Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Good Calories, Bad Calories: Fats, Carbs, and the Controversial Science of Diet and Health Paperback – September 23, 2008
|New from||Used from|
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
About the Author
- Item Weight : 1.75 pounds
- Paperback : 640 pages
- ISBN-13 : 978-1400033461
- Dimensions : 6.1 x 1 x 9.2 inches
- ISBN-10 : 1400033462
- Publisher : Anchor; Reprint edition (September 23, 2008)
- Language: : English
- Best Sellers Rank: #24,910 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I completely believed the calories in/calories out model of dieting: that is, if you consume more calories than you expend, you will put on weight, and that you lose weight by expending more calories than you consume. That model was simple and made a lot of sense. But, Taubes convincingly argues, that is too simplistic and misleading.
If you just cut your calorific intake, your metabolism slows down; if you exercise more, you get hungrier. Hence the problem with traditional dieting & exercise advice. (I know a lot of people who seem to think that they simply cannot lose weight. Alas, they've been given the wrong advice.) Calories in/calories out is still true, but we need to dig deeper to understand how the body regulates fat storage in order to discover how to lose weight.
What matters isn't so much the quantity of calories consumed, but their quality. Rice, potatoes, flour (including cakes, bread, pasta, etc.), sugar, and other refined, easily digestible carbohydrates are converted to simple sugars in our digestive systems. In turn, this sugar enters our blood streams and raises our blood sugar levels. Since high blood sugar is dangerous and fatal if not addressed, our bodies respond by producing insulin which causes that blood sugar to be converted into fat and stored in our fat cells. This is all basic high-school biology, and completely uncontroversial. When our blood sugar levels drop, another dangerous condition, insulin production drops and our stored fat is converted back into sugar.
Taubes, however, builds upon these basic facts and cites study after study that implicate the recommended "healthy" low-fat, high-carb diets as a primary cause of obesity, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, certain cancers and a whole range of other health problems. He explains the mechanisms that lead to these diseases, and punches holes in the accepted wisdom behind recommended "healthy" dietary guidelines.
I was on a long, domestic flight when I read an in-flight magazine article by Taubes about this book back in early 2008. I was very skeptical, because what he had written flew in the face of what I had come to believe about health and diet, but I was intrigued because of the claims he made about the links between diet and hypertension. I had recently been diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure) and my doctor had put me on a course of medication to bring it under control. He had also told me to cut out as much sodium from my diet as possible. When I asked my doctor what I needed to do to come off the medication completely, he told me there was nothing I could do and that I probably needed it for the rest of my life. I was in my early 40's and didn't like the sound of that at all! So I bought a copy of this book and read it from cover to cover.
It was a revelation!
He cited studies that indicated hypertension was caused by eating a diet rich in easily digestible carbohydrates. The resulting raised insulin levels had other effects on the body, one of which was to cause the kidneys to reabsorb more water back into the blood stream. In other words, insulin acted as an anti-diuretic. The resulting excess water increased blood pressure. (One of the drugs in my blood pressure medication was a diuretic, so it clearly worked by reducing the amount of water in my body.) At the same time, Taubes pointed out that blood sodium levels, which conventional wisdom claimed was the cause of that excess water (again, without a great deal of evidence to support it), was quite easily regulated by the kidneys and passed out of the body in urine.
This made a lot of sense to me, and so I started a diet that the book indicated would be healthier: one without starchy foods, but with fish, meat, dairy products and green vegetables. Within days, I started getting muscle cramps and dizzy spells, and saw my doctor about the problem. It seemed that the combination of the diet and my hypertension medication was giving me low blood pressure and dehydration symptoms. He halved my medication dosage, instructed me to buy a blood pressure monitor, and to come off the medication altogether if my symptoms continued - but to check my blood pressure regularly. In the end, I stopped taking the medication, and my blood pressure has been routinely around 118/75 or lower ever since. So much for having to take the medication for the rest of my life. I also enjoy having salt on my food, and have not reduced my sodium intake.
But other effects were happening to me while I was on this diet. I started losing weight (I was, I'll admit, slightly obese when I started), yet I never felt hungry, and could seemingly eat as much as I liked, without ever feeling bloated or full. This was supposedly one of the primary benefits of the diet and one of the main points of the book, but I was still surprised with the results. I'm now normal weight for my height, and I always feel nimble and energetic compared to how I used to feel before reading this book.
Taubes' research also predicted that such a diet would do the following to my blood lipids: it would lower triglyceride levels, raise HDL ("good" cholesterol) levels and possibly raise LDL ("bad" cholesterol). Over the course of a year, the blood work performed by my doctor backed this up: I significantly lowered my triglyceride levels, significantly raised my HDL levels - both unequivocally good things - while slightly increasing my LDL levels. Taubes' analyses had indicated that HDL levels had a strong inverse correlation with coronary heart disease incidence (that is, the higher the HDL levels, the lower the risk of coronary heart disease), while LDL had a weak, positive correlation, so I wasn't too concerned about the increase in LDL.
So, it worked for me.
However, this is not a book primarily about diet. It might be more accurate to say that it's a book about the science of diet, nutrition and health, and Taubes is happy to acknowledge that we still need to do a lot more research on the subject, but without any preconceptions. Indeed, throughout the book, Taubes points out the lies, errors, misinterpretations and failed critical thinking that led to the current dietary recommendations of a predominantly low-fat, high-carb diet. If those recommendations are right, he asks, why are we seeing such an explosion in obesity, hypertension and type 2 diabetes diagnoses?
He certainly doesn't claim to have all the answers, but he does put a lot of pseudo-scientific diet & health claims to the sword - and he explains why. He convincingly argues that Ancel Keys' "lipid hypothesis" (that diets which are high in fat - and high in saturated fat in particular - cause coronary heart disease) not only has no evidence to support it, but is contradicted by the evidence that is available. Taubes also demonstrates that in all likelihood saturated fat, far from being unhealthy, is actually an essential component of our diets.
I highly recommend this book!
Doing some Google "research" I came across this book. I was intrigued because it appeared to be an honest book and not promoting "this" or "that." A book about the science and history of our nutrition. So I gave it a chance.
Wow. BLOWN AWAY! My jaw was dropped most of the book. I found myself rereading aloud passage after passage in a furious breath to my husband. I was shocked at how we as citizens have been lied to when it comes to our dietary needs by those we have trusted.
I wish I could get everyone I know and love to read this book. I want to share all my newfound knowledge with anyone that will listen. It's such a hard topic to discuss with people though. Unless you read this book what I would be saying would sound crazy. People won't believe what I say. They have to read it themselves.
There are many parts I skimmed because it was over my head. It's a book that I will revisit often. Life changing. Now I feel very sad that I know the truth and I see the constant lies bombarding us everywhere. I feel helpless when I see my fellow man making what they think are "healthy choices" for themselves and their families and I know the truth.
I just hope more doctors, scientist, journalist, people in power positions become brave enough to go against the grain of the mainstream and enlighten the rest of the people that will never read this book.
I will not come out and say everyone should go this route; everyone is different and it may not be right for you. I am going to proceed with it, eliminating sugars and lowering carbs in general and seeing what happens. I have known a number of people who HAVE lost weight on a low carb approach and kept it off. I WILL say the logic is sound - humans were hunter-gatherers for hundreds of thousands of years and we evolved living on mostly proteins and fats. There were few carbs to be found except in fruits and other plant foods. So it seems reasonable that the body evolved to thrive on such a diet. Only recently in our history was agriculture invented and the concomitant arrival of breads, sugars, etc. Would our bodies change in so short a time to adapt to candy bars and white bread as our prime fuels? Unlikely.
My suggestion is read this book with an open mind and be prepared to be surprised at how little science and how much ego and self-dealing goes into what we are told by experts. Conventional wisdom may indeed be conventional, but it isn't necessarily wisdom.