Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy and the Failed Hunt for Bin Laden (Nation Books) Paperback – January 1, 2002
- Print length208 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherNation Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2002
- Dimensions5 x 0.75 x 7.75 inches
- ISBN-101560254149
- ISBN-13978-1560254140
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : Nation Books (January 1, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 208 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1560254149
- ISBN-13 : 978-1560254140
- Item Weight : 6.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5 x 0.75 x 7.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #975,223 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #17,046 in Sociology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Jean-Charles Brisard (1968) is an international expert and consultant on international terrorism. He authored the first and most exhaustive study ever written on the financial network of the Bin Laden organization, "The economic environment of Osama Ben Laden". His report was written for the French intelligence community and published by the French National Assembly in 2001. He testified on his work before the US Congress Joint Inquiry into the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and before the US Senate Banking Committee. He served as an expert or witness in prosecutions of terrorism financing and money laundering cases in France, Switzerland, the UK and the United States. Between 2002 and 2009, he served as chief investigator for lawyers representing families of the 9/11 victims in the course of civil lawsuits. He is the author of best-seller "Forbidden Truth: U.S.-taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy And The Failed Hunt For Bin Laden" in 2002 and "The New Face of Al-Qaeda" about Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in 2005.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Of course, the authors show that fossil fuels drives American policy in the region. The Clinton and Bush administrations both negotiated with the Taliban for the construction of a natural gas pipeline to be built in Afghan territory despite clear-cut evidence of the regime's human rights abuses. However, the book also makes the eye-popping suggestion that U.S. representatives may have recklessly threatened the Taliban prior to the September 11 attack, thereby provoking Al Qaeda into action.
Basically, Brisard and Dasquie explain that Saudi Arabia supports radical Islamic movements (including the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Usama Bin Laden) in order to extend its hegemony over the area. Saudi support of the Taliban, for example, helped keep Afghanistan from falling under Iranian influence. Interestingly, the authors point out that the first arrest warrant ever issued against Usama Bin Laden came not from the U.S. -- which wanted to overlook Usama's behavior in order to keep Saudi oil flowing -- but from Libya.
I must admit that all of this came as quite a surprise to me, since Saudi Arabia has always been portrayed as a staunch ally of the U.S. In fact, Brisard and Dasquie recall how U.S. oil companies helped the country develop, but they also show that the Kingdom remains dependent on religion to maintain control over its people. So the country is practically schizophrenic in its need to simultaneously maintain business ties with the U.S. and defend against the spread of Arab nationalism by covertly preaching the gospel of anti-Americanism.
The authors go into considerable detail illuminating the people, organizations and financial relationships that make the Saudi-supported terror network possible. The indictments reach the highest levels of Saudi society. In this light, it appears that Usama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda simply spun out of their master's control and took the anti-American cause too far.
All this should give us pause to consider why the U.S. allowed the Saudis to play such a dangerous game for so long. Also, one would think that prudence should compel the U.S. to develop an energy policy that does not depend on Middle Eastern oil. But already, Brisard and Dasquie report that talks for the pipeline have resumed since the installation of the Karzai regime in Afghanistan in May 2002.
On a technical note, the book could benefit from additional editorial work to correct a few grammatical errors (presumably due to the translation from French to English?) and several footnote mistakes. Stylistically, the author's research sometimes makes for dry reading, but that is only because the facts have been meticulously documented and presented. So although "Forbidden Truth" is at times far from entertaining, the reader is nevertheless impressed with the professionalism of the research and its air-tight conclusions. (Indeed, sensing the threat that the book poses to its business empire, the Bin Laden family succeeded in getting the book banned in Switzerland.)
"Forbidden Truth" is recommended for anyone who wants to gain a better understanding of the dynamics underlying the war on terror.
They do a good job by describing the banking connections that bin Laden had with Saudi Arabia. Their "charts" in the back of the book were helpful showing the interrelationships between Bank of Commerce
and Credit (BCCI).the bin Laden family and bin Laden himself showed that, perhaps he wasn't the black sheep of the family as was reported by major media outlets. Also mentioned was that the BCCI was created by a
Saudi Prince and George H.W. Bush, a bank that collapsed in scandal. They mentioned the oil pipeline that UNOCAL and other oil companies were interested in. They wanted peace in Afghanistan so that they could build the pipeline. They accurately described how a stable government there would enable the project to succeed and that the relationship soured between the Western Powers and Afghanistan's Taliban that could have been the precursor to September 11. They also stated that the U.S. and others supported the Mujahedeen which was done so to fight against the Soviets. The Mujahedeen eventually became the Taliban, so, in essence, as the book points out, we created our own "Islamic Frankenstein" a point made by former Pakistani President, Benazir Bhutto before she was tragically assassinated. Why did out government refused the Sudanese government's offer to take bin Laden after it was offered up twice? They quote the late John O'Neil, former Counter terrorism expert of the FBI that all of the answers are there in Saudi Arabia.
Perhaps the following comment was not the thrust of this particular book but I believed that they missed the elephant in the room, e.g., the fact that the U.S.'s military response was lacking, if there was any complicity with regard to the actions or inactions by out government. As an example, after the WTC #1 and #2 were hit, why were planes still on the ground? While they admit that the 19 alleged hijackers were trained at 'puddle-jumper' schools in Florida, they do not pursue this further, namely, how does one reconcile the piloting of a Cesna to either a 757 or 767 jumbo jet? If ordinary procedures and processes were followed, why were our military planes still sitting on the ground almost 1 hour after the first plane hit the north tower. Why weren't planes scrambled after the first tower to possibly intercept the second plane before it hit the second tower? Assuming that planes could not be scrambled in time for the second tower, why weren't they scrambled to prevent the attack on the Pentagon?
For that I only gave it 3 stars.






