It's hard to defend a strict prescriptivist view when I have lived in three English-speaking countries all with different dialects and even spelling conventions. That's the synchronic linguistics aspect of the debate. Dr Crystal likewise grew up in two separate parts of the UK, with different dialects.
The way English has changed over time, i.e. diachronic linguistics, makes it even harder to be a strict prescriptivist. Different eras had different quirks, as the book documents. E.g. when Caxton brought the printing press to England, he hired Dutch printers. In Dutch, their g is like the ch in German and Hebrew, so to make our g sound, they added an h. Hence the silly spellings "ghost" and "ghoul" Another was trying to be helpful by linking words to their Latin source so people would learn the meanings. This is why a silent b was added to debt and doubt, to connect with debitum and dubitum. A split infinitive often sounds more rhythmic in English because our speech likes to use alternating weak and strong stresses, e.g. Stark Trek's "to BOLDly GO where NO man has GONE beFORE" rather than "to GO BOLDly …"
But Dr Crystal makes it clear he doesn't support "anything goes". There is a place for the right language for the right situations.
The Fight for English: How Language Pundits Ate, Shot, and Left Reprint Edition
by
David Crystal
(Author)
|
David Crystal
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
ISBN-13:
978-0199229697
ISBN-10:
0199229694
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Editorial Reviews
Review
`Sensitive, balanced ... elegant, accessible, illuminating' Times Education Supplement
`Illuminating' The Guardian
`Illuminating' The Guardian
About the Author
David Crystal is the foremost writer and lecturer on the English language, with a world-wide reputation and over 100 books to his name. He is Honorary Professor of Linguistics at the University of Wales, Bangor, and has been awarded an OBE for services to the English language.
Start reading The Fight for English on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Reprint edition (January 3, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 239 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0199229694
- ISBN-13 : 978-0199229697
- Item Weight : 9.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 7.4 x 0.9 x 5.2 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#365,837 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #448 in Linguistics (Books)
- #716 in Grammar Reference (Books)
- #798 in Words, Language & Grammar Reference
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5
31 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on June 9, 2018
Verified Purchase
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 31, 2018
Verified Purchase
Fantastic Book...if you want to know the truth about grammar.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 12, 2008
Verified Purchase
I bought the Kindle edition of this book, because I love the English language and its history. As others have written, the contents of the book are very interesting, providing much insight into how and why the various grammatical rules of English were "discovered" and forced upon students, whether those rules made sense or not. Crystal's writing is very easy to read and is fun.
If I read this as a physical book, I would undoubtedly give it a 5-star review. Unfortunately, I read the Kindle version of the book, and it is clear the publisher made no effort to make sure the book was formated properly. The opening paragraphs of each chapter are clearly in the wrong order, with the chapter's opening paragraph usually the second or third paragraph, while the first paragraph presented is clearly not the opening paragraph. There are endnotes at the end of the book, but the publisher does not provide hyperlinks to enable the reader to reference an endnote from the text, or, having found the endnote, to go to the text the note refers to. The index of the book is provided, but each entry of the index references a page number, which, of course, is meaningless in a Kindle book. The Index should refer to Locations in the book, and include hyperlinks to those Locations.
If I read this as a physical book, I would undoubtedly give it a 5-star review. Unfortunately, I read the Kindle version of the book, and it is clear the publisher made no effort to make sure the book was formated properly. The opening paragraphs of each chapter are clearly in the wrong order, with the chapter's opening paragraph usually the second or third paragraph, while the first paragraph presented is clearly not the opening paragraph. There are endnotes at the end of the book, but the publisher does not provide hyperlinks to enable the reader to reference an endnote from the text, or, having found the endnote, to go to the text the note refers to. The index of the book is provided, but each entry of the index references a page number, which, of course, is meaningless in a Kindle book. The Index should refer to Locations in the book, and include hyperlinks to those Locations.
13 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 11, 2015
Verified Purchase
Interesting read. Loved hearing about why English words are spelling so weirdly.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on July 31, 2007
Verified Purchase
This is a great read, especially if you are into the evolution of our language. I read a lot of this stuff. I got interested in this area years ago when I watched the Story of English on PBS. That was perhaps 20 years or more ago. I don't try to pick up the historical pronunciation, because in my case, it would be impossible. The great thing that one comes away with is that English is still evolving.
13 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2015
Verified Purchase
I enjoyed the book even though it was not what I was expecting. It is more about how the English language developed than how to write it well.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2018
After I read Crystal's Stories of English, I became one of his fans so I grabbed this book when I saw it. However, much of what he covers in this book is just a brief rehash of what he covered in Stories of English, and not covered as well as he covered it in Stories of English. In addition, it seems to me that Crystal wrote this book to cash in on Lynn Truss' success of Eats, Shoots and Leaves.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2008
Ok, I have always believed that it is better to speak and write "correctly" than not. As Americans go, I think I do pretty well. But I also am aware of the fact that many other people from various parts of the country speak their own languages "well" and communicate among themselves just fine--even though it may sound awful to me. And yes, I was teased when I was a kid.
The book, The Fight for English makes it clear, however, that both sides of that conversation have been far more vicious to each other in England than in America for something like a millennium. And David Crystal's story of how all of those dialects that grew up in the relative isolation of horses and buggies turned into modern English is fascinating. And particularly amusing is the fact that for the last 500 years or so, there was invariably somebody complaining about how the decline in the standards of English was leading the whole society to ruin. (It turns out, by the way, that starting the last sentence with "And" isn't nearly the horrible sin that I was raised to believe.)
David Crystal's view is that throughout its history, the English language has been evolving--first bringing together the very different languages of the Celts, Angles, and the Saxons, and then merging in Norman French and Latin. Shakespeare understood that different dialects added variety to the language and included many in his plays, but he did so without prejudice. People from Yorkshire were not presented as comedic figures, presumed to be ignorant. Their accents were included simply to add variety to the sound of the language in the play. Soon after his time, however, the early "pundits" began to make it clear that there was a particular language for the upper classes, and if you didn't speak that, you were clearly a hick, with all that that implied.
But different accents and dialects have persevered to this day, and the English language has not died. To the contrary, it is flourishing and is working on becoming the first true international language since Latin.
None of this means that there should be no standards and it certainly does not mean that children should not learn the grammatical structures of the language. Indeed, in the 1960s, the British system discontinued teaching grammar in the 1960s as a backlash from the ruler on the knuckles approach to teaching English that had prevailed for a hundred years or more, and an entire generation has suffered. The students didn't even learn parts of speech.
That approach clearly was faulty, so the response (in the UK, at least) has been development of the New English National Curriculum. This is a radically different approach that focuses on preparing students to understand the nature and structure of the language, with all the different ways that it can be used. The idea is that they should understand what the old rules are--as well as why they are changing. They should understand why different cultures use language differently.
Most significantly, they should learn how to use language in a way that is appropriate to each situation.
Don't get the wrong idea. Mr. Crystal has no patience with obfuscation--either intentional by politicians and marketers, or unintentional by people who simply don't understand language. But correctness of grammar has never guaranteed that writing would be clear. Sometimes just the opposite is the case.
Yes, I recommend this book highly.
The book, The Fight for English makes it clear, however, that both sides of that conversation have been far more vicious to each other in England than in America for something like a millennium. And David Crystal's story of how all of those dialects that grew up in the relative isolation of horses and buggies turned into modern English is fascinating. And particularly amusing is the fact that for the last 500 years or so, there was invariably somebody complaining about how the decline in the standards of English was leading the whole society to ruin. (It turns out, by the way, that starting the last sentence with "And" isn't nearly the horrible sin that I was raised to believe.)
David Crystal's view is that throughout its history, the English language has been evolving--first bringing together the very different languages of the Celts, Angles, and the Saxons, and then merging in Norman French and Latin. Shakespeare understood that different dialects added variety to the language and included many in his plays, but he did so without prejudice. People from Yorkshire were not presented as comedic figures, presumed to be ignorant. Their accents were included simply to add variety to the sound of the language in the play. Soon after his time, however, the early "pundits" began to make it clear that there was a particular language for the upper classes, and if you didn't speak that, you were clearly a hick, with all that that implied.
But different accents and dialects have persevered to this day, and the English language has not died. To the contrary, it is flourishing and is working on becoming the first true international language since Latin.
None of this means that there should be no standards and it certainly does not mean that children should not learn the grammatical structures of the language. Indeed, in the 1960s, the British system discontinued teaching grammar in the 1960s as a backlash from the ruler on the knuckles approach to teaching English that had prevailed for a hundred years or more, and an entire generation has suffered. The students didn't even learn parts of speech.
That approach clearly was faulty, so the response (in the UK, at least) has been development of the New English National Curriculum. This is a radically different approach that focuses on preparing students to understand the nature and structure of the language, with all the different ways that it can be used. The idea is that they should understand what the old rules are--as well as why they are changing. They should understand why different cultures use language differently.
Most significantly, they should learn how to use language in a way that is appropriate to each situation.
Don't get the wrong idea. Mr. Crystal has no patience with obfuscation--either intentional by politicians and marketers, or unintentional by people who simply don't understand language. But correctness of grammar has never guaranteed that writing would be clear. Sometimes just the opposite is the case.
Yes, I recommend this book highly.
26 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
O. Joffe
3.0 out of 5 stars
Does what it says on the tin
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 2, 2013Verified Purchase
I like David Crystal's books and have read a fair number of them. His approach is to observe linguistic phenomena and to describe them in a non-judgemental way. This book is a bit of a departure from his usual style, as it is a polemic. He argues (cogently) that one should not be too judgemental about the way people use language, and one should differentiate between using appropriate language, whether that be RP or a particular dialect or register, and following rules blindly. I completely agree with him on all those points. The problem, nevertheless, is that this is a polemic. He is arguing with those people who think otherwise, and since I am not one of them, I found the book a bit dull. So, if you are someone who hates split infinitives, and bemoans sentences ending in a preposition, buy this book and give yourself a heart attack... Otherwise, choose a different, more informative book by this prolific author.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
km123
4.0 out of 5 stars
Thought provoking
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 31, 2014Verified Purchase
An interesting history of challenges to the English language and how there has always been someone shouting about how standards have suddenly started slipping. It certainly softened my stance on what is "grammatically correct". You can judge for yourself whether that is a good thing or not!
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Ms. R. Galletly
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 14, 2018Verified Purchase
Great book. Arrived earuler than I was expecting!
Joanna
3.0 out of 5 stars
but I know I will love it because I enjoy David Crystal's work
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 7, 2017Verified Purchase
Haven't read it yet, but I know I will love it because I enjoy David Crystal's work!
M.Collins
5.0 out of 5 stars
Five Stars
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 23, 2015Verified Purchase
Crystal clear.

