Other Sellers on Amazon
FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
91% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Follow the Authors
OK
The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election Hardcover – September 15, 2013
|
John Sides
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Lynn Vavreck
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length352 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherPrinceton University Press
-
Publication dateSeptember 15, 2013
-
Dimensions6 x 1 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-100691156883
-
ISBN-13978-0691156880
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of AmericaPaperback$11.09$11.09FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Sep 20
Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a LifetimePaperback$11.39$11.39FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Sep 20
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of AmericaPaperback$11.09$11.09FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Sep 20
Editorial Reviews
Review
"The Gamble reveals how few 'breaking' developments in presidential campaigns (the rules are different for your local freeholder race, with its scant media coverage) can actually move the numbers. Pry out the secrets, read the data, and you can ignore the rest of the clattering B.S. machine that is the modern presidential election."---David Weigel, Slate
"A necessary corrective to the personality-driven and hyperventilating accounts of presidential campaigns driven by a news media out to sell half-baked narratives. . . . Eminently readable."---Rick Hasen, Slate
"The Gamble is political analysis done properly, a serious challenge to journalists and pundits. And it suggests that the politics that works is politics done properly, that produces real improvements for people in their daily lives."---Daniel Finkelstein, The Times
"With the most comprehensive and demanding analytics of a wide array of data, Sides and Vavreck cut through many of the myths of the 2012 campaign. . . . Reading The Gamble, I'm pulled in two directions. There is an excitement that comes with the clarity of very smart and skilled professionals working through data and presenting an overwhelmingly compelling case. That's balanced with a maddening sense of frustration that so much blood, sweat, tears, and treasure was put into an endeavor that was likely predetermined by forces out of anyone's control. . . . Read [it]. You'll be glad you did."---Stuart Stevens, Daily Beast
"A work of real originality and depth. In places it extends existing work and does so with care and sophistication. In other places it breaks new ground, especially with analyses of the interplay between the media and popular references and perceptions."---Richard Johnston, Forum
"Sides and Vavreck's book is an overdue corrective. They weren't embedded in a campaign or buddies with top strategists. They don't usher you inside the room. But they have something that campaign reporters lack: data. Lots and lots and lots of it. . . . Underpinning their real-time information are decades of supporting political-science data and theory. The result is that while most election narratives track the inputs of the campaign, Sides and Vavreck track the outputs. . . . There's no better book for understanding it--and the political structures that will continue shaping U.S. elections in 2016 and beyond--than The Gamble. For campaign journalism, the book is a game-changer."---Ezra Klein, Bloomberg View
"Without a doubt the most provocative book is The Gamble by Sides and Vavreck."---Ed Kilgore, Washington Monthly
"The Gamble is a mine of information about why the result of the election was apparent to said psephologists as far back as November 2011. . . . This is a scientific book. As the publication blurb states, 'other books may tell you what the candidates did and why, but this book tells you whether what they did actually mattered.' In that respect The Gamble pays off."---Simon Burns, MP, Total Politics
"The discounting of campaign drama has more recently been taken to a new level by political scientists John Sides and Lynn Vavreck in The Gamble, which might have been subtitled Nothing to See Here, Folks. . . . Sides and Vavreck take the provocative but stimulating route of considering every explanation of the outcome other than the 'fundamentals' (basically, the power of incumbency and acceptably positive economic trends and conditions) and exploding each with varying quantities of empirical dynamite."---Ed Kilgore, Washington Monthly
"Sides and Vavreck offer a detailed, quantified description of the battlefield--an effort to provide political science insight in real time."---David Lauter, Los Angeles Times/Jacket Copy blog
"What really mattered in last year's elections? George Washington University professor John Sides and UCLA professor Lynn Vavreck, in a remarkably fast turnaround for an academic work, applied social science to the developments of last year's presidential election in The Gamble. It turns out that the events journalists described in real time (including this one) weren't as important as they were made out to be. And Sides and Vavreck provide an important reality check that observers should heed before the daily doings of 2016 consume us all."---Steven Shepard, National Journal
"Good, sane tome on how the fundamentals matter."---Tyler Cowen, Marginal Revolution
"In The Gamble, two super-smart thinkers lay out moneyball politics for anyone to understand."---Gregg Easterbrook, ESPN.com
"Honorable Mention for the 2013 PROSE Award in Government & Politics, Association of American Publishers"
Review
"In their lively and insightful account of what really happened in the 2012 presidential campaign, Sides and Vavreck replace wild conjecture about gaffes and undecided voters with hard data and broad context. If you want to understand the dynamics of presidential campaigns, turn off the cable shows and read this book."―Alan S. Gerber, Yale University
"Sides and Vavreck have invented an important new genre of campaign book, perfect for our age of accelerated media. Observers of American politics will relish The Gamble for its fresh research and authoritative analysis, even if my fellow journalists resent it for demonstrating how often we got the story wrong."―Sasha Issenberg, author of The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns
"John Sides and Lynn Vavreck have done something remarkable: They've managed to not just report on the 2012 election in real time, but research it in real time, too. They've solved the problem that bedevils those of us in journalism: How to actually know what you're talking about when you're talking about something as fluid and fast-moving as a presidential election. This book should change how we cover campaigns."―Ezra Klein, columnist, The Washington Post
"Sides and Vavreck have done more to bridge the worlds of campaign reporting and political science than any other academics working today. The Gamble, their penetrating and accessible study of the 2012 presidential election, is mandatory reading for anyone who cares about American politics."―Ryan Lizza, Washington Correspondent, The New Yorker
"The 2012 election was when 'Moneyball' defeated 'Game Change'―and Sides and Vavreck explain why political scientists and number-crunchers were able to forecast the results well in advance, while the conventional wisdom was so often wrong. The Gamble is crisply written, comprehensively researched, and carefully argued. It provides the definitive account of what really happened and what really mattered in the campaign."―Nate Silver, author of The Signal and the Noise
From the Inside Flap
"Conventional campaign books portray a fantasy world shaped by brilliant strategists and dramatic events. Sides and Vavreck have invented a new genre--in-the-moment electoral analysis grounded in first-rate political science. Read their book to understand why Barack Obama was reelected, and get your fantasy fix from Game of Thrones."--Larry M. Bartels, author ofUnequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age
"In their lively and insightful account of what really happened in the 2012 presidential campaign, Sides and Vavreck replace wild conjecture about gaffes and undecided voters with hard data and broad context. If you want to understand the dynamics of presidential campaigns, turn off the cable shows and read this book."--Alan S. Gerber, Yale University
"Sides and Vavreck have invented an important new genre of campaign book, perfect for our age of accelerated media. Observers of American politics will relishThe Gamble for its fresh research and authoritative analysis, even if my fellow journalists resent it for demonstrating how often we got the story wrong."--Sasha Issenberg, author ofThe Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns
"John Sides and Lynn Vavreck have done something remarkable: They've managed to not just report on the 2012 election in real time, but research it in real time, too. They've solved the problem that bedevils those of us in journalism: How to actually know what you're talking about when you're talking about something as fluid and fast-moving as a presidential election. This book should change how we cover campaigns."--Ezra Klein, columnist,The Washington Post
"Sides and Vavreck have done more to bridge the worlds of campaign reporting and political science than any other academics working today.The Gamble, their penetrating and accessible study of the 2012 presidential election, is mandatory reading for anyone who cares about American politics."--Ryan Lizza, Washington Correspondent,The New Yorker
"The 2012 election was when 'Moneyball' defeated 'Game Change'--and Sides and Vavreck explain why political scientists and number-crunchers were able to forecast the results well in advance, while the conventional wisdom was so often wrong.The Gamble is crisply written, comprehensively researched, and carefully argued. It provides the definitive account of what really happened and what really mattered in the campaign."--Nate Silver, author ofThe Signal and the Noise
From the Back Cover
"Conventional campaign books portray a fantasy world shaped by brilliant strategists and dramatic events. Sides and Vavreck have invented a new genre--in-the-moment electoral analysis grounded in first-rate political science. Read their book to understand why Barack Obama was reelected, and get your fantasy fix from Game of Thrones."--Larry M. Bartels, author ofUnequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age
"In their lively and insightful account of what really happened in the 2012 presidential campaign, Sides and Vavreck replace wild conjecture about gaffes and undecided voters with hard data and broad context. If you want to understand the dynamics of presidential campaigns, turn off the cable shows and read this book."--Alan S. Gerber, Yale University
"Sides and Vavreck have invented an important new genre of campaign book, perfect for our age of accelerated media. Observers of American politics will relishThe Gamble for its fresh research and authoritative analysis, even if my fellow journalists resent it for demonstrating how often we got the story wrong."--Sasha Issenberg, author ofThe Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns
"John Sides and Lynn Vavreck have done something remarkable: They've managed to not just report on the 2012 election in real time, but research it in real time, too. They've solved the problem that bedevils those of us in journalism: How to actually know what you're talking about when you're talking about something as fluid and fast-moving as a presidential election. This book should change how we cover campaigns."--Ezra Klein, columnist,The Washington Post
"Sides and Vavreck have done more to bridge the worlds of campaign reporting and political science than any other academics working today.The Gamble, their penetrating and accessible study of the 2012 presidential election, is mandatory reading for anyone who cares about American politics."--Ryan Lizza, Washington Correspondent,The New Yorker
"The 2012 election was when 'Moneyball' defeated 'Game Change'--and Sides and Vavreck explain why political scientists and number-crunchers were able to forecast the results well in advance, while the conventional wisdom was so often wrong.The Gamble is crisply written, comprehensively researched, and carefully argued. It provides the definitive account of what really happened and what really mattered in the campaign."--Nate Silver, author ofThe Signal and the Noise
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; Edition Unstated (September 15, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691156883
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691156880
- Item Weight : 1.38 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#2,171,535 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,942 in Elections
- #3,634 in United States Executive Government
- #3,728 in Democracy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Would like to see more of this type of analysis going forward.
Was it Romney's "47%" remark? The number of ads the Obama campaign put on TV in the battle-ground states? The almost flawless Democratic convention? Obama's bouncing back in the last two debates? The fact that the US economy, while not exactly booming, was at least ticking upwards? Um, no.
And what were the reasons behind Romney's loss? His Mormon religion? The "47%" remarks? His perceived business practices and lack of divulging more than 2 years of his tax returns? His stiff personality? A lack of affection and trust of him by the Republican base. Um, no. "No", because the authors really don't pinpoint a reason for one man's victory at the polls and another man's defeat. Oh, maybe "Chicago's" decision to "front-load" their ads - airing them early in the summer instead of waiting til the end of the campaign - which might have helped "define" Mitt Romney. But then the authors point out that most watchers of the ads were already interested in the race and politics in general, so maybe that wasn't it. Hey, maybe Obama's race lost him some points at the polls. But, maybe not.
I closely follow politics - I am, after all, a political "junkie" - and I was fascinated by the 2012 election. All parts of it, from the long, tedious Republican primary to the Romney campaign's solid belief that they were going to win the election to Mitt Romney's gracious concession speech. Almost every single day between first and last day was interesting to me. But - maybe because I was part of it - the Obama "ground game" was the most interesting thing of all. How disappointing to find out the while Vavreck and Sides wrote about, they didn't think it mattered all that much.
Polls in late 2011 and early 2012 showed Obama holding a narrow nation-wide lead. The polls stayed about the same on that level but later polls showed Obama leading in the critical swing-states. Barack Obama won every one of those states he was expected to win, but one, North Carolina. Obama won reelection without much trouble and without much drama. Most of the "drama" was stirred up by the media, which needed a tense, close election to fill the 24/7 news cycles. John Sides and Lynn Vavreck take an interesting look at this election, but don't come up with many firm reasons why Obama won and Romney lost. Personally, I think it was SO many reasons that they all combined into that unexplainable, unknowing victory because Barack Obama was simply more likable than Mitt Romney.
This is a great book for a detail-minded political junkie.


