It’s hard to know just what to make of Ken Russell’s “Gothic”. It’s certainly not good by any rational measure. It fails utterly as history, narrative, comedy, tragedy or horror. Yet, it’s….as we Minnesotans would say, “Well, that’s sure different.” And that it is.
I initially wondered why Gabriel Byrne was affecting a limp until it hit me. “Oh, the club foot thing!” That’s about as much Byron-esque characterization as we get. It’s not that it’s bad acting. It’s just completely stylized and referential. Every speech of Byrnes is either something is Byron is supposed to have said or wrote, or something he might’ve written if he’d been working on a screenplay. It’s kind of a pantomime Byron; not even close to realism, but trying poetically get that whole “mad, bad, dangerous” thing going. Not very successfully.
Natasha Richardson seems to be working on a whole different movie set. Her scenes, when she isn’t shrieking, stuffing her knuckles in her mouth or running through hallways, are a lot closer to what we’d call conventionally “acting”. Talent will out, apparently. Aside from having to spout some of the more ridiculous lines in all of Ken Russell-dom, which is saying something, she’s better than the rest.
Better than Julian Sands, who is deeply and truly terrible. He was beautiful back then; his Shelley’s angelic looks are contrasted with his shameless mugging into the camera. Between the eye-bugging and showing us every tooth he’s got, he finds time to flail about randomly, wander the rooftops naked and generally carry on like a cocaine fiend on a bender. Overacting is not an adequate term. This one goes to eleven! I assume Russell extracted this performance from Sands to express the sheer emotional intensity of the superheated menage taking place on the shores of Lake Geneva. I’d like to think Sands, given his druthers, might have dialed it down a few notches.
About Myriam Cyr, I know nothing, except that anyone who can run down the stairs backwards two steps at time, and then roll around naked in the mud while chewing a prosthetic rat? She’s OK in my book. Plus, mammarical eyes. How can you not like those? Double plus, she can open her actual eyes wider than anyone since the beloved Marty Feldman. We’re talking white all around, here. Acting-wise, she’s about on a par with whatever Sands was doing. That is, making every line hyper. She’s also the token nudity which we expect in any Ken Russell movie. That guy playing Polidori does wander about with no pants a good bit of the picture, so there’s that.
And he is selling it like a true drama queen, hitting every word so flamboyantly that even in 1987, it must have come across as an offensive stereotype. As a portrayal of a gay man, it’s up there with Mickey Rooney playing Chinese. So over-the-top as to be risible rather than believable.
So, the players are, at best, an oddly mixed bag. How’s the movie? Another oddly mixed bag. Technically, it’s very good. The lush interior of the villa is wonderfully illuminated. Way too illuminated for a costume drama, to be sure; this sure isn’t “Barry Lyndon” filming by real candlelight. Total artifice in every lovingly set-dressed frame of "Gothic". And they are lovely frames. Everything is more real than reality could ever measure up to. I liked that. For a Ken Russell movie, the editing is exceptional, the sound is very good and the image of this Amazon stream much above average. It’s all totally competent, and better than a great deal of currently passes for cinema. The soundtrack (by new wave fave Thomas Dolby!) is undistinguished but unobjectionable. Routine, I’d call it.
But the screenplay, that’s where the donkey falls. This long unfocused ramble through the drug-addled psyches of a bunch of deeply unlikeable literary nerds, it just drones on and on. Everybody is hallucinating a mile-a-minute and not quietly. They all run through the hallways, slam doors, sob, emote, self-stimulate, self-mutilate (Polidori ever gets to do the stigmata!) and make out. Confessions are confessed, truths are told, anatomical models go down the stairs, rats are eaten, nightmares squat on chests, chests develop extra eyeballs….it’s all very busy but somehow kind of dull.
I think the problem is that this just isn’t Ken Russell enough. Where are the jump-cut blasphemies and gonzo religious symbolism? We get one crucifix, a couple big snakes, and a lot more dead baby than anyone, especially me, really needs. But check out “Lisztomania” and compare. “Gothic” is cream cheese spread thin on bland white bread next to “Tommy” or “Lair of the White Worm”. This ain’t no “Altered States” for sheer inspired lunacy. To say nothing of “The Devils”. Or even “Valentino”. If I’m going to invest two hours in a Ken Russell movie, I want to be shocked, challenged, even disgusted.
With “Gothic”, I was at most mildly amused. This picture skirts awfully close to a slamming door farce, with the principals constantly running through corridors Benny Hill style. A whole lot of rooms and doors, but not much progress. I’ll be pedantic enough to mention that laudanum, an opium extract, will not result in manic activity and hallucinations and full-tilt running and shouting. Opiates make users slow, stupid and sleepy, not jittery and creative. This whole crew would have been nodding out, not seeing gods and monsters.
Aside from the lack of classic Russell tropes, my caveat might be that Byron and Shelley were the A-list celebrities of their time. Big time literary smart guys. But we never see either poet doing any actual poetizing. Or creating anything, aside from Byron making snarky quips like some over-literate teenager on Twitter. Doing an Oscar Wilde impression. Shelley flutters about in a dither, Byron does his bon mots, Mary Shelley does not much of anything. She has a bit of a snit about Byron and Shelley making out with each other, has dead baby visions, and gasses on about creating life and destroying life, but to little effect. She doesn’t pick up a quill (did they still write with quills at this point? Surely steel nibs were in use) and say, “You fops are never gonna get anything written, to be frank. Frank…. Maybe another stein of Muller Brau will get things moving…. Stein. That’s it!”
The novel about the modern Prometheus doesn’t’ get much mention, except in a brief and pointless present day coda. I will allow that seeing old Square Head in the guise of that baby was a nice touch.
Maybe I’m being too critical. I was impatient during a lot of these two hours, but not really bored. Back in 1987, “Gothic” might’ve played better. Though going by the box office numbers, not much better. But by today’s lights, this is Russell-lite. With ten or twenty seconds of digital blurring, “Gothic” could play on basic cable and nobody would much notice. I mean, I see “Deadpool” on TV every week, seems like, with language that even a definitely non-prudish me finds kind of ear-boggling. “Gothic” isn’t even slightly scary, isn’t at all sexy and isn’t even very daring.
If I’d paid money and then stuck out the two hours in a theater, I’d have been majorly disappointed. For the price of a Prime admission, it was interesting enough to pass time on the elliptical. If you’re a Ken Russell completist, I’d say watch it. If you’re at all interested in the poetry of Byron or Shelley (and frankly, who is anymore? To anyone younger than me, if Byron is known at all, it’s for the whole louche lifestyle and incest and affairs and scandals and drugs and gambling and boarding school dormitory roulette) then maybe give it a pass. If you’re into the whole Frankenstein mythos, “Gothic” will provide no exposition beyond a few pools of goo and some unlikely stuff about lightning.
Other Sellers on Amazon
Sold by:
Amazon.com
Temporarily out of stock.
We are working hard to be back in stock. Place your order and we’ll email you when we have an estimated delivery date. You won’t be charged until the item ships.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
We are working hard to be back in stock. Place your order and we’ll email you when we have an estimated delivery date. You won’t be charged until the item ships.
$32.03
+ $5.67 shipping
+ $5.67 shipping
Sold by:
Green Orbit
Sold by:
Green Orbit
(9298 ratings)
92% positive over last 12 months
92% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
$39.16
+ $3.99 shipping
+ $3.99 shipping
Sold by:
newtownvideos
Sold by:
newtownvideos
(410572 ratings)
85% positive over last 12 months
85% positive over last 12 months
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Shipping rates
and
Return policy
Image Unavailable
Image not available for
Color:
Color:
-
-
-
- Sorry, this item is not available in
- Image not available
- To view this video download Flash Player
Gothic [Blu-ray]
Gabriel Byrne
(Actor),
Julian Sands
(Actor),
Ken Russell
(Director)
&
0
more
Rated:
Format: Blu-ray
R
| List Price: | $39.97 Details |
| Price: | $30.17 |
| You Save: | $9.80 (25%) |
Enhance your purchase
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Lair Of The White Worm [Blu-ray]Amanda DonohoeBlu-ray$20.98$20.98FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Sep 21Only 4 left in stock - order soon.
Little Monsters [Blu-ray]Fred SavageBlu-ray$7.50$7.50FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18
Shivers [Blu-ray +Digital]Joe SilverBlu-ray$12.59$12.59FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18
Class of 1999 [Blu-ray]Mark LesterBlu-ray$22.86$22.86FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18Only 20 left in stock - order soon.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Lair Of The White Worm [Blu-ray]Amanda DonohoeBlu-ray$20.98$20.98FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Sep 21Only 4 left in stock - order soon.
Dagon [Blu-ray]Stuart GordonBlu-ray$23.77$23.77FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18
The Gate [Blu-ray]Stephen DorffBlu-ray$24.60$24.60FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18
Parents [Blu-ray]Randy QuaidBlu-ray$27.99$27.99FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Return Of The Living Dead 3 [Blu-ray]James CallahanBlu-ray$19.46$19.46FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18
Class of 1999 [Blu-ray]Mark LesterBlu-ray$22.86$22.86FREE Shipping on orders over $25 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Sep 18Only 20 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Product Description
In this fictionalised recreation of the events leading to the writing of Frankenstein, Russell is in his element reveling in the seething psycho-dramas, the fetid atmosphere of sexual abandon, menacing candlelight and decaying flesh. An entertainment rollercoaster of a ride.
Review
Special Features:
Audio Commentary with Lisi Russell, in conversation with Film Historian Matthew Melia
Isolated Score Selections and Audio Interview with Composer Thomas Dolby
Interviews with Actor Julian Sands, Screenwriter Stephen Volk, and Director of Photography Mike Southon
Theatrical trailer
TV Spot
Still Gallery --Lionsgate
Product details
- MPAA rating : R (Restricted)
- Product Dimensions : 0.7 x 7.5 x 5.4 inches; 5.92 Ounces
- Audio Description: : English
- Director : Ken Russell
- Media Format : DTS Surround Sound, NTSC, Widescreen
- Run time : 1 hour and 27 minutes
- Release date : January 30, 2018
- Actors : Gabriel Byrne, Julian Sands, Natasha Richardson, Myriam Cyr, Timothy Spall
- Producers : Penny Corke
- Studio : Lionsgate
- ASIN : B077MYFG1Y
- Number of discs : 1
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#25,030 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
- #1,141 in Horror (Movies & TV)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
319 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2019
Verified Purchase
17 people found this helpful
Report abuse
4.0 out of 5 stars
Perverse, intense and just plain weird; a fictionalized historical horror about Mary Shelley, Lord Byron and mass hysteria.
Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2016Verified Purchase
Perverse, intense, sensual, and just plain weird, this fictionalized historical horror about Mary Shelley and Lord Byron makes for an interesting watch loaded with before-they-were-stars.
This tells the fascinating story of how a modern horror legend came to be—in a heavily fictionalized sense, anyway. As we are introduced to our characters, we find their extravagant lifestyles are punctuated by hedonism, male sexual dominance and the entitlements of severe classist elitism. They are most extreme in pleasure, manor stricture, and delights.
Lord Byron (Gabriel Byrne; End of Days, Stigmata) hosts his guests Shelley (Julian Sands; Warlock, Arachnophobia), the future Mary Shelley (Natasha Richardson; Big Trouble in Little China) and Clair (Myriam Cyr; Species II) along with Byron's doctor Polidori (Timothy Spall; Sweeney Todd, The Bride). The cast alone is reason enough to see this perverse film.
Like a vampire, Lord Byron breeds emotional and social intensity, drawing more than an occasional discomfort from his controlled guests. What's more is their collective sexual nature. It's not homoerotic nor bisexual really, but rather a sort of pansexuality; a pervasive general sensuality. Think Interview with a Vampire (1994) while being less polite about it.
They gather together and tell ghost stories with perverse tones, speak in poetic seduction of the mind and body, engage in voyeurism and orgy, and lead one another into deep creativity and hysteria. All manner of nightmare fuel accosts their minds from the ghastly nocturnal homunculus to the blinking eye-nippled woman, perhaps the most iconic scene of the film. It's strikingly weird; even other-worldly.
Our guests descend into madness as they mesh polyamory and paranoia, erring on the side of madness. They envision everything from dead fetuses to animated disembodied heads.
Director Ken Russell (Altered States, The Lair of the White Worm) has a flair for melodrama. But it is deliberate and perhaps appropriate given his aims to paint our storytellers as creators; creators of their horrors within.
This film tiptoes the line separating ludicrous bad horror and brilliant mania. I recommend it to general horror fans whose taste spans all manner of quality and style, since this film is a bit hard to classify.
This tells the fascinating story of how a modern horror legend came to be—in a heavily fictionalized sense, anyway. As we are introduced to our characters, we find their extravagant lifestyles are punctuated by hedonism, male sexual dominance and the entitlements of severe classist elitism. They are most extreme in pleasure, manor stricture, and delights.
Lord Byron (Gabriel Byrne; End of Days, Stigmata) hosts his guests Shelley (Julian Sands; Warlock, Arachnophobia), the future Mary Shelley (Natasha Richardson; Big Trouble in Little China) and Clair (Myriam Cyr; Species II) along with Byron's doctor Polidori (Timothy Spall; Sweeney Todd, The Bride). The cast alone is reason enough to see this perverse film.
Like a vampire, Lord Byron breeds emotional and social intensity, drawing more than an occasional discomfort from his controlled guests. What's more is their collective sexual nature. It's not homoerotic nor bisexual really, but rather a sort of pansexuality; a pervasive general sensuality. Think Interview with a Vampire (1994) while being less polite about it.
They gather together and tell ghost stories with perverse tones, speak in poetic seduction of the mind and body, engage in voyeurism and orgy, and lead one another into deep creativity and hysteria. All manner of nightmare fuel accosts their minds from the ghastly nocturnal homunculus to the blinking eye-nippled woman, perhaps the most iconic scene of the film. It's strikingly weird; even other-worldly.
Our guests descend into madness as they mesh polyamory and paranoia, erring on the side of madness. They envision everything from dead fetuses to animated disembodied heads.
Director Ken Russell (Altered States, The Lair of the White Worm) has a flair for melodrama. But it is deliberate and perhaps appropriate given his aims to paint our storytellers as creators; creators of their horrors within.
This film tiptoes the line separating ludicrous bad horror and brilliant mania. I recommend it to general horror fans whose taste spans all manner of quality and style, since this film is a bit hard to classify.
20 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2017
Verified Purchase
There is nothing like a Ken Russell film to excite the senses and challenge the mind. He is sadly no longer with us, but his gallery of unique and eclectic films are his brilliant legacy to cinema..."Gothic" not withstanding. Russell didn't like telling his biographical films' story from beginning to end loaded with "facts" that you could just read about in a biographical book on the subject or subjects. He took the essence of their lives and their art, then he would create visuals with his camera and a music score that would convey the emotions of the person and how their "art" could move the viewer. In "Gothic" Russell takes the viewer on a phantasmagorical journey into the minds of the people attending Lord Byron's estate on that fateful night from which Mary Shelley would inevitably conjure up her horror classic "Frankenstein." The imagery Russell creates from his subject's lives (past, present and future) are some of the most haunting, disturbing, and all-out-gothic visuals to ever grace the cinema screen. The whole movie has a drive to it as it rushes from scene to scene, a madness that increases with every minute and builds to a glorious finale of horror, sadness, fear and pain. The viewer truly feels these character's fears along with them. Ken Russell's "Gothic" is a gut-wrenching, visceral thriller of a movie. If you have an open mind and just go with Russell's vision, then you will have a wonderful, frightening experience watching this demented, artful film.
18 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Death to spurs
4.0 out of 5 stars
Strange behaviour on Lake Geneva in the summer with no sun.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 30, 2016Verified Purchase
Very bizarre but constantly interesting take on the shenanigans at the villa deodati where Shelley, Byron et al gathered in the summer of 1816.
The film chronicles their decision to write their own ghost stories and their descent into madness as their ingestion of laudanum and alcohol takes hold.
Interesting visuals from Ken Russell include the coming to life of Fuseli's painting The Nightmare and a woman with eyes in her breasts.
I found this film constantly interesting and novel.
It's well worth seeking out
The film chronicles their decision to write their own ghost stories and their descent into madness as their ingestion of laudanum and alcohol takes hold.
Interesting visuals from Ken Russell include the coming to life of Fuseli's painting The Nightmare and a woman with eyes in her breasts.
I found this film constantly interesting and novel.
It's well worth seeking out
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Donald Robinson
4.0 out of 5 stars
A good film, even though it played up Frankenstein, and played down Polidori's vampire.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 16, 2021Verified Purchase
A good DVD, but I doubt if Byron, Shelleys, and Polidori were as "whimsical" as portrayed by Ken Russell. I liked the homage it gave Mary Shelley as authoress of Frankenstein, but think the miscarriage was more pivotal, but disliked John Polidori being made oafish, when his creation of the vampire was moulded around the devious Byron; and surely have some influence to the creation of Dracula by Bram Stoker eighty years later (coincidentally, Interview With the Vampire by Anne Rice came out eighty years after Dracula; seems almost a tradition).
Choren
5.0 out of 5 stars
Incredible Film!!!!
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 19, 2011Verified Purchase
If you really know what does the genre gothic means, then you will love this film. Ken Russell depicts with images what Goya says in his engraving "The sleep of reason produces monsters". This film is an oniric voyage created by opium and by the characters' fears. Gothic, as literary critic Fred Botting describes: "signifies a writing of excess". This is what Russell does, a film full of excesses and of a constant battle between otherness. This in an excellent movie. I also recommend an excellent film full of gothic elements, Svankmajer's "Conspirators of Pleasure".
12 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Mr. J. M. Zielinski
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great movie from famous director
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on May 8, 2011Verified Purchase
Very lucid, surreal and frantic at times, portrays one of most important moments in history of fantastic literature. Symbolic, with unique visions (which is Russel's trademark). Good acting, including late Natasha Richardson and Julian Sands. Shame this is only "bare-bones" edition, with no extras added - I believe they exist, or may be created one day? Anyway, one of best horror-related British movies of 80's.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
GA
5.0 out of 5 stars
Something special
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 9, 2013Verified Purchase
It's difficult to say much about this film without giving things away, being a spoiler, but I'll try. But if you want all the surprises, you shouldn't be reading any reviews in the first place, so there.
This is the story about the night when Frankenstein's monster was born. That is, when the story itself was born. More or less nothing is shown that doesn't take place, one way or the other, in reality or in mind, and that's part of what makes it such a fascinating ride. And those fascinating people having existed for real doesn't diminish the pleasure.
On a side note, I have heard about an anthology containing the other stories, those that didn't win. If anyone knows how to find it, do tell!
This is the story about the night when Frankenstein's monster was born. That is, when the story itself was born. More or less nothing is shown that doesn't take place, one way or the other, in reality or in mind, and that's part of what makes it such a fascinating ride. And those fascinating people having existed for real doesn't diminish the pleasure.
On a side note, I have heard about an anthology containing the other stories, those that didn't win. If anyone knows how to find it, do tell!
Deals related to this item
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

![Waxworks Compilation [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81VVHsyUVRL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)
![Wishmaster Collection (4 films) [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61-sOr4xBxL._AC_UL160_SR160,160_.jpg)

![April Fool's Day (1986) [Blu-ray]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81TFiZzibLL._AC_UL250_SR250,200_.jpg)