Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Going Dark Paperback – October 1, 2013
- Print length162 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAmerica Star Books
- Publication dateOctober 1, 2013
- Dimensions5.51 x 0.37 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-101629074284
- ISBN-13978-1629074283
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : America Star Books (October 1, 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 162 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1629074284
- ISBN-13 : 978-1629074283
- Item Weight : 8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.51 x 0.37 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,949,595 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #7,269 in Scientist Biographies
- #11,761 in Environmental Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Guy R. McPherson is the world's leading authority on the topic of abrupt climate change leading to near-term human extinction. He has been featured in several documentary films, as well as an episode of National Geographic Explorer.
Professor McPherson was honored with the Jazz for Peace Honorary Ambassador Award in September 2019. A ceremony was held on 10 October 2020. The four previous honorees since Jazz for Peace was founded in 2002 include United States Congressional Representative Dennis Kucinich, United States consumer advocate Ralph Nader, America’s first Chinese mayor Jean Qian (Oakland, California), and American historian Howard Zinn. Jazz for Peace is an American professional jazz organization with the goal of promoting unity and peace across cultures through the performance of music. The group also seeks to increase arts and music education in schools.
McPherson is Professor Emeritus of conservation biology at the University of Arizona, where he taught and conducted research for twenty award-winning years. His scholarly work has produced more than a dozen books and hundreds of articles.
Born in 1960 in northern Idaho, McPherson grew up in a small logging town. Surrounded by the bounty and beauty of the natural world, he grew up hunting and fishing, and witnessed the final years of the age of economic expansion, along with the final log drive down the Clearwater River.
McPherson received a forestry degree at the University of Idaho, and paid his way through college as a wildland firefighter. He completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees at Texas Tech University and, following a brief postdoctoral experience at the University of Georgia and a Visiting Assistant Professor position at Texas A&M University, he began his tenure-track experience in Tucson. McPherson was promoted to Full Professor before he turned 40 years of age.
During his tenure in Tucson, McPherson also taught at the University of California in Berkeley, Grinnell College in Iowa, and Southern Utah University. He was the inaugural director of the David H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship Program, which is administered by the Society for Conservation Biology. His pioneering activities in the classroom and in the field led to opportunities to speak at many colleges and universities, and garnered numerous accolades.
The Professor left active service at the University in 2009. Only 49 years of age when he assumed Emeritus status, McPherson established a homestead in rural, southern New Mexico. After a move to Belize, and then another back to the country of his birth, he continues his prolific writing and public speaking from southern Vermont.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book entertaining and engaging. However, some readers feel the writing quality is poor and unreadable. Opinions are mixed on the pacing, with some finding it life-changing and touching on all the critical issues of our time, while others say it's more of a memoir or political rant.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well worth reading, entertaining, and engaging. They say the author is terrific and has compelling evidence to show.
"...He was sober, engaging, and had compelling evidence to show...." Read more
"...For that alone, I'd say the book is worth reading." Read more
"This is absolutely the worst book I've read in 20 years...." Read more
"...That says it all!Will look into more books by the author, great read." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the pacing of the book. Some mention it's a life-changing read that touches on all the critical issues of our time. Others say it's more of a memoir or political rant than helpful. They also find the book loaded with unsupported cliches and too much personal information.
"...that's only because he delivers direct unfiltered truth and backs it up with studies...." Read more
"...The book is more of a memoir or political rant than something that is all that helpful with my goal of learning more about the facts of the problem..." Read more
"...He was sober, engaging, and had compelling evidence to show...." Read more
"...This is a very sobering concept and it does have scientific authenticity...." Read more
Customers find the writing quality of the book poor, unreadable, and screams out for an editor.
"...This is not that book. This book reads like a lamentation, like the meditations of a man who has realized that he is facing the extinction of himself..." Read more
"...or further investigation and McPherson is also prone to poor quality grade school prose, making sweeping statements and generalizations with no..." Read more
"...That being said, the words here are genuine, earnest, and I couldn't help but develop a deep affection for their author...." Read more
"...The writing style is random, stream-of-consciousness--and always, always entirely self-referential--as you learn immediately with his Introduction,..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book is more of a memoir or political rant than something that is all that helpful with my goal of learning more about the facts of the problem facing us. I should have guessed this when the preface of the book was mostly about the author's deceased dog and how much he misses him.
If you're into this sort of writing, I'm sure you'll like the book. I don't care for this sort of thing, and I feel like the description and marketing of the book is a bit misleading, so I'm giving it one star. I say this in spite of the fact that I share the author's views.
For example, I think it might be better to have the author's picture on the cover, so as to convey this is about his personal thoughts. The description might be better to focus on how you'll hear of the author's political convictions and personal experiences rather than learn much about the details of our climate and future. Imagine if the left had a Glen Beck or a Rush Limbaugh, and you might get a better feel for the tone of the book, without the cruel sexist and otherwise over the top remarks.
I should have expected things to be a bit off from the Hebrew script on the cover and the obvious references to Armageddon , but since it was so inexpensive, I decided to give it a shot.
Again, I imagine a lot of people would like the book. It's just not my thing or what I thought it was.
Top reviews from other countries
Starting with the Introduction to the book, it contains among other things, an over-long mourning for the loss of a favoured pet - the metaphor to the main subject (if there was one) was quite lost on me.
The body of the book gets into its swing, with a plethora of largely unsubstantiated forecasts, most of which seem to be an attempt to justify Mr McPherson's decision to drop out of the system. If he wants to be a recluse somewhere away form the mainstream, then he should go ahead, but don't seek the readers' approval of the decision.
Currently, I am reading Chapter 5 (page 56/159) and am fighting the urge to give up and donate the book to a charitable organisation. Maybe that way, someone else will get something out of it. I'll likely struggle on to the end, but I doubt I will go through sufficient change of heart to be recommending this book to anyone I know.
Finally, the book is poorly written with a style well below that one might expect from a former "tenured professor at a major university". Sorry Mr McP., but I won't be looking for clarity by reading another of your books.

