Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Friends of Richard Nixon, The Paperback – January 1, 1976
- Print length351 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBallantine Books
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1976
- ISBN-100345252268
- ISBN-13978-0345252265
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Popular titles by this author
Product details
- Publisher : Ballantine Books; First Edition (January 1, 1976)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 351 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0345252268
- ISBN-13 : 978-0345252265
- Item Weight : 1.15 pounds
- Best Sellers Rank: #6,356,450 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Higgins likes to be clever. This book oozes clever. It screams, "Look how witty I am. I am clever." Here is ONE sentence on page four:
"To those bereaved by the works of murders; to those raped, robbed, mugged, dispirited by the loss of their possessions, or enraged by the violation of their children, or unalterably convinced that untrammeled traffic in dirty books, pictures and films will certainly proliferate rapists and child molesters: to that vast popular majority which fears that legal cession of a monopoly on the use of force, to the government, under the social contract, is not in fact a matter of unanimous consent, too - sedulous attention to the rights of those accused is not a welcome course of conduct."
Throughout, Higgins' book cries out, `I'm a good Boston lawyer and let me tell you about those bad White House people from California. And know lots of big words, too.' I'm no Nixon fan, but Higgins' writing makes one think of the `Eastern Establishment' types that Nixon was always railing against.
He just can't resist using a difficult word or meandering sentence when a simple word or short sentence will do. It's like an obsession.
Higgins was a lawyer, including a US Attorney for Massachusetts and there's no denying his insights into the system bring something to the table; they certainly give a unique look at Earl Silbert, who was the US Attorney for DC and led the initial Watergate investigation. He paints a more positive picture of Silbert's efforts than most.
But, literally every page has at least one sentence like this: "It constituted recognition that the existence of additional defendants, one of them placed fairly high in ostensibly respectable circles, implied the possibility that one or more unidentified people might have it in mind to balk the orderly processes of justice."
Higgins should have spent less time trying to write highbrow prose and just put together sentences that a reader didn't have to parse and try to understand. His opinions on the justice system and law enforcement are sometimes insightful and sometimes just condescending. I enjoyed some parts of this book, but on the whole, found it to be annoying. And that's not usually a good thing to say about a book.
In contrast to some later histories, there's an appealingly lively immediacy to Higgins' account that compensates for its loose and sometimes unfocused approach. Higgins great strength is his familiarity with the law and criminal prosecution. He succeeds in getting into the head of the original cover-upper, John Dean, at least to the extent of framing the challenges faced by the young Counsel to the President . `Since Dean did not now who was responsible,' Higgins writes, `he was constrained to assume that everybody was responsible and act accordingly.' It didn't hurt, Higgins notes, that Acting Assistant Attorney General Henry Petersen, who was prosecuting the Watergate burglars, was naïvely reporting to Dean on the progress of the case. `With those advantages,' Higgins observes, `a thoughtful baboon could obstruct justice. For a while.' [`Friends of Richard Nixon' is filled with such trenchant observations. My favorite is Higgins take on Judge John Sirica's harsh sentence of G. Gordon Liddy. Higgins didn't like Sirica (`A nice guy if you like martinets') and felt he overstepped his role many times. To Higgins Liddy was a `standup guy' and a kook who seemed to realize better than anyone that the fix was NOT in and took it like a good soldier. Higgins goes to great length explaining how criminal trials operate, and he convinces us that Sirica's sentencing of Liddy - meant to scare the other Watergate burglars into perhaps copping a plea and cooperating with the investigation - was harsh in the extreme. `... five (years) would've done that. The seven to twenty was for getting Sirica (expletive deleted by reviewer) off, seven for doing it, fourteen more for doing it on purpose.'] Liddy didn't have a lot of respect for Maximum John Sirica, either.
Higgins' final chapters deal with the Senate Watergate Committee, the House Judiciary Committee that was chaired by Peter Rodino, and the post-pardon legal landscape. Higgins' entertaining opinions aren't bolstered by much description - a profile of Senator Sam Ervin in 1975 probably would have been superfluous, anyway. Thirty years on, though, they kind of hang out there in an unsatisfying vacuum. This book is weakest the farther it strays from the legal give and take, the challenges faced by prosecutors and defense attorneys, and especially the fragile construction of an impossible conspiracy.







