Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
95% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
Follow the Author
OK
The UN Gang: A Memoir of Incompetence, Corruption, Espionage, Anti-Semitism and Islamic Extremism at the UN Secretariat Hardcover – September 13, 2005
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
-
Print length208 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherDoubleday
-
Publication dateSeptember 13, 2005
-
Dimensions6.32 x 0.75 x 9.57 inches
-
ISBN-100385513194
-
ISBN-13978-0385513197
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
The UN Gang is the right book at the right time. With his insider knowledge of how the UN functions, Pedro Sanjuan confirms what we believed all along about the failings of the UN. He exposes its longstanding pervasive anti-Semitism, along with a host of wrongdoings, which cry out for reform. For anyone interested in international affairs and world peace, this book is a must read.”
—Abraham H. Foxman, National Director, Anti-Defamation League and author of Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism
“This is a true and entertaining account of the UN from the inside of the Secretariat. It will shock some readers and inform many others. I warmly recommend it.”
—Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, former US ambassador to the UN
“If you love the UN, hate it, or are indifferent, this is a book you must read. Mr. Sanjuan writes elegantly and with humor, yet the end result is enough to make a strong man weep. The author has spent more than a decade observing the United Nations from the inside; the picture he paints is not a pretty one. Corruption, mismanagement, nepotism, open espionage against the U.S.—these are but a few of the ‘warts’ on the body of this august international institution that are described in detail. Sanjuan’s proposed reforms make sense; whether there are those within the UN with the good sense to adopt them remains to be seen.”
—Lawrence S. Eagleburger, former US Secretary of State
About the Author
PEDRO SANJUAN has worked in seven different government departments during seven presidential administrations, including two tours on the White House staff. His writings have appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Quarterly, the Wall Street Journal, and numerous foreign publications.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
So Your Father Was Jew!
So, your father was Jew, yes?" United Nations Undersecretary-General Viacheslav Ustinov asked me abruptly.
He was a Russian who squinted constantly and spoke English with a forced, high-pitched voice and a persistent interrogative inflection. Instead of saying "er" between words, he said "myah." His eyes marbled off the wall next to him, cluttered with several pictures, poster-style, of the United Nations building and a large one of the Palace of Culture in Moscow. His shifting eye movements toward me and the wall seemed to be saying, "See? The United Nations may be in New York, but the Palace of Culture is in Moscow!"
Ustinov was the top Soviet official in the UN Secretariat, but not the top Soviet agent. His special assistant who watched over him held that honor, a fact that was well known around the corridors. Arkady Kashirin spoke and acted unmistakably as a member of the Soviet Committee on Government Security, or KGB. He would let you know with side glances and body language that he, Kashirin, was really in charge.
In a sense I outranked Ustinov, for I was understood to be the top American spy, a new commodity with my arrival at the UN. During the Cold War the Soviets had established a considerable covert beachhead at the UN Secretariat, and I had been unofficially appointed by Vice President Bush to monitor their activities. But I probably did not match Kashirin, who held real power over Ustinov as a KGB control. I was one against 274 of them at the time of my arrival, for, unfortunately, I was the only American spy. I knew that all too well, as did Kashirin. Still, I believe that he considered me to be some sort of worthy rival. We owed each other professional courtesy as spies and scoundrels. During the Soviet era, no stigma was attached to being a scoundrel in support of the right cause.
I had entered never-never land only a few days before, arriving from Washington in mid-September 1983. It was not that I was unaccustomed to circuslike environments, for I had already spent twenty-seven years in the U.S. government, including time with several executive departments, two White House staffs, and an international development bank--all organizations in which bizarre professional styles and equally bizarre codes of conduct were standard. I had also spent a considerable amount of time informally lobbying and appearing before the U.S. Congress.
But the United Nations Secretariat seemed to me at first glance to be a loosely supervised playground for alarmingly disturbed adults. Even the Soviet staff members were allowed to engage in whimsical bureaucratic escapades provided they did not run away or defect. I was still too narrow-minded and unprepared for so much lunacy.
Ustinov's question about my father's lineage was one that had never been put to me while serving in the United States government. I asked Ustinov to repeat the question.
"Your father, your father, he was Jew."
"My father was a Basque with a non-Basque last name. I don't believe he was a Jew."
"Yes, yes," Ustinov insisted. "Your father was Jew. I know. I have very good sources in this building. You have a big file here at UN now. Also, I have article--recent article--about you in newspaper Washington Times. It say your father was composer. I know!"
Several thoughts occurred to me during this seemingly demented confrontation. Are all composers Jews? Was the KGB moonlighting for the United Nations in Washington, stealing people's records for their UN personnel files? Why did my Soviet inquisitor give a damn who my father was? And more specifically, why was I--until a few days before an assistant secretary in good standing in the U.S. Department of the Interior--being subjected to this blatant anti-Semitic harassment? And why, indeed, was I being put in a position where I had to deny being Jewish in front of this idiot or anyone else?
But what I considered preposterous seemed to be a question of the utmost importance at the UN. Why was the United States sponsoring a Secretariat official who was also a Jew? Did it have any political significance? Was it a tangible and legitimate issue?
I quickly realized that haggling and lengthy arguments were the wrong strategy with the likes of Undersecretary-General Ustinov, who delivered an incoherent combination of smiles and intimidating expressions that did not appear to parallel his words.
"All right, my father was indeed a Jew, and proud of it, too!" I lied belligerently. Ustinov smiled very smugly, but gently, in what he thought was his moment of triumph.
But then he frowned.
"Yes, I thought," he said.
Soviet bureaucrats had to be right--always. I knew about that from numerous encounters with them in Geneva and other places during my Defense Department days. They would never agree with you. You had to make them think you agreed with them to get any point across.
Soon the mystery unraveled, however. The originator of another interrogation was not a Russian. He was a Peruvian.
Two days prior to my courtesy call on comrade Ustinov, I had visited the UN secretary-general, Javier Perez de Cuellar, whose policy planning director I had been asked to become by means of an "urgent" telegram-contract from the secretary-general himself.
Don Javier, a Peruvian diplomat, was not much of a conversationalist. His occasional flair for subtle Cheshire cat humor later indicated to me that he was not stupid. Yet during social occasions he used to focus nervously on obvious trivia. At receptions he would say things like "The food is still warm at the buffet" or "So many people here are Polish," at a social gathering at the Polish mission.
"Your name is Sanjuan," Don Javier said at one point during that first meeting, with a slight interrogatory inflection. I had spent the previous first awkward minutes in a belligerent exchange with him, sitting on a couch across from his desk in his six-window office facing the East River from the thirty-eighth story of the UN--a great view except that much of the river traffic there usually consists of garbage scows. He did not look directly at me but in a glancing way, indicating that he saw me only peripherally.
"Yes, Sanjuan is indeed my name! I got it from my father, Don Javier. But then you have known that for a while now!"
"Yes," he replied, now gazing out the windows. "But how did you get the name of a saint? It is not very common."
"Well," I replied, "probably some ancestor of mine, way back at the end of the fifteenth century in Spain, converting from Judaism to Christianity, changed his name to San Juan as a sign of his sincere conversion, or so my father used to conjecture."
The secretary-general--apparently quite disturbed at the possibility that I was of Jewish descent--must have commented about the untoward discovery to a few of his aides. So at least the indiscreet Emilio de Olivares, Javier's assistant, suggested to me, apparently in an effort to ingratiate himself. Nevertheless, Olivares himself probably passed the alarming word around, "The Americans have sent us a Jew in disguise." And I was to be the top and only American spy with White House credentials. This was bad news. The news soon reached Ustinov, who confronted me with the "hidden facts" of my case when I paid him the courtesy call a few days later.
These Ionesco-like scenes did not take place in seventeenth-century Warsaw, nor in Minsk in the previous century, nor in the Kiev ghetto during the reign of Nicholas I of Russia. This was taking place in New York City in late September 1983, inside an international enclave apparently totally removed from the reality surrounding it.
For me it was the beginning of an anti-Semitic journey of ten years' duration that never ceased to amaze me, particularly after I realized that anti-Semitism was an established part of the UN way of life. It was not just a political attitude involving Israel. Anti-Semitism was a cultural mind-set, colloidally suspended or emulsified, that defined the UN "culture."
Yet this was not the only paradox that disfigured an otherwise benevolent and humanitarian UN image. Other quaint forms of racism as well as the indulgence of incompetence and sloth, along with a pervasive ecosystem of corruption, all competed for the UN malpractice trophy.
* * *
I had arrived at the main doors of that famous glass tower on Manhattan's First Avenue without a pass. It was a warm September day. My arrival was awaited in the office of the secretary-general with suspicion and alarm. The American spy was not welcome. The secretary-general himself was a former Peruvian ambassador to Moscow whom I had first met when I was a member of U.S. delegations dealing with the doomed Law of the Sea Treaty and the laws of war.
A uniformed guard had met me at the United Nations visitors' entrance. Tourists in shorts and sandals, some in pin curls with noisy children running around eating lollipops, were being allowed free access to the building. But not I, even on my first day of official duty. There was never much meaningful security at the UN, particularly in those preterrorist days. But the reception accorded to me was special. I seemed to be the present danger. Although I was actually already on the staff of the secretary-general, the guard escorted me in much the way they used with prisoners going to maximum security in Alcatraz. Still another guard halted me after I left the elevator at the thirty-eighth floor.
"Wait!" he commanded.
"Have you forgotten something?" I asked him quite audibly.
"What?"
"The word 'please,' my friend," I said, again just as audibly.
I told him I had no intention of proceeding anywhere since I did not know my way ...
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Doubleday; First Edition (September 13, 2005)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 208 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0385513194
- ISBN-13 : 978-0385513197
- Item Weight : 1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.32 x 0.75 x 9.57 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#3,521,166 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,596 in Political Intelligence
- #6,693 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- #17,429 in Political Leader Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author worked in the UN and writes about all the seedy things that go on inside; drug traffic, illegal weapons sales, bribery, anti semitism, scandals, massive tax waste, jobs that are pointless, espionage ect.
It is very good. He doesn't talk much about the UN 'peace' troops who are notorious for rape and theft that much, but more about the UN building.
Overall very brief and yet thorough. It is also very funny:)
1) During the Cold War, the UN was infiltrated with Soviet agents who used its library as well as other UN sources to effectively spy on the US.
2) There is much corruption in the UN. For example, to solicit business, private enterprises pay UN officials under the table for lucrative contracts.
3) Various of the global programs performed by the UN such as the Oil for Food have had funds stolen by UN officials, their business associates, or corrupt government members of other countries and the programs frequently don't benefit their intended recipients.
4) Much anti-semitism exists in the UN and both Jews and Israel are heavily discriminated against.
5) According to the author, the UN also serves as a place where terrorist sympathizers congregate to denounce and plot against their intended victims.
Although I recognize that all nonfiction books are to some degree one-sided, I enjoyed this one and learned a good deal from it.
That is why I choose 5 stars.
Best regards,
Elena Varlamova

