There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
on November 2, 2016
Boring, Boring, Boring! Too much blah blah, small amount of action.
on December 22, 2013
The acting is OK. Both movies tell a story about war. If you want to see a war movie with little or no action these two movies are the ones to see. They only have at the most about 5 minutes of action in them. If you want to see a war movie with a lot of action these are not the movies to see. Guns at Batasi is about what happened with some British soldiers in Africa. There is no combat action in the movie. Fixed Bayonets! is about a soldier that learns that a soldier at times has to do what he does not want to do. The combat in Fixed Bayonets, if you want to call it that lasts about 3 to 5 minutes for the whole movie. I prefer a lot more and I mean a lot more combat action in a war movie. Based on the combat action, I give these two movies two thumbs down.
on September 18, 2014
To much talk and griping
on November 24, 2012
In my opinion this was a terrible movie. It deals with a corporal (Richard Basehart) who has leadership issues, i.e. will he be able to lead if he is put in that situation. A better movie would be "Hell is for Heroes" which also deals with the Korean war, or "Retreat Hell" starring Frank Lovejoy. Don't waste your money or time on this one.
on June 14, 2007
Frankly I'm quite dissapointed in this film. It's in black and white, which actually is no problem for me since I enjoy classic war films. The dissappointmnet is that the whole movie seems to be shot in a studio!!! and a very small studio! Really dissapointed. Also nothing really special about the story.
