Top critical review
97 people found this helpful
3.0 out of 5 starsHere's my advice: either read this one section a week or so, or read this as a book when facing insomnia
ByHRWon March 25, 2017
I loved the idea of this book and jumped on it when it came up as a Kindle First choice of the month, but the execution... meh.
Now, mind you, this is a topic that interests me. Heck, the only reason I don't have a tattoo right now is I finally settled on the exact one I wanted, a quote I'd seen attributed time and again to Robert Frost that would have been perfect. Except before getting it permanently imprinted upon myself, I wanted to verify the source... at which point I hit a stumbling block. I was unable to find any verifiable source, other than collections of internet quotes. I even turned to our local library's research librarians for help, and they came back with the same. Lots of people SAY he said it, but there's nothing anyone could find to verify that he did (or who else originally did, for that matter). And so, to this day, Heather remains untattooed.
So, this is the kind of stuff I love, finding out the real truth behind the things we pass from person to person somehow trusting it because it comes up on a nice picture online, or is being shared by someone we respect. (I could do a whole segue into the whole "fake news" issue of the moment, but will spare you.)
All of this to say... I went in primed. The opening of the book was actually a good overview of the different ways quotes can end up misattributed, and I expected more information on each in the coming chapters, and then we moved into the meat of the book itself and.... it was basically Steak 'Ums.
This reads like (heck, it might even <b>be</b>, but I'm so worn out from slogging through the whole thing to want to do any research of my own right now) a series of blog posts. And not particularly engaging blog posts at that.
Each section is a quote showing who it is most commonly attributed to, and then tracing its most likely actual origins. There were two problems for me: 1. the format got old fast, and there were a LOT of quotes. 2. The greater problem - the writing just wasn't engaging.
It reminded me of reading a late elementary schooler's history paper. Date, event, name. Date, name, event. There wasn't context, there wasn't insight, there wasn't commentary. It was all well researched and sources were perfectly cited, but... *yawn* It just was not a writing style that worked in book length for me. I'd probably have enjoyed these from time to time as a single article or blog post, but to read them all back-to-back (er, back-to-front if we're going to be technical) just became tedious.
Which really stinks, because I was so excited to have a non-fiction Kindle First choice at all, never mind one about a subject in which I was truly interested. Boo.