Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$20.59$20.59
FREE delivery: Monday, Feb 19 on orders over $35.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $7.30
Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
94% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
86% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Gaming the Vote: Why Elections Aren't Fair (and What We Can Do About It) Paperback – Illustrated, February 17, 2009
Purchase options and add-ons
At least five U.S. presidential elections have been won by the second most popular candidate, but these results were not inevitable. In fact, such an unfair outcome need never happen again, and as William Poundstone shows in Gaming the Vote, the solution is lurking right under our noses.
In all five cases, the vote was upset by a "spoiler"―a minor candidate who took enough votes away from the most popular candidate to tip the election to someone else. The spoiler effect is more than a glitch. It is a consequence of one of the most surprising intellectual discoveries of the twentieth century: the "impossibility theorem" of the Nobel laureate economist Kenneth Arrow. His theorem asserts that voting is fundamentally unfair―a finding that has not been lost on today's political consultants. Armed with polls, focus groups, and smear campaigns, political strategists are exploiting the mathematical faults of the simple majority vote. The answer to the spoiler problem lies in a system called range voting, which would satisfy both right and left, and Gaming the Vote assesses the obstacles confronting any attempt to change the U.S. electoral system.
The latest of several books by Poundstone on the theme of how important scientific ideas have affected the real world, Gaming the Vote is both a wry exposé of how the political system really works and a call to action.
Review
“Mr. Poundstone is a clear, entertaining explicator of election science. He easily bridges the gaps between theoretical and popular thinking, between passionate political debate and cool mathematical certainty.” ―The New York Times
“A handy compendium of alternatives to plurality voting. … Poundstone gives math a leading place in politics.” ―Salon.com
“Gaming the Vote entertainingly probes the combative history of voting over the past few centuries.” ―Mother Jones
“Poundstone's book raises a big question: how mad do the rest of us have to get before we change a system that just isn't working?” ―Newsweek
“Poundstone has a lively style and a penchant for anecdote that make his more difficult passages of analysis accessible and at times even dramatic.” ―The Wall Street Journal
“Poundstone 'writes not with a partisan's bile but with a technician's delight in explaining all the ways our democracy can give us what we don't want.'” ―The Seattle Times
“Poundstone always writes with the premise that thinking can be entertaining. His latest book, Gaming the Vote, clearly reasoned, well-researched, and often amusing, deals with the crucially important question: How best does a government ‘by the people' decide what to do? He does not find a definitive answer, but he shows why it is so difficult and prepares the citizen to face the question responsibly.” ―Rush Holt, U.S. House of Representatives (NJ-12)
“In 1948 economist Kenneth Arrow dropped a bombshell on political scientists. He proved that no voting system can be perfect. Poundstone's eleventh book is a superb attempt to demystify Arrow's amazing achievement, and to defend ‘range voting' as the best voting system yet devised. His account is interwoven with a colorful history of American elections, from the corrupt politics of Louisiana to Ralph Nader as the ‘spoiler' whose splitting of the Democratic votes helped elect George W. Bush. A chapter covers Lewis Carroll's little-known valiant efforts to solve the voting problem. A raft of amusing political cartoons enliven Poundstone's prose. There is no better introduction to the inescapable flaws and paradoxes of all voting systems than this eye-opening, timely volume.” ―Martin Gardner, author of Are Universes Thicker than Blackberries? and more than 60 other titles
“Gaming the Vote is a witty, irreverent tour d'horizon of voting theories, voting theorists, and their quarrels. Unlike many academic brouhahas, the stakes here are high. Both citizens and politicians will delight in the tales Poundstone tells, but it won't always be easy to tell who's right. Nevertheless, Poundstone cuts through a lot of the obfuscation and takes sides, which won't please everybody.” ―Steven J. Brams, Department of Poltics, New York University, and author of Mathematics and Democracy: Designing Better Voting and Fair-Division Procedures
“Gaming the Vote is a must-read for anyone interested in the process and outcomes of voting. Poundstone gives a clear and remarkably accurate account of the rich theoretical literature. At the same time, his examples of voting anomalies in real elections are both lively and revealing.” ―Kenneth J. Arrow, professor of economics (emeritus) at Stanford University and winner of the 1972 Nobel Prize in Economic Science
“In this masterful presentation William Poundstone sketches the history of voting systems, elucidates ideas such as Borda counts, Condorcet winners, and range voting, and shows how changing our system could make it less likely to yield paradoxical and unfair results. Ranging easily over material as disparate as Arrow's impossibility theorem and recent presidential elections, he makes it clear just how unclear is the question, "Who won?" The book has my vote.” ―John Allen Paulos, author of Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences and the forthcoming Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for Religion Just Don't Add Up
About the Author
- Print length352 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateFebruary 17, 2009
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.79 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100809048922
- ISBN-13978-0809048922
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : Hill and Wang; First Edition (February 17, 2009)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0809048922
- ISBN-13 : 978-0809048922
- Item Weight : 15.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.79 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,376,213 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,263 in General Elections & Political Process
- #2,497 in United States Executive Government
- #2,566 in Elections
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

William Poundstone is the author of two previous Hill and Wang books: Fortune's Formula and Gaming the Vote.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book could benefit from some additions, firstly an overall model of the voting process. Voting does not usually occur suddenly and unexpectedly but in an iterated cycle of discussion, expression of preference, and vote counting, in phases: self-selection into groups (e.g. cliques, voting districts or parties), nomination, runoffs, and final selection. The early phases occur with some expectation of the later phases, and certainly with historical awareness, so the system evolves continuously (e.g. via gerrymandering).
One of those early phases is establishing a constitution, but this gets no mention. Because even the technically fairest election can produce evil results ("Democracy is when two wolves and a lamb vote on what to eat for dinner"), we typically have constitutions to set the voting rules, e.g. limiting the range of questions that can be voted upon. Behind a "veil of ignorance" as to the details of future votes, we can agree on voting rules so that votes will inflict minimal harm. The book mentions Social Choice theory often, but Public Choice only once, and merely as the journal where voting theorist Donald Saari happened to publish an article. Saari gets practically a whole chapter, but Gordon Tullock and Nobel Prize-winner James Buchanan, the authors of Public Choice theory's landmark work "The Calculus of Consent" are completely missing. CALCULUS OF CONSENT, THE (Tullock, Gordon. Selections. V. 2.)
Poundstone attributes much of the current election evil to the rise of political consultants, who consciously coordinate negative publicity, spoilers, and other unfair shenanigans. He does not mention that their rise may be not a cause but a result of the increased government spending and power that began with FDR (the book focuses instead on the other Roosevelt). As the stakes grow higher, so do the campaign budgets. "As long as there is power to be bought, there will be money to buy it."
Proportional voting is mentioned only briefly, but surely deserves more. Under what conditions it is more appropriate than single-winner elections? Some decisions are made only once, while others (e.g. for a legislature) are for representatives who themselves will vote repeatedly. Even for the seemingly one-off cases of choosing a restaurant or a movie, if the same group of friends sees many movies together, surely they would want a voting system that occasionally acknowledges the minority preference? Achieving *consensus* is important for any group that wants to stay friends. Contrast this with modern American politics, with its polarization and ongoing bitterness.
It is ironic that voting theorists still disagree vehemently on the proper voting system for a given set of circumstances. It is doubly ironic that Range Voting is a simplified version of the Comparison Matrix, which is used to evaluate candidates in just such situations when people are emotionally attached to their favorites. Comparison matrices remove some of the emotion by having evaluators (voters) assess each candidate against a weighted set of criteria. The weighted scores are averaged to producing a single score: a range vote. The book would benefit from the addition of such a matrix summarizing how various voting schemes satisfy various fairness criteria.
I bought Poundstone's book rather than some others on the same general topic, because I was told it covered real historical examples and not just the math. It does, but not very evenly: the historical chapters are indeed interesting in places, but have a different feel from the theoretical chapters, more polemical and sometimes partisan. In mentioning the Great Figure-Skating Flip-Flop of 1995, Poundstone says "Trust me -- there wasn't [anything funny about the scoring system]. If I explained the whole voting system, you would nod your head and say, That sounds fair." Maybe so, but I'd rather you did take the time to explain it and let me nod for myself, and spend fewer pages on Lee Atwater and negative campaigning, of which I already know all I need to and more than I want to, and isn't exactly the point of the book.
Note that Poundstone is concerned almost exclusively with "voting systems" in the mathematical sense, he doesn't get into things like tampering with electronic voting machines at all. Similarly, for all the times he refers to the presidential election of 2000 it's to discuss Nader's role as a spoiler, not butterfly ballots or hanging chads, nor the disconnect between the popular vote and the electoral college. Not just OUR system, in other words, but the very theory of voting in general (albeit with virtually all examples and illustrations taken from US history)
As far as the "What We Can Do About It" part of the subtitle goes, there's not really very much about that. Poundstone has his clear favorite system (Range Voting) but admits it isn't likely to get much traction, maybe Instant-Runoff Voting is the best we can work for. He says there's not much point in writing to incumbent politicians, because they're too vested in the current system, but if you do want to he recommends writing to Senator McCain or Senator Obama -- this alone makes the book feel dated beyond its years.
Interesting, very readable, explains things I hadn't understood before; good notes, excellent bibliography. But all that said, it fails to change my life.



