Buy new:
$9.00$9.00
FREE delivery:
Aug 31 - Sep 6
Payment
Secure transaction
Ships from
bookbiz75
Sold by
Returns
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
Buy used: $8.35
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
88% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
99% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Authors
OK
Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime Hardcover – January 11, 2010
Purchase options and add-ons
"This shit would be really interesting if we weren't in the middle of it."
—Barack Obama, September 2008
In 2008, the presidential election became blockbuster entertainment. Everyone was watching as the race for the White House unfolded like something from the realm of fiction. The meteoric rise and historic triumph of Barack Obama. The shocking fall of the House of Clinton—and the improbable resurrection of Hillary as Obama's partner and America's face to the world. The mercurial performance of John McCain and the mesmerizing emergence of Sarah Palin. But despite the wall-to-wall media coverage of this spellbinding drama, remarkably little of the real story behind the headlines has yet been told.
In Game Change, John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, two of the country's leading political reporters, use their unrivaled access to pull back the curtain on the Obama, Clinton, McCain, and Palin campaigns. How did Obama convince himself that, despite the thinness of his résumé, he could somehow beat the odds to become the nation's first African American president? How did the tumultuous relationship between the Clintons shape—and warp—Hillary's supposedly unstoppable bid? What was behind her husband's furious outbursts and devastating political miscalculations? Why did McCain make the novice governor of Alaska his running mate? And was Palin merely painfully out of her depth—or troubled in more serious ways?
Game Change answers those questions and more, laying bare the secret history of the 2008 campaign. Heilemann and Halperin take us inside the Obama machine, where staffers referred to the candidate as "Black Jesus." They unearth the quiet conspiracy in the U.S. Senate to prod Obama into the race, driven in part by the fears of senior Democrats that Bill Clinton's personal life might cripple Hillary's presidential prospects. They expose the twisted tale of John Edwards's affair with Rielle Hunter, the truth behind the downfall of Rudy Giuliani, and the doubts of those responsible for vetting Palin about her readiness for the Republican ticket—along with the McCain campaign staff's worries about her fitness for office. And they reveal how, in an emotional late-night phone call, Obama succeeded in wooing Clinton, despite her staunch resistance, to become his secretary of state.
Based on hundreds of interviews with the people who lived the story, Game Change is a reportorial tour de force that reads like a fast-paced novel. Character driven and dialogue rich, replete with extravagantly detailed scenes, this is the occasionally shocking, often hilarious, ultimately definitive account of the campaign of a lifetime.
- Print length464 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarper
- Publication dateJanuary 11, 2010
- Dimensions6 x 1.41 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100061733636
- ISBN-13978-0061733635
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
From Booklist
Review
“A smoking new book. . . . The real revelation in Game Change: Campaigns turn our politicians into lunatics.” — Tina Brown, The Daily Beast
“Heilemann and Halperin have conducted hundreds of interviews to provide the inside story of the 2008 campaign. . . . It vividly shows how character flaws large and small caused Obama’s opponents to self-destruct.” — Jacob Heilbrunn, The New York Times Book Review
“A thoroughly researched, well-paced and occasionally very amusing read. . . . The result is something that conveys the feel, or perhaps more accurately the smell, of one of recent history’s most thrilling elections, and it does so better than any of the other books already on the market.” — The Economist
“I can’t put down this book!” — Stephen Colbert
“Compulsively readable. Once begun, you can’t put it down. . . . Deeply and knowledgeably reported and presented with all the cool sophistication one would expect from two accomplished political reporters.” — Tim Rutten, The Los Angeles Times
“Riveting, definitive. . . . A great campaign book. . . . Halperin and Heilemann got insiders to cough up astonishing artifacts, including emails and recordings. . . . Game Change is really interesting, and puts you deep in the middle of it.” — Kurt Andersen, Very Short List
“The hottest book in the country.” — The Associated Press
“Everybody talked. Anybody that tells you they didn’t is lying to you.” — A former top Clinton aide, to Politico’s Ben Smith
“The best presidential political book since What it Takes by Richard Ben Cramer and Teddy White’s books. These are the types of books that got me into politics.” — Joe Scarborough
“An explosive new book. . . . An absolute page turner.” — Soledad O’Brien on Larry King Live
“You’ve got to read Game Change. . . . I read each and every word. . . . Game Change is a great book.” — Don Imus
“A fascinating account. . . . Heilemann and Halperin serve up a spicy smorgasbord of observations, revelations, and allegations. . . . Game Change leaves the reader with a vivid, visceral sense of the campaign and a keen understanding of the paradoxes and contingencies of history.” — Michiko Kakutani, The New York Times
“Riveting. . . . Its pages brim with scandalous tidbits. . . . This is a must-read for anyone interested in the cutthroat backroom hows and whys of a presidential campaign. . . . And it doesn’t hurt that Game Change reads more bodice-ripper than Beltway.” — Tina Jordan, Entertainment Weekly
“The authors of Game Change succeed in creating a plausible account of the emotional tumult of the 2008 campaign as it might have been―perhaps even was―experienced by the candidates, their spouses, and their staffs.” — Hendrik Hertzberg, The New Yorker
“An amazing piece of work. . . . One of the best books on politics of any kind I’ve read. For entertainment value, I put it up there with Catch 22. . . . An absolutely gripping read . . . they can write.” — Clive Crook, The Financial Times
Book Description
"This shit would be really interesting if we weren't in the middle of it."
—Barack Obama, September 2008
In 2008, the presidential election became blockbuster entertainment. Everyone was watching as the race for the White House unfolded like something from the realm of fiction. The meteoric rise and historic triumph of Barack Obama. The shocking fall of the House of Clinton—and the improbable resurrection of Hillary as Obama's partner and America's face to the world. The mercurial performance of John McCain and the mesmerizing emergence of Sarah Palin. But despite the wall-to-wall media coverage of this spellbinding drama, remarkably little of the real story behind the headlines has yet been told.
In Game Change, John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, two of the country's leading political reporters, use their unrivaled access to pull back the curtain on the Obama, Clinton, McCain, and Palin campaigns. How did Obama convince himself that, despite the thinness of his résumé, he could somehow beat the odds to become the nation's first African American president? How did the tumultuous relationship between the Clintons shape—and warp—Hillary's supposedly unstoppable bid? What was behind her husband's furious outbursts and devastating political miscalculations? Why did McCain make the novice governor of Alaska his running mate? And was Palin merely painfully out of her depth—or troubled in more serious ways?
Game Change answers those questions and more, laying bare the secret history of the 2008 campaign. Heilemann and Halperin take us inside the Obama machine, where staffers referred to the candidate as "Black Jesus." They unearth the quiet conspiracy in the U.S. Senate to prod Obama into the race, driven in part by the fears of senior Democrats that Bill Clinton's personal life might cripple Hillary's presidential prospects. They expose the twisted tale of John Edwards's affair with Rielle Hunter, the truth behind the downfall of Rudy Giuliani, and the doubts of those responsible for vetting Palin about her readiness for the Republican ticket—along with the McCain campaign staff's worries about her fitness for office. And they reveal how, in an emotional late-night phone call, Obama succeeded in wooing Clinton, despite her staunch resistance, to become his secretary of state.
Based on hundreds of interviews with the people who lived the story, Game Change is a reportorial tour de force that reads like a fast-paced novel. Character driven and dialogue rich, replete with extravagantly detailed scenes, this is the occasionally shocking, often hilarious, ultimately definitive account of the campaign of a lifetime.
From the Back Cover
“This shit would be really interesting if we weren’t in the middle of it.”—Barack Obama, September 2008
In 2008, the presidential election became blockbuster entertainment. Everyone was watching as the race for the White House unfolded like something from the realm of fiction. The meteoric rise and historic triumph of Barack Obama. The shocking fall of the House of Clinton—and the improbable resurrection of Hillary as Obama’s partner and America’s face to the world. The mercurial performance of John McCain and the mesmerizing emergence of Sarah Palin. But despite the wall-to-wall media coverage of this spellbinding drama, remarkably little of the real story behind the headlines has yet been told.
In Game Change, John Heilemann and Mark Halperin, two of the country’s leading political reporters, use their unrivaled access to pull back the curtain on the Obama, Clinton, McCain, and Palin campaigns. How did Obama convince himself that, despite the thinness of his résumé, he could somehow beat the odds to become the nation’s first African American president? How did the tumultuous relationship between the Clintons shape—and warp—Hillary’s supposedly unstoppable bid? What was behind her husband’s furious outbursts and devastating political miscalculations? Why did McCain make the novice governor of Alaska his running mate? And was Palin merely painfully out of her depth—or troubled in more serious ways?
Game Change answers those questions and more, laying bare the secret history of the 2008 campaign. Heilemann and Halperin take us inside the Obama machine, where staffers referred to the candidate as “Black Jesus.” They unearth the quiet conspiracy in the U.S. Senate to prod Obama into the race, driven in part by the fears of senior Democrats that Bill Clinton’s personal life might cripple Hillary’s presidential prospects. They expose the twisted tale of John Edwards’s affair with Rielle Hunter, the truth behind the downfall of Rudy Giuliani, and the doubts of those responsible for vetting Palin about her readiness for the Republican ticket—along with the McCain campaign staff’s worries about her fitness for office. And they reveal how, in an emotional late-night phone call, Obama succeeded in wooing Clinton, despite her staunch resistance, to become his secretary of state.
Based on hundreds of interviews with the people who lived the story, Game Change is a reportorial tour de force that reads like a fast-paced novel. Character driven and dialogue rich, replete with extravagantly detailed scenes, this is the occasionally shocking, often hilarious, ultimately definitive account of the campaign of a lifetime.
About the Author
Mark Halperin is editor-at-large and senior political analyst for Time magazine. He is the author of The Undecided Voter’s Guide to the Next President and the coauthor of The Way to Win: Taking the White House in 2008. He has covered six presidential elections, including during his decade as the political director for ABC News. He lives in Manhattan.
Product details
- Publisher : Harper; First Edition (January 11, 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 464 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0061733636
- ISBN-13 : 978-0061733635
- Item Weight : 1.35 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.41 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #508,923 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #495 in General Elections & Political Process
- #530 in Elections
- #667 in United States Executive Government
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the authors

John Heilemann is the national political correspondent and columnist for New York magazine. An award-winning journalist and the author of Pride Before the Fall: TheTrials of Bill Gates and the End of the Microsoft Era, he is a former staff writer for The New Yorker, Wired, and The Economist. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

Mark Halperin is editor-at-large and senior political analyst for Time magazine. He is the author of The Undecided Voter's Guide to the Next President and the coauthor of The Way to Win: Taking the White House in 2008. He has covered six presidential elections, including during his decade as the political director for ABC News. He lives in Manhattan.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
From the time he gave the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic Convention, stressing the concept of unity, Obama was headed for stardom. Unlike the other main candidates in the book, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and John McCain, his strategists functioned well together, and created an astonishing model for fundraising that made public financing, for him at least, unnecessary. Obama, cool, collected and egocentric, was, by all appearances, something new, indeed exciting. Underneath the veneer, so carefully crafted that it no doubt fooled many of his ardent supporters, was an agenda of division and an almost pathological desire to downgrade the country he is currently destroying.
His combatants for the Democratic nomination in 2008 created their own problems. Hillary, thought to be a queen in waiting, hated the drudgery of calling supporters, and prized loyalty in her staff above competence, and even unity. Her staff was always battling, her first campaign manager, a Chicagoan named Patty Solis Doyle wholly incompetent. The key strategists always were thrusting knives at each other. And Clinton herself was a ponderous campaigner, maladroit at appearing, unlike her husband Bill, at ease, or making every move less than a calculation. Hillary was, and is, essentially as a campaigner, sort of a female Richard Nixon. Essentially, against her instincts, she had to use Bill as chief surrogate, and he was often out of control. But Bill Clinton, even while in the White House never had any coattails. And did not have them in 2008.
The third wheel in the race for the Democrats John Edwards, turned out to have the same internal campaign problems as Hillary, a bickering staff for certain, but complicated by the role of his wife Elizabeth. Cutting, condescending and unfortunately suffering from the incurable cancer that would several years later take her life, she was a terrible presence in the campaign trail. Edwards had two other problems. Once known as a nice guy, after he ran for vice-president alongside John Kerry, he became messianic. He could do no wrong. He dropped out early, tring to swap his endorsement for a Cabinet post. His reputation became tattered after his affair with a whacked out bimbo, Rielle Hunter made tabloid headlines. Later on, it was learned that he had fathered her child, although he attemptedto cover that up by using a low level aide, married, to claim fatherhood. John Edwards, a cipher and empty suit, is as odious as they make them.
McCain, after his campaign nearly collapsed in debt, recovered by running by the seat of his pants, as is his wont, since he thought the campaign was wherever he was, forget strategy, logistics and tactics. It was all about him and it showed. He won the Republican nomination because the field was so weak. There was nobody else to really challenge him, although a puff of smoke might have bowled his campaign over for good. Trailing badly, cash-strapped and not the same man who ran against Bush 43 for the 2000 nomination,and needing a surprise pick to join him on the ticket to ramp up the campaign, he chose, after little vetting, Sarah Palin. She gave great speeches, became a star, held Joe Biden to a draw in their debate, and knew practically nothing about history or policy. Palin did not know why Korea was divided, who the enemy was in Iraq, nor what, even generally the Federal Reserve did. She couldn't even get through a softball interview with Katie Couric, who never asked her a hard question, and like McCain, was undisciplined. She was sometimes moody and isolated during the campaign, more concerned with her poll numbers in Alaska. It was not just that she had but twenty months as Governor of Alaska. Sadly for this conservative, it is beyond debate, there is no there there. She is fine on Fox News. In the Oval Office, she would have been a calamity. None of that really mattered however. Nobody votes for a vice-president. And God, if he come down to join McCain on the ticket, could not have made him win that November.
Once the financial meltdown hit in September, it was all over but the shouting. McCain, not well versed in economics, suspended his campaign to no good purpose, and simply did not, or could not lead the Republicans on that issue. On the other hand, Obama looked commanding, and again, cool, because he consulted important and knowledgeable people on the problem. McCain was just bored.
But truth be told, it was a virtual certainty that a Democrat, any Democrat, would have won in 2008. Any time an unpopular incumbent is leaving office, the candidate of the other party wins. Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson gave rise to Warren Harding, Dwight Eisenhower and Nixon. George W.Bush never even appeared in person at the GOP Convention.
Heilemann and Halperin have done a good job of getting the inside story of the campaign, in the tradition of Theodore White, who started in all in 1960. But they never got a handle on the real Obama, even though they sometimes point out his arrogance and churlishness. They look at him as a pragmatic liberal, although he is not liberal at all, but studiously dictatorial and a true radical. Hillary, just as activist as he but for what she perceives as the betterment of the country, plainly doesn't like him, although she served as his Secretary of State. McCain, who likes Bill and Hillary both, apostasy for a Republican, detests him. People in Congress during the campaign were enamored of him and his power with the spoken word. Now he has no friends there, and fewer and fewer lapdogs. Like Wilson,another terrible and dictatorial president, Obama, as is plainly evident by now, thinks there are two kinds of people, superior beings who should run the government, and a lesser class of citizens, who should not think independently and should heel without dissent. We do not know what kind of a president Hillary or McCain would have been, but they, in the Senate, both reached across the aisle. Two things are certain. Obama won. The rest of us lost, and are still losing.
Bill Clinton wanted Ted Kennedy to endorse Hillary. But instead, he angered Kennedy so badly that Kennedy went all out for Obama. Here's how it happened according to the book . . .
"As Hillary bungled Caroline, Bill's handling of Ted was even worse. The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said,' A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.' "
Of course, we have to wonder if Kennedy was telling the truth or perhaps colorizing it to fit his own agenda since Kennedy was not a moral or virtuous man or one known for telling the truth. So, in reality, this story is secondhand. It could be false or it could be taken out of context. Or, it could be true.
On another matter the Clintons wanted to go after Obama's drug use. Can you imagine alleged coke sniffer Bill going after alleged dope smoker Obama? Well, that was going to be the way it went down if the Clintons had their way.
And . . .
Before BHO decided to run for president, the Obamas flew to Nashville, TN to get Al Gore's assurance that he would not run.
Among the things we learn . . .
When Obama asked Hillary Clinton to be secretary of state, she initially turned him down. Why? Bill's penchant for controversy. She felt it would interfere with her efforts in the job.
When President-elect Obama called her again to convince her to be his secretary of state, Clinton told him there was a problem. That great big mouthy problem was her husband. "You've seen what this is like; it will be a circus if I take this job," she said to Obama.
Clinton almost never admits this to anyone. And, Obama who seldom shows his vulnerable side, admits to Hillary that he needs her. He seems overwhelmed with the economy and all that's going on, all that faces him.
The McCain-Palin camp was afraid that Sarah Palin would screw things up because of the tremendous amount of information she needed to debate Biden. "The debate was going to be a debacle of historic and epic proportions...she was not focused...not engaged." She was not really participating in the prep, the authors add.
Sidebar:
In a recent news article Palin's spokeswoman, Meghan Stapleton, said in a statement: "The Governor's descriptions of these events are found in her book, 'Going Rogue.' Her descriptions are accurate. She was there. These reporters were not." Stapleton was talking about what was said about Palin in this book by the authors.
and then . . .
McCain aides confront Cindy McCain over reports that she had an extramarital affair.
The authors tell us that Hillary Clinton was so confident she would get the Democratic nomination that she had two top advisers planning her transition for after she won the general election.
They also point out that up until only days before the Republican Convention, Sen. John McCain was still thinking Sen. Joe Lieberman would be his running mate, until the "blowback" was so strong, they feared Lieberman would be rejected by the party, forcing the last-minute choice of Palin for the role.
Steve Schmidt, John McCain's former chief campaign strategist believes the Obama-Biden victory would have been even more lopsided without Palin on the Republican ticket, according to the book.
On John Edwards . . .
John Edwards went from being typically conceited to having megalomania. Women were always after him. He loved it and it fed his enormous ego. But it was also a problem for the campaign.
Edwards thought the contest would be between him and Hillary. The Clinton camp thought the same thing.
Edwards was normally warm to his staff. But he turned disdainful. He ignored and dismissed them. He even mistreated both staff and supporters. "You can't talk to people that way, "an aid told him after one of his displays. "People didn't like the new John Edwards."
Surprisingly, Elizabeth Edwards was fast to show John that she was his intellectual superior. She called him a "hick" in front of people and derided him for having "redneck parents." She called some staffers idiots. Her illness mellowed her in the early months of 2005 - but not for long.
While John's wife may have made him feel small, his new gal pal made him feel like a king. She told him that he had "the power to change the world," that "the people will follow you." She told him that he could be as great a leader as Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr. She told him, "You're so real. You just need to get your staff out of your way." She reinforced everything he already believed about himself. She told him exactly what he wanted and needed to hear.
No one gets off free in the book. The authors tell us that Senate Majority Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had referred privately to Barack Obama early in his campaign as a "light-skinned" African American "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one."
Ladies and gentlemen . . . meet America's elite.
This book makes Lady Chatterley's Lover as sexy as a high school algebra text book. It makes Madame Bovary look positively saintly. If even half of what this book reports is true, I've got higher forms of life on the bottom of my shoe than we've got running our country.
What a read. Gustave Flaubert couldn't have written it any better.
- Susanna K. Hutcheson
Top reviews from other countries
"Race" belongs to the school of "omniscient journalism." Its authors report not only what protagonists did and said ("F-bombs" and all) but also what they thought at the time. John Heileman and Mark Halperin, both established journalists ("New York" magazine and "Time", respectively), construct their narrative from a base of 300 interviews with over 200 people, including several of the principals. Since these interviews were "deep background," there are few attributions to specific sources. The account appears to be substantially accurate, though I understand that Sarah Palin's staff have disputed how their boss is portrayed - and well they might, since she is documented as "catatonic", ill informed, less than fully truthful and off message. Not worthy of high office, in other words. Hopefully this message will stick.
Most of the book addresses the epic struggle between Hillary Clinton and Obama in the Democratic primary as Clinton's seemingly assured victory melted away and Obama's quixotic insurgency morphed into a Movement. There is a brief digression to cover John Edwards' doomed bid: Edwards is revealed to be the egomaniac, sleazebag that we had suspected all along, though it was surprising to learn that his wife, tragically afflicted by cancer, is not the saint suggested by her public image but rather an unpleasant, vindictive bully. Once Obama wins the nomination, the focus turns to his battle with McCain. The earlier part of the Republican contest is barely covered, and by this time McCain is already on the way to losing, damned by his impetuous and ill-researched choice of Palin as his running mate and the exposure by the sudden financial crisis of his economic illiteracy.
The story of the campaigns is pretty much as expected: the massive demands on the candidates' physical and psychic stamina, the huge war chests needed every step of the way, the temporary victories, setbacks and bounce backs, the incessant bickering among campaign staff, the crude deals struck or implied with financial supporters and putative kingmakers and the ever rattling sexual skeletons in the closets of virtually every candidate - Obama being the principal exception. There is little substantive discussion of policy. Whether this is a reflection of fact or a bias in the reporting is not clear but it is probably the former - as Obama's law school mentor, Chris Edley comments "a focus group isn't policy-making."
The account is enlivened by numerous anecdotes: how Mitt Romney enters the men's room just before a Republican debate to find all of his rivals lined up at the urinals joking about how each of them detest him; of how Bill "Big Dog" Clinton lost his cool in a conversation with Ted Kennedy and undid a career long record of non-racism by snapping that "a few years ago, this guy (Obama) would be fetching us coffee"; how the Obamans were so worried about Joe Biden blowing the vice presidential debates that they not only enlisted Michigan Governor, Jennifer Granholm to act as Palin in a rehearsal, but they also rehearsed Granholm for the rehearsal against a stand-in for Biden; how an "undecided" voter in Ohio told a focus group that she feared that Obama might be a Muslim and soft on terrorists and when asked in return how, given that fear, she could remain undecided, responded " because if McCain dies Palin would be president."
Both Clinton and Obama come across quite well in the account. To be sure, Clinton is as ambitious, ruthless, convinced of her own entitlement and flexible in her positions as we thought, but she is also tough, smart, exceptionally well prepared, continuously learning and phenomenally hard working. Deep down, she is shown to have a core of principle, ideals, duty and patriotism. Arguably, she did deserve to win, for if anyone ever earns these things, she did.
Obama, for his part, walks on water. The authors seem in awe of him. He is cool, cerebral, rational, capable of stepping out of himself to see where he needs to adjust course or fix himself, certain in his destiny, idealist in his goals, equipped with a true moral compass, well-briefed and devoted to his family. He fights clean, announcing to his staff that "I will come out the other side as the same person I was on the way in...... if I ever catch anyone digging into the Clintons' personal lives, you will be fired." While we know today, one year into Obama's presidency, that he has his weaknesses, it is hard not to conclude in reading this book that he is a man superbly fitted to be president.
The ending of the book closes the circle by Hillary signing on as Obama's Secretary of State. He personally decides that he wants her, not merely for the political wow effect but because he believes that she is the most qualified and that she deserves it. Clinton is "anguished," she is shattered and exhausted by the campaign and just wants a normal life; she is afraid that if she accepts, Bill will somehow mess it up (though he, to his credit, rushes to make all the necessary disclosures of donors to his various causes to open the way for her). She declines. Obama won't give up until, overcome by duty and respect for the man whom until recently she despised, she reverses her decision. Obama's staff never saw their boss "prouder or more satisfied" than he was at this moment. Somehow, after all the cynical detailing of the dark side of politics, I found this uplifting.
Although Obama is the central character, the narrative revolves around other key players, principally Hillary Clinton, but also John Edwards, John McCain and Sarah Palin. It altered my opinion about Clinton - who comes across as thoroughly decent, diligent and admirable character - but reinforces what I knew about the others.
Those who saw and loved the last two brilliant series of the much-missed West Wing are in for a real treat. The powerful characters and breakneck narrative seem more in tune with a fictional creation than the staid world of politics.
Yet truth is stranger than fiction, and had that programme's creators devised characters such as Sarah Palin, they would have been accused of parody.
Palin - with the egomanic and sleazy John Edwards - comes off worst in this book, although it is her ignorance rather than cynicism or ego that is her worst sin. It remains a terrifying thought that she could have been a missed heartbeat away from being the most powerful person in the world.
One of the books' best episodes recounts her cramming sessions on forign affairs. During a lengthy primer on twentieth century history, of which she knew nothing, one ofe her aides suggests a break. "No, no, no, let's keep going," said Palin with the apparent wonderment of a child. "This is awesome."
The book should be read with a few reservations. It's certainly not (thankfully) political science, yet not even a work of journalism - which would be properly sourced - rather a piece narrative non-fiction. We have to trust the authors' integrity to faithfully and even handedly deal with their off the record sources, and for some readers that will invariably be a leap of faith too far.
Yet in my view, the book is richer and more candid for being off the record and gossipy. It's well-written, fascinating and a rare thing among books of its genre - a real page turner.
It is written in a griping and novel-like manner which makes it difficult to put down once started. It is an excellent review from behind the scenes of the McCain, Edwards and Clinton camps. One can only assume that the Obama camp had its share of problems, too but they simply went unreported or undetected.
This is, for sure, a story of the Democratic campaign: only a quarter of the book refers to the GOP although the widely trailed tidbits about Palin are both interesting to read and quite terrifying. I disagree with the reviewer who suggests that the authors are in awe of Obama: these are two very experienced journalists who understand what made him a standout candidate and the right man at the right time. There has also been criticism of the lack of sources for the work but if this is read as a piece of journalism rather than an academic history then this is not a big deal. If anyone disagreed with the narrative then you'd be sure to have heard about it.
If you're looking for a readable, enlightening reminder of the 2008 campaign then you'll find much to enjoy in this book. Recommended.
I appreciate that this book is 'the' story of the '08 US presidential elections but I'd hoped & expected a more balanced approach, viewing the Republian & democrat campaigns as equal. Instead, the authors are clearly in Obama's camp. You'd think that he ran the perfect-10 campaign from start to finish, with no errors, oversights, underplays, or mistakes; while the rest of the political players are fools, stumbling through in his wake.
Seriously, in column inches, Sarah Palin was the 'star' of the '08 campaign, but hardly brings notice, maybe only rating 20 pages of text. The authors make little reference to the very biased US media's treatment of McCain & Palin, and Clinton in the presidential race, which so clearly affected the outcome and Obama's (undeserved?) victory.
If you're interested in Obama, buy this book ('GO team Obama') but if you're interested in Palin, purchase 'Sarah from Alaska' instead which shows the '08 US presidential run in honest and open light.








