The First Crusade: A New History 1st Edition
| Thomas Asbridge (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Now, in The First Crusade, Thomas Asbridge offers a gripping account of a titanic three-year adventure filled with miraculous victories, greedy princes and barbarity on a vast scale. Readers follow the crusaders from their mobilization in Europe (where great waves of anti-Semitism resulted in
the deaths of thousands of Jews), to their arrival in Constantinople, an exotic, opulent city--ten times the size of any city in Europe--that bedazzled the Europeans. Featured in vivid detail are the siege of Nicaea and the pivotal battle for Antioch, the single most important military engagement of
the entire expedition, where the crusaders, in desperate straits, routed a larger and better-equipped Muslim army. Through all this, the crusaders were driven on by intense religious devotion, convinced that their struggle would earn them the reward of eternal paradise in Heaven. But when a hardened
core finally reached Jerusalem in 1099 they unleashed an unholy wave of brutality, slaughtering thousands of Muslims--men, women, and children--all in the name of Christianity.
The First Crusade marked a watershed in relations between Islam and the West, a conflict that set these two world religions on a course toward deep-seated animosity and enduring enmity. The chilling reverberations of this earth-shattering clash still echo in the world today.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Similar books based on genre
Editorial Reviews
Review
"This lively account of the Crusade looks set to replace Steven Runciman's classic 1951 account of the expedition as the best introduction to the subject....Asbridge's book gives exactly the sort of fast-flowing narrative the story demands. He writes clearly and vigorously, with a fine eye for
telling detail. Having walked considerable parts of the itinerary the Crusade followed, he presents a vivid picture of the landscapes they passed through. He admires the crusaders' hardiness and extraordinary boldness without condoning cruelties they inflicted....Recommended to a general reader who
wants an introduction to the Crusades."--Hugh Kennedy, The New York Times Book Review
"Asbridge combines fast-paced history writing, evocative prose and lucid research for a first-rate history of the First Crusade....Brilliantly re-creates the three-year history of the First Crusade, chronicling its difficulties and victories, not downplaying its brutality but emphasizing its
genuinely religious impulse."--Publishers Weekly
"Balances persuasive analysis with a flair for conveying with dramtic power the crusaders' plight throughout the nine-month siege of Antioch....Stunning...should revitalize the study of this fascinating period in European history."--Christopher Silvester, The Financial Times
"Rousing....Asbridge knows this territory well. In 1999, he even walked 350 miles of the crusaders' route."--Christian Science Monitor
"Asbridge, in keeping with his aim to produce a popular history, writes with maximum vividness."--Joan Acocella, The New Yorker
"Asbridge has produced a taut, clear and exciting narrative, which also manages to convey the best of modern Crusader scholarship....His pace is tremendous, and he has a remarkable feel of place. It certainly helps that, like so many Crusaders nine centuries ago, Asbridge has himself walked 350
miles from Antioch towards Jerusalem."--The Guardian
"Although well researched, the book wears its scholarship lightly and reads like a work of fiction, complete with vivid characters."--The Herald (Glasgow)
"Asbridge achieves vivid characterization and gripping storytelling without sacrifice of scholarship. Interweaving analysis, narrative, evocative description and occasional wry humor, he tells us--as no other book on the subject really does--who the crusaders were, how they behaved, how they killed
and died and, most surprisingly of all, how they survived and triumphed."--Felipe Fernández-Armesto, author of Millennium and Civilizations
"There is an underlying assumption among commentators looking at the confrontation between Islam and the West that it has been engendered by the events of September 11, 2001. Thomas Asbridge, by tracing the roots to the First Crusade in his lucid and provocative 'new history,' helps us to understand
the present by explaining the past."--Akbar S. Ahmed, Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies American University
About the Author
Thomas Asbridge is Lecturer in Early Medieval History at Queen Mary, University of London. An acknowledged expert on the history of the Crusades, he has traveled extensively in the Near East following the route of the First Crusade.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (September 29, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 448 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195189051
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195189056
- Item Weight : 1.42 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.2 x 1.13 x 6.14 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,003,882 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #259 in Middle Eastern History (Books)
- #682 in Military History (Books)
- #750 in Christianity (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Thomas Asbridge is Reader in Medieval History at Queen Mary, University of London, and the author of 'The Greatest Knight: The Remarkable Life of William Marshal, the Power Behind Five English Thrones' (2014), 'The Crusades: The War for the Holy Land' (2010) and 'The First Crusade: A New History' (2004). He studied for a BA in Ancient and Medieval History at Cardiff University, and then gained his PhD in Medieval History at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Thomas wrote and presented a BBC documentary, 'The Greatest Knight: William Marshal', and a landmark three-part documentary series 'The Crusades' for the BBC, filmed on location across the Near East and Europe. He has also appeared in many other internationally broadcast television documentaries and radio programs, and has worked as a historical consultant for HBO and Company Pictures. He now lives in southern England.
For more information visit: www.thomasasbridge.com
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
What struck me about the book was how carefully Asbridge highlighted the differences between modern and medieval modes of thought. This would seem to be an obvious goal of the historian, but too often a writer will criticize his subjects based on 21st-century values rather than examining the subject through his own. A few other reviewers have mistakenly said that Asbridge "justifies" or makes excuses for Crusader "atrocities." Nothing could be further from the truth. Asbridge simply puts the reader into the mind of the 11th-century warrior, repeatedly reminding the reader that, while we might cringe at the thought of civilian deaths today, during the Crusading era that was a way of life. This constant reminder of the differences between the past and present places Asbridge's history among the very best that I have read.
One of the most important aspects of Asbridge's work is that he carefully entwines medieval piety with medieval concerns for prestige, landholdings, and booty. The result is a very well-realized glimpse into the medieval mind, where seemingly contradictory concepts held simultaneous sway for centuries.
The book isn't perfect. Asbridge leaves little to no room for coincidence in the events he writes about. "All the evidence suggests," he says of the arrival of much-needed timber at Jaffa, "that the crusaders had not anticipated the fleet's arrival, but it would be incredible, almost miraculous, if such a timely boon had been wholly unplanned." In my admittedly limited experience, what all the evidence suggests is often the best interpretation. On a similar note, Asbridge seems to enjoy reading between the lines, conjecturing thoughts and motivations for figures--Urban II and Raymond of Toulouse in particular--that are possible, yes, but only possible.
The greatest of the book's few weaknesses lies in Asbridge's picking and choosing of when to take the Crusaders at their word. He repeatedly tells us that the medievals exaggerated the size of armies, that they tended to gloss over embarassing episodes, and that they tended to downplay the Christians' level of involvement with the Muslims, but buys unreservedly into Crusader stories of the slaughter in Jerusalem, something evidence from the Muslim perspective suggests has been grossly exaggerated.
But overall, despite one or two minor (and I emphasize minor) flaws, I really enjoyed Asbridge's book and found it to be among the best Crusade histories in recent memory. If only every crusade could get such a carefully-crafted treatment.
Highly recommended.
I found his assertions of the motivations for Pope Urban to preach the First Crusade reasonable and well explained. I did think he dismissed the threat of the invasion of Islamic peoples too quickly. Power during medieval times regularly ebbed like the waves of the ocean. To say that the vacuum of power in the Islamic lands prior to the Crusades meant there was no threat or urgency is naive.
After the great examination of Pope Urban II, I found the early part of the description of the crusade a little lacking. However, Asbridge's explored at great depth the siege of Antioch and battle for power between Bohemund and Raymond of Toulouse. Asbridge has examined Antioch in more detail in his book The Creation of the Principality of Antioch, 1098-1130 .
Asbridge writes with authority, but he does not examine the differences between first-hand accounts. He makes frequent end note references to first-hand accounts, but they are usually jumbled and you would not be able to determine what information he is getting from where unless you have access to these sources.
There is a lot of contemporary and modern work available for the Crusades. I would recommend A History of the Crusades Vol. I: The First Crusade and the Foundations of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (Volume 1) by Stephen Runciman for the most comprehensive telling of the First Crusade. I would also recommend The First Crusade: "The Chronicle of Fulcher of Chartres" and Other Source Materials (The Middle Ages Series) by Edward Peters for the best compilation of firsthand accounts of the First Crusade.
Top reviews from other countries
This book is incredibly biased, of course The Guardian rates this very high and praises it, it is a book more about preaching a certain ideology and a pathological point of view rather than a genuinely historical one. No attempt is missed to blame Christianity and to portray it as the highest evil ever to scourge our planet. Of course, there is NOTHING negative about Muslims in this book, it actually praises Muslims many times, describing them as more sophisticated, peaceful, accepting, and ultimately no where near as bad as the Christians. First hand accounts from Christian writers are instantly said to be lies and "pure propaganda". Literally, this is how the book describes accounts of Muslim warriors raping people during siege. A paragraph later, a deal of attention is given to describe how rape, murder, torture, and the hunger for war was just "everyday life" to a Christian at the time. It does this while scoffing at the idea people where raped by Muslims or brutally circumcised when it is a historical fact. It describes Christian crusaders and pilgrims as "chillingly barbaric" for the simple reason of trying to take Jerusalem back after being sieged by Muslims. But there is not a single bad word or calling of barbarians to Muslims, which is absolutely ridiculous and a clear double standard. Basically the author hates Christians and the West but sympathizes massively with Muslims and Jews to the point of sheer pathology separated from reality.
What this book has done is very wrong, because it is inaccurate and omits information when it doesn't serve the authors personal political (and clearly marxist) views. The author is anti-western, anti-christian, and above all, against honest speculation and the passing of genuine truthful information uncontaminated by ideological trends.
Seriously, this book is disgusting. I can't bare to read it any longer after actually being educated on the subject and this not just being my first book on the topic. "A New History" is an appropriate title as I feel the author is compelled to try and change history and out perceptions of it rather than tell us what it really is.


