Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform Paperback – June 12, 2007
- Print length512 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBasic Books
- Publication dateJune 12, 2007
- Dimensions5.75 x 1.5 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100465045804
- ISBN-13978-0465045808
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Basic Books; Annotated edition (June 12, 2007)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 512 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0465045804
- ISBN-13 : 978-0465045808
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 1.5 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,672,739 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,668 in United States National Government
- #4,971 in Elections
- #29,408 in Political Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Mark Crispin Miller is Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University. He is the author of several books, including 'Boxed In: The Culture of TV;' 'The Bush Dyslexicon: Observations on a National Disorder;' 'Cruel and Unusual: Bush/Cheney’s New World Order' and 'Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform.' He is also the editor of 'Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008.' His essays and articles have appeared in many journals, magazines and newspapers throughout the nation and the world, and he has given countless interviews worldwide.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 2, 2005How is it that the carefully-researched, meticulously-documented, copiously-footnoted works of Administration critics are dismissed as madness, while the unsupported, categorical rhetoric of Administration supporters is accepted as common wisdom?
Miller is a clear and convincing writer. He's done his homework, and he makes a powerful case, calling the legitimacy of the Bush White House into question. This is a story that has been woefully neglected, even by the 'liberal' arm of the US press. It has been told piecemeal by internet bloggers and non-profit websites. In Europe and New Zealand (!) the story of the election heist of 2004 has been reported by the commercial press, and is common knowledge. But in America, it has been considered slightly loony to question the integrity of our electoral machinery.
'Fooled Again' may just prove to be a turning point for the conventional wisdom. What Miller has done with this book is far more than to document anecdotes of election fraud and put them in perspective. He paints for us a coherent picture that I, for one, have understood for the first time after reading his work. I had been familiar with the economic analysis of right-wing politics - the growing power of multinational corporations, the lobbyists and the PACS, and their dominance in setting our government's agenda. It had seemed to me to be the work of a distant, inaccessible money machine.
Miller adds a psychological perspective, making the actions of the power-grabbers very tangible, comprehensible and real. The subversion of our democracy was planned for decades by people who are not so much evil as afraid, and no more dishonest with us than they are with themselves. If the methods with which they push their agenda seem deceptive, autocratic and draconian, it is because they perceive their situation (and ours) to be desperate.
One weakness of the book is that it focuses exclusively on anecdotal evidence for election theft. There is another half of the story which is told by numerical evidence. The widespread statistical anomalies in the 2004 election provide a context for the anecdotes, so that they cannot be dismissed as isolated aberrations. The statistical story will be told in a forthcoming book by Steve Freeman.
Since November '04, I had been a follower of the internet dialogs about election fraud, and a minor contributor to the statistical analysis. I have found Miller's book to be empowering: He offers us a context in which we might hope to organize a new movement for electoral integrity, setting the system aright before it becomes entrenched.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2006Miller does appear to make a good case. But the mainstream press can't touch this book. To do so would be to de-legitimize the US government, an impossible, almost unthinkable situation.
There is no mechanism to contest the events described here - the courts and media and every other institution has a deep vested interest in putting the process to bed on election day and the Supreme Court is pro-GOP. Facts become instantly disputed and unprovable on the ground and the 45+% that did indeed vote for Bush would become violent, screaming banshees. No proof of malfeasance would be acceptable. We would have large-scale civil unrest.. It hasn't happened since the early 70's and nobody knows what it would lead to.
And as an individual, to follow this thread to it's conclusion would be to leave normal society and join some hopelessly outgunned, outnumbered fringe militia somewhere. It's unthinkable - and so it's no wonder that people are treating the book as radioactive.. People fear the first step that would logically lead them off the cliff. In this climate it's just too much to ask. If this is indeed the truth, we have been outmaneuvered.
There is something of a backstory here. Republicans thought that JFK stole the election from Nixon in 1960 (True? ?? I don't know..), which is one reason why Nixon became so paranoid and devious during the Watergate years. Those were the formative years for Bush, Rove & Cheney, so they similarly think that lying is acceptable, because the other guy is supposedly doing the same thing. They're deep down the slippery slope and they're taking the country with them.
As a group the American Left is intimidated and afraid of the Right wing arm of the GOP. They think of us as evil boogie-men and no amount of logic or conversation appears to reach them. Until this changes, and we get rid of these abominable no-trail electronic voting machines, American democracy will be in permanent decline.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2006Most reviews have focused on the appalling lists of Republican dirty tricks in the 2000 and 2004 elections (mostly the latter) in this book, but I think perhaps the greater value is in Miller's clear description of the paranoid, cult-like mindset of these people. Although they utter many untruths, they are not always lying - it seems likely that many have convinced themselves of their fanatical nonsense and are able to genuinely ignore inconvenient facts. But whether they are simply blindly obsessive, or cynical and duplicitous (as some certainly are) the danger to the republic is the same.
And Miller rightly blasts the media for their lack of attention to all this. This may be changing somewhat, as events like Katrina have made the scales fall from some eyes: but not enough.
If there is one fault to find with Millers's review of media attitudes, it is that he gives a lot of attention to what the Press did or didn't print - lots of chapter and verse - rather less for TV and radio. But TV and radio - sorry, all you folks who love to read - have, for the majority of our population, about fifty times the impact of anything that may appear in newspapers. The Press sins largely (though not only) by omission - not covering something, not following up. But TV - and even more so, talk radio - are into heavy-duty sins of commission, spreading misinformation and bias overtly hour after hour, day after day. No wonder we're in the state we're in. Recovery will not be easy.

