Buying Options
| Print List Price: | $16.95 |
| Kindle Price: |
$8.99
Save $7.96 (47%) |
| Sold by: |
Random House LLC
Price set by seller. |
Follow the Author
OK
Finale: A Novel of the Reagan Years Kindle Edition
|
Thomas Mallon
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Hardcover, Deckle Edge
"Please retry"
|
$5.00 | $0.59 |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$19.99 | — |
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherVintage
-
Publication dateSeptember 15, 2015
-
File size3723 KB
Customers who read this book also read
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Sly and penetrating. . . . Mallon’s most audacious and important work yet.” —The New York Times Book Review
“[A] scintillating comic epic of politics. . . . Mallon follows his troupe across thousands of miles, capturing what happens with rapier wit.” —San Francisco Chronicle
“A story about the limits of human ambition. . . . Wicked good, that Thomas Mallon.” —The Washington Post
“Finale offers a certifiable slice of the recent past but teases its readers with subtle fictionalization . . . Mallon handles it with an easy mastery.” —The Wall Street Journal
“Richly imagined. . . . Mallon offers a useful reminder that Presidential reputations often improve with the passage of time.” —The New Yorker
“Masterful performances, by the author and by his subject.” —Dallas Morning News
“Gorbachev, Thatcher, the Gipper himself—the gang’s all here and ready to party like it’s 1986 in this propulsive and often very funny novel that portrays political upheaval through the eyes of some of recent history’s most formidable players.” —O, The Oprah Magazine
“Full of witty, sometimes withering and often surprisingly sympathetic portraits of the characters clustered around the ever-unknowable president.” —Chicago Tribune
“Vivid. . . . Mallon impressively blends his singular knowledge of political history with his limitless imagination to capture an era.” —The Philadelphia Inquirer
“[Mallon] sculpts characters who embody the folly and frustration of political power. . . . Mallon has become a master of such political theater. . . . Combin[es] broad historical accuracy and fictional verisimilitude with aplomb.” —The Christian Science Monitor
“Mr. Mallon isn't just a gifted novelist; he also has a sound working knowledge of Washington ways. . . . A splendid example of the genre at its best.” —Washington Times
“Captur[es] the texture of the times with a dry wit and a keen eye for subtle insights. . . . His renderings of Hitchens’s tartness are dead on, and many of the one-liners about other figures zing off the page. . . . He has captured the mood and feel of the late 1980s perfectly.” —National Review
“What a pleasure it is to enter the rough-and-tumble politics of Thomas Mallon’s historical novels. . . . Mallon captures that uncertain tenor of the times while portraying the complex drama of high-level politics with real clarity and energy.” —The AV Club
“One of this novel’s many joys is the beauty and elegance of its prose. . . . [Mallon] reminds us that history is not about facts and dates; it’s the greatest story ever told.” —The Miami Herald
“Mr. Mallon can twist language like a knife. . . . [He] skillfully interweaves the personal and the political. . . . Mr. Mallon’s vivid take on this period in American politics rings true.” —Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
“An intriguing, humorous, even catty backstage view of the Reagan presidency from an artisan of the historical novel.” —Kirkus Reviews (starred)
“A scrupulously researched novel that gives readers a front-row seat on world-changing events—a combination that proves irresistible.” —Booklist (starred review)
About the Author
www.thomasmallon.com --This text refers to the paperback edition.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
October 1, 1986
“This has given us a lot of ideas for ours,” said a smiling Ronald Reagan to an unsmiling Rosalynn Carter, as the incumbent president concluded a quick tour of his predecessor’s new library.
“Yes,” agreed Nancy, who was thinking: ideas for what not to do. All these kitsch displays: the “Peanut Brigade” banner from ’76; the kids’ letters—“Please stop people from killing the whales”—and worse, Carter’s replies to them, signed “Jimmy.”
“Good,” said Rosalynn, without adding any words or warmth.
The two presidential couples filed out into the sunshine, toward the speakers’ platform, as the Fort McPherson army band played “Hail to the Chief.” Nancy looked over the four circular pavilions that had just been constructed on this hillside and thought they looked like a monotonous world’s fair.
Still, as much as she tried, it was hard for her to dislike the Carters themselves. No matter how prudish and pickle-pussed the two of them might be, there was no getting away from how much they had done for her and Ronnie—first, by defeating the Fords, whom she had no trouble at all disliking; and then, once in the White House, by screwing up so badly they seemed to have spent their whole four years rolling out a red carpet for the Reagans. Someone on Mike Deaver’s staff used to refer to the thirty-ninth president as “the Mastermind,” insisting that Jimmy Carter was the greatest Republican strategist of all time.
Nancy looked back at the building they’d just exited, as if to pay the design a compliment with some extra attention. She was actually trying to take comfort in the thought of how Carter’s papers were now neatly stored in towering rows of banker’s boxes that ran along a huge curving wall. Even failure could be made to look like accomplishment; something settled, achieved. So maybe there was hope for her and Ronnie if things really did fall apart.
No, things could fall to such smithereens that even an illusion became impossible to construct. Nixon’s library still wasn’t built, and from what she heard it would be a penny arcade of cheap statues and props, while the documents it ought to house remained far away under the government’s lock and key, serving the prison term that Nixon had avoided.
She and Ronnie, along with the Carters, reached the platform. Applause—and jeers—could be heard from the crowd of spectators on the hillside. Nancy for a moment couldn’t tell if the disapproval related to the Sandinistas or South Africa—probably the latter, given that most of Atlanta’s black establishment was here for the dedication. She looked over at Carter, who had just taken his seat; today was the first time she’d seen him in five years, since the night Ronnie had sent all the ex-presidents off to Sadat’s funeral. She regarded his pursed preacherly lips and thought of the handwritten notes to Sadat and Begin now on display in the library behind them, signed “JC,” as if they were memos from Christ himself, ordering the tribes in his Holy Land to make peace.
Well, she thought, it was decent of him to pout over the disrespect the protesters were showing Ronnie. But after a few more seconds she realized the reason for his sour expression: he was being protested, too! She strained to make out the chant that had gone up:
YOU TAKE THE HIGH ROAD! WE’LL TAKE THE NO ROAD!
On the flight down, one of the advance men had told her that a lot of locals opposed the four-lane highway being built to bring people here; the courts had actually halted construction for a while. These boos must be putting a bit of a damper on JC’s sixty-second birthday—not that his successor’s unavoidable presence hadn’t already cast a pall over it. Ninety percent of the news cameras here would be leaving halfway through the program, as soon as Ronnie finished his speech.
She waved hello to Carter’s little strawberry-blond granddaughter, who would cut the ribbon. The girl looked just the way awful little Amy, who’d grown up into more of a slob than Patti, had looked during JC’s White House days. His deciding to quote her on “nuclear proliferation,” as if she were some Quiz Kid, during the ’80 debate! Another gift from the gods.
In one way it was good that she and Ronnie hadn’t gotten to the White House sooner than they did. Had that happened, Patti, who actually did talk about nuclear proliferation, might have been living with them, as the world’s most impossible college student, foisting people even worse than that horrible Caldicott woman on her soft touch of a father.
Nancy looked at her tiny platinum wristwatch.
###
“I often get invited to library dedications,” spoke the president. “There aren’t that many people still around who knew Andrew Carnegie.”
Jimmy Carter displayed his large, recently whitened teeth to the crowd, imitating amusement while he stole a glance at Mondale, the other person here who’d had the experience of playing straight man to this dunce on a national debate stage. Carter noticed, to his dismay, that Fritz’s stomach, larger than when he’d last seen it, was shaking agreeably. His own vice president was actually enjoying this.
I can think of no other country on Earth where two political leaders could disagree so widely yet come together in mutual respect.
The old actor was sounding generous while really paying himself a compliment, letting the audience trick itself into thinking that the thirty-ninth president had a peanut shell’s worth of respect for the fortieth. This business of pretending that we’re “all Americans” just trivially separated by party labels was the domestic version of the “moral equivalence” that Reagan and his kind—chief among them Jeane Kirkpatrick, former Democrat—were always deploring on the international plane.
Reagan was now praising Carter’s mother, “Miss Lillian,” as well as his sister, Ruth, recently swallowed by the pancreatic cancer that stalked the family—and was likely to get them all before long. He himself was expecting a short ex-presidency, and he was determined to do something different and redemptive with it.
Jimmy Carter spoke these words in his inaugural address as governor of Georgia: “I say to you quite frankly that the time for racial discrimination is over.”
The man being quoted adjusted his smile to something grave and appreciative; he avoided meeting Coretta King’s gaze, so as not to appear to be fishing for additional compliments. But a part of him longed to have a lapel microphone into which he could say to Reagan: “Yes, and you started your 1980 campaign against me talking about states’ rights in Philadelphia, Mississippi.” The thought of that murderous hamlet, with three civil rights workers buried in an earthen dam, left him righteous—and ever so slightly uneasy. He had come a long way in his ideological life, as far forward as Reagan had gone backward, but he still hoped the papers from this gubernatorial campaign Reagan was referencing would remain unprocessed a while longer, lest some zealous researcher become intrigued by a few leaflets that might suggest why Jimmy Carter had actually gotten only five percent of the black Georgia vote in 1970.
. . . using his gifts—in particular, his superb intelligence . . .
Reagan made intelligence sound like a handicap, the way his aides had mocked his predecessor for actually reading the Air Force budget instead of just approving it. Looking out into the audience, Carter observed Sam Nunn, the sort of conservative Democrat on his way to extinction and thus, like a liberal Republican, highly respected. He knew that Nunn considered Reagan’s supposed toughness to be the proper antidote to Jimmy Carter’s own now-legendary weakness, and his jaw jutted forward at the thought of the false comparison. If he’d made a deal for Daniloff like the one announced yesterday, there’d have been a dozen cartoons in the papers this morning depicting him as a frightened bunny rabbit. Eight years ago, on his watch, two Russian spies had gotten fifty years in jail apiece, whereas Zakharov had just been allowed to leave the U.S. with a plea of nolo contendere—and been given permission to come back in five years! That was Reagan’s toughness.
. . . your countrymen still have vivid memories of your time in the White House . . .
He could see two aides smirking, as if to say “Do they ever,” and then realized that one of them wasn’t even Reagan’s but a guy who’d worked for him!
. . . repairing to a quiet place to receive the latest word on the hostages you did so much to free, or studying in your hideaway office for the meeting at Camp David . . .
It was as if the class football hero had been ordered to pay tribute to the class grind.
And there’s only one thing left to say. From the fortieth president to the thirty-ninth, happy birthday. And, Mr. President, if I could give you one word of advice: Life begins at seventy!
As everyone laughed—including Fritz, with god-awful gusto—the former president realized that this was the line that would play on the evening news. There you go again, you son of a bitch. He had to trump him, or at least come up with something sufficiently gracious to guarantee a few words of his own on tonight’s broadcasts. So at the top of his typewritten remarks, he quickly penciled in a new lead:
Having heard you speak, Mr. President, I finally, for the first time, understand why you won and I lost.
It was the sort of lie he’d once promised never to tell the American people. The truth was he’d come to understand this long ago.
###
--This text refers to the paperback edition.
Product details
- ASIN : B00RKO0KNG
- Publisher : Vintage (September 15, 2015)
- Publication date : September 15, 2015
- Language : English
- File size : 3723 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 481 pages
- Lending : Not Enabled
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#814,059 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #812 in Biographical Literary Fiction
- #1,041 in Historical Fiction Short Stories (Kindle Store)
- #1,499 in Historical Biographical Fiction
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Having read Thomas Mallon's previous novel, "Watergate," and having enjoyed that book immensely, I ordered "Finale" as soon as I discovered the author had come out with it. I must say, unfortunately, that I was a little disappointed with his latest effort and I contrast it unfavorably with his last book. In "Watergate," following the unfolding of historic events, there's an impending quality to the narrative despite the reader knowing exactly how things will end. In this novel, the story peters out and, coupled with the disjointed accounts from the point-of-view characters, I can't help but think Mallon intended to write an allegory about the effects of Alzheimer's disease (which would come to overshadow Ronald Reagan's life in the future).
The weakest parts of the novel concern the wholly fictionalized personages of Anne Macmurray and Anders Little. I believe Anne Macmurray is a character from Mallon's previous work "Dewey Defeats Truman," and Anders Little is a new creation for this book. The two form an unlikely acquaintance despite their difference in age and political philosophy. The mentality and motivations of these two struck me as less realistic than those of the historical Nancy Reagan and Pamela Harriman - who serve as foils for one another; as two striving females in the game of politics, as well as wives to older, powerful husbands under their care.
It's clear to me that Thomas Mallon has a keener insight into the Nixon years, being formative years for him (by his own account, he got to see the Nixons up close, campaigning in his hometown on Long Island in 1968 in an open-top convertible), and I think that's why "Watergate" rings truer than this follow-up novel. In "Finale," Mallon again makes Richard Nixon a POV character and he, along with everyone else in the book, has a hard time understanding what really makes Ronald Reagan tick. In this regard, I think Thomas Mallon is like Ronald Reagan's authorized biographer, Edmund Morris (yet another POV character in the book), who put a fictional version of himself in his biography of Reagan in order to craft an historical account.
Reading "Finale," there were moments that I particularly enjoyed, like the scenes at Hofdi House in Reykjavik, as Reagan and Gorbachev discuss disarmament and SDI (aka "Star Wars"). But, overall, I believe this book will leave no lasting impression on me. It will be like the names and faces dimly perceived by a victim of Alzheimer's.
Even supporters at that time of Reagan, such as myself, realized that there were some strange, unprecedented things going on as far as the running of the Reagan administration. Even supporters made fun of a President so calm that he fell asleep in meetings when he became bored. We were amazed at the power of Nancy Reagan who appeared ruthless and Machiavellian when demanding staff changes in the Presidential Cabinet. Yet Nancy placed great trust in one specific astrologer who became important in scheduling Presidential trips and meetings. How this common knowledge was received by foreign leaders is not explored.
As Mallon creates dialogue between characters, the fictional part become an “of course” moment. Nancy may have worried about Ronnie eating popcorn with the crew working on a presidential TV appearance but her musings can only be known to the fiction writer. That this is fiction is noted by the author in the acknowledgments section with the following “This is perhaps as good a place as any to repeat what I said in a note to a previous novel: “I have operated along the always sliding scale of historical fiction. The text contains deviations from fact that some readers will regard as unpardonable and others will deem unworthy of notice. But this remains a work of fiction, not history.”
It is a good idea to start with a quick review of the Cast of Characters. This is approximately eleven pages long and Mallon helpfully puts totally fictional character names in quotation marks. I counted only eight fictional characters which fill less than one page. This leaves more than ten pages of historical characters and even those of us who lived through these years can profit from a quick review. Mallon examines the personalities and public records of the historical characters and uses his fictional characters as allies in making transitions and moving the story forward.
There is a love story; many readers might think there are two. The marriage of Ronald Reagan and Nancy Davis (Reagan) has frequently been portrayed in the popular press as a true and great love story. Mallon does not contradict this but in his account, the realities of married life are explored. There are occasional conflicts. Nancy is smart enough to let Ronnie think he wins them. But Mallon gives us another love story, between the fictional Peter Cox and Anne Macmurray. They are divorced for most of this novel. Peter is a former low-level political figure and wants to be more. His self-love has led him to divorce Anne, marry another, get deserted by the second, younger, trophy wife, and meet somewhat of a tragic end in the arms of Anne. This frequently contentious relationship for more than twenty years is highly entertaining and nudges the overall story along.
Mallon expands on popular images we have of a variety of well-known characters. Margaret Thatcher is portrayed as a person who would not hesitate to take Ronnie to the woodshed if he made silly foreign policy decisions. Jane Wyman, Reagan’s first wife, comes off more self- centered than Pamela Harriman, super rich widow of Averell Harriman, in a tough competition for that title. George Schultz comes across as a true friend of Nancy and he may have been one. His public persona was that of a person who did not suffer fools. Mallon treats Richard Nixon with respect as his Nixon character makes cynical comments about mistakes he made in office. Bob Dole is a person past his useful time as far as Nancy is concerned. Lillian Gish, Betty Davis, and Ann Sothern make appearances as does Eva Gabor. Jimmy Carter is portrayed as a person resentful of Reagan and comes across as whiney. This is just a sampling of characters commented upon.
Not much is said about Kissinger or Ollie North. Both are still influential today and it may have been a wise decision on Mallon’s part not to create a fictional dialogue that may find its way to court.
The influence of Jeanne Kirkpatrick is explored vis-à-vis several other characters. A unique British view on the Great Game is supplied through observations made by Christopher Hitchens. Whenever this character appears, the entire tone of the writing changes and becomes “high-brow.”
The Epilogue is masterful. It will bring tears to the eyes of many readers. This is Reagan’s confused musings and attempts to grasp lucid moments while he is in the final stages of Alzheimer’s. It is Reagan seeing only parts of the highlights of events he knew he was a part of. It allows Mallon to tie everything together as far as a literary device. At the same time, it is very emotional.
I immediately followed Mallon’s author page on Amazon and I will read a lot more of his work.











