Buy new:
$24.99$24.99
Arrives:
Saturday, Dec 9
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: MbBooks
Buy used: $7.42
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture Paperback – October 3, 2006
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $8.57 | — |
Purchase options and add-ons
Meet the Female Chauvinist Pig—the new brand of “empowered woman” who wears the Playboy bunny as a talisman, bares all for Girls Gone Wild, pursues casual sex as if it were a sport, and embraces “raunch culture” wherever she finds it. If male chauvinist pigs of years past thought of women as pieces of meat, Female Chauvinist Pigs of today are doing them one better, making sex objects of other women—and of themselves. They think they’re being brave, they think they’re being funny, but in Female Chauvinist Pigs, Ariel Levy asks if the joke is on them.
In her quest to uncover why this is happening, Levy interviews college women who flash for the cameras on spring break and teens raised on Paris Hilton and breast implants. She examines a culture in which every music video seems to feature a stripper on a pole, the memoirs of porn stars are climbing the bestseller lists, Olympic athletes parade their Brazilian bikini waxes in the pages of Playboy, and thongs are marketed to prepubescent girls. Levy meets the high-powered women who create raunch culture—the new oinking women warriors of the corporate and entertainment worlds who eagerly defend their efforts to be “one of the guys.” And she traces the history of this trend back to conflicts between the women’s movement and the sexual revolution long left unresolved.
Levy pulls apart the myth of the Female Chauvinist Pig and argues that what has come to pass for liberating rebellion is actually a kind of limiting conformity. Irresistibly witty and wickedly intelligent, Female Chauvinist Pigs makes the case that the rise of raunch does not represent how far women have come, it only proves how far they have left to go.
- Print length236 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateOctober 3, 2006
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.7 x 8.38 inches
- ISBN-100743284283
- ISBN-13978-0743284288
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
The Pornification of America: How Raunch Culture Is Ruining Our SocietyHardcover$9.75 shippingGet it as soon as Saturday, Dec 9Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
-- Malcolm Gladwell, author of Blink and The Tipping Point
"Reading Female Chauvinist Pigs, Ariel Levy's lively polemic, gave me an epiphany of sorts. Finally a coherent interpretation of an array of phenomena I'd puzzled over in recent years.... Levy's argument is provocative -- and persuasive...a consciousness-raising call to arms."
-- The New York Times Book Review
"With the fresh voice of a young woman who grew up taking equal rights for granted while feminism was being perverted into a dirty word, Levy both shocks and sobers as she exposes the real cost of youth culture's 'Girls Gone Wild' form of status-seeking....A great choice for book clubs of either gender, it's a fast read and a surefire discussion sparker."
-- Minneapolis Star-Tribune
"Witty and provocative, painfully funny...as it documents the rise of trashy, raunchy, really, really bad female behavior, Levy's newly published book may well provide the next 'aha' moment in how North American women see themselves."
-- Maclean's (Toronto)
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Female Chauvinist Pigs
Women and the Rise of Raunch CultureBy Ariel LevyFree Press
Copyright ©2006 Ariel LevyAll right reserved.
ISBN: 9780743284288
Introduction
I first noticed it several years ago. I would turn on the television and find strippers in pasties explaining how best to lap dance a man to orgasm. I would flip the channel and see babes in tight, tiny uniforms bouncing up and down on trampolines. Britney Spears was becoming increasingly popular and increasingly unclothed, and her undulating body ultimately became so familiar to me I felt like we used to go out.
Charlie's Angels, the film remake of the quintessential jiggle show, opened at number one in 2000 and made $125 million in theaters nationally, reinvigorating the interest of men and women alike in leggy crime fighting. Its stars, who kept talking about "strong women" and "empowerment," were dressed in alternating soft-porn styles -- as massage parlor geishas, dominatrixes, yodeling Heidis in alpine bustiers. (The summer sequel in 2003 -- in which the Angels' perilous mission required them to perform stripteases -- pulled in another $100 million domestically.) In my own industry, magazines, a porny new genre called the Lad Mag, which included titles like Maxim, FHM, and Stuff, was hitting the stands and becoming a huge success by delivering what Playboy had only occasionally managed to capture: greased celebrities in little scraps of fabric humping the floor.
This didn't end when I switched off the radio or the television or closed the magazines. I'd walk down the street and see teens and young women -- and the occasional wild fifty-year-old -- wearing jeans cut so low they exposed what came to be known as butt cleavage paired with miniature tops that showed off breast implants and pierced navels alike. Sometimes, in case the overall message of the outfit was too subtle, the shirts would be emblazoned with the Playboy bunny or say Porn Star across the chest.
Some odd things were happening in my social life, too. People I knew (female people) liked going to strip clubs (female strippers). It was sexy and fun, they explained; it was liberating and rebellious. My best friend from college, who used to go to Take Back the Night marches on campus, had become captivated by porn stars. She would point them out to me in music videos and watch their (topless) interviews on Howard Stern. As for me, I wasn't going to strip clubs or buying Hustler T-shirts, but I was starting to show signs of impact all the same. It had only been a few years since I'd graduated from Wesleyan University, a place where you could pretty much get expelled for saying "girl" instead of "woman," but somewhere along the line I'd started saying "chick." And, like most chicks I knew, I'd taken to wearing thongs.
What was going on? My mother, a shiatsu masseuse who attended weekly women's consciousness-raising groups for twenty-four years, didn't own makeup. My father, whom she met as a student radical at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in the sixties was a consultant for Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and NOW. Only thirty years (my lifetime) ago, our mothers were "burning their bras" and picketing Playboy, and suddenly we were getting implants and wearing the bunny logo as supposed symbols of our liberation. How had the culture shifted so drastically in such a short period of time?
What was almost more surprising than the change itself were the responses I got when I started interviewing the men and -- often -- women who edit magazines like Maxim and make programs like The Man Show and Girls Gone Wild. This new raunch culture didn't mark the death of feminism, they told me; it was evidence that the feminist project had already been achieved. We'd earned the right to look at Playboy; we were empowered enough to get Brazilian bikini waxes. Women had come so far, I learned, we no longer needed to worry about objectification or misogyny. Instead, it was time for us to join the frat party of pop culture, where men had been enjoying themselves all along. If Male Chauvinist Pigs were men who regarded women as pieces of meat, we would outdo them and be Female Chauvinist Pigs: women who make sex objects of other women and of ourselves.
When I asked female viewers and readers what they got out of raunch culture, I heard similar things about empowering miniskirts and feminist strippers, and so on, but I also heard something else. They wanted to be "one of the guys"; they hoped to be experienced "like a man." Going to strip clubs or talking about porn stars was a way of showing themselves and the men around them that they weren't "prissy little women" or "girly-girls." Besides, they told me, it was all in fun, all tongue-in-cheek, and for me to regard this bacchanal as problematic would be old-school and uncool.
I tried to get with the program, but I could never make the argument add up in my head. How is resurrecting every stereotype of female sexuality that feminism endeavored to banish good for women? Why is laboring to look like Pamela Anderson empowering? And how is imitating a stripper or a porn star -- a woman whose job is to imitate arousal in the first place -- going to render us sexually liberated?
Despite the rising power of Evangelical Christianity and the political right in the United States, this trend has only grown more extreme and more pervasive in the years that have passed since I first became aware of it. A tawdry, tarty, cartoonlike version of female sexuality has become so ubiquitous, it no longer seems particular. What we once regarded as a kind of sexual expression we now view as sexuality. As former adult film star Traci Lords put it to a reporter a few days before her memoir hit the best-seller list in 2003, "When I was in porn, it was like a back-alley thing. Now it's everywhere." Spectacles of naked ladies have moved from seedy side streets to center stage, where everyone -- men and women -- can watch them in broad daylight. Playboy and its ilk are being "embraced by young women in a curious way in a postfeminist world," to borrow the words of Hugh Hefner.
But just because we are post doesn't automatically mean we are feminists. There is a widespread assumption that simply because my generation of women has the good fortune to live in a world touched by the feminist movement, that means everything we do is magically imbued with its agenda. It doesn't work that way. "Raunchy" and "liberated" are not synonyms. It is worth asking ourselves if this bawdy world of boobs and gams we have resurrected reflects how far we've come, or how far we have left to go.
Copyright © 2005 by Ariel Levy
Continues...
Excerpted from Female Chauvinist Pigs by Ariel Levy Copyright ©2006 by Ariel Levy. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; 1st edition (October 3, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 236 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0743284283
- ISBN-13 : 978-0743284288
- Item Weight : 8.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.7 x 8.38 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,224,674 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,075 in Feminist Theory (Books)
- #4,122 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Ariel Levy is a staff writer at The New Yorker magazine, where she has written about the swimmer Diana Nyad, the Supreme Court plaintiff Edith Windsor, the former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, and the drug ayahuasca. She was the editor of The Best American Essays 2015. Her personal story "Thanksgiving in Mongolia" won a National Magazine Award for Essays and Criticism, and it is the basis for her new book, The Rules Do Not Apply.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The last three chapters seem to be only tangentially related--one on the misogyny of San Fransisco Boi's in the 2000's, and another on high school sexuality and the failure of abstinence education during the Bush years that could have been written by anyone at the Atlantic. So these parts read like a book with magazine pieces sutured in, and when I read the notes they were. There was nothing particularly objectionable to these sections but instead of going deeper into the roots of the problem, just more symptoms are pointed out. While the "raunch culture" Levy describes may have died-down a bit, the aping of stereotypes of male and female values have not and the neo-liberalization of feminist rhetoric continues. This book seems to indicate that Levy would have a lot to say on that, but more pathological work is needed. This book isn't in the genre for that to possible within its pages.
For what the book actually does, popularizing a problem that seemed be treated as a dinosaur's debate in the late 90s and early 2000s, Levy's book is excellent. The events are real and implied, although even though it is only eight years old, actually feels surprisingly dated now. I just saw a pathological critique implied about how the problem emerged hidden in the pages of Levy's book, but the structure and format of popular non-fiction long-form journalism didn't enable it to come out.
This book is really about two things: sexual pleasure and freedom. Specifically, Levy wants to know why "post-feminist" freedom and sexuality -- epitomized by Girls Gone Wild, Playboy bunnies, and the glorification of porn stars and strippers -- looks so much like its opposite: a pre-feminist world in which women try their damnedess to please their partners (or crowds, or video cameras) without a strong sense of their own sexual desires.
There are two different identities that Levy describes: first, that of the "empowered" sex object, personified in the idea of the sex worker (porn stars, strippers) as the ultimate women; and second, the woman who is actually one of the guys, personified successful corporate women who, like Judith Reagan, seem to talk about the the size of their penises a lot, while professing a general distrust of women, especially "girly-girls", who are generally referred to as "pussies".
The two identities generally overlap (combining into the "Female Chauvinist Pig"), and even people in the first group seem to hate "girly-girls". But people solidly in the former group seem to be drunk, unhappy, and prone to eating disorders, whereas people in the latter group are more likely to be successful and tend not to make out with other women in bars. But a lot of women seem to spend time in both categories, and sometimes you get a Paris Hilton, who perfectly embodies both sides of the coin.
The book really focuses on the peusdo-stripper aspect of the identity, which makes its way down to girls who are younger and younger (think middle school), and older and older (think thirty-something lawyer). The problem with this identity, for Levy, is that strippers and porn stars are inappopriate sexual role models, not because they are too sexual, but because they are paid to pretend that they enjoy something that they wouldn't be doing otherwise.
And in interview after interview, Levy finds sexually libertine females of all ages who don't seem to enjoy sex at all, in no small part because they don't seem to really know what it is that they would want from a partner (other than attention), or what they would want sexually (other than to please someone else). For Levy, it would seem, the ultimate sin is having sex and not enjoying it. And it's a sin that has its roots in a culture that teaches women to be sexy and men to be sexual.
Some reviews have said that Levy doesn't offer solutions; I don't think that that's true. Levy brings in a brief history of feminism from the 1950s to the 1980s to argue that freedom (through equality) and honest female pleasure were really what feminists were after, and the breakdown of feminism around issues like pornography and the universality of lesbianism has left modern women less able to understand the idea that women share a fate.
Levy argues over and over that if women, as a whole, are thought of negatively, then the mere fact of being female will continue to be a taint on all females, even those who most solidly identify with masculinity. So the beginnings of a solution are fairly obvious; women should understand that their fates are linked, and people should generally work to destigmatize womanhood.
Barring that, individuals should look at their own sexuality and sexual behavior and ask themselves if they're really getting what it is that they want, and if not, they should pursue a different strategy for sexual fulfillment.
Top reviews from other countries
This seems to be a common stance taken in today's culture, not only in the US (which the author here analyzes exclusively). But have we really gained so much? Are women really part of it? Is the power of one form of sexuality the only power available and in fact desirable for women?
Levy undertakes a tour of the US, interviews women and men in the TV industry, the sex industry, straight and lesbian women about their perceptions of women and femininity and develops a position highly critical of what she terms "raunch culture."
While her style is mostly essayistic and sometimes a little repetitive, her description of the situation women find themselves in today - a total commodification of their sexuality disguised as liberation - is very successful. Her comparison to the feminism of the 1970s - both its criticism of porn and its demand for a freed, sovereign sexuality for women - is very illuminating, especially when she interviews an icon such as "sex-friendly feminist" Erica Jong.
The analysis could be sharper and better balanced at times. I was left wondering whether "raunch culture" is really that ubiquitous in the US (Levy reports mainly from the coasts and her subjects seem to be mainly white middle class young women) and whether there aren't any benefits to it (the freedom to have sex as opposed to, say, old-fashioned religious control over women's bodies).
However, all in all I find this an important publication that helped me developed new distance to the omnipresence of sexualized pictures of women. Yes, I find these pictures offensive. Yes, women should not just have (some sort of limited) power because they have boobs. I, personally, want the power of making responsible decisions because I have a brain and a will and dedication.
Levy does a good job of reminding us of the importance of this form of participation and she argues well that we must not let ourselves be limited by one idea of male centered sexuality.
(I would give this book 4,5 stars if it were possible. Since I consider it an important publication, I will give it 5)
'Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture' is polemical work which looks at how women have fallen into the trap of mimicking and idolising either an extreme form of female sexuality (such as the pole dancer, stripper or porn star) or a hard-nosed, aggressive male stereotype (the sort who would oggle pole dancers etc). Chapters look at the issue from different angles, including the effect on young men and women, it's manifestation in 'boi' culture among New York lesbians and how the author believes the whole issue relates back to consumerism, power and the codification of sexuality.
There was a lot of really interesting information and ideas in this book, but it is really badly written. Even looking beyond the fact that no concession seems to have been made for the British market (Levy is an American writer and the book is clearly aimed at someone with a basic understanding of relevant law and events in that country), there's no clear, logical structure or flow to take the reader on a journey through the writer's ideas. The introduction alone felt rather like an angry, foot-stamping, ranting, tantrum, which was exhausting to read, and, afterall, has anyone ever really had their mind changed by someone shouting at them?
The terrible structure was made all the worse by the fact that there is a lot of really interesting information in this book. I found the chapters looking at US Feminism and how it led to the 'Rise of Raunch Culture' ('The Future that Never Happened') and the effect of this trend on young people ('Pigs in Training') extremely interesting, but still hard work. Although the interviews quoted were a great for grounding the subject, ultimately they weren't enough. More actual statistics would have helped as it was difficult to tell whether the issues discussed were as severe as suggested because so much of the argument felt like it was based on here-say and a very narrow sample of interviews.
This is a book I would love to see rewritten with some more thorough research and better structuring so that it becomes a logical, comprehensible discussion and a cogent argument for reflection and change. The focus on different groups/topics in different chapters is fine, but how information is conveyed within those chapters really needs looking at. Unfortunately, until this happens, I'm afraid that wouldn't recommend it to anyone, which is a real shame as I do believe there is a very important issue being discussed here, possibly even the biggest issue in modern feminism.
I am very grateful to Levy for explaining so well in this excellent book what a tragic mistake we're all making today - why us women are so profoundly wrong in thinking that we are empowered and liberated when, for example, we now imitate strippers and/or porn stars in dress and behaviour; when we subject ourselves to mutilation (including genital) under the guise of cosmetic surgery; when we forego education, hard work and generally being excellent people, and choose instead to focus on our (increasingly standardized) looks ... and imagine we're doing it for our own gratification.
'Female Chauvinist Pigs' tells us how and why this all started, how our whole culture and way of life have become so pornified, why everything in our society today has to be ''sexy'' in order to be noteworthy. For women, but resolutely not for men, being ''sexy'' is the one and only factor by which our worth as human beings is measured; and sadly, women willingly participate in this tragic situation. Levy successfully takes apart the contemporary prevailing argument, the gigantic misconception we all now seem to have: that striving for sexiness at all cost is somehow feminist, liberating, and altogether some kind of wonderful and empowering thing for women everywhere. It is not.
To those who believe it is, I warmly recommend this book. Likewise, if you are trying to make up your mind, you will find here a lot of intelligent arguments to help. A brilliant but easy read, which made me re-think a whole lot of my own assumptions.
Ariel Levy has explained in her book things that had been bothering me but I couldn't put into words. Its nice that someone has figured it out and pointed it out for us all to understand. This book has helped me to be more confident to be the kind of woman I want to be, and in a way that I don't feel quite so alone about it. I will share this book with many people, my son and daughter for sure and would recommend it to anyone who can handle taking a good hard look at themselves and how they contribute to "raunch culture."
Ariel Levy is earnest in her research, but the book is eminently readable for the humanity she shows towards her interviewees and the opinions they express. As a fortysomething male, I am sure I was not the first reader she had in mind, but this book is not a lofty, academic treatise and lends itself to a very wide readership.
Her conclusion is powerful, as she argues that, far from liberating women, the adoption of a traditionally masculine approach to sex and sexuality has actually had the opposite effect to that intended, since women are still objectified, albeit in a different sense. Her contrast between the growing "liberation" of sex with the restrictions imposed upon sex education and attempts to ban gay marriages in the US says it all.


