Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion 1st Edition, Kindle Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
- Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
- Create digital flashcards instantly
- Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
- Create digital flashcards instantly
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Customers who bought this item also bought
“A revealing book...Using "myth" in the popular sense, to mean falsehood, Galileo Goes to Jail debunks widespread misconceptions.”―Douglas Todd, Vancouver Sun
“A splendid book.”―Christopher Howse, Daily Telegraph
“As a collection, these myth-busting arguments work to soften the wedge responsible for the schism between science and religion. The topics and writing style will appeal to all readers, but students of science and religion should consider this essential reading.”―J. A. Hewlett, Choice
“Informative and thought-provoking reading.”―Ernan McMullin, The Tablet
“The volume's careful organization and execution reveal the kind of planning and teamwork absent from too many edited collections, but which have come to be expected from Numbers...Each chapter of Galileo Goes to Jail begins with two or three epigraphs that clearly convict scholarly and popular literature of perpetuating the myth in question. Most authors then explore the nuances of the myth, its origin, complexity, and longevity, before telling the "rest of the story."”―Mark A. Kalthoff, First Things
“The authors necessarily spend the bulk of their time debunking attacks on religion in the name of science, but they also clear the muddy waters left behind when pro-religion forces try to obscure the scientific record...As Numbers points out in his introduction, fewer than half of the contributors are religious believers at all; and of those, there are only two evangelicals, one Catholic, and one Jew. In other words, they have no axe to grind, and their only agenda is to set the historical record straight. Given all of the polemics published today, this is a breath of fresh air.”―Ryan T. Anderson, Weekly Standard
“[Ronald L. Numbers] is a religious agnostic whose scholarship on the history of American religion and science is marked by meticulous accuracy and impartiality...[This book was written] with ordinary readers, not specialists, in mind, making this a truly rare book: where else can you find such authoritative scholarship delivered so accessibly and fairly on such an important subject?”―Edward B. Davis, belief.net --This text refers to the paperback edition.
- Publication Date : March 31, 2009
- Print Length : 320 pages
- File Size : 2483 KB
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Publisher : Harvard University Press; 1st Edition (March 31, 2009)
- Language: : English
- ASIN : B006SDJCOI
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced Typesetting : Not Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Lending : Not Enabled
- Best Sellers Rank: #272,433 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I deduct one star because the book doesn't always live up to its aim. In some cases, the topics are either esoteric or somewhat biased in their own regard.
On the esoteric side, Chapter 12 on Descartes and the mind-body distinction seemed like too academic a topic for a book such as this. If the book is geared toward the general public and the misconceptions they have about historical tensions between scientists and people of faith, I doubt this would rank high on the list of misconceptions. I for one had never even heard of this particular myth until I read the chapter, and after reading it, I'm still not sure what it was trying to prove.
On the bias side, Chapter 23 on Intelligent Design doesn't at all succeed in what it sets out to prove. The author of that chapter does a fair job of summarizing the principal argument of ID: that organisms with irreducible complexity had to have been that way from the start, because you cannot get there by gradual mutations. But the author does nothing at all to show why this is not a valid scientific observation and critique of Darwinian theory. If you are going to attack ID as being "not science," I would expect you to show, scientifically, why the irreducible complexity argument against Darwinism falls apart. But the author never does. Instead, he simply plucks a couple of quotations by ID proponents by Michael Behe and others to attempt to show that ID is really just creationism in new clothing. The author mentions that he was an expert witness during the 80s on court cases dealing with the teaching of creationism in schools. That would seem to make him a biased scholar on this issue, one who wants to paint any scientific critique against evolution and in favor of design as "creationism." To me, this chapter was completely unconvincing.
Was Galileo imprisoned and tortured for teaching Copernicanism?
Did the church suppress the growth of Science?
Did the church teach the earth is flat?
Has science secularized western culture?
and many more. I found much of this book provocative, and much of it comforting as well.
The first myth was that Ancient Christianity caused a demise in scientic study. For example, the terrible murder of Hypatia in 415 AD was not due to her work re science. Hypatia was caught in a terrilbe political dispute between Bishop Cyril and the Roman Perfect which had nothing to do with Hypatia's scholarship. While some of the early Church Fathers disagreed with "pagan" Greek and Roman thought, these Fathers accepted much of what the Ancient Romans and especially the Ancient Greeks achieved. St. Augustine (354-430) relied on Platonic thought and rhetoric to make his arguements in his work especially his tome THE CITY OF GOD. He was also aware that the Cosmos was much larger than the earth. Mr. Numbers mentioned that St.Basil of Caesarea (330-379) scolded early Christians for making claims against Greek thought when these Christians were totally ignorant of Ancient Greek learning and made themselves, and Christianity, look foolish. St. Augustine whose work was important to Catholcism was clear that the Bible was often allegorical and not meant to make taken literally. As an aside, unless one knows the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Koine Greek languages, one does not have a perfect understanding of the Bible.
Another myth that was exploded in this book was the notion that the Catholic Church suppressed scientic thought. Michael Shanks' essay in this book undermines this myth. While no mention of the work of St.Albertus Magnus (1193-1280), is made, Shanks cited the work of another devout Catholic.Roger Bacon (c. 1214-1294) who was one of the most creative scientists of his ear and credited with experimental science. The myth that Fr. Bacon was jailed was proven false by John Helborn, "no apologist for the Vatican," in his book titled THE SUN IN THE CHURCH. Shanks mentioned several other devout Catholic Churchmen who did advanced scientic work.
As mentioned in this review's opening paragraph, men and women of different religious affiliation made significant contributions to science. The essay by Syed Nomanul Haq produced solid proof of Islamic scientic acheivements. Abu Hamid al Ghazali (1058-1111) supported advanced scientific and mathematical study. "For example," Qusta Ibn Luqa (820-912) translated the Greek Diophantus' Greek ARISTHMETIC as THE ART OF ALGEBRA which was an important advance re mathematic calculation. Haq also cited Islamic scholars not only faithfully translated Greek thought, they embellished it with their glosses and commentaries. C. 1259, the Islamic astronomer Nasir Al-Din a-Tusi proved that the geocentric Ptolemic thoery was worng. As Haq Fr.noted, Copernicus (c1472-1543), who was a Caholic monk, used Islamic studies to enhance his work. Haq cited other Islamic scholars whose endeavors contributed to mathematics.
Another interesting essay in this book was written by Katharine destroyed the myth that Catholic Church autorities prohibited human dissection. The Catholic authorities did not make such prohibition. In fact, Catholics dissected human remains to prepare the dead for burial. What the Catholic authorities did prohibit was grave robbing or removing the dead from prisons or poor houses without permission of family members. When Versalius (1514-1564) did his work re human anatomy, Catholic authorities were aware of his work.
The trial of Galileo (1564-1642) is another myth that has been corrected. Maurice A. Finocchiaro's essay makes this very clear. In 1610 Pope V (1605-1621) and in 1624 Pope Urban VIII (1623-1644) both had elaborate celebrations honoring Galileo's work Galileo's secular rivals initiated the issues that brought Galileo to trial. Finocchaiaro disproved the lies that Galileo was placed in a dungeon and torutured. His inquistors never laid a hand him. Galileo spent his "imprisonment" in the Tucany's and Florentine's embassy' and the prosecutor's luxery six room apartment. Galileo has his own chef and wine taster. Galileos' sanctions included house arrest which was a moot point since he was legally blind.He continued his work, and his daughter, a devout Catholic nun, served as his secretary.
Other essays disproved that Darwin (1809-1882) worked against Christianity. The popular notions of Darwin as "the bad guy" or the "good guy" are either exaggerated or simply myths that have no bearing in reality. Other myths undermined in this book is that Darwin & co. were complicit in "Nazi" race halluciantins. Such a connection never existed once readers read the book and sources cited in this book. The essays re Einstein (1879-1955) and quantum mechanics are instructive to understand modern scientific theory.
While this reviewer knew some of the topics in this book, the book was informative. Mr. Numbers could have included the work of Father Le Maitre (1894-1966) whose work on an expanding universe was praised by Einsten. Mention could have made of Father Jaki's (1924-2009) who was a formost mathematician, physicist, and astronomy. Anthony Rizzi's book THE SCIENCE BEFORE SCIENCE could have embellished this book. These omissions should not discourage readers from accessing this book. The book is very helpful as a study of the history of science.
James E. Egolf
Novermber 9, 2014
Top reviews from other countries
It is fun to read. Each chapter is short and well written. The examples are sufficient to make you realise that many people are misusing science to other agendas other than genuinely finding out about the world.
It is a very useful book and illuminates many current arguments, and makes them look rather silly. Almost as silly as the belief that many people ever did believe in a flat earth. (See myth 3)
Recommended reading to those interested in the intersection of science and religion. The relationship between them is more accommodating, more interesting and more complex than many of us realise. This book shows us the myths, and exposes their falsity.