Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Finkler Question Hardcover – January 1, 2010
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2010
- Dimensions7.99 x 10 x 1.85 inches
- ISBN-109781408808870
- ISBN-13978-1408808870
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Most purchasedin this set of products
The Netanyahus: An Account of a Minor and Ultimately Even Negligible Episode in the History of a Very Famous FamilyPaperback
Product details
- ASIN : 1408808870
- Publisher : Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; First U.S. Hardcover Edition (January 1, 2010)
- Language : English
- ISBN-10 : 9781408808870
- ISBN-13 : 978-1408808870
- Item Weight : 1.2 pounds
- Dimensions : 7.99 x 10 x 1.85 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,549,954 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

An award-winning writer and broadcaster, Howard Jacobson was born in Manchester, brought up in Prestwich and was educated at Stand Grammar School in Whitefield, and Downing College, Cambridge, where he studied under F. R. Leavis. He lectured for three years at the University of Sydney before returning to teach at Selwyn College, Cambridge. His novels include The Mighty Walzer (winner of the Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize), Kalooki Nights (longlisted for the Man Booker Prize) and, most recently, the highly acclaimed The Act of Love. Howard Jacobson lives in London.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The main character in The Finkler Question is not Jewish.He is a chronic misfit named Julian Treslove who hangs out with media celebrity author Sam Finkler and an old Central European named Libor in London.Treslove functions as a vantage point for the novel.As he becomes more and more obssessed with the idea of Jewishness, the reader gets the opportunity to observe modern Jewish life from his viewpoint.So what we have here is a novel by a Jewish writer which centers on a non Jew fixated on Jewishness. Jewishness is a floating target here.It doesn't have the taken for granted quality of , say, SEIZE THE DAY.Thrilled that he has finally had sex with a Jewish woman, Treslove finds out she is a Reform(Liberal) convert.In one of the funniest jokes in the book , after aquiring an "authentic " Jewish girlfriend , Treslove is told by her to read Maimonides GUIDE FOR THE PERPLEXED because after all he holds himself out to be perplexed and he could use a guide.The only part of the book that interests Treslove is Maimonides reflections on circumcision and the foreskin.Meanwhile Finkler is off leading a group called Ashamed Jews which advocates the Palestinian cause , while Libor rather senses he's lived too long.All that was solid about Jewish life has melted and confusion and absurdity reign supreme.Herzog, Tommy Wilhelm, let alone Duddy Kravitz weren't happy or secure but they were rooted mensches compared to these people.Jacobsen may have written a post Jewish novel or perhaps a kind of death note.It's often funny and it is exaggerated .I suspect it 's more true than not.I would definitely classify it as what Philip Rieff would call a deathwork.
Remarkably, the book transforms abruptly in the second act. A visible narrative emerges. There is time and space and action. It begins the breathe.
We never gain much in the way of sympathy for Julian Treslove, the self-hating wandering non-Jew who anchors the story, but we find the parts of him that live in ourselves. We recognize the people in our lives who are reflected by the two other central players. We get shamefully brief flashes of the only two female characters with any dimension.
Reviewers who note the wit are on point, but like all of the sharpest writing, it comes too late to compensate for the plodding and bloated throat-clearing of a first act.
In the final analysis, Howard Jacobson makes little new headway on a most ancient religious question: what does it mean to be a Jew? But Julian proves an interesting entry point, even if the character himself is not an entirely successful construct. In that way, he proves a reasonable metaphor for the novel itself: Jacobson shows glimmers of insight as he drags Treslove through the pitted topography of modern Western Judaism - with its twin lodestones of Israel and the Holocaust, and its Red-Rover lineups for and against Zionism - but the whole is less than the sum of its parts.
Julian Treslove is a born loser in this 2010 Man Book Prize winner, something his two closest friends, Sam Finkler and Libor Sevcik, aren't afraid to tell him, even as they shore him up against his own emotional baggage. Still, in this triangular friendship Treslove is the odd man out. Sam and Libor are Jewish, Treslove a Gentile. Sam and Libor have been married (their wives have both recently died) and Treslove has never married.
Jacobson leads his characters through a series of encounters in which they reminisce about their earlier lives - Sam and Julian have been students of Libor's - and about the losses they've suffered. Sam's and Libor's lives, however, have had many ups as well as the downs they are currently sharing. Treslove can empathize with their losses, but in his mind, he's never had the better moments. That is, until he meets Hephzibah, Libor's niece and moves in with her.
But life has never seemed real to Treslove, and his relationship with Hephzibah becomes one more learning experience - now he wants to become Jewish. But even the patient and enduring Hephzibah can't help Julian come to grips with his life.
Meanwhile, Libor bemoans the loss of his wife to such a degree that he can no longer find reason to live. Sam is a womanizer who never realized his wife's effect on his life until she dies.
These sketchy impressions only touch the surface of these three men's lives and the dynamics the author imposes on their mutual relationship. Jacobson sketches them against a backdrop of Jewish-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East - and the shock waves the conflict causes for Jews in Britain.
But the tripartite friendship, as well as the Middle East conflict, are metaphors Jacobson uses to examine relationships, personal, ethnic, and national. This, then, seems to be the larger Finkler Question up for examination here: how do we get along with one another?
Does the author provide answers? No - but then that's not the purpose of such stories. Jacobson's project is to ask the question in the context of these situations and these characters, and this he does fairly well.
Top reviews from other countries
Second question: how did I endure the agony of reading this laboriously boring book?










