Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
By Geoffrey Kabaservice Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, From Eisenhow (Reprint) [Paperback] Unknown Binding
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $8.48 | — |
- Kindle
$9.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your 3-Month Audible trial - Hardcover
$12.86 - $15.08Other new, used and collectible from $2.49 - Paperback
$9.99 - $21.95Other new and used from $2.48 - MP3 CD
$9.99Other new from $8.48
- PublisherOxford University Press
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest ratedin this set of products
It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald TrumpHardcover - Lowest Pricein this set of products
Insurgency: How Republicans Lost Their Party and Got Everything They Ever WantedJeremy W. PetersHardcover - Most purchasedin this set of products
How the South Won the Civil War: Oligarchy, Democracy, and the Continuing Fight for the Soul of AmericaHardcover
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I struggled a little with the first chapter, which covers a lot of ground, providing an overview of moderate and conservative factions within the Republican party from 1854 to the present. However, from the second chapter onward the book has a wonderful narrative flow. Although this is a scholarly work it reads as easily as a novel, and author Geoffrey Kabaservice has an elegant style that incorporates both wit and depth. Most of the book focuses upon the 1960s. When you think about the anti-establishment protests of the `60s, you usually think of liberal college-age students dropping acid and protesting the Vietnam War. This book made me realize that another revolt was taking place during those years, on the opposite side of the political spectrum. An arch-conservative minority within the Republican party was fomenting rebellion, determined to bring down the moderate, progressive Republicans who had been in power since the days of Eisenhower.
There always had been a conservative element within the Republican party, of course, but Kabaservice argues that the rebellious conservatives of the `60s -- militant right-wingers who had been strongly influenced by Joe McCarthy -- were a different breed. Republicans of the time period considered them "a totally new element" in the party and regarded their value system as a "weird parody" of traditional Republican beliefs. Their appearance had coincided with McCarthy's rise to power, and they became a more vocal and determined group in the late `50s and early `60s. Like Joe McCarthy, these new conservatives believed that the US was run by "a traitorous elite"of wealthy Eastern intellectuals. In their minds, moderate Republicans, also known as progressive or liberal Republicans, were part of this hated elite. Since its founding, the Republican party had included liberal Republicans as well as conservatives, but the New Right believed that any kind of liberalism "led inexorably to socialism and Communism, and that the smallest government effort to provide for the general welfare constituted the first step on `The Road to Serfdom'..." Unlike previous generations of conservative Republicans, who had respected intellect, kept their religious views private, sought to preserve the existing political system, and were not bound by any particular ideology, the New Right was anti-intellectual, ideologically-driven, and ultimately came to be dominated by the religious right. Most importantly, the new conservatives wanted to overthrow the existing system, getting rid of the moderate Republicans even at the risk of damaging the Republican party irreparably.
Kabaservice says that the New Right was so intent upon ridding the party of its moderate members that it pursued a "rule or ruin" strategy, supporting the opponents of moderate Republican politicians even if they were liberal Democrats. Their efforts to destroy moderate Republicanism were successful, in part due to weaknesses inherent in the moderate stance - by its nature, moderation is less passionate and less driven than extremism, and its adherents are less likely to adopt a "take-no-prisoners, ends-justify-the-means" approach to politics. Kabaservice writes that in recent years, "movement conservatism finally succeeded in silencing, co-opting, repelling, or expelling nearly every competing strain of Republicanism from the party, to the extent that the terms `liberal Republican' or `moderate Republican' have practically become oxymorons."
This book provides a lot of historical perspective. I'm so accustomed to thinking of the Republican party as a mostly white, non-racially inclusive political organization that I often forget that this is the party of Lincoln, founded out of opposition to slavery. This book reminded me that Republicans have a strong civil rights heritage. It was interesting to learn that the vast majority of mid-`60s Republicans were infuriated by Goldwater's segregationist views and regarded him as a demagogue and dangerous zealot. It also was interesting to learn that a greater percentage of Republicans than Democrats supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. In 1960, way before the civil rights movement had really caught fire, GOP nominee Richard Nixon's civil rights plank was as strong as the Democrats', supporting sit-ins and promising federal intervention in securing job equality for African-Americans. In fact, African-Americans didn't start defecting to the Democratic Party in droves until 1964 -- Eisenhower received 39% of the black vote in 1956. All of this seems strange to me because it's so different from the Republican party I know.
Also strange, as mentioned earlier, is the fact that Eisenhower would have been considered liberal in many respects by today's standards. He invested heavily in education and public works. He decried unnecessary military spending, which he considered out of keeping with fiscal conservatism and which he felt often came at the expense of human needs. Here's a great Eisenhower quote from 1953: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed." Can you imagine a Republican today saying that?
I could go on and on, but I'll stop now. Obviously, I'm enthusiastic about this book. It's an important historical work and the timing for its appearance could not be better. Five stars.
With a PHD from Yale, Kabaservice is not only astute in the field of political science and history, but also a master of prose. As evidenced from not only the existence of a vast notations section, but also the broad expanse of sources, Rule and Ruin is a shining example of exhaustive research. Unlike many political authors, Kabasevice even goes into oral histories and has conducted interviews with figures who would have ordinarily been long lost to history.
Curiously missing from Kabaservices book, however, are the mind-springs from where many radical Conservatives draw a lot of their ideology from; Ayn Rand's novels. Perhaps he didn't find it essential since, Rand's novels could merely reflect their ideologies in fiction form and aren't necessarily the source of them. That said, in my debates with many conservatives, ten minutes doesn't go by without them bringing up either Atlas Shrugged or The Fountainhead.
What I relish from the book are not only the quotes from Moderate Republican's like George Romney and Robert Kuchel about how dangerous Conservative are,
"A fanatical neo-fascist political cult of right-wingers in the GOP, driven by a strange mixture of corrosive hatred and sickening fear that is recklessly determined to control our party or destroy it!" - Republican Senator Thomas Kuchel 1966.
...but also the repeated citations as to how the Conservative movement emulates Communist tactics and ire to stoop their way to the stars.
"The young Conservatives were exactly like the Red Guards of the '30's. With the same anger and the same passion[62]. Clifton White (Conservative pioneer) saw in movement Conservatism the vehicle by which to take over the Republican party, using tactics he had learned from the Communists." R&R p. 50 (ref: Marvin Liebman, Coming Out Conservative, San Fransisco Chronicle, 1992 - page. 149)
also,
"[Conservative activist] Bozell protested that this was in effect red-baiting. Substituting Conservatism with Communism. But his own McCarthyist background limited the sympathy for this claim.[45]" R&R p. 82 (Mathias news release, April 29, 1964 CMMP IX-2 "Primary Campaign Press Release" 1964)
and,
"[Hugh Scott of the Young Republican's] pleaded with the YR's to stop alienating potential voters and to put aside The Syndicate's Leninist tactics and win at all cost mentality. He reminded them that "power comes from the public opinion and public backing and not from petty back-room intrigue and trickery. [15]" R&R p. 164 (Hugh Scott's address to Washington D.C. Young Republicans, April 25th 1966 CR May 10, 1966 - p. 9661- 9962.
This book has been added to my Best Reads Ever shelf. The antiseptic, matter-of-fact style in which it meters out bad news, clearly defines the psychosis of Conservatism movement to either rule the Republican Party or ruin it altogether with. I am now well equipped to devastate any radical Conservative in any debate. Thank you Geoffrey Kabaservice.




