HTC Shift X9500 UMPC - 800MHz 1GB 40GB 7" LCD QuadBand GSM 3G UMTS/HSDPA EDGE Bluetooth Camera WiFi Windows Vista Business Keyboard
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
| Specific Uses For Product | business |
| Brand | HTC |
| Operating System | Microsoft Windows Vista |
| Memory Storage Capacity | 1 GB |
| Screen Size | 7 Inches |
| Ram Memory Installed Size | 1 GB |
| Model Name | Shift X9500 |
| Color | black |
| CPU Manufacturer | Intel |
| Connectivity Technology | Bluetooth, Cellular, Wi-Fi |
About this item
- Always-on access to critical information with HTC SnapVUE
- Receive instant e-mails with Microsoft Direct Push technology up to 2 days on battery standby
- Powerful enough to give you the full Windows Vista experience
- Worldwide UMTS with HSDPA
- Bluetooth 2.0 and Wi-Fi
More to consider from our brands
Product Description
Experience a new era in mobile computing with the HTC Shift. Powerful enough to run Windows Vista Business, the HTC Shift has the optimal blend of portability and functionality, giving you uncompromised performance while on the move. HTC Shift features SnapVUE, an always-on mode that provides you instant access to critical information -- including e-mail previews, local weather, calendar, and SMS -- even if the device is not switched on. Push e-mail gives you instant alerts whenever you have new Outlook e-mails. Through Wi-Fi or 3.5G high-speed connectivity, you enjoy the ultimate productivity and highest fidelity Internet experience around. HTC Shift also features a 7-inch touch sensitive screen that slides out and tilts to a comfortable angle. It has a full QWERTY keyboard for convenient messaging and text input. A built-in fingerprint sensor is provided for increased security.
Product information
| Product Dimensions | 5.08 x 0.98 x 8.15 inches |
|---|---|
| Item Weight | 1.76 pounds |
| ASIN | B000X1YL2Y |
| Item model number | 99HEC015-00 |
| Customer Reviews |
3.2 out of 5 stars |
| Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Vista |
| RAM | 1 GB |
| Wireless communication technologies | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi |
| Connectivity technologies | Bluetooth, Cellular, Wi-Fi |
| Display technology | LCD |
| Other display features | Wireless Phone Accessory |
| Device interface - primary | Keyboard |
| Form Factor | All-in-One |
| Colour | black |
| Manufacturer | HTC |
| Date First Available | March 12, 2008 |
Feedback
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The point of this is review is to tell you that the HTC Shift, for its time (2007), was hands down the coolest device on the market. With the onslaught of tablets since then, the HTC Shift has lost its luster, but only in a few respects. If you've come across this product, then you likely know a little about the HTC Shift's uniqueness. You can only seem to find it by searching for an uncommon combination of terms. As you likely already know, the greatest thing about the Shift was that you could simultaneously work in both Windows and Windows Mobile with the click of a button - it was a phone and netbook in one. Out of the box, the Windows Mobile side was locked down though, and you couldn't make calls. But if you were able to figure out how to unlock it and get phone calls to work (via XDA developers website), you could be talking to someone over the cell connection and work on files in Windows at the same time. Because the cellphone capabilities on the Windows Mobile side could be integrated with the Windows side, you could share the data connection, meaning that you never had to turn on Wifi on the Windows side and you'd have a connected Windows netbook anywhere for the price of a single data plan. Further, you could also turn the Shift into a Mobile hotspot using the Windows side's "internet sharing" feature. It was 3.5G, which for the time was amazing and still suitable today. If you swapped out the components, the HD for an SSD, 1GB RAM for 2GB, a bigger battery, and Windows Vista for 7, it was truly a very usable computer, so long as you were doing only one taxing thing at a time. It was perfectly capable of handling email checking, lite web browsing, and word processing all at once, but more than that starts to bog down performance. I used to play Starcraft on there with no problems; the touch screen was ideal for gameplay. The keyboard hid away so nicely and the typability was great, of course, my small fingers certainly help there. You also had a built in fingerprint reader for logging in and accessing sites. With a ready VGA compatible monitor on your desk and a dashboard mount in your car, you seriously could work anywhere and stay connected constantly.
Here are the drawbacks. The XDA devs never got the cellphone to connect with bluetooth, so you always had to make calls with the built-in mic and speaker. The screen had no sort of palm rejection so writing or drawing was not really feasible. There was no back facing camera. Screen rotation was something of a pain without an accelerometer. The internal parts were kinda weak quality. If you ever opened it up, such as to swap out parts, you would have to be very precise in everything that you did, otherwise you'd end up with one HTC Brick. The internal power button, for instance, was this tiny piece of plastic that snapped off with the slightest pressure from the wrong direction. The Windows Mobile side had a very small ROM chip, 64MB, so you were limited in how much you could use that side. The XDA devs never got the SD card reader to be utilized by the Windows Mobile side, so that didn't help the problem of limited ROM.
The HTC Shift was in a league of its own and ahead of its time and we've yet to see anything like it since. I personally think that many of the limitations of the HTC Shift were due to business and communications regulations rather than any design flaw, meaning that the limitations were intended. That's why the mobile side's ROM was limited, that's why the cellphone was locked down, that's why the mobile side couldn't use the SD card, that's why the mobile side couldn't use bluetooth. If regulations were such that a truly all-in-one device could enter the market, we might see more products like the Shift, but until then it's going to be Smartphones, tablets, netbooks, laptops, desktop replacements, desktops, workstations, and so on. Maybe regulators and manufacturers are in cahoots, knowing that if they were to allow the gaps to be bridged between existing products, there'd be less to flood the market with. But with the HTC Shift back in 2007, HTC apparently didn't get the full memo. They're up to speed now. Man, it would be nice if someone ignored the regulations, just once.
If you've got an extra $1000 laying around and some hobby time, I'd recommend this device. The base model is cheap and the main accessories (Super Talent 1.8 zif pata 128GB ssd, 2GB 214 pin Microdimm, and Mugen 6600mAh battery) are still available (as of 8 March 2013); they won't be for much longer. However, the likelihood that you'll have this device for more than 3 years is slim. The base unit will likely begin to crumble thereafter - tilt screen mechanism failing, plastic around ports chipping, speaker mesh guards breaking, power button snapping, etc. If I were in the market for a mobile device today (and I didn't have a history of breaking HTC Shift's), I'd very likely give the HTC Shift another go, despite the fact I'd have to spend just over $1000 to get it maxed out, simply because of it's all-in-one design. The HTC Shift certainly had it's flaws, many of which have been fixed by recent mobile devices on the market, but recent devices lack the Shift's all-in-one design. Really, there is no, nor has there ever been, a worth-while product on the market for my tastes, but the HTC Shift came closest so far. Hopefully, HTC is working on an updated version, but I'm not crossing my fingers because of the regulations.
Just to clarify the assertion that there is still nothing on the market like the HTC Shift (since 8 Mar '13), I've listed recent offerings that have come close, but explain why they fall short:
iPad/Galaxy Tabs/or any tablet (not to be confused with Tablet PCs):
- Cannot make cellular calls (not VoIP) - only 1st gen jailbroken iPad can with purchase of an app/most rooted Android devices can (Tab 7.7 (P68000) can out-of-the-box, but shortfalls below still exist)
- No keyboard - can be fixed with Clamcase (for iPad) or similar (for others)
- Does not run fully functional OS - only work around is running a VNC app, which is tough when away from home network, plus its sluggish when it does work
Large Phones (like Galaxy Note):
- No keyboard - there are a few specially made keyboards, but their even smaller than the Shift's keyboard. Any bluetooth keyboard could work, but you lose mobility
- Does not run fully functional OS - only work around is running a VNC app, which is tough when away from home network, plus its sluggish when it does work
Atrix/Padfone/Clambook (combination phone/tablets):
- Does not run fully functional OS - only work around is running a VNC app, which is tough when away from home network, plus its sluggish when it does work
Windows 8 tablets:
- Cannot make cellular calls (not VoIP) - no work around
- Drins battery, which takes away from the purpose of a tablet
- No mobile OS to sip at the battery and allow longer use of device
Addressing an argument: It could be argued that we no longer need a fully functioning OS because so much is being moved to "the cloud" - with Office, games, etc. I'll agree with that argument a few years from now, when the online apps are truly "fully functioning." As of write now, there is no Adobe CS and Office Live or 365 is no where close to on par to its installable cousin.
The worst thing about the HTC Shift X9500 is the battery life. The claim is 2 hours, but I never got more than 1 hr and 15 mins. There are extended batteries available online for around $200 that are supposed to give it 4 hours of battery life, but I felt like it wouldn't be worth the expenses and decided to sell my Shift and purchase one of the new Clover Trail tablets instead.
Gonna try Win 7, and see if it helps?
HTC should have NEVER given up on the Shift.
Top reviews from other countries
Die Bedienung des Shifts per Touchscreen geht leicht von der Hand, auch die Tastatur besitzt einen weichen Anschlag, einen realen Druckpunkt und ist deutlich besser als bei anderen kleinen Geräten. ( wie Smartphonetastaturen) Das Gerät scheint damit tatsächlich zum Arbeiten konstruiert.
Der Bildschirm ist klar und deutlich, spiegelt aber leider.
Zu Vista:
Vista läuft stabil und rund, aber auch etwas gemütlich. Bis auf Origami (Das eine auf Touchscreen ausgelegte PDA artige Benutzeroberfläche für UMPCs) ist der Autostart schön sauber.
Booten 40 Sekunden.
Es vergehen aus dem Standby gute 4 Sekunden bis zum Anmeldeschirm und etwa 5 Sekunden von dort, bis man weiterarbeiten kann. Der Clou: Anmeldung mit Fingerabdruck. Also entweder gibt man sein langes Passwort ein oder zieht schlicht den Finger durch den Scanner. Angenehm wenn das Passwort zwölf Stellen mit Sonderzeichen besitzt.
Der Nachteil von Vista: Es verbraucht im Betrieb massig Strom und lässt etwa 3 Stunden Laufzeit übrig.
Für ein Ultramobiles Gerät ... leider recht wenig. Außerdem hört man hin und wieder einen Lüfter, sowie den Festplattenzugriff.
Aber es gibt ja noch das generell unterschätzte SnapVue.
Zu SnapVue:
Man stelle sich einfach vor, im UMPC ist noch ein PDA verbaut, der sich Akku, Datenmodem und Bildschirm mit dem Vista Part teilt. Die Hardware auf die SnapVue zugreift ist:
WindowsMobile 6.
Ein eigener 400Mhz Prozessor.
43MB Systemspeicher
38MB Verfügbarer Programmspeicher
640*480 Auflösung
Touchscreen
Hardwaretastatur.
Telefonmodem
Usb zu Vista.
Der Vorteil ist klar. Ein PDA arbeitet lautlos und besitzt InstantOn. D.h euer bearbeitetes Dokument beispielsweise ist sofort verfügbar.
Außerdem hält das Gerät im SnapVue Modus viel länger durch, da deutlich weniger Strom verbraucht wird. Über 10h dauerhafte On Zeit ist möglich, bei zweitniedrigster Beleuchtungsstufe.
Leider ist werkseitig eine Sperre eingebaut, die den vollen Umfang von WM6 zunächst blockiert.
Mit einer kleinen Anleitung ist WM6 aber in wenigen Minuten vollständig verfügbar. Googelt einfach nach '"liberate your htc shift'" und schaut, ob ihr euch das zutraut.
Keine Gewähr von meiner Seite daher. ;)
Aber da nach einem eventuellen Hardreset der Ausgangszustand von SnapVue wiederhergestellt wird, sollte es auch keine Probleme mit der Garantie geben.
Beachtet aber, dass der PDAmodus SnapVUE nur die oben genannten Dinge besitzt. Wifi, Blueetooth, SD Slot, Usb, und VGA-Ausgang bleiben Vista vorbehalten.
Dateiaustausch zwischen SnapVUE und Vista funktioniert intern über Aktive-Sync.
Warum man den PDA Part toll finden kann:
Ich beispielsweise installierte Softmaker Office 06 für WindowsMobile, löschte dessen Rechtschreibwörterbücher um Platz einzusparen, und kann jetzt 10h am Stück an Word und Exeltabellen arbeiten.
Oder man installiert sich einen Browser und geht per Datenmodem stromsparen ins Internet.
Was will man mehr?
Nun, vielleicht das HTC den WM6 Part offiziell unterstützt und dann auch mit allen Schnittstellen.
Trotzdem Klasse Gerät!
Gibt derzeit nichts Besseres - gerade den PDA Modus find ich prima.
Punkt Abzug weil irgendeiner bei HTC auf die Idee kam, statt WM6 - SnapVue zu erfinden und wahrscheinlich dafür gelobt wurde.
Die Tastatur ist brauchbar, das Display eher Durchschnitt, es glänzt weder durch Brillianz noch durch eine hohe Auflösung.
Dieses Gerät hat drei gewaltige Handicaps:
1. es kann von 1GB RAM nicht auf 2GB RAM erweitert werden.
Hier hat es HTC wirklich versäumt Nägel mit Köpfen zu machen obwohl 1GB
RAM zusätzlich wohl in der Produktion kaum mehr als ein paar EUR gekostet hätten. Mit 1GB RAM läuft Vista nicht gerade berauschend.
2. der Intel Stealey Prozessor mag Strom sparen, er ist aber auch sehr langsam. Wer z.B. iTunes Videos im Vollbildmodus geniessen will, der ganz den HTC Shift ganz schnell wieder vergessen.
3. die Festplatte sorgt auch nicht gerade für Rekordgeschindigkeiten
Fazit: mit einem Outdoor-tauglichen Display mit höherer Helligkeit, mit 2GB RAM, mit einem Intel U7600 Dualcore Prozessor samt Intel X3100 oder 945/950er GPU, einer 32 bzw. 64GB SSD und einem Akku mit doppelter Kapazität wäre der HTC Shift vielleicht ein wirklich brauchbares Gerät geworden. Allerdings würde es dann wohl über 2000 EUR kosten.
So ist der HTC Shift weder Fleisch noch Fisch, da würde ich dann eher den Samsung Q1 Ultra mit HSDPA empfehlen, der auch auf 2GB RAM aufgerüstet werden und in den man mit relativer Leichtigkeit auch eine schnellere HDD verbauen kann. Leider liefert Samsung diese Geräte vornehmlich mit Windows Tablet PC aus, so dass das Update auf Vista(unbedingt empfehlenswert, Vista hat eine viel besser Touchscreen Unterstützung als XP) evtl. noch zusätzliches Geld kostet, von den extra 1GB RAM mal ganz abgesehen.
Wer ein portables Gerät mit sehr viel Leistung braucht, dem sei aus eigener Erfahrung das aktuelle Dialogue Flybook V5(mit U7600 CPU) ans Herz gelegt. Auch Toshiba R500 und Sony TZ21/31 sind durchaus schnelle Zeitgenossen. Ansonsten gibt es nicht viel am Markt, was sich lohnt.
Natuerlich ist der HTC viel zu langsam unter Vista und WM6 aeusserst beschraenkt dadurch, dass man nicht einmal den SD Kartenslot darunter benutzen kann. Also wird das nichts mit dem schnellen Austausch zwischen anderen Spielzeugen.
Meine Empfehlung: Acer One. Kostet ein Drittel, leistet doppelt so viel. Der Touchscreen des Shift ist ohnehin sehr grobschlaechtig in der Bedienung und eher als "Thumbscreen" zu verstehen. Also nutzlos bis auf das Scrollen von Pages (und auch da nervig, weil man z.B. bei Hyperlinks oft zigmal auf andere Seiten gepusht wird, obwohl man nur nach unten scrollen wollte.)
Alles in allem: Optik super, Qualitaet Mist, Gebrauchswert null.







