explain. Plus, it annoyed me. In the book, anyone who expressed anything remotely Christian other than the saint candidate, was a sleeper agent.

Further showing the black and whiteness, submission to fear is portrayed as the main motivation for those who disagree with George's political beliefs and it is disdained. Yet it is never questioned that maybe fear motivates some of her beliefs and actions too. For example, she never lets anyone get close. We're supposed to believe she has friend when it really seems like she has co-workers and contacts. This action and her fear is never questioned. She never gets over it. It's a missed opportunity because here is where some character development could have happened.

Her relationships and other characters for that matter are further shown to be cheap. Her brother, she loves devotedly. He never seriously annoys her even though she spends 24/7 with her. That can't be possible. He's a Not-a-Love-Interest (Look it up on tvtrope.org) done to the extreme. That relationship too never grows or changes. Also, it came off as odd to me that she loves her brother so much but enables his dangerous behavior. (She talks endlessly about how she wants to die if he dies but never really does anything to make their lives longer.) Another example is her relationship with the candidate's wife. She suffers a horrible tragedy and talks about how it (sorry, revealing what the tragedy is would be a spoiler) affects George. As if that's what would be important to someone at that time. To be honest, her and her husband's reaction to it seemed ridiculous. No one bears something like that so calmly. George's relationship with her parents is also one dimensional. Her adoptive parents only used her and her brother for publicity- that means that they couldn't have loved the children they raised for eighteen years, not even a little bit. And because George and Shaun figured out that they weren't loved, they don't love them or desire their attention and support at all, not even a little bit. The reason for the adopted parents' behavior, a dead child of their own, seems a little baffling. Wouldn't they be more protective rather than exploitative? It's a Freudian excuse for why George and Shaun act the way they do but it is never fully explored, just as most if not all the characters go unexplored.

Ultimately, this book showed potential and was enjoyable but failed as a story because it failed to have compelling characters with compelling motivations. The black and whiteness of the plot and the characters strongly annoyed me. One example in particular bothers me, the female candidate who George dismisses as a porn star trying to get people to vote with her breasts. This from a book with a supposedly strong heroine. But of course, no one who runs against her candidate could have been equal to her candidate in any way. This is symptomatic of the weak characterization and flat plot present in this book. It's easy to ignore at the time. The world is engaging. George, on the surface, is engaging. The language too is engaging. Still, afterwards I'm left writing a rant. I have to say I don't regret reading this book but I won't read the sequel.
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Need customer service?
‹ See all details for Feed (Newsflesh, Book 1)

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations
›
View or edit your browsing history
After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Amazon Newsletter
  • About Amazon
  • Accessibility
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
  • Amazon Science
Make Money with Us
  • Start Selling with Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Supply to Amazon
  • Protect & Build Your Brand
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a Package Delivery Business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
  • ›See More Ways to Make Money
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon Visa
  • Amazon Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Gift Cards
  • Amazon Currency Converter
Let Us Help You
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Recalls and Product Safety Alerts
  • Help
English
United States
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Ads
Reach customers
wherever they
spend their time
6pm
Score deals
on fashion brands
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
ACX
Audiobook Publishing
Made Easy
Sell on Amazon
Start a Selling Account
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
 
Amazon Fresh
Groceries & More
Right To Your Door
AmazonGlobal
Ship Orders
Internationally
Home Services
Experienced Pros
Happiness Guarantee
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
Audible
Listen to Books & Original
Audio Performances
Box Office Mojo
Find Movie
Box Office Data
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
 
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
IMDbPro
Get Info Entertainment
Professionals Need
Kindle Direct Publishing
Indie Digital & Print Publishing
Made Easy
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Prime Video Direct
Video Distribution
Made Easy
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
Amazon Warehouse
Great Deals on
Quality Used Products
 
Whole Foods Market
America’s Healthiest
Grocery Store
Woot!
Deals and
Shenanigans
Zappos
Shoes &
Clothing
Ring
Smart Home
Security Systems
eero WiFi
Stream 4K Video
in Every Room
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
Neighbors App
Real-Time Crime
& Safety Alerts
 
    Amazon Subscription Boxes
Top subscription boxes – right to your door
PillPack
Pharmacy Simplified
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
   
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
© 1996-2024, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates