Buy new:
$8.99$8.99
FREE delivery: Friday, Feb 10 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$7.88$7.88
FREE delivery: Monday, Feb 13 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Northbridge
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
& FREE Shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
+ $4.59 shipping
96% positive over last 12 months
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Ghostbusters
Learn more
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
- Free returns are available for the shipping address you chose. You can return the item for any reason in new and unused condition: no shipping charges
- Learn more about free returns.
- Go to your orders and start the return
- Select the return method
- Ship it!
Additional DVD options | Edition | Discs | Price | New from | Used from |
Watch Instantly with ![]() | Rent | Buy |
Enhance your purchase
Genre | Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi/Fantasy |
Format | Dubbed, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC |
Contributor | Chris Hemsworth, Columbia Pictures, Leslie Jones, Cecily Strong, Paul Feig, Charles Dance, Amy Pascal, Ed Begley, Melissa McCarthy, Neil Casey, Matt Walsh, Kate McKinnon, Kristen Wiig, Ivan Reitman, Michael Williams See more |
Language | English |
Runtime | 1 hour and 57 minutes |
From the manufacturer

Ghostbusters makes its long-awaited return, rebooted with a cast of hilarious new characters. Thirty years after the beloved original franchise took the world by storm, director Paul Feig brings his fresh take to the supernatural comedy, joined by some of the funniest actors working today – Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, and Chris Hemsworth. They’re here to save the world!
Product Description
Ghostbusters makes its long-awaited return with Director Paul Feig's unique and hilarious take on the classic, supernatural comedy, led by the freshest minds in comedy today, Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, and Chris Hemsworth. Together they team-up to save Manhattan from a sudden invasion of spirits, spooks and slime that engulfs the city. Robert Abele of TheWrap says, "This new A-team of ghostbusters are fresh and funny."
Product details
- Digital Copy Expiration Date : December 31, 2019
- Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
- MPAA rating : PG-13 (Parents Strongly Cautioned)
- Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 2.72 Ounces
- Audio Description: : English
- Item model number : D47049D
- Director : Paul Feig
- Media Format : Dubbed, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
- Run time : 1 hour and 57 minutes
- Release date : October 11, 2016
- Actors : Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones, Chris Hemsworth, Cecily Strong
- Dubbed: : Spanish
- Subtitles: : English, Spanish
- Producers : Amy Pascal, Ivan Reitman
- Studio : Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
- ASIN : B01I2FFJW8
- Country of Origin : USA
- Number of discs : 1
- Best Sellers Rank: #9,754 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #1,176 in Action & Adventure DVDs
- #1,272 in Comedy (Movies & TV)
- Customer Reviews:
Videos
Videos for this product
11:04
Click to play video
Ghostbusters
Merchant Video
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2016
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Like the first Ghostbusters this is not really a scary movie, nor even much of an action movie. Essentially it's a comedy, which is greatly enhanced by beautiful special effects, a great cast and nice special features on the Blu-Ray disc.
In the USA of 2016, which seems wracked by moods of anger anxiety and self-doubt, it's refreshing to have a pure comedy--a comedy which even captures some of the spirit that used to make the USA a great country: a belief that technology, a can-do attitude and teamwork can overcome any odds.
The cast are excellent. Melissa McCarthy, one of the funniest female comedians today with a brash and frequently foul mouth, is supplemented by Kristen Wiig, who tends to be much more self-deprecating, Kate McKinnon who is perfect as the brilliant, oddball hardware specialist and Leslie Jones who is truly funny, unlike her predecessor Ernie Hudson, who played a completely straight role. The hapless secretary this time is Chris Hemsworth who usually plays a male hero but proves to be a real hoot in this comic role. Rick Moranis's tool of evil is replaced by Neil Casey as "Rowan North". "Rowan" isn't quite as funny as Moranis, but does pretty well as a sweaty custodian with dreams of revenge against the world. When you watch some of the outtakes, you realize all the main actors are quite adept at ad libbing.
This is likely only scary to some kids under the age of 10-12. There's a lot of funny sexual innuendos, but they are also delivered obliquely enough that it's likely only older teens or adults are going to catch the allusions. There's also very little in the way of swearing, no blood and no nudity. Also, no dead bodies depicted. So PG-13 seems quite appropriate.
The ghosts and other "paranormal" effects are far more beautiful than they are scary. Yes, some of them are creepy-looking. Others are amusing (just like the hot-dog eating ghost in the original). Interesting story here: when they contemplated what kind of large-scale ghosts would work in New York City, what popped into mind was the huge Macy's Thanksgiving parade balloons. They went into archives looking at very early balloon figures, back into the 1930's, and those balloons were CREEPY! It turned out they were EXACTLY the concepts the team was looking for! So when you see the large balloon shapes, almost all of them are taken directly from real parade models! [Not the "Sta-Puft Marshmallow Man, of course]. Basically all they added was the fantastic lighting...
It's interesting that as computer graphics have gotten more and more real, directors are returning to anchoring as much of a movie as they can with REAL effects and using CG sparingly. Sometimes nothing else looks quite as real as a model or an actor in the right make-up. Where CG is used in this movie, a lot of attention was paid to ensuring the light reflecting on the real set matched what should be coming from the ghost...
The movie closely tracks the basic plot of the original Ghostbusters yet manages to do it without feeling like a re-tread. Some of that is because the dialog is all different, even if the general plot is similar. There's also the gender inversion in the re-make. The original had 4 guys as ghostbusters and one possessed woman [Akroyd, Murray, Ramis, Hudson, Weaver]. The remake has 4 women and a possessed guy [or two]. Basically, Wiig replicates Murray's cautious character, McCarthy replaces Akroyd's more impulsive adventurer, Jones replaces Hudson as a normal blue-collar worker who gets thrown into this mix, and McKinnon replaces Ramis's technical genius. Adding Hudson in the original always felt quite strained to me, but this film manages to add Jones in a much more credible way.
Hemsworth's "secretary" is TOO funny and has to be seen to be believed!
They managed to incorporate almost every one of the main actors from the original Ghostbusters into THIS film while still adding an all-new cast! Bill Murray has a small part as a skeptic ghost-debunker. Akroyd is a cabbie. Hudson is Jones's funeral parlour-owning uncle (and he's funnier than in the original). Sigourney Weaver makes a quick appearance as McKinnon's mentor. Old secretary Annie Potts is now a desk clerk. Although Harold Ramis passed away, his son is in this film. Ivan Reitman was a producer for the original and again for this one. Rick Moranis was offered a part, but declined, as he is now a single parent and doesn't take many roles. Some other interesting characters appear in the new film including Ozzie Osbourne (yes, really), Charles Dance [the elder Lannister from Game of Thrones, who positively drips patrician sarcasm], and Steve Higgins, undoubtedly the least-qualified character you ever saw as Dean of a college [and also the funniest].
Were the writers psychic? This movie came out last year. They have an aide to the Mayor who has a resemblance to Nikki Haley, governor of South Carolina who may soon be hanging around NYC as US representative to the UN. They mention a future date at which the President of the US is "a PLANT". 5 letters, like TRUMP. Hmm...
Do I have ANY complaints about the movie? Well, just a few. Their version of Sta-Puft Marshmallow Man, although higher-tech than the original, just doesn't look as good as the old one to me. A minor issue I think.
Oh and they've left VERY ample room for a sequel. In fact at the end of the film the name "Zuul" comes up!
If you think I spoiled everything, I didn't! The fun is in listening to this cast and in watching the visual feast. Also there's a heaping helping of more comedy in the "specials" on Blu-ray.
The cast are all excellent. Melissa McCarthy, definitely one of the funniest female comedians today with a brash and frequently foul mouth, is supplemented by Kristen Wiig who tends to be much more self-deprecating, Kate McKinnon who is perfect as the brilliant, oddball hardware specialist and Leslie Jones who is truly funny, unlike her predecessor Ernie Hudson who played a completely straight role. The hapless secretary this time is Chris Hemsworth who usually plays a male hero but proves to be a true hoot in this comic role. Rick Moranis's tool of evil is replaced by Neil Casey as "Rowan North". Rowan isn't quite as funny as Moranis, but does pretty well as a sweaty custodian with dreams of revenge against the world. When you watch some of the outtakes you realize that all the main actors are quite adept at ad libbing.
This is likely only scary to some kids under the age of 10-12. There's also a lot of funny sexual innuendos, but they are delivered obliquely enough that it's likely only the older teens or adults are going to catch the allusions. There's also very little in the way of swearing, no blood and no nudity. Also, no dead bodies depicted.
The ghosts and other "paranormal" effects are far more beautiful than they are scary. Yes, some of them are in fact creepy-looking. Others are amusing (just like the hot-dog eating ghost in the original). Interesting story here: when they contemplated what kind of large-scale ghosts would be in New York City, what popped into mind was the huge Macy's Thanksgiving parade balloons. They went into archives looking at very early balloon figures, all the way back into the 1930's, and those balloons were CREEPY! It turned out they were EXACTLY the concepts the team was looking for! So when you see the large balloon shapes, almost all of them are taken directly from real parade models! [Not the "Sta-Puft Marshmallow Man, of course]. Basically all they added was the fantastic lighting...
It's interesting that as computer graphics has gotten more and more real, directors are returning to anchoring as much of a movie as they can with REAL effects, and using CG sparingly. Sometimes nothing else looks quite as real as a model or an actor in the right make-up. Where CG is used in this movie, a lot of attention was paid to ensuring the light reflections on the real set matched what should be coming from the ghost...
The movie somewhat closely tracks the basic plot of the original Ghostbusters yet manages to do that without feeling like a re-tread. Some of that is because the dialog is all different, even if general plot is similar. There's also the gender inversion of the re-make. The original had 4 guys as ghostbusters and one possessed woman [Akroyd, Murray, Ramis, Hudson, Weaver]. The remake has 4 women and a possessed guy [or two]. Basically Wiig replicates Murray's somewhat cautious character, McCarthy replaces Akroyd's more impulsive adventurer, Jones replaces Hudson as a normal blue-collar worker who gets throw into the mix and McKinnon replaces Ramis's egghead. Adding Hudson in the original always felt quite strained to me, but this film manages to add Jones in a much more credible way.
Hemsworth's "secretary" is TOO funny and has to be seen to be believed!
They managed to incorporate almost every one of the main actors from the original Ghostbusters into THIS film, while still adding an all-new cast! Bill Murray has a small part as a skeptic ghost-debunker. Akroyd is a cabbie. Hudson is Jones's funeral parlour-owning uncle (and he's funnier than in the original). Sigourney Weaver makes a quick appearance as McKinnon's mentor. Old secretary Annie Potts is now a desk clerk. Although Harold Ramis passed away his son is in this film. Ivan Reitman was a producer for the original and again for this one. Rick Moranis was offered a part but declined, as he is now a single parent and doesn't take many roles. Some other interesting characters appear in the new film including Ozzie Osbourne (yes, really), Charles Dance [the elder Lannister from Game of Thrones] who positively drips patrician sarcasm, and Steve Higgins, undoubtedly the least-qualified character you ever saw as Dean of a college [and also the funniest].
Were the writers psychic? The movie came out last year. They have an aide to the Mayor who has a significant resemblance to Nikki Haley, governor of South Carolina who may soon be hanging around NYC as US representative to the UN. They mention a future date at which the President of the US is "a PLANT". 5 letters, like TRUMP. Hmm...
Do I have ANY complaints about the movie? Well, just a few. Their version of Sta-Puft Marshmallow Man, although higher-tech than the original, just doesn't look as good as the old one to me. Minor.
Oh and they've left VERY ample room for a sequel. In fact at the end of the film the name "Zuul" comes up!
If you think I spoiled everything, I didn't! The fun is in listening to this cast and in watching the visual feast.
this is a particular knife-edge of a reboot, given that Tradition has apparently decided to make life difficult for any film, however worthy, which should try to follow-up the first. Ghostbusters II, for instance, is one of the most underrated/unjustly maligned films ever made. not only does it seamlessly recapture the spirit of it's ancestor, it offers two significant improvements: a WAY scarier villain, and a surprisingly though-provoking script with profound things to say about how people love you (when they need you, that is), how easy it is to forget something once it ceases to stare you in the face, and how a backlog of emotional negativity can come back to (literally) haunt you. (to say nothing of The Statue Of Liberty giving her finest performance since Planet Of The Apes.) they say timing is everything, so you can mark my words: if it hadn't come out in the shadow of that queen-mother of overrated blockbusters, Tim Burton's version of Batman, Ghostbusters II would be officially recognized today as the greatest sequel since The Empire Strikes Back and until The Two Towers and The Return Of The King!!
circumstance set up a similar uphill battle for this film, in fact rendered it the most controversial film of the year. there were the inevitable objections to remakes in general, as well as a suggestion or two that it was basically an attempt to cash in on the recent death of Harold Ramis, but it's major Achilles' heel was something else again. the announcement that the new film would feature a female team, alas, brought out the male chauvinist (if not misogynist) in an awful lot of people. the notion was branded a gimmick at best and a piece of anti-man propaganda at worst. (just about every criticism i've heard boils down to "Ghostbusters with tits? Hell, no!") that the film underperformed is principally due to the stigma ignited by this you-know-what storm.
it's really a shame, not only because the film is a delightful hoot, but because the sexual politics issue proved quite misleading. one of the cool things about this film is that it's heroes just happen to be women, as opposed to Thelmas and Louises. don't get me wrong: i'm all for Women's Lib. truth to tell, i don't really like men very much, so i'm not so much feminist as female chauvinist. but the movie knows it's not the place for that debate, and so isn't trying to be. gender around here is a moot point, pure an' simple.
of course, any team is only as good as it's components. the new ensemble is happily as intricately cast as it's forebears. Kristin Wiig shines as our central "everywoman," giving in to her belief in ghosts only after her efforts to make it in a more orthodox world fall apart. Leslie Jones, despite a loud voice and broad performance style, is a charming, relatable audience representative as the new recruit. One Kate McKinnon, as the nerdiest nerd this side of ComiCon, maybe even Mesna, is the hands-on machinist. basically she's to the Ghostbusters was Q was to James Bond. and finally, Melissa McCarthy, easily the most famous of the four, brings determined energy to the team as their unofficial but unmistakable leader.
(it's hard to say just who was leader the first time around. most would probably say Peter Venkman, but the role he played that would make you think so was really more that of PR man. the way the original dynamic was designed, according to Dan Aykroyd and original director Ivan Reitman, "Egon is the brain, Ray is the heart, Peter is the mouth."
while we're on the subject, Aykroyd and Reitman are both credited producers here. if they're approval doesn't legitimize the film, what the heck would?)
for the diehards, the most fun will probably be the sprinkling of the original cast in cameo form. Rick Moranis opted to sit this one out, not seeing what he could possibly contribute to the passing of the torch (and being retired anyway), but Dan Aykroyd, Sigourney Weaver, Ernie Hudson, Annie Potts, a bronze bust of the late Harold Ramis, as well as his children and grandchild, and (as if they'd dare omit him) Slimer are all lurking in there somewhere. i won't spoil the easter-egg hunt in their cases, but i must give a shout-out to Bill Murray's brief but stirring portrayal of a crotchety rival scientist who disbelieves in the paranormal and so accuses the ladies of fraud.
this is most likely an inside joke. Murray has said a number of times that while he doesn't necessarily dislike Ghostbusters, he doesn't consider it his finest hour and so can get fed up with how it seems to be the most prevalent specimen of his legacy. this is (however reluctantly) understandable. a resume which can also boast of Stripes, Groundhog Day, and Ed Wood - not to mention the definitive edition of Saturday Night Live - is hardy that of a one-hit wonder. so much so, in fact, that like Moranis he initially balked. so they could well of decided to make him the new "Dickless" to enable him to vent a bit of that frustration.
if it has a weakness it's that it it doesn't built up to quite as intricate a plot on the part of the spirits. the original films unfolded like something by H.P. Lovecraft: a central evil spirit snares an unwitting dupe from among the living to help him unleash his army of darkness. this should be remembered if only for resulting in one of the few chinks in the original film's armor: much is made of one Ivo Shandor, the psychopath architect/surgeon ("performed a lot of unnecessary surgery") who founded the Gozer cult in the '20s. i'm not a hundred percent sure, but this could be the single most elaborate movie backstory ever for a character who never actually showed up.
(aficionados will tell you that Dr. Shandor was slated to play a more significant role in a early blueprint for the film, but that's another story.)
here, however, the ultimately unleashed undead aren't much more than thugs. the central villain is a nerdy outcast with years of accumulated angst for having been bullied, and the ghosts are basically here to vent that rage for him. doesn't quite have the grandeur of what Gozer and Prince Vigo had in mind, does it? but if nothing else it does redeem the film's weakest link, namely the receptionist played by Chris Hemsworth. as himself, the character is a one-note doofus who quickly wears out his welcome. as the film progresses, the aforementioned mad scientist permits himself to be killed so his spirit can possess various people, including Hemsworth. in this less benevolent form he gets a nice meaty part and shows he doesn't need Mjolnir the hammer to project charisma.
there's also room for debate as to whether it measures up in the horror department. while the comedy aspect bristles like a live wire, the original could be genuinely scary in a way that frankly eludes this one. personally, i attribute this to changing times. the first film, like the Star Wars and Superman franchises, was produced at the forefront of a renaissance in special effects, and so was able to present a literally unprecedented spectacle. today, alas, not only is that sort of epic spectacle rather commonplace, but CGI is making it harder and harder to make one's own distinctive. in others words, that much couldn't be helped.
but ya know what? filmmakers are only human, so every film, even Casablanca or The Godfather, has a few such nits to be picked. when a film is this spirited (pun intended) and eager to please, it can handle a blemish or two. i guess technically all remakes are love letters to their ancestors, but this actually FEELS like one.
Enjoyable for the whole family
Top reviews from other countries


Poor script.
Bad directing.
Many times, the story lacked a sense of urgency - despite the scenes obviously called for it.
The movie could have used A LOT more humour.
Also, the editor of this film seemed lost. A big dance scene, for instance, was edited out, but parts were included during the closing credits - which seemed out of place! Conversely, the location, in the show, where the dance should have occurred seemed missing something and, thereby, weird.
In addition, the makers of this film seemed to be trying to live past glories by dropping many references to the original "Ghostbusters" movie, in this version.
Overall, however, it was disappointing!

En el caso del audio ganamos sonido posicional (Atmos) en Inglés, el doblaje al Español Latino sigue siendo 5.1 tradicional, peor aún, mientras que el Blu-ray tradicional nacional incluye 2 versiones diferentes del doblaje (con modismos Mexicanos, y sin ellos), aquí solo se incluye uno.
Lo bueno es que el paquete también incluye los discos 3D y 2D HD, e inclusive una copia digital en 4K, desafortunadamente para eso último es necesario usar una cuenta de correo y un VPN con IP gringo, si no no funciona.




Reviewed in Mexico 🇲🇽 on September 20, 2020


