
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$25.99$25.99
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$9.99$9.99
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: DnM Deals
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy 1st Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-100521612284
- ISBN-13978-0521612289
- Edition1st
- PublisherCambridge University Press
- Publication dateMarch 13, 2006
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.99 x 0.46 x 9.01 inches
- Print length184 pages
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Do you want a political system in which people actively participate or in which people discuss issues with diverse interlocutors? In Hearing the Other Side one of the most creative political scientists working today demonstrates that we cannot have it both ways since, according to varied and appropriate data, deliberation among the politically heterogeneous is inversely related to levels of participation in politics. Seen in this light, perhaps it is just as well that only 23 percent of Americans could recall having a political conversation with someone who disagreed with them. Diana Mutz's grounded, trenchant analysis of real political talk in the workplace and beyond shows why the study of deliberation must not be left to political theorists: it is a concept that appears much more attractive from the isolation of the ivory tower than from the bustle of the plant." John R. Hibbing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
"This important new book presents the startling results of careful research into some basic issues in political philosophy. The findings ring true to personal experience, but call into question some widely accepted tenets of contemporary democratic theory. This well-crafted volume should make big waves in our national debate about democratic renewal, helping to set a new agenda--how to reconcile the tension between active citizenship and diversity." Robert D. Putnam, Harvard University
"Diana Mutz has hit yet another grand-slam with Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Readers will find it difficult, much like a good novel, to put this engaging and well-written book down. Successfully combining traditional political philosophy with empirical research others have tried, few have succeeded Professor Mutz offers a compelling argument why the two lofty democratic goals, active participation and considered deliberation, are incompatible. Hearing the Other Side will set a new disciplinary research agenda for years to come." James Kuklinski, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
"This engagingly written and carefully researched book suggests that there may be an empirical tension between theories of deliberative democracy and participatory democracy." - Benjamin I. Page, Northwestern University
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press; 1st edition (March 13, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 184 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0521612284
- ISBN-13 : 978-0521612289
- Item Weight : 9.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.99 x 0.46 x 9.01 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #596,176 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #265 in Non-US Legal Systems (Books)
- #1,941 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- #2,322 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Diana C. Mutz holds the Samuel A. Stouffer Chair in Political Science and Communication at the University of Pennsylvania where she also serves as Director of the Institute for the Study of Citizens and Politics. She lives with numerous pets including birds, reptiles, amphibians, and mammals, as well as a few invertebrates.
Mutz served as founding co-PI of Time-sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences (TESS), an interdisciplinary infrastructure project that continues to promote methodological innovation across the social sciences. This project received the Warren Mitofsky Innovator Award in 2007.
In 2011, Mutz received the Lifetime Career Achievement Award in Political Communication from the American Political Science Association. She was inducted as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2008. She received a Guggenheim Fellowship in 2015, and a Carnegie Foundation Fellowship in 2016. Most recently, she was elected to the National Academy of Sciences.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star51%33%16%0%0%51%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star51%33%16%0%0%33%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star51%33%16%0%0%16%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star51%33%16%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star51%33%16%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 28, 2016a good book
- Reviewed in the United States on October 29, 2018This is helpful if you are interested in, or studying, public engagement of the creation of a public process. It is interesting and instructive, and explains how to constrictive engage and include all stake holders.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 27, 2006Mutz explains very clearly how and why political conversation in this country is stilted, unsatisfying and so often leads to more misunderstanding. She explains that the goody-two-shoes vision of democracy -- where we would all understand one another if we just had all the facts and listened -- is a fantasy. It's an excellent combination of social psychology and political science. After reading this you'll understand politics (and American society) in a much deeper way.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2018This is a very sophisticated analysis with important implications. I believe that the presentation may be a bit "over academic" for many readers, including myself. Still, it was interesting
- Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2007In Hearing the Other Side, Diana Mutz claims that "deliberation" actually discourages people from taking action politically. She then draws the conclusion that deliberative democracy and participatory democracy are incompatible. But when you look more closely at the kinds of interactions she is talking about, it becomes clear that she is dealing with informal settings where different kinds of people share their views on controversial issues. In these situations, the basic elements of successful deliberation - sharing personal experiences, using a guide that lays out different views, assembling a critical mass of people, etc. - are not part of the equation. Mutz's argument is interesting, but it applies more to casual conversations than to deliberation as it is being practiced today.



