Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery

FREE Returns

FREE delivery Tuesday, November 28

Or fastest delivery Friday, November 24. Order within 1 hr 36 mins

Select delivery location

In Stock

$$37.00 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details

Ships from

Amazon.com

Ships from

Amazon.com

Sold by

Amazon.com

Sold by

Amazon.com

Returns

Returnable until Jan 31, 2024

Returns

Returnable until Jan 31, 2024

For the 2023 holiday season, eligible items purchased between November 1 and December 31, 2023 can be returned until January 31, 2024

Read full return policy

Payment

Secure transaction

Payment

Secure transaction

We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more

Details

Add a gift receipt for easy returns

Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime

FREE delivery Wednesday, November 29 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35

Select delivery location

Used: Good | Details

Sold by M&M Bookery

Fulfilled by Amazon

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

Other Sellers on Amazon

Added

Not added

$29.98
+ $3.99 shipping

Sold by: txtseasy / Tom The Book Guy

Follow the author

Thomas Ferguson

Follow

Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems (American Politics and Political Economy Series) 1st Edition

by Thomas Ferguson (Author)

4.4 22 ratings

Part of: American Politics and Political Economy (8 books)

See all formats and editions

Price

New from

Used from

Kindle

"Please retry"

$34.80

—

Paperback

"Please retry"

$37.00

$29.98

$20.24

Kindle
$34.80 Read with our free app
Paperback
$29.77 - $37.00

9 Used from $20.24 10 New from $29.98

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$37.00","priceAmount":37.00,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"37","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"00","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"OPDoaao0YzUEDBMkhMkDIuulrCbpOf5oYrFMLWvAeS68alvpE1Low9v8W4dFE89t18gepynj812XfxlzkrgHyGXl628MbkwwoZZR8T3cPAS%2BFai6fdn0BksjKKzu8A30G3zDItMUS8w%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$29.77","priceAmount":29.77,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"29","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"77","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"OPDoaao0YzUEDBMkhMkDIuulrCbpOf5oqbCZWAXFX2UH%2Bs7ckbqT1QJMReOSepKDn2QSpyk0%2BdL3HgFs6YTMZqvjQfyMgUw8bG5hhQlDRhmIcvJbtrxIBidpEQNEebUhBRXd2L9avETt50wI0h5TnGRCH703AXktVJ4QdmFKQSkQL0qITMVqmg%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

"To discover who rules, follow the gold." This is the argument of Golden Rule, a provocative, pungent history of modern American politics. Although the role big money plays in defining political outcomes has long been obvious to ordinary Americans, most pundits and scholars have virtually dismissed this assumption. Even in light of skyrocketing campaign costs, the belief that major financial interests primarily determine who parties nominate and where they stand on the issues—that, in effect, Democrats and Republicans are merely the left and right wings of the "Property Party"—has been ignored by most political scientists. Offering evidence ranging from the nineteenth century to the 1994 mid-term elections, Golden Rule shows that voters are "right on the money."

Thomas Ferguson breaks completely with traditional voter centered accounts of party politics. In its place he outlines an "investment approach," in which powerful investors, not unorganized voters, dominate campaigns and elections. Because businesses "invest" in political parties and their candidates, changes in industrial structures—between large firms and sectors—can alter the agenda of party politics and the shape of public policy.

Golden Rule presents revised versions of widely read essays in which Ferguson advanced and tested his theory, including his seminal study of the role played by capital intensive multinationals and international financiers in the New Deal. The chapter "Studies in Money Driven Politics" brings this aspect of American politics into better focus, along with other studies of Federal Reserve policy making and campaign finance in the 1936 election. Ferguson analyzes how a changing world economy and other social developments broke up the New Deal system in our own time, through careful studies of the 1988 and 1992 elections. The essay on 1992 contains an extended analysis of the emergence of the Clinton coalition and Ross Perot's dramatic independent insurgency. A postscript on the 1994 elections demonstrates the controlling impact of money on several key campaigns.

This controversial work by a theorist of money and politics in the U.S. relates to issues in campaign finance reform, PACs, policymaking, public financing, and how today's elections work.

ISBN-10

0226243176
ISBN-13

978-0226243177
Edition

1st
Publisher

University of Chicago Press
Publication date

June 15, 1995
Part of series

American Politics and Political Economy
Language

English
Dimensions

9.17 x 6.25 x 1.25 inches
Print length

440 pages
See all details

Frequently bought together

Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems (American Politics an

$37.00

Get it as soon as Tuesday, Nov 28

In Stock

Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.

+

Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics

$22.00

Get it as soon as Wednesday, Nov 29

In Stock

Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.

Total price:

To see our price, add these items to your cart.

Try again!

Details

Added to Cart

Choose items to buy together.

Thomas Ferguson
10
Paperback
29 offers from $8.93
Edward S. Herman
2,505
Paperback
93 offers from $9.41
Helen Thompson
253
Hardcover
1 offer from $25.50
Richard Bourke
Hardcover
17 offers from $25.95
Michael Hudson
24
Paperback
21 offers from $30.47
Neil Postman
3,389
Paperback
109 offers from $3.51

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ University of Chicago Press; 1st edition (June 15, 1995)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 440 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0226243176
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0226243177
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.44 pounds
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 9.17 x 6.25 x 1.25 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #273,775 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #216 in Elections
- #333 in United States National Government
- #1,158 in Political Science (Books)

Customer Reviews:
4.4 22 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload your video

Important information

To report an issue with this product, click here.

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Thomas Ferguson

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5

22 global ratings

2 star

0%

1 star

7%

How customer reviews and ratings work

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Payton H.

Golden Rule (8/5)

Reviewed in the United States on August 5, 2016

Verified Purchase

Golden Rule was a very interesting read. If you are really interested in how policy is influenced by big money this is your book. It shows, since this countries inception , the shifting alliances within the business sector (s). It shows how globalization has amplified the complexities of the alliances between domestic and international partnerships. The sobering side is how the common man is left out of the major influencing of policy due to.....money!! Good read.........but could be depressing or motivating in regards to the maintenance of our democracy!!!!

6 people found this helpful

Helpful

ATLCustomer

Five Stars

Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2017

I'm fully satisfied.

Democracy, Capitalism & the State

Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2010

The central foundational principle of the capitalist nation-state is that it is a reflection of its economic constituencies. Those who own and control the means of production shape the state in the form that they desire. This truism - that money runs politics - is the central argument of Thomas Ferguson's "Golden Rule." He begins by asking what are political parties? They are organizations composed of blocs of major investors who come together to advance favored candidates in order to control the state. They do this through direct cash contributions and by providing organizational support through the making available of sources of contacts, fundraisers and institutional legitimation. Candidates are invested in like stocks. For them electoral success is dependent on establishing the broadest base of elite support. Candidates whom have best *internalized* investor values see their "portfolios" grow exponentially at the expense of candidates who have not internalized these values. So what you have is a filtering system in which only the most indoctrinated and business friendly of the intellectual class advance to state power. The higher you go up the ladder the more you've appealed to elite interests. Representatives of the major investors are also often chosen to fill political appointments after a favored candidate has achieved office. This political-economic model helps explain why the state largely functions to serve elite business interests on the domestic and international stages.

Of course, corporate interests vary and evolve. Capital-intensive corporations tend to invest in Democratic politicians. Labor-intensive corporations tend to invest in Republicans. That's because capital-intensive corporations can afford to sit in a party which also represent organized labor. The AFL-CIO rarely poses a threat to Wall Street; and vice-versa. So what would we expect from a system like this? One thing we would expect is that on issues which the public cares about but on which there is cross-party investor agreement no party competition will take place. That means that the issues the public is most interested in will not appear on the agenda. The polls have been pretty consistent on this point. Major public interest revolves around issues having to do with trade agreements, in favor of a single-payer health care system, increased spending for education, slashing the Pentagon budget and many other issues. At times the population has been able to organize successfully and force popular issues onto the agenda despite business opposition.

Ferguson details how the growth, development and fall of major industries correspond to the growth, development, and fall of their political parties. He examines the rise and fall of five major investment bloc party systems - the Federalist vs. Jeffersonian, the Jacksonian, the Civil War party system, the system of 1896 and the New Deal. The latter is dealt with in much detail, while the final chapters also study the elections of 1988 and 1992. The book, while highly informative, is not without its flaws. Ferguson's prose is obtuse and very, very dry. The charts are helpful but the ideas could have been presented in a more compact form. Regardless of these reservations, this book is very important for an understanding of how our political system functions and deserves a large audience, discussion and action.

Also recommended: Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics

52 people found this helpful

Helpful

J Gwinn

Stands mainstream political science on its head.

Reviewed in the United States on June 11, 2009

Thomas Ferguson argues the US two party system functions as a mediator between conflicting business interests. Through case studies (primarily the New Deal era) Ferguson persuasively backs his argument.

During the New Deal era, Ferguson contends the Democratic party was controlled by capital intensive "free trade" multinational businesses vs the Republican party which was dominated partly by labor intensive "protectionist" industry.

Who were the multinational interests? (siding with Democrats) Major oil companies/ Rockefeller dominated banking e.g.,standard oil,chase manhatten. General Electric was also a major player.

Who were the labor intensive/protectionist interests? (Siding with Republicans)Textiles,Steel,Domestic oil producers and rubber manufacturers. Capital intensive Chemical industries led by Dupont lobbied for protection due to competition from Germany....Also JP Morgan due to interlocks with certian holding companies which partly separated Morgan Interests from Rockefeller financial interests.

A fascinating study! The capital intensive industries favored labor mediation/social welfare while the labor intensive industries lobbied against. Ferguson follows the paper trail which shows GE interests strongly influencing the creation of the national labor relations board while the Social security act was the brainchild of Rockeller interests. From ferguson's point of view, business reacted to class conflict by creating top down business oriented reforms in reaction to labor unrest.

Much more to Ferguson's research. I highly recommend this book. Don't let the copywrite fool you...Ferguson's work is a timeless classic and will be used as source for years to come.

40 people found this helpful

Helpful

M. Swanson

This is one of the most important political science books ...

Reviewed in the United States on November 27, 2016

This is one of the most important political science books written about the American political system ever. And it's a key to understanding how politics works today and why critical political realignments happened in the past.

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

Justin Lawson

it must be good, no

Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2016

If Noam Chomsky mentions it to support his lecture(s), it must be good, no?

10 people found this helpful

Helpful