Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Grand Strategies: Literature, Statecraft, and World Order Hardcover – June 22, 2010
From “the man on whom nothing was lost,” a unique guide to the elements of statecraft, presented through spirited interpretations of classic literary works
“The international world of states and their modern system is a literary realm,” writes Charles Hill in this powerful work on the practice of international relations. “It is where the greatest issues of the human condition are played out.”
A distinguished lifelong diplomat and educator, Hill aims to revive the ancient tradition of statecraft as practiced by humane and broadly educated men and women. Through lucid and compelling discussions of classic literary works from Homer to Rushdie, Grand Strategies represents a merger of literature and international relations, inspired by the conviction that “a grand strategist . . . needs to be immersed in classic texts from Sun Tzu to Thucydides to George Kennan, to gain real-world experience through internships in the realms of statecraft, and to bring this learning and experience to bear on contemporary issues.”
This fascinating and engaging introduction to the basic concepts of the international order not only defines what it is to build a civil society through diplomacy, justice, and lawful governance but also describes how these ideas emerge from and reflect human nature.
- Print length368 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherYale University Press
- Publication dateJune 22, 2010
- Dimensions9.6 x 6.24 x 1.08 inches
- ISBN-109780300163865
- ISBN-13978-0300163865
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A fascinating book that has the feel of a life's work. . . . Hill affirms the intellectual endeavor of looking at the world through a literary lens. . . . At a deeper level, the book is about the fragility of order and the struggle of statesmen to balance, restrain, and legitimate state power."--John Ikenberry, Foreign Affairs
-- John Ikenberry ― Foreign Affairs
“Grand Strategies concerns statesmanship and strategy: the uses of power, the fate of alliances, war and peace. It also, happily, provides a tour through the Great Books, giving special attention to nation-states and their vexed relations.”--William Anthony Hay, Wall Street Journal
-- William Anthony Hay ― Wall Street Journal
"A remarkable book. . . . Hill is the exemplification of the Clausewitzian coup d’oeil―the ability to see how everything connects to everything else."―John Gaddis, Yale University -- John Gaddis
"Charles Hill's Grand Strategies is a gem that combines long and valuable practical experience with the wisdom that comes from a broad and deep knowledge of history, literature and philosophy to produce a wisdom badly needed by statesmen and diplomats."―Donald Kagan, Yale University
-- Donald Kagan Published On: 2009-12-21"In an age of short attention spans and disaggregated facts, Charles Hill does much to revive two venerable traditions―the classical ideal of statesmanship, and the close engagement with great texts.”―Henry A. Kissinger -- Henry A. Kissinger Published On: 2009-12-22
"Charles Hill's Grand Strategies transcends the tired categories of realism and idealism in the study of politics. Drawing from such as Aristotle and Homer, he spans centuries and circles the globe, always gazing from the standpoint of greatness. A sage and powerful book."―Harvey Mansfield, Harvard University
-- Harvey Mansfield Published On: 2010-01-05"The originality of this book lies . . . in the argument that these works have actually shaped the world of nations because of the influence they have on kings, princes, generals, and statesmen. . . . Grand Strategies is an unusual volume, filled with sharp insights about a daunting list of writers and circuitous pathways and detours that eventually lead the reader to hidden destinations. It makes its case diplomatically by drawing the reader into a way of thinking about the political world rather than by pressing a single argument or set of conclusions. It is as original as it is unusual, the rare volume that provokes neither agreement nor disagreement, but rather independent thought about the worlds we have lost and the one we have inherited."—James Piereson, The New Criterion -- James Piereson ― The New Criterion
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 030016386X
- Publisher : Yale University Press (June 22, 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 368 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780300163865
- ISBN-13 : 978-0300163865
- Item Weight : 1.5 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.6 x 6.24 x 1.08 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,160,875 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,035 in General Books & Reading
- #4,412 in Literary Criticism & Theory
- #4,541 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
But this case for the diplomat-engineer is seldom made. More often than not, it is considered that the statesman and his close kin, the diplomat, should be trained in the humanities. Charles Hill, a diplomat turned educator and a lover of great books, takes as his aim "the restoration of literature as a tutor for statecraft". The argument of his book is that the world should recognize high political ideas and actions of statecraft as aspects of the human condition that are fully within the scope of literary genius, and ones that great writers have consistently explored in important ways. For Charles Hill, the international world of states and their modern system is a literary realm; it is where the greatest ideas of the human condition are played on. Even literary works read and praised for insights on personal feelings and intimate matters, such as Jane Austen's Emma, possess a dimension wholly apt for statecraft--in Emma's case, the gathering and misanalysis of intelligence. Conversely, when literary works take up matters of statecraft, images suggest that the foundation stone of world order is located in marriage and the family.
For Charles Hill, political science proves inadequate in dealing with "the great matters of high politics, statecraft, and grand strategy". Political scientists are experts who ignore the reality of politics in search of "scientific" answers to some trivial or obvious aspects of a problem. Political science by self-definition must confine itself to a narrow band of problems, capable of scientifically replicable solutions--leaving the biggest questions beyond its reach. Neither can history provide the answer to the issues at hand. Historians have the pleasure of dealing with all the facts known to all the participants of any past event. But the statesmen of the time must make decisions when knowing only a small portion of what is happening. Neither historians nor political scientists can deal with the complexity of true strategy and statecraft.
As the author claims in Grand Strategies, statecraft cannot be practiced in the absence of literary insight, without a "grasp of the ungraspable" that only literature allows. Decisions in diplomacy must be taken before all the facts are in, when all the implications cannot be known. That is why diplomacy must be practiced as one of the humanities and informed by all of humanistic learning, with literature at the apex. The dimension of fiction, and of poetic license, is indispensable to the strategist who cannot, by the nature of the craft, know all of the facts, considerations, and potential consequences of a situation at the time a decision must be made, ready or not. Literature lives in the realm grand strategy requires, beyond rational calculation, in acts of the imagination.
Charles Hills begins his literary grand tour with Homer's epic of war between assembled Greek warriors and the citadel of Troy. In the Iliad, Achilles has retreated under his tent and Odysseus is sent by Agamemnon on a diplomatic mission to convince him to join back the fray. But Odysseus violates two fundamental laws of diplomacy. He doesn't follow his instructions to the letter, putting aside the demand that Achilles bow down to Agamemnon as a token of allegiance. And he doesn't report back to Agamemnon accurately, stating that Achilles is still bursting with anger whereas the Greek hero agreed to consider the request carefully. In any case, Odysseus' diplomatic mission to Achilles, and his later trials on his way back to Ithaca, demonstrate that diplomacy precedes the state, and may count among the oldest trades humanity has ever practiced. Halfway between the myth and the epic, Aeschylus's great trilogy The Oresteia locates civilization's origin in the creation of the state. The drama tracks the aristocratic house of Atreus, disintegrating under a curse that demands revenge down the generations until Orestes, in Athens, is the central character in a transition from the primeval cycle of revenge to civil society based on judicial order.
There is a literary genre that takes at its subject the foundation and preservation of a polity. This genre is the epic, and its evolution through the ages provides the Ariadne's thread that runs throughout the labyrinth of great literary works. Epic stories come in verse or in prose, and they may stick to fact and realism or give leeway to the powers of the imagination. But they all have a state-making quality: the hero's fate is closely linked to the birth of a nation, and it is told with the benefit of hindsight by the heirs to that national tradition. Epics are political narratives that tell the story of a state before history began, through the trials of one individual who shoulders the destiny of a community without knowing that all his wanderings and chance encounters will ultimately make sense.
Every classic epic involves a visit by the hero to the Underworld, where the experience will reveal to him his true, fated mission. Reaching the nether region requires contact with a vegetation symbol, like Virgil's Golden Bough, and a guiding companion. Charles Hill finds that same narrative structure in many works of fiction, from the classic narrative poems of Homer, Virgil, Dante and Milton to the modern novels of Jonathan Swift, Thomas Mann and Franz Kafka. The descent to the underworld, and the walk in the woods that precedes it, infuse the political order with a mythical element that sustains it. To be legitimate, any political system must at least hint at the underlying divinely founded order.
Although Charles Hill is mostly preoccupied with works of fiction and poetry, he also suffuses the text with his real-life experience. He was a direct witness when Prime Minister Lee Kwan Yew visited Harvard in 1970 and when, in front of anti-war protesters and New Left faculty, he declared: "If the U.S. were not fighting in Vietnam, Singapore would be gone by now". The author concurs and adds that "not many years later, the emergence of the Asian Tigers as successful states in the global economy would prove Lee correct." The author also refers to his close relationship with Henry Kissinger, who shared the same literary tastes and passion for history. Kissinger poked fun at State Department officers who had never heard of Cardinal Richelieu, or misquoted Thucydides without having read The Peloponnesian War. Clearly the community of grand strategists and readers of ancient epics is an exclusive club. On the other hand, being steeped in books does not necessarily make one a more enlightened statesman. During the epoch-making visit to China in 1972, Mao received Nixon and Kissinger in his private room full of books and manuscripts, a location which looked more like the retreat of a scholar than the audience room of a political leader. But Chairman Mao is certainly no model for Charles Hill, who was trained as a China watcher during the horrendous years of the Cultural Revolution.
Charles Hill has a good knowledge of the literary canon, as he revisits the masterworks "every schoolboy used to know" but nobody now remembers, such as the long march of the Ten Thousand in Xenophon's Anabasis. His command of diplomatic history also enlightens the text, as when he retells the story of the Telegram from Ems that Bismarck rewrote and leaked in order to trick the French into declaring war to Prussia. To be true, the connections that the author establishes between works of fiction or poetry and the course of history are sometimes tedious, and we get the impression that the author writes about certain works just because he likes them for their literary value, which is fine. The parallel he draws between T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land and Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points is rather far-fetched, even though he is right to draw attention to the literary dimension of what he considers "the most influential document in American diplomatic history".
Based on Hill's lectures at Yale, the book leaves the reader with a long list of suggested readings, including the masterworks whose reading one always postpone, such as Dante's Divine Comedy, Milton's Paradise Lost, or Whitman's Leaves of Grass. But a reader's humanistic culture is always a work in progress, and Charles Hill is no exception: the misspellings in his quotes of Rimbaud's volumes suggest that his French could need a little refreshing. Perhaps more than the classics, I was drawn to the works of contemporary fiction that he refers to in the book, and which I have added to my reading list. These are Cyril Connolly's The Unquiet Grave, David Stacton's People of the Book, and Roberto Calasso's The Ruin of Kasch. Readers' feedback on these books would be most appreciated.
That's all really just a long way of saying that in reading Charles Hill's "Grand Strategies: Literature, Statecraft, and World Order" I constantly found myself adding new books to some real or imagined book list that I may, or may not, ever get a chance to read. Every chapter of Grand Strategies was full of new books that sounded interesting and fascinating. Some-like Mark Twain`s "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn," Salmon Rushdie`s "Satanic Verses," or Thucydides's "The Peloponnesian War"-I had read and could quickly relate. Others-Xenophon's "The Persian Expedition" or Marcel Proust`s "In Search of Lost Time"-were new, at least to me. Worse, especially for my book list, Hill manages to craft his dialogue about each in such a way as to bestow meaning and insight beyond a cursory reading of the text.
For example, though I've often heard it referenced and cited as powerful piece of poetry, never had I seen John Milton's "Paradise Lost" as a commentary on war and the modern polity. And yet, perhaps it is.
"But far beyond the politics of the day `Paradise Lost' is Milton's comprehensive commentary on modern warfare, revolution, founding a polity; on strategy, leadership, intelligence, individual choice under conditions of modern statecraft; and on the justification of God's ways to men."
Suddenly, the war in heaven, through Milton's eyes, becomes a proxy for competing views of the world worked out during the Oliver Cromwell English Civil War.
In Hill's eye, fiction is more than just a story. In literature, we see the great ideas and forces that move history worked out, argued, and recorded. The "international world of states and their modern system is a literary realm," he argues. "[I]t is where the greatest issues of the human condition are played out." Nothing may come closer to a thesis for his opus. He continues:
"A sacral nature must infuse world order if it is to be legitimate. that order is not to be identified with a particular social system, but to legitimate, the system must hint at the underlying divinely founded order. The modern Westphalian system was conceived when such was the case, but with the Enlightenment's addition of secularism, science, reason, and democracy, the system increasingly spurned , then forgot, its legitimizing sources of authority.[...] Revolutionary ideology radicalized secularism, science and reason into the task of erasing original sin, o perfecting humanity-all requiring terror to create "the New Man." Modern efforts to create a sovereignty potent enough to fill the void produced the statist monstrosities of Stalin and Hitler. America became an empire but never gained the understanding to go with it. China is now on its own misguided course."
Thought provoking, insightful, and, of course, full of literature to read when you finish it (including a bibliography of primary and secondary sources that will keep you busy for several years), and reread, Hill's "Grand Strategies" is a worthy addition to your bed-stand stack. Just make sure you put it on top.
This is fantastic read and anyone interested in the previously discussed topics will find this book both enlightening and thought provoking.
I said what I said.
Not a knock against the seller at all.






