This is a compelling drama of theological ideas written in 1973 by Martin Gardner (1914 - 2010) who was primarily a mathematics and science writer.
The novel unfolds as a retrospective by Homer Wilson, a Unitarian minister and teacher at the University of Chicago's theology school, after a breakdown during an Easter sermon by Wilson's fiery fundamentalist student, Peter Fromm.
Fromm, raised in a fundamentalist Pentecostal church, chooses to attend the University of Chicago for the express purpose of defeating the ideas emanating from one of the country's most liberal seminaries. While they have diametrically opposed views, Wilson, who does not beleive in God, remains involved with Fromm and tells his story.
This scaffolding is a set up for contrasts between Fromm's vise-like grasp on fundamentalism and Wilson's unbelief, and includes discussions of the ideas of prominent theologians such as Karl Barth and Paul Tillich. We see how a liberal education and the unfolding of life itself eventually dismantle Fromm's fundamentalism and lead to his breakdown.
For many, reading theology is a dry exersice in abstraction. As with writers such as Iris Murdoch, Gardner dramatizes such ideas in the form of a novel which draws them down into the human struggle and makes them much more accessible and compelling.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
Send link
Processing your request...
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Flip to back
Flip to front
The Flight of Peter Fromm Paperback – October 1, 1994
by
Martin Gardner
(Author)
|
Martin Gardner
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
-
Print length280 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherPrometheus
-
Publication dateOctober 1, 1994
-
Dimensions5.4 x 0.62 x 8.3 inches
-
ISBN-100879759119
-
ISBN-13978-0879759117
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Martin Gardner (1914 - 2010), the creator of Scientific American’s "Mathematical Games" column, which he wrote for more than twenty-five years, was the author of almost one hundred books, including The Annotated Night Before Christmas, The Annotated Snark, Martin Gardner’s Favorite Poetic Parodies, From the Wandering Jew to William F. Buckley Jr., and Science: Good, Bad and Bogus. For many years he was also a contributing editor to the Skeptical Inquirer.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Nolyn: The Rise and Fall, Book 1
In the depths of an unforgiving jungle, a legend is about to be born. Listen now
Product details
- Publisher : Prometheus; Reprint edition (October 1, 1994)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 280 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0879759119
- ISBN-13 : 978-0879759117
- Item Weight : 12 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.4 x 0.62 x 8.3 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#602,143 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #13,636 in Contemporary Literature & Fiction
- #21,536 in Christian Literature & Fiction
- #72,258 in American Literature (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
18 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2011
Verified Purchase
11 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2012
Verified Purchase
This novel reads so realistically that I occasionally forgot that it was fiction. It provides an accurate view of the struggle into which many Christians have fallen when they're exposed to convincing modernism or liberal theology. Tension is sustained throughout the novel by the reader's uncertainty about whether theology student Peter Fromm's old literal faith will prevail as it's attacked by the sophisticated views of his liberal professors and mentor. Nowhere does this novel present possibility beyond knowledge derived from the rational-empirical scientific model, i.e., the logical possibility of sheer revelation, but its does an excellent job of presenting an engrossing, human tale of a young man doing the best he can with his reason and his faith in common, non-revelatory knowledge.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2013
Verified Purchase
The Flight of Peter Fromm was the only novel ever written by Martin Gardner, a science writer best known for his mathematical column in Scientific American. This book is partly a roman a clef, partly a Bildungsoman in which the theological career of Peter (for the apostle) Fromm (the German word for pious) is narrated by an older man, Homer Wilson, a Unitarian minister and teacher at a thinly disguised version of the University of Chicago Divinity School.
At the beginning of the novel, Peter Fromm is an ethusiastic Pentecostal Christian from Oklahoma, who decides to enter the ministry and to study at the Chicago Divinity School because he wants to prove that his evangelical faith can withstand the assaults of liberal Protestant theology. His chief mentor is a Unitarian minister, Homer (for the Greek poet?) Wilson, who no longer believes in God, but who wants to perpetuate the church as a vehicle for promoting liberal social and political causes. To accomplish that goal, Wilson believes that one can and should use religious language ambiguously so that traditional church goers will think they are hearing a traditional religous message, while the minister is carefully introducing a new, more liberal meaning. Wilson tells Peter that, in the ministry, one can either be a "truthful traitor" (i.e., publicly proclaim a liberal theology and risk having the church disintegrate as traditional believers bolt) or a "loyal liar" (i.e. camoflague one's liberal views in order to perpetuate the church while slowly changing its belief structure). There is a fascinating scene in which Wilson, by the careful use of ambiguous language, convinces Peter's religiously conservative mother that his beliefs are consistent with hers, when of course they are not.
As Peter's studies progress, he is introduced to the whole gamut of 19th and 20th century Protestant biblical scholarship and theology. Gradually, he sheds his traditional beliefs and adopts most of the liberal beliefs of Wilson and his other divinity school professors. Nevertheless, he is morally troubled at the thought of becoming a "loyal liar." He comes see liberal Protestantism as a gigantic humbug or charade, in which liberal theologians and clergy manipulate people through the equivocal use of language. Increasingly, he tries to get his professors to state their real beliefs unambiguously, but he cannot shake them from their equivocations. At the end of the novel, Peter finally concludes that he cannot stomach the thought of entering the ministry and participating in what he regards as a program of deception. In the penultimate scene, Peter suffers a kind of nervous breakdown and, out of pure frustration at one minister's double talk, punches the man. (The minister in question is a thinly veiled version of Norman Vincent Peale.)
This book is well well written and provides a nice overview of liberal Protestant thinking at the time Gardner wrote. Since, howevr, Gardner's purpose is to describe what he sees as a culture of widespread intellectual evasiveness in liberal Protestantism, the characters are a bit stereotyped. Nevertheless, the book is still very much worth reading. Although this book was written more than half a century ago, if anything, the trends described by Gardner have become even more pronounced than they were then. Reading the Flight of Peter Fromm may help Protestant lay men and women who experience cognitive dissonance between the traditional words of their church liturgies or the Bible and what they hear from the pulpit or in adult Sunday School classes. It may also be a good book for liberal Protestant ministers and divinity students, possibly shaking up some of their complacency. ("Would some power the giftie gie us, to see ourselves as other see us. Would from many a blunder free us and foolish notion." Robert Burns)
At the end of the book, Peter Fromm believes in God but no longer in the Christian church, which seems to have been Martin Gardner's own position. (Readers may also want to consult Gardner's Notes of a Philosophical Scrivener, in which he explains why he thinks it is still possible, on a philosophical basis, to believe in God and in an afterlife.)
At the beginning of the novel, Peter Fromm is an ethusiastic Pentecostal Christian from Oklahoma, who decides to enter the ministry and to study at the Chicago Divinity School because he wants to prove that his evangelical faith can withstand the assaults of liberal Protestant theology. His chief mentor is a Unitarian minister, Homer (for the Greek poet?) Wilson, who no longer believes in God, but who wants to perpetuate the church as a vehicle for promoting liberal social and political causes. To accomplish that goal, Wilson believes that one can and should use religious language ambiguously so that traditional church goers will think they are hearing a traditional religous message, while the minister is carefully introducing a new, more liberal meaning. Wilson tells Peter that, in the ministry, one can either be a "truthful traitor" (i.e., publicly proclaim a liberal theology and risk having the church disintegrate as traditional believers bolt) or a "loyal liar" (i.e. camoflague one's liberal views in order to perpetuate the church while slowly changing its belief structure). There is a fascinating scene in which Wilson, by the careful use of ambiguous language, convinces Peter's religiously conservative mother that his beliefs are consistent with hers, when of course they are not.
As Peter's studies progress, he is introduced to the whole gamut of 19th and 20th century Protestant biblical scholarship and theology. Gradually, he sheds his traditional beliefs and adopts most of the liberal beliefs of Wilson and his other divinity school professors. Nevertheless, he is morally troubled at the thought of becoming a "loyal liar." He comes see liberal Protestantism as a gigantic humbug or charade, in which liberal theologians and clergy manipulate people through the equivocal use of language. Increasingly, he tries to get his professors to state their real beliefs unambiguously, but he cannot shake them from their equivocations. At the end of the novel, Peter finally concludes that he cannot stomach the thought of entering the ministry and participating in what he regards as a program of deception. In the penultimate scene, Peter suffers a kind of nervous breakdown and, out of pure frustration at one minister's double talk, punches the man. (The minister in question is a thinly veiled version of Norman Vincent Peale.)
This book is well well written and provides a nice overview of liberal Protestant thinking at the time Gardner wrote. Since, howevr, Gardner's purpose is to describe what he sees as a culture of widespread intellectual evasiveness in liberal Protestantism, the characters are a bit stereotyped. Nevertheless, the book is still very much worth reading. Although this book was written more than half a century ago, if anything, the trends described by Gardner have become even more pronounced than they were then. Reading the Flight of Peter Fromm may help Protestant lay men and women who experience cognitive dissonance between the traditional words of their church liturgies or the Bible and what they hear from the pulpit or in adult Sunday School classes. It may also be a good book for liberal Protestant ministers and divinity students, possibly shaking up some of their complacency. ("Would some power the giftie gie us, to see ourselves as other see us. Would from many a blunder free us and foolish notion." Robert Burns)
At the end of the book, Peter Fromm believes in God but no longer in the Christian church, which seems to have been Martin Gardner's own position. (Readers may also want to consult Gardner's Notes of a Philosophical Scrivener, in which he explains why he thinks it is still possible, on a philosophical basis, to believe in God and in an afterlife.)
3 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2017
Verified Purchase
A very good story of a young college student's journey from a belief in Christian fundamentalism to a belief in humanism.
Reviewed in the United States on October 10, 2016
Verified Purchase
Really good conditions, looked new :)
Top reviews from other countries
AS
5.0 out of 5 stars
A wonderful novel
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 28, 2011Verified Purchase
It turns out that the late Martin Gardner, a polymath who could discourse on subjects as wide as math, science, literature, philosophy and skepticism, was also a rather good writer of fiction, too. It is a pity, therefore, that he didn't write more fiction, since this autobiographical account of a young man's journey as he wrestles with questions of religion and God's existence is a fluid, touching and often humourous book.
Gardner here propounds and defends the religious or philosophical doctrine known as 'philosophical theism', which holds that belief in a benevolent deity ultimately rests on faith and nothing more - something that the hero of the book, as he gradually grows disillusioned with organized religion and discovers Miguel de Unamuno, etc. ultimately realizes.
Although an atheist myself, and therefore someone incapable of making that 'leap of faith' across to philosophical theism, I synpathise with Gardner's stance. If I could bring myself to believe in a benevolent God, then it would be within the tradition of philosophical theism. Moreover, I have always felt that it is a position that has not been addressed by the advocates of the new atheism. Gardner shows that, if one can make the leap in one's heart, then having a belief in, and a yearning for, an all-loving, all-merciful God, is both tenable and acceptable.
Gardner here propounds and defends the religious or philosophical doctrine known as 'philosophical theism', which holds that belief in a benevolent deity ultimately rests on faith and nothing more - something that the hero of the book, as he gradually grows disillusioned with organized religion and discovers Miguel de Unamuno, etc. ultimately realizes.
Although an atheist myself, and therefore someone incapable of making that 'leap of faith' across to philosophical theism, I synpathise with Gardner's stance. If I could bring myself to believe in a benevolent God, then it would be within the tradition of philosophical theism. Moreover, I have always felt that it is a position that has not been addressed by the advocates of the new atheism. Gardner shows that, if one can make the leap in one's heart, then having a belief in, and a yearning for, an all-loving, all-merciful God, is both tenable and acceptable.

