Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Global Warming False Alarm, 2nd edition: The Bad Science Behind the United Nations' Assertion that Man-made CO2 Causes Global Warming Paperback – October 13, 2012
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length224 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateOctober 13, 2012
- Dimensions6 x 0.51 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100984098917
- ISBN-13978-0984098910
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Canterbury Publishing (October 13, 2012)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0984098917
- ISBN-13 : 978-0984098910
- Item Weight : 10.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.51 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,891,714 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #9,456 in Environmental Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Ralph B. Alexander, a science writer who puts science above political correctness, is the author of "Science Under Attack: The Age of Unreason" (2018) and "Global Warming False Alarm" (2nd edition, 2012). With a PhD in physics from the University of Oxford, he has also authored numerous scientific research papers and reports on complex technical issues. Dr. Alexander has been a researcher at laboratories in Europe and Australia, a professor at Wayne State University in Detroit, the co-founder of an entrepreneurial materials company, and a market analyst in environmentally friendly materials for a small consulting firm. He grew up in Perth, Western Australia and currently lives in California with his wife, Claudia.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book easy to read and informative with lots of references. They also appreciate the author's writing style.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book easy to read, informative, and well structured. They also say it's believable and interesting to read.
"...Thank you Ralph B. Alexander for writing an easy to read, informative, instructive book for "deniers" like me to read and have factual ideas to..." Read more
"...R.Alexander has a balanced look at the evidence. The book is well structured...." Read more
"...the science of climate and climate change are straightforwardly explained in terms easily understood by the non scientist...." Read more
"...both sides of the issue and analyzing it in a calm, believable manner. Add a star for eschewing jargon and name calling." Read more
Customers find the book very informative, with excellent arguments and relevant evidence. They also say it's easy to read and veryrevealing.
"...you Ralph B. Alexander for writing an easy to read, informative, instructive book for "deniers" like me to read and have factual ideas to present to..." Read more
"...The book is well structured. His arguments are excellent, supported by relevant evidence and are written for the non-technical person...." Read more
"The information is presented in an unbiased manner. He demonstrates the fraud using their own words and data...." Read more
"Very informative with lots and lots of references. Everyone should read this before making claims based on popular literature!" Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author did a great job of EDUCATING me on the false "science" (if you can call it that) used by the global warming fanatics.
I enjoyed the science lessons and learning about how the sun affects climate (more complex than I thought) and it was very revealing to learn how LITTLE we "really" know about how climate is created and regulated in the first place.
I personally think that as the world (at least the Western world) has grown more secular and less religious, people have a void in their lives. All you need to do is join the Church of Global Warming Alarmists - what better new religion than to save the world - from ourselves. And there are, IMO, some really crafty people out there who have figured out how to make lots and lots of $$$ while they do it!
For cripes sake, you can "throw away" $12.50 on carbon credits at the airport because you feel "guilty" about the fuel used on the flight you are on. Come on!
I will remember forever the quote about computer models: "With 4 (adjustable) parameters, I can fit in an elephant. And, with 5, I can make him wiggle his trunk." Mathematicin John von Neumann. And the whole damn thing is based on....COMPUTER MODELS!!!!
Well, we have a 3 ring circus full of elphants - only not so entertaining when you realize the draconian laws about to be passed, the taxes to be levied and the changes governments would like to make to our lives (lower standard of living) for something that is a FAKE. All courtesy of the IPCC - who answers to no one really and persecutes and ridicules those who try to bring the "science" back on track.
And the "inconsistencies":
Silly stuff like the Primevial Warming Period, which was MUCH hotter than any temperatures we know now, but gee that doesn't really fit so - whosh - it's gone!
More inconvenient items like atmospheric temperatures, gathered by satellites and weather balloons that prove there is little or NO global warming - just leave 'em out!
Go ahead, locate many of your weather stations on airport property on or near black top, concete buildings and automotive traffic - then call it an "accurate temperature" which proves warming.
China and Russia took out many of their weather stations, so there's no data - but that's not a problem - MAKE IT UP! (Do you see elephants???)
CRAZY stuff - but "they" did these things and more and as a result many, many people are buying the global warming snake oil this group of liars is selling.
Thank you Ralph B. Alexander for writing an easy to read, informative, instructive book for "deniers" like me to read and have factual ideas to present to my friends who have run off and joined this new religion. Some of them listen, some of them have purchased and read this book - and some of them are really ANGRY that they were lied to by "experts" and to this amazing extent. They feel like fools - but they are not - after all, it's the "government" telling you this crap, and being awarded Nobel Prizes along the way.
Enough - BUY THIS BOOK - go on a religious crusade of your own, share the info with your friends and family - it's time to STOP THE INSANITY of Global Warming!!!
Alexander puts the possible contribution of anthropogenic-CO2 to current global warming in perspective with other critical elements of the whole system, such as the sun, water vapour, major ocean currents and volcanoes. He also puts the current warming event in context with what has happened on earth through millennia.
This book is recommended reading for anyone interested in the issue.
One of the major points of the book dealt with the bias of placement of temperature sensing stations located in "hot" spots. A recent NOAA announcement that 600 of these stations were shut down for this bias confirmed my belief that this is a must read book to become informed about what is really going on with global warming.
[Product purchased by me in April 2010]
IanForrest
Top reviews from other countries
Here is portrayed a debasement of scientific principles, compounded by the way in which funding and the freedom to publish or criticise have been colonised. Single-tracked obsessions have occurred elsewhere within science from time to time, but never has the philosophical basis of the discovery process been compromised in this way.
Scientific malfeasance is exposed at every level: distortion of raw data, cherry-picking of results, manipulation of statistics, use of fudge factors and biased presentation as well as exclusion of conflicting views by secrecy or suppression. Motives, whether professional, financial, political or merely superstitious, are explored in some detail.
Climate science, in the true sense, is hampered by such a distorted presentation of the hypothesis that CO2 is the sole driver of change to the exclusion of natural cycles and their possible causes. Despite which, alternative well-founded explanations for climate change do continue to be explored, all capable of accommodating the recent departure from monotonic global temperature rise that leaves adherents of the IPCC's flawed models floundering for excuses.
An extensive bibliography provides entry to detailed coverage of every aspect of the climate change controversy, including original papers by truly innovative researchers.
An appendix deals with how feedback can modify any driving factor, for example a doubling of CO2 levels. It provides a lucid illustration of how the arbitrary assignment of a convenient value to this component of a computer model can guarantee any desired prediction - at least until outcomes render it inconvenient.
For example, it covers the “pause” in global temperature in the noughties that gave rise to many learned papers, but was too early for the way that was tidied over by amending both the main surface temperature data sets and one of the satellite global temperature data sets to eliminate the pause. It also predates the IPCC assessment reports AR5 (2014) and AR6 (2021), although neither of these have much bearing on the points that he makes.
If the book has a weakness, it is perhaps too dismissive and too judgemental. Those who already have doubts about man-made climate change will appreciate it: but it would be unlikely to cause a believer to change his/her mind.
Against: Because he's refuting the IPCC he does not give a comprehensive explanation of what we know of how climate works. This is a refutation only; otherwise it might run into a thousand pages. It is 224 pages.
