Add Prime to get Fast, Free delivery
Amazon prime logo
Buy new:
-18% $26.95
FREE delivery Friday, January 10 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Ships from: Amazon
Sold by: QuickyShipper
$26.95 with 18 percent savings
List Price: $32.99
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Friday, January 10 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or Prime members get FREE delivery Tuesday, January 7. Order within 8 hrs 5 mins.
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$26.95 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$26.95
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon
Amazon
Ships from
Amazon
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
$23.58
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
Unmarked text; normal shelf wear Unmarked text; normal shelf wear See less
FREE delivery Friday, January 10 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or Prime members get FREE delivery Wednesday, January 8. Order within 8 hrs 5 mins.
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$26.95 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$26.95
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the authors

See all
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Global Catastrophic Risks 1st Edition

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 68 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$26.95","priceAmount":26.95,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"26","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"95","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"nP6ErrO7D13duYRjKk0lf832a9I5Z8%2BRW8sIJPDoZGZQ0oIIWq6hLc1uHIYmeHaNInnZTZXib2m1A%2BsIjlyDxX8iqd7TIxO44bbvY%2BwlYnb%2FDZGBinrvpkRKhZS4HSATG9zgWwZp8L%2BHeREWS7I0fmPGk05lR5JX%2FCsDe0%2BcACKGvJahzmeEiw%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$23.58","priceAmount":23.58,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"23","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"58","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"nP6ErrO7D13duYRjKk0lf832a9I5Z8%2BRBOnIcZro9L4IcBWlJPE74wCx9rvlYEyGcbKgNi9kOFqFI%2FpNvHliNa2%2Fg7tMcTuCEdF%2BfWuu%2BjJh3m7MscOx01EnSNCx4bTU4FC2T5mOziLyR44FM%2F9kYfa7x4DnWKwl7Yhhd19UDVcKbscKJOBFIA%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

A global catastrophic risk is one with the potential to wreak death and destruction on a global scale. In human history, wars and plagues have done so on more than one occasion, and misguided ideologies and totalitarian regimes have darkened an entire era or a region. Advances in technology are adding dangers of a new kind. It could happen again.

In
Global Catastrophic Risks 25 leading experts look at the gravest risks facing humanity in the 21st century, including asteroid impacts, gamma-ray bursts, Earth-based natural catastrophes, nuclear war, terrorism, global warming, biological weapons, totalitarianism, advanced nanotechnology, general artificial intelligence, and social collapse. The book also addresses over-arching issues - policy responses and methods for predicting and managing catastrophes.

This is invaluable reading for anyone interested in the big issues of our time; for students focusing on science, society, technology, and public policy; and for academics, policy-makers, and professionals working in these acutely important fields.

Frequently bought together

This item: Global Catastrophic Risks
$26.95
Get it as soon as Friday, Jan 10
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Sold by 🚀QuickyShipper📚 and ships from Amazon Fulfillment.
+
$17.09
Get it as soon as Friday, Jan 10
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$25.60
Get it as soon as Friday, Jan 10
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price: $00
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
spCSRF_Treatment
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.

Editorial Reviews

Review

`Review from previous edition This volume is remarkably entertaining and readable...It's risk assessment meets science fiction.' Natural Hazards Observer`The book works well, providing a mine of peer-reviewed information on the great risks that threaten our own and future generations.' Nature`We should welcome this fascinating and provocative book.' Martin J Rees (from foreword)`[Provides] a mine of peer-reviewed information on the great risks that threaten our own and future generations.' Nature

Book Description

25 leading experts look at the gravest risks facing humanity in the 21st century

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Oxford University Press; 1st edition (August 1, 2011)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 576 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0199606501
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0199606504
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.88 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 1.3 x 6.1 x 9.2 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 68 ratings

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
68 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book thought-provoking and interesting. They describe it as an important work on an important subject. Opinions differ on the literacy level, with some finding it sensible and well-argued, while others consider it somewhat technical.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more
7 customers mention "Thought provoking"7 positive0 negative

Customers find the book thought-provoking and interesting. They describe it as an important work on a relevant subject. The essays are described as varied and eye-opening.

"...Overall, a valuable and eclectic selection of thought-provoking articles." Read more

"...etc. etc. But the overall impact of the book is tremendous...." Read more

"...remote possibilities, but nonetheless are still very pertinent for the continuity of humanity...." Read more

"...germane to the book's theme; all the same, they are well done and fascinating...." Read more

5 customers mention "Literacy"2 positive3 negative

Customers have different views on the book's literacy. Some find it sensible and well-argued, describing it as a general primer on nanotechnology. Others feel that scientific literacy is highly desirable and necessary for most chapters, with complex math, graphs, and scientific jargon. They consider the book too technical for average or semi-advanced readers, and too complicated to enjoy reading.

"...This book is probably the best general and somewhat technical primer to become acquainted with serious problems we are currently facing and that we..." Read more

"...These articles are somewhat technical, so it is a curious relief to arrive at "totalitarian government" which discusses in an easy to read way why..." Read more

"...and on risks from biotechnology and from nanotechnology are perfectly sensible and well-argued...." Read more

"A really good book. It's not light reading, though. Scientific literacy is highly desirable and maybe necessary for almost all chapters...." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2008
    21 chapters by different authors succeed in the declared goal of giving a big picture of the subject (GCR) as seen by academics in different disciplines. The content is appropriately non-technical -- like the serious end of the ``popular science" genre -- though the writing styles are more reminiscent of an academic paper or lecture than the style of best-selling popular science books. The opening 8 ``background" chapters (on very diverse topics from long-term astrophysics to public policy toward catastrophe) were the least satisfying to me, many (while interesting in themselves) seeming to be each author's favorite lecture recycled with a nod to GCR. Of these chapters, let me just single out Eliezer Yudkowsky's chapter on cognitive biases in an individual's risk assessments, as one of the best 20-page summaries of that topic I have read.

    Amongst the core chapters discussing particular risks, the three that are most ``hard science", on supervolcanos, asteroid or comet impact, and extra-solar-system risks are just great -- one learns for instance that (contrary to much science fiction) comets are more a risk than asteroids, and the major risk in the last category is not nearby supernovas but cosmic rays created by gamma ray bursts. These three chapters are perhaps the only contexts where it's reasonable to attempt to estimate actual probabilities of the catastrophes.

    The balanced article on global warming is unlikely to please extremists, concluding that mainstream science predicts a linear increase in temperature that may be unpleasant but not catastrophic, while the various speculative non-linear possibilities leading to catastrophe have plausibilities impossible to assess. The article on pandemics is surprisingly upbeat (``are influenza pandemics likely? Possibly, except for the preposterous mortality rate that has been proposed"), as is the article on exotic physics ("Might our vacuum be only metastable? If so, we can envisage a terminal catastrophe, when the field configuration of empty space changes, and with it the effective laws of physics ..."). The articles on nuclear war, on nuclear terrorism, and on risks from biotechnology and from nanotechnology are perfectly sensible and well-argued. These articles are somewhat technical, so it is a curious relief to arrive at "totalitarian government" which discusses in an easy to read way why 20th century totalitarian governments did not last forever, and circumstances under which a stable worldwide totalitarian government might emerge.

    The article on AIs emphasizes that we wrongly imagine intelligent machines as like humans -- "how likely is it that AI will cross the vast gap from amoeba to village idiot, and then stop at the level of human genius?" -- and that we should attempt to envisage something quite different. But the subsequent discussion of Friendly or Unfriendly AIs rests on the assumptions that AIs may be created which have intelligence and motivation ("optimization targets", in the author's effort to avoid anthropomorphizing) to do things on their own initiative, and that their motivations will be comprehensible to humans. Well, I find it hard enough to imagine what "motivation/optimization targets" mean to an amoeba or a village idiot, let alone an AI.

    The only article I found positively unsatisfactory was on social collapse. A catastrophe eliminating global food production for one year would likely cause "collapse of civilization" in fighting over the 2 months food supply in storage. But not elimination for just one month. A serious discussion of the sizes of different catastrophes needed to reach this tipping point would be fascinating, but the article merely assumes power law distributions for the size of an unspecified disaster -- this is the sort of thing that brings mathematical modeling into disrepute.

    Overall, a valuable and eclectic selection of thought-provoking articles.
    9 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on January 13, 2009
    GCR (Global Catastrophic Risks) is a real page-turner. I literally couldn't put it down. Sometimes I'd wake up in the middle of the night with the book open on my chest, and the lights on, and I'd begin reading again from where I'd dozed off hours earlier, and I'd keep reading till I just had to go to sleep.

    I had read a review of GCR in the scientific journal "Nature" in which the reviewer complained that the authors had given the global warming issue short shrift. I considered this a plus.

    If, like me, you get very annoyed by "typos," be forewarned. There are enough typos in GCR to start a collection. At first I was a bit annoyed by them, but some were quite amusing... almost as if they were done on purpose.

    Most of the typos were straight typing errors, or errors of fact. For example, on page 292 the author says that the 1918 flu pandemic killed "only 23%" of those infected. Only 23%? That seems a rather high percentage to be preceeded by the qualifier "only". Of course, although 50 million people died in the pandemic, this represented "only" 2% to 3% of those infected... not 23%. On p 295 we read "the rats and their s in ships" and it might take us a moment to determine that it should have read, "the rats and their fleas in ships."

    But many of the typos were either fun, or a bit more tricky to figure out: on p. 254 we find "canal so" which you can probably predict should have been "can also." Much trickier, on p. 255 we find, "A large meteoric impact was invoked (...) in order to explain their idium anomaly." Their idium anomaly?? Nah. Better would have been..."the iridium anomaly!" (That's one of my favorites.) Elsewhere, we find twice on the same page "an arrow" instead of "a narrow"... and so it goes..."mortality greater than $1 million." on p. 168 (why the $ sign?) etc. etc.

    But the overall impact of the book is tremendous. We learn all sorts of arcane and troubling data, e.g. form p.301 "A totally unforseen complication of the successful restoration of immunologic function by the treatment of AIDS with antiviral drugs has been the activation of dormant leprosy..." I can hear the phone call now...."Darling, I have some wonderful news, and some terrible news...hold on a second dearest, my nose just fell off..."

    So even if you're usually turned off by typos, don't let that stop you from buying this book. I expected more from the Oxford University Press, but I guess they've sacked the proofreader and they're using Spell-Check these days. But then, how did "their idium anomaly" get past Spell-Check? I guess Spell-Check at Oxford includes Latin.
    23 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • carlos sidnei coutinho
    5.0 out of 5 stars Imperial Superpower Myth: End of Pax Americana
    Reviewed in Brazil on August 23, 2019
    Atendeu minhas expectativas.
  • B
    5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent summary of global catastrophic risks
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 4, 2015
    This is a very interesting (if depressing) summary of the spectrum of different catastrophic risks facing humanity from the obscure and unlikely such as a vacuum phase transition to very real and well known risks such as nuclear terrorism and climate change. Each risk is discussed by a different author and some chapters are evidently better than others but as a whole, topics are addressed clearly and intelligently and are generally very accessible.

    As another reviewer has commented on, "obscure and unlikely" risks receive as much, if not more, attention than the more well known risks but the book makes it very clear from the onset that it is not supposed to be a manual for saving the world. Instead, it is simply trying to inform readers about global catastrophic risks as a wider issue (the book includes several chapters on sociological aspects such as cognitive biases) rather than specifically trying to help people prepare for them. I think it does this very well.
  • Oparazzo
    3.0 out of 5 stars Apokalypsen à la carte
    Reviewed in Germany on April 8, 2017
    Ein vielleicht etwas morbides Interesse an der Frage, ob und wenn ja, wann und wie unsere Zivilisation ein jähes Ende finden könnte, hat mich auf diese Aufsatzsammlung gebracht. Sie basiert auf einer Konferenz, die 2008 am Future of Humanity Institute in Oxford abgehalten wurde.

    Man merkt dem Buch an, dass dies eine Veranstaltung von Wissenschaftlern für Wissenschaftler war - die von mir sonst so gerne gelobte Fähigkeit und Bereitschaft anglophoner Autoren, sich für den interessierten Laien verständlich auszudrücken, ist hier sehr unterschiedlich ausgeprägt, und das ist angesichts der Vielfalt der vertretenen Fakultäten etwas schade. Naturwissenschaftliche Vorbildung sowie eine gewisse Bereitschaft, sich mit Zahlen auseinanderzusetzen, sind jedenfalls bei den meisten Themen von Nutzen.

    Auch wenn ein paar Randgebiete reingerutscht sind - milleniaristische Kulte haben mit echten Katastrophen wenig zu tun, und den Artikel über Für und Wider alleskönnender Nanofabrikchen fand ich etwas sehr verspielt-hypothetisch - haben andere dafür umso mehr Substanz, wie die über Asteroiden, Kometen oder Supervulkane. Sehr eindrucksvoll auch das Kapitel über künstliche Intelligenz und die Gedanken, die man sich tunlichst gemacht haben sollte, bevor diese sich dem Einfluss ihrer Macher entzieht. Beim Kapitel über den Klimawandel war ich mir nicht sicher, ob hier nicht zu viel hinterfragt, zu wenig gewarnt und damit den interessengesteuerten Leugnern zu viel Munition an die Hand gegeben wurde.

    Das könnte aber auch damit zusammenhängen, dass das Buch inzwischen fast zehn Jahre alt ist. Das merkt man nicht nur daran, das Osama bin Laden noch lebt und es den IS noch nicht gibt, sondern es wird auch eine so unmittelbar drohende Gefahr wie die multiresistenter Keime nur in einem Absatz gestreift. Dass ein Sonnensturm wie der von 1859, der unser Kommunikationsnetz weltweit und langfristig lahmlegen würde, nicht als Risiko eingeschätzt wird, hat mich ebenfalls sehr gewundert (2012 hätte es uns fast wieder erwischt). Und schließlich dürften auch die Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit einer nuklearen Katastrophe heute etwas anders eingeschätzt werden, angesichts der Tatsache, dass ein inkompetenter Narzisst und ein undurchsichtiger Diktator die Finger an den jeweiligen Roten Knöpfen haben.

    Das sind, zugegebenermaßen, alles nur persönliche, den Blick möglicherweise verstellende Sichtweisen - vor dem cognitive bias wird in dem Buch nicht nur einmal ausdrücklich gewarnt.
  • Ken Padmore
    4.0 out of 5 stars Global Catastrophic Risks
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on December 18, 2014
    Rather depressing! Tough going on the math but certainly provides food for thought. Not sure I agree on the Totalitarian sections.
  • X93250617
    1.0 out of 5 stars Sums up the arrogance of modern science
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 5, 2011
    I've been concerned about the future of life on planet Earth since I was in my teens some 25 years ago. Not much has changed since then as we have not made much progress, save the ability to chat inanely to those lucky enough to have access to modern technology. So what did I expect from this book? A lot more than it gave, that's for sure!

    As I was reading the child-like introduction by Martin J. Rees, who lashes out at those he sees as a threat in a similar way to a kid in the playground starts name calling when he's not getting his way, I knew it was going to be an uphill struggle. To quote one sentence: "And there are extreme eco-freaks who believe that the world would be better off if it were rid of humans." Convince me that we are beneficial to life on earth with well constructed arguments and I will try to see just how "better off" the world is with us lot subjugating nature to our own selfish ends. But it will take a lot to convince me!

    The book doesn't claim to cover every conceivable threat to human existence on the planet, but the threats that are included are not necessarily the most realistic. Whole chapters are devoted to what can only be termed as science-fiction: that we are part of some simulation and the "Director" of said simulation could tire of watching us and switch the simulation off. Huh? Another chapter is devoted to artificial intelligence that will somehow begin a life of it's own. Come on, people, there are more realistic threats that we should be concerned with, such as disease (a mere 17 pages compared to 35 on artificial intelligence), weaponry (only nuclear and biological weapons are covered), natural events that come as a result of over-population (this is the single biggest threat to human life on earth as no-one is addressing the issue and we expect the earth to support an infinite number of humans - truly absurd!).

    The chapter on cognitive bias was probably the most interesting chapter for me, which is about how difficult it is to be truly objective in trying to assess risks. This makes sense as it takes selfless introspection to truly transcend the bias of our human nature, i.e.: the instincts that drive us. The assumption that human beings are the most intelligent life-forms ever to inhabit the planet, that the planet would be worse-off if we were not here - these are emotionally-driven statements that come from the deepest instinct of all - that of survival. They are not intellectual arguments and have no place in a scientific body of work.

    One thing that does strike me is how little we know of the past. There is a lot of guesswork, a lot of assumptions, a lot of "probables". This is not factual nor is it scientific, so why do so-called scientists put it forward as "fact"?

    All-in-all, I was left quite numb after reading this book. Not because of any threats to the existence of "human" life on earth, but the arrogance that shines through from all these "intellectuals". As far as they are concerned, human beings are the only things that matter and everything else on the planet, in the universe, is there for the taking. It is this attitude towards life that will lead to our extinction and for the sake of the rest of life on this wonderful and unique planet, the sooner the better! Even if we became extinct next week, we would leave behind a terrible legacy, one that we should be ashamed of (assuming that any of us have a sense of humility, that is).