Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
High Stakes, No Prisoners: A Winner's Tale of Greed and Glory in the Internet Wars Paperback – December 5, 2000
by
Charles Ferguson
(Author)
Charles Ferguson's hilarious, hard-boiled journey into the heart of high-tech darkness has become the signal book of the start-up generation. Ferguson took a good idea, started a company, and sold it to Microsoft for $133 million -- all in less than two years. High Stakes, No Prisoners is both a blistering inside account of how he did it and a brilliant tour of the brutally competitive and utterly unique world of Silicon Valley.
- Print length400 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherThree Rivers Press
- Publication dateDecember 5, 2000
- Dimensions6 x 1 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-10060980698X
- ISBN-13978-0609806982
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Sign up now
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
uson's hilarious, hard-boiled journey into the heart of high-tech darkness has become the signal book of the start-up generation. Ferguson took a good idea, started a company, and sold it to Microsoft for $133 million -- all in less than two years. High Stakes, No Prisoners is both a blistering inside account of how he did it and a brilliant tour of the brutally competitive and utterly unique world of Silicon Valley.
From the Back Cover
"A minefield of a book . . . few give a better portrait of the financial machinations that govern the life of a start-up."
-- Scott Herhold, San Jose Mercury News
"The Liar's Poker of the Internet economy . . . a wickedly funny book, in its way just as amusing as The New New Thing, but it is also more systematically informative about the technology business."
-- James Fallows, The New York Review of Books
"A fine, edgy story . . . Microsoft takes no prisoners, and neither does Charles Ferguson."
-- Steve Hamm, Business Week
"Great reading . . . Ferguson has a flair for describing the inside angle, and he relishes serving up unflattering descriptions of some of the tech industry's biggest names."
-- Thomas Goetz, The Industry Standard
"A terrific inside account of the journey from inspiration to start-up to IPO to takeover target. Fascinating."
-- Chicago Tribune
-- Scott Herhold, San Jose Mercury News
"The Liar's Poker of the Internet economy . . . a wickedly funny book, in its way just as amusing as The New New Thing, but it is also more systematically informative about the technology business."
-- James Fallows, The New York Review of Books
"A fine, edgy story . . . Microsoft takes no prisoners, and neither does Charles Ferguson."
-- Steve Hamm, Business Week
"Great reading . . . Ferguson has a flair for describing the inside angle, and he relishes serving up unflattering descriptions of some of the tech industry's biggest names."
-- Thomas Goetz, The Industry Standard
"A terrific inside account of the journey from inspiration to start-up to IPO to takeover target. Fascinating."
-- Chicago Tribune
About the Author
CHARLES H. FERGUSON founded Vermeer Technologies with Randy Forgaard in 1994. Previously, Ferguson consulted to the White House and some of the world's leading high-tech companies. He has written for the Harvard Business Review, the New York Times, and Foreign Policy, and is the coauthor (with Charles R. Morris) of the critically acclaimed Computer Wars. He currently divides his time between economic policy research and high technology investing.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
"A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money."
--Senator Everett Dirksen
"You are not the kind of guy who would be at a place like this at this time of the morning. But here you are . . ."
--Jay McInerney, the opening lines of Bright Lights, Big City
In the late summer of 1993, I got the beginnings of a very cool, very big idea--an idea that could create a huge new industry. After spending the rest of the year timidly thinking of starting a company, I finally decided to try. Randy Forgaard and I shook hands and founded Vermeer Technologies in April of 1994. Barely a month later, we discovered that about two-thirds of my idea was useless--the World Wide Web had gotten there first. However, the Web also seemed to make the remaining portion of my idea even more powerful. We refocused on that and rolled the dice. We secured $4 million in venture capital in February 1995, shipped the first version of the FrontPage product in October 1995, and sold the company to Microsoft in January 1996. It was a wild ride: fascinating, exciting, brutal, tense, unforgettable. Some of it, including my sudden wealth, sometimes feels bizarre. I grew up in a poor family and had finished graduate school thirty thousand dollars in debt only a few years before starting Vermeer.
Yet, by the standards of the Internet industry, we barely made it into the middle class. Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Jerry Yang of Yahoo! are each worth billions; five years ago, nobody had heard of either of them. For better or worse, one of the most striking characteristics of American high technology is that sudden riches like this are almost routine. No other industry, in any nation, makes it so easy to start a business, make a difference, get rich--and do it fast. This is not to say that success is easy, or that there are any guarantees. Our principal competitors were Microsoft, America Online (AOL), and Netscape; many of the other start-ups we either competed or partnered with in 1994 and 1995 got killed or were snapped up at fire-sale prices.
But if you get it right, the results are staggering. As I write this, FrontPage has already become the industry standard for Web site development software. It has nearly three million users and holds about 70 percent of the world market for Web page development software. A rapidly increasing fraction of the world's Web servers are equipped with FrontPage software. As I had predicted, our technology has become strategically critical to Microsoft. FrontPage is being bundled with the new version of Microsoft Office, and from now on, Office will use FrontPage's technology for posting documents to Web servers. Nobody else has that technology.
Since Office has more than 90 percent market share, we can safely assume that within a few years, virtually all Web servers will be FrontPage enabled, and Microsoft will be on its way to securing yet another monopoly. No, this does not make me totally happy, but as you'll see, we had little choice. Netscape under Jim Barksdale was out to lunch, and Microsoft would have killed us if we had tried to go it alone.
And yet even Microsoft's power can't suppress the wave of new start-ups driven by the Internet revolution. Despite its many flaws, the Silicon Valley start-up system unquestionably works. It is the crown jewel of the American economy and a critical driver of American high technology. Silicon Valley itself is an amazing place--electric, addictive, vulgar, full of brilliance, brutally fair and brutally unfair, fiercely competitive, often dishonest, tremendously exciting, and utterly unique. It is no coincidence that the Internet revolution is headquartered there. I'd spent a lot of time in the Valley before starting Vermeer, but I had never really appreciated the sheer intensity of the place until my own future, my own fortune, and the careers of fifty other people who had put their faith in me were on the line.
I've been fortunate enough to observe and participate in the high technology world from several different angles, and at levels ranging from working-level employee to start-up founder to MIT policy analyst to White House consultant. Highest level is not always best; I learned more by starting Vermeer than I did by testifying before Congress. But I think the combination of these experiences has been extremely valuable and has given me an unusual perspective on high technology and the Internet industry, their effects on the world, and the issues they raise. In fact, government policy has been much more important in shaping the Internet industry than most people realize, and it played a major though indirect role in Vermeer's ultimate fate.
Thus, I hope to capture the entire high technology experience in this book: making a start-up really work; raising venture capital; being inside a world-historic revolution; dealing with Microsoft's power, trying to affect White House policy; being forced to deal with the environment that government policy has created. I want to convey the highs and the lows, the electric energy, the brainpower, and the quirky personalities in the Valley, as well as the brutal, ruthless maneuvering that few outsiders ever see. I also want to show how brilliant policymaking by technologists helped create this revolution, and yet how foolish regulatory policies and interest group politics are slowing it down.
Consequently this book tells three interconnected stories. The first is a personal account of what it really takes to do a winning high technology start-up, especially in the Internet industry, where any speed below warp nine doesn't even get you to takeoff. When I started this book, I discovered to my surprise that virtually nobody had written about this experience from the inside. Second, I describe the Internet revolution and analyze the strategic war for control of it, particularly the contest between Microsoft and Netscape and its effect on Vermeer. In doing this I combine my firsthand experience with a broad strategic analysis. And finally, I address the large-scale economic and political issues raised by the Internet and the information era: the question of Microsoft's power, the even worse problem presented by telecommunications monopolies, and the new issues of electronic money, privacy, political censorship, and the effects of information technology on the American and global economies. Forgive me; I still have the MIT political scientist lurking inside.
--Senator Everett Dirksen
"You are not the kind of guy who would be at a place like this at this time of the morning. But here you are . . ."
--Jay McInerney, the opening lines of Bright Lights, Big City
In the late summer of 1993, I got the beginnings of a very cool, very big idea--an idea that could create a huge new industry. After spending the rest of the year timidly thinking of starting a company, I finally decided to try. Randy Forgaard and I shook hands and founded Vermeer Technologies in April of 1994. Barely a month later, we discovered that about two-thirds of my idea was useless--the World Wide Web had gotten there first. However, the Web also seemed to make the remaining portion of my idea even more powerful. We refocused on that and rolled the dice. We secured $4 million in venture capital in February 1995, shipped the first version of the FrontPage product in October 1995, and sold the company to Microsoft in January 1996. It was a wild ride: fascinating, exciting, brutal, tense, unforgettable. Some of it, including my sudden wealth, sometimes feels bizarre. I grew up in a poor family and had finished graduate school thirty thousand dollars in debt only a few years before starting Vermeer.
Yet, by the standards of the Internet industry, we barely made it into the middle class. Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Jerry Yang of Yahoo! are each worth billions; five years ago, nobody had heard of either of them. For better or worse, one of the most striking characteristics of American high technology is that sudden riches like this are almost routine. No other industry, in any nation, makes it so easy to start a business, make a difference, get rich--and do it fast. This is not to say that success is easy, or that there are any guarantees. Our principal competitors were Microsoft, America Online (AOL), and Netscape; many of the other start-ups we either competed or partnered with in 1994 and 1995 got killed or were snapped up at fire-sale prices.
But if you get it right, the results are staggering. As I write this, FrontPage has already become the industry standard for Web site development software. It has nearly three million users and holds about 70 percent of the world market for Web page development software. A rapidly increasing fraction of the world's Web servers are equipped with FrontPage software. As I had predicted, our technology has become strategically critical to Microsoft. FrontPage is being bundled with the new version of Microsoft Office, and from now on, Office will use FrontPage's technology for posting documents to Web servers. Nobody else has that technology.
Since Office has more than 90 percent market share, we can safely assume that within a few years, virtually all Web servers will be FrontPage enabled, and Microsoft will be on its way to securing yet another monopoly. No, this does not make me totally happy, but as you'll see, we had little choice. Netscape under Jim Barksdale was out to lunch, and Microsoft would have killed us if we had tried to go it alone.
And yet even Microsoft's power can't suppress the wave of new start-ups driven by the Internet revolution. Despite its many flaws, the Silicon Valley start-up system unquestionably works. It is the crown jewel of the American economy and a critical driver of American high technology. Silicon Valley itself is an amazing place--electric, addictive, vulgar, full of brilliance, brutally fair and brutally unfair, fiercely competitive, often dishonest, tremendously exciting, and utterly unique. It is no coincidence that the Internet revolution is headquartered there. I'd spent a lot of time in the Valley before starting Vermeer, but I had never really appreciated the sheer intensity of the place until my own future, my own fortune, and the careers of fifty other people who had put their faith in me were on the line.
I've been fortunate enough to observe and participate in the high technology world from several different angles, and at levels ranging from working-level employee to start-up founder to MIT policy analyst to White House consultant. Highest level is not always best; I learned more by starting Vermeer than I did by testifying before Congress. But I think the combination of these experiences has been extremely valuable and has given me an unusual perspective on high technology and the Internet industry, their effects on the world, and the issues they raise. In fact, government policy has been much more important in shaping the Internet industry than most people realize, and it played a major though indirect role in Vermeer's ultimate fate.
Thus, I hope to capture the entire high technology experience in this book: making a start-up really work; raising venture capital; being inside a world-historic revolution; dealing with Microsoft's power, trying to affect White House policy; being forced to deal with the environment that government policy has created. I want to convey the highs and the lows, the electric energy, the brainpower, and the quirky personalities in the Valley, as well as the brutal, ruthless maneuvering that few outsiders ever see. I also want to show how brilliant policymaking by technologists helped create this revolution, and yet how foolish regulatory policies and interest group politics are slowing it down.
Consequently this book tells three interconnected stories. The first is a personal account of what it really takes to do a winning high technology start-up, especially in the Internet industry, where any speed below warp nine doesn't even get you to takeoff. When I started this book, I discovered to my surprise that virtually nobody had written about this experience from the inside. Second, I describe the Internet revolution and analyze the strategic war for control of it, particularly the contest between Microsoft and Netscape and its effect on Vermeer. In doing this I combine my firsthand experience with a broad strategic analysis. And finally, I address the large-scale economic and political issues raised by the Internet and the information era: the question of Microsoft's power, the even worse problem presented by telecommunications monopolies, and the new issues of electronic money, privacy, political censorship, and the effects of information technology on the American and global economies. Forgive me; I still have the MIT political scientist lurking inside.
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I'd like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Three Rivers Press; 1st Pbk. Ed edition (December 5, 2000)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 400 pages
- ISBN-10 : 060980698X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0609806982
- Item Weight : 12.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 1 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,050,737 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,553 in Computers & Technology Industry
- #2,463 in Starting a Business (Books)
- #5,695 in Internet & Telecommunications
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5
49 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on August 28, 2013
Verified Purchase
ignore all the personality quirks, what we have here is a rare thing - an unvarnished account by an insider of what it took to make a deal with the VC sharks during the dawn of the Internet Age and come out of it with something you could take to the bank. You wont find many other tech business books giving such a detailed account from start to finish. Though it is lacking on the technical side, the view from the 'money guys' is pretty detailed. It is pretty amazing to realize the whole arc of the story is only about two years. Makes me wonder what I have been doing the last 10 years since I read this book, commuting my life away. To then leverage his proceeds into some constructive social documentaries like 'Inside Job' is a great second act, if only the Larry Ellisons or Steve Ballmers had that kind of commitment to civic culture.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
4.0 out of 5 stars
Some interesting observations about managing startups, very mixed impression in technology area
Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2010Verified Purchase
I was a heavy user of FrontPage almost from its first release by Microsoft and heard about the book several times, but read the book only now.
This is a good book, but it essentially consists of two books in one: one is about business culture of Internet start-ups and venture capital in early 1990th and the second is about technology as it was understood by the author in late 90th. It also colored by really unpleasant, arrogant and confrontational personality of the author.
Only the first on those two books has lasting value. I have found insights about Internet startups environment fascinating although behavior of the author at times was really questionable despite his attempt to present himself in a favorable light. The author adopts Machiavellian approach ("no prisoners") and is ready play dirty (he described patent trolling that his startup was engaged is in gory details). He also tried to create a lock-in for the product with so called FrontPage extensions.
His descriptions of other players such as Netscape and Microsoft are quite paranoid but he conveys the cut-throat atmosphere of Internet startups in mid 1990th quite accurately. The description of his conflict with the hired by VC CEO John Mandle is quite typical and quite educating story. Another interesting story is how he talked with a programmer who decided to go to Netscape although he was just in late interviewing/pre-hiring stage with Vermeer (p 92-93). Here is a very telling quote:
>>>>>>
I told him we'd utterly destroy him if he breathed a word about us. I warned him that if he even told Netscape of our existence that he'd be violating our nondisclosure agreement. Furthermore, I said, if Netscape announce similar products, we'll go after you and them for a few billion dollars. Their position will be that they didn't know that you were betraying us, and they'll probably let you twist in the wind. Your depositions and court appearances will take years and your legal bills will bankrupt you, We'll have private detectives going over every phone call you've ever made, every e-mail you've ever send, every dream you've ever had, every lie you've ever told. Netscape will fire you and you'll never work in this industry gain. If you need a demonstration that I can be a complete bastard let me know and I would be happy to provide it. Do you get it. He did; I scared the hell out of him, which was just fine.
<<<<<<
Super-sized egos and arrogance are helpful in get financing and starting the business but are bad in running the company, especially with hired CEO. That's actually classic Greek tragedy theme: qualities which initially helped the hero to get to the top eventually lead to his demise. The author self-characterization "I was extremely tense, angry, and frequently unpleasant, but I'm not stupid" (p. 261) say it all. The guy really has had huge personality problems. Was he a sociopath or borderline personality in unclear. The other reviews address this point more in-depth (see Jane Smith's review from December 2004)
The period covered in the book is just approximately a year or year and a half: $4 million of financing was secured in February 1995 and company was sold to Microsoft for 130 millions in January 1996. To produce a solid HTML editor in 20 months is not something incredible, but as staff was distracted by countless presentations as well as political maneuvering and infighting, it's still impressive. The author did manage to assemble a good technical team with two lead technical guys: Randy Forgaard (co-founder of Verme and the key and Andrew Schulert were essentially the designers of the product. Role of Ferguson is unclear from the book and there may be none.
Despite many true and insightful observations, the author technology views as well as bits of Internet history scatted in the book and related deliberations very frequently generated in me some kind of protest: either because they look to me questionable from historical point of view or from technological point of view or both. The author never have been a programmer. He does has BS in mathematics but that's about it. So all his apt observations about "Nontechnical professional CEO problem" (p.285) are applicable. Sometimes he is completely off the mark like his lament that Netscape did not port its webserver to Netware as well as his remark "None of its Webservers ever run on Windows 3.1". The first would be waste of money and time, the second would be waste of time and money :-). All-in-all I do not trust his analysis of Netscape demise in Chapter 9 although he makes many good, valid points. And I would like to remind readers that Netscape was sold to AOL for 4 billion dollars not for $150 millions. So in comparison with Netscape Vermeer was tiny, obscure, peripheral Internet startup and the fact that Microsoft spend 150 millions on it is really surprising. It was just one day moth. All the major history of FrontPage was written after Vermeer acquisition by Microsoft and truth be told Microsoft did a very good job of developing the product.
All-in-all this is a book written by a very sharp businessman who managed to assemble a good team and launch a startup that produced pretty good Windows-based HTML editor. Getting from Microsoft 130 millions for HTML editor that was just one year in development and which Microsoft can replicate in probably less then a year at half-cost, the product which at the time of acquisition sold less then 300 copies, was an impressive business achievement.
It is important to understand that there was nothing revolutionary or visionary in the decision to create GUI-based HTML editor for Windows in 1994. Technologically it was all dull work with no new or existing components despite author claims. It was essentially a purely commercial project and I understand reluctance of venture capital guys to finance it. I would not if I were in their place. It was pretty risky business plan even in the crazy atmosphere of the growing dot-com boom. So that fact that the author executed business portion of the strategy pretty successfully and managed to milk acquisition for so much money is really amazing. As far as I remember the first version sold by Microsoft it was a good, solid editor but was far from "breakthrough" and has "provincial" Windows-centric architecture (no support of regular expressions, no macro language or some external API for editor). It was acceptable but it was clearly inferior in quality to Office products in both interface and in the absence of the macro language. Actually Microsoft greatly improved it in subsequent versions up to FrontPage 2003, but the fact that it was initially developed outside of Office team remained a handicap. For example spell checker in FrontPage 2003 was still inferior in comparison with MS Word.
And of course FrontPage was never in the same league of complexity and sophistication as MS Word. In this sense I have a feeling that Microsoft decided to buy Vermeer instead of producing equal of better HTML editor in a year or so only because it needed HTML editor quickly and did not want to wait six month or so. May be that was one of the first signs of Microsoft decline ;-).
I also disagree with the author assessment of the speed in Internet penetration. Many ISPs provided shell accounts in early 1994 which could be used to browse Web. Generally in 1994 it was clear for many people that Internet and World Wide Web will have tremendous importance.
Among negatives of the book is black and write mentality, superficial understanding of dot-com boom and the technology development it entailed (visible in the constant bashing of Netscape and incompetent bashing of Microsoft; you need to read Hard Drive to understand Microsoft better) as well as personality problems with nasty bashing of several personalities involved and first of all hired Vermeer's CEO throughout the book. Double standard mentality typical for sociopathic personalities is also visible in some episodes for example in getting a cash severance payment for himself.
I think the author was tremendously lucky to be at the right place at the right time, and his venture was not that different from many other "one day", "make money fast" ventures of dot-com era. It was not the most useless either.
This is a good book, but it essentially consists of two books in one: one is about business culture of Internet start-ups and venture capital in early 1990th and the second is about technology as it was understood by the author in late 90th. It also colored by really unpleasant, arrogant and confrontational personality of the author.
Only the first on those two books has lasting value. I have found insights about Internet startups environment fascinating although behavior of the author at times was really questionable despite his attempt to present himself in a favorable light. The author adopts Machiavellian approach ("no prisoners") and is ready play dirty (he described patent trolling that his startup was engaged is in gory details). He also tried to create a lock-in for the product with so called FrontPage extensions.
His descriptions of other players such as Netscape and Microsoft are quite paranoid but he conveys the cut-throat atmosphere of Internet startups in mid 1990th quite accurately. The description of his conflict with the hired by VC CEO John Mandle is quite typical and quite educating story. Another interesting story is how he talked with a programmer who decided to go to Netscape although he was just in late interviewing/pre-hiring stage with Vermeer (p 92-93). Here is a very telling quote:
>>>>>>
I told him we'd utterly destroy him if he breathed a word about us. I warned him that if he even told Netscape of our existence that he'd be violating our nondisclosure agreement. Furthermore, I said, if Netscape announce similar products, we'll go after you and them for a few billion dollars. Their position will be that they didn't know that you were betraying us, and they'll probably let you twist in the wind. Your depositions and court appearances will take years and your legal bills will bankrupt you, We'll have private detectives going over every phone call you've ever made, every e-mail you've ever send, every dream you've ever had, every lie you've ever told. Netscape will fire you and you'll never work in this industry gain. If you need a demonstration that I can be a complete bastard let me know and I would be happy to provide it. Do you get it. He did; I scared the hell out of him, which was just fine.
<<<<<<
Super-sized egos and arrogance are helpful in get financing and starting the business but are bad in running the company, especially with hired CEO. That's actually classic Greek tragedy theme: qualities which initially helped the hero to get to the top eventually lead to his demise. The author self-characterization "I was extremely tense, angry, and frequently unpleasant, but I'm not stupid" (p. 261) say it all. The guy really has had huge personality problems. Was he a sociopath or borderline personality in unclear. The other reviews address this point more in-depth (see Jane Smith's review from December 2004)
The period covered in the book is just approximately a year or year and a half: $4 million of financing was secured in February 1995 and company was sold to Microsoft for 130 millions in January 1996. To produce a solid HTML editor in 20 months is not something incredible, but as staff was distracted by countless presentations as well as political maneuvering and infighting, it's still impressive. The author did manage to assemble a good technical team with two lead technical guys: Randy Forgaard (co-founder of Verme and the key and Andrew Schulert were essentially the designers of the product. Role of Ferguson is unclear from the book and there may be none.
Despite many true and insightful observations, the author technology views as well as bits of Internet history scatted in the book and related deliberations very frequently generated in me some kind of protest: either because they look to me questionable from historical point of view or from technological point of view or both. The author never have been a programmer. He does has BS in mathematics but that's about it. So all his apt observations about "Nontechnical professional CEO problem" (p.285) are applicable. Sometimes he is completely off the mark like his lament that Netscape did not port its webserver to Netware as well as his remark "None of its Webservers ever run on Windows 3.1". The first would be waste of money and time, the second would be waste of time and money :-). All-in-all I do not trust his analysis of Netscape demise in Chapter 9 although he makes many good, valid points. And I would like to remind readers that Netscape was sold to AOL for 4 billion dollars not for $150 millions. So in comparison with Netscape Vermeer was tiny, obscure, peripheral Internet startup and the fact that Microsoft spend 150 millions on it is really surprising. It was just one day moth. All the major history of FrontPage was written after Vermeer acquisition by Microsoft and truth be told Microsoft did a very good job of developing the product.
All-in-all this is a book written by a very sharp businessman who managed to assemble a good team and launch a startup that produced pretty good Windows-based HTML editor. Getting from Microsoft 130 millions for HTML editor that was just one year in development and which Microsoft can replicate in probably less then a year at half-cost, the product which at the time of acquisition sold less then 300 copies, was an impressive business achievement.
It is important to understand that there was nothing revolutionary or visionary in the decision to create GUI-based HTML editor for Windows in 1994. Technologically it was all dull work with no new or existing components despite author claims. It was essentially a purely commercial project and I understand reluctance of venture capital guys to finance it. I would not if I were in their place. It was pretty risky business plan even in the crazy atmosphere of the growing dot-com boom. So that fact that the author executed business portion of the strategy pretty successfully and managed to milk acquisition for so much money is really amazing. As far as I remember the first version sold by Microsoft it was a good, solid editor but was far from "breakthrough" and has "provincial" Windows-centric architecture (no support of regular expressions, no macro language or some external API for editor). It was acceptable but it was clearly inferior in quality to Office products in both interface and in the absence of the macro language. Actually Microsoft greatly improved it in subsequent versions up to FrontPage 2003, but the fact that it was initially developed outside of Office team remained a handicap. For example spell checker in FrontPage 2003 was still inferior in comparison with MS Word.
And of course FrontPage was never in the same league of complexity and sophistication as MS Word. In this sense I have a feeling that Microsoft decided to buy Vermeer instead of producing equal of better HTML editor in a year or so only because it needed HTML editor quickly and did not want to wait six month or so. May be that was one of the first signs of Microsoft decline ;-).
I also disagree with the author assessment of the speed in Internet penetration. Many ISPs provided shell accounts in early 1994 which could be used to browse Web. Generally in 1994 it was clear for many people that Internet and World Wide Web will have tremendous importance.
Among negatives of the book is black and write mentality, superficial understanding of dot-com boom and the technology development it entailed (visible in the constant bashing of Netscape and incompetent bashing of Microsoft; you need to read Hard Drive to understand Microsoft better) as well as personality problems with nasty bashing of several personalities involved and first of all hired Vermeer's CEO throughout the book. Double standard mentality typical for sociopathic personalities is also visible in some episodes for example in getting a cash severance payment for himself.
I think the author was tremendously lucky to be at the right place at the right time, and his venture was not that different from many other "one day", "make money fast" ventures of dot-com era. It was not the most useless either.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2014
Verified Purchase
Venture teams/inventors/entrepreneurs - do you know the way to San Jose?
Absolutely not, until you have read and re-read Chapter 3 of "High St@kes, No Prisoners" comparing what you'll uncover there - each topic in Ch. 3 - versus the alternative "Beacon Model" of community supported venture capitalization for high growth ventures.
For additional prep, read "Rock-A-Bye IP" and be sure to tour the "virtuous circle" that you will find on BrightChange.org.
Bon voyage.
Absolutely not, until you have read and re-read Chapter 3 of "High St@kes, No Prisoners" comparing what you'll uncover there - each topic in Ch. 3 - versus the alternative "Beacon Model" of community supported venture capitalization for high growth ventures.
For additional prep, read "Rock-A-Bye IP" and be sure to tour the "virtuous circle" that you will find on BrightChange.org.
Bon voyage.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2001
Verified Purchase
The part about raising capital is excellent (actually, I remembered reading a very similar article in Fast Company a year or two ago).
What I didn't like was the constant bashing of Netscape, and Vermeer's CEO throughout the book. There's also a certain double standard mentality: the author accuses the CEO of trying to negotiate an unfairly good personal deal, yet later in the book demands a cash severance payment for himself; talks about how immoral the CEO was for suggesting sending engineers to competitors to interview hoping to learn about their technologies, yet later in the book admits that obtaining Microsoft's beta code through 'a friend' was Ok under the circumstances.
In a nutshell, this book about being in the right place at the right time.
What I didn't like was the constant bashing of Netscape, and Vermeer's CEO throughout the book. There's also a certain double standard mentality: the author accuses the CEO of trying to negotiate an unfairly good personal deal, yet later in the book demands a cash severance payment for himself; talks about how immoral the CEO was for suggesting sending engineers to competitors to interview hoping to learn about their technologies, yet later in the book admits that obtaining Microsoft's beta code through 'a friend' was Ok under the circumstances.
In a nutshell, this book about being in the right place at the right time.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on October 25, 1999
Verified Purchase
High Stakes, No Prisoners. should be titled, In Over My Head. Charles Ferguson uses this book to skewer everyone in the Tech World. Particularly those who weren't patient listening to his paranoid rants. Charles had a good idea with the Frontpage product and it was successful despite his pathetic management. He was very luck to align himself with some talented people who worked very hard to mitigate his damage. The few times that Charles is right in this book is when he calls himself names! The other time was when he states that he was the only Vermeer employee that did not get a job offer from Microsoft when they were sold. In fact, Microsoft paid him to stay silent for 18 months just to make sure he wouldn't undermine the whole purchase. Don't waste your money on this book.
15 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2014
Verified Purchase
very interesting story, got some good behind the scenes info that you rarely get access to.
Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2012
Verified Purchase
If you want to risk a start-up....run, don't walk and find this book. HIGH STAKES, NO PRISONERS!!!! If you just want the fun of reading a real present day WHO DUNNIT - do the same! A page turner.
Top reviews from other countries
Brian M
4.0 out of 5 stars
Compulsory reading for startup founders and venture capitalists alike
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 24, 2022Verified Purchase
Although this book is a heavy duty read, it should probably be compulsory reading for startup founders and venture capitalists alike. On the surface it is a tale of success, the story of a company in that was created and quickly exited in the early internet boom. Underpinning this was some strategic brilliance and outstanding execution by what seems to have been a very talented team. However, the reality is that it was so close to going wrong because this is a tale of egos, naivety, misunderstanding, conflicting agendas, short tempers and mismanagement too.
While the other reviewers are right in that this has dated a bit, that actually makes it even more relevant. Modern venture capital practice is usually much better understood by founders and conventions now smooth over many of the issues that the book raises. However, the same cross-motivations and conflicts of interest are still there under the surface and could derail companies without strong leadership and clear objectives. Books aren't written about failures and this may be the best example of what can go wrong, even if it didn't ruin the company in the end.
The author has confidence in talents that may border on arrogance, but is candid about his flaws too and generous in his praise of the technical team. He seems to have spent half of the company's existence arguing with VCs and people he wishes he had never recruited. Despite all this, you root for him.
The last three chapters are commentary on US anti-trust policy, Microsoft and the internet. His perspective on the latter is very prescient, as many (most?) of his predictions have come to pass, albeit several trends were already apparent in 2000. It is perhaps only in recent months that we have finally seen a change in anti-trust, but a lot of damage has been done in the interim. The case against Microsoft didn't bring any of the remedies he discusses. Many consider it cramped Microsoft anyway, but it may be that Ballmer's management did much of that without any help. As case studies they have interest, but only the internet chapter really seems to have direct relevance to the rest of the book. These chapters in particular would have benefited from tighter editting as some point keep being repeated.
In summary, worthwhile read with a great story and plenty to think about.
While the other reviewers are right in that this has dated a bit, that actually makes it even more relevant. Modern venture capital practice is usually much better understood by founders and conventions now smooth over many of the issues that the book raises. However, the same cross-motivations and conflicts of interest are still there under the surface and could derail companies without strong leadership and clear objectives. Books aren't written about failures and this may be the best example of what can go wrong, even if it didn't ruin the company in the end.
The author has confidence in talents that may border on arrogance, but is candid about his flaws too and generous in his praise of the technical team. He seems to have spent half of the company's existence arguing with VCs and people he wishes he had never recruited. Despite all this, you root for him.
The last three chapters are commentary on US anti-trust policy, Microsoft and the internet. His perspective on the latter is very prescient, as many (most?) of his predictions have come to pass, albeit several trends were already apparent in 2000. It is perhaps only in recent months that we have finally seen a change in anti-trust, but a lot of damage has been done in the interim. The case against Microsoft didn't bring any of the remedies he discusses. Many consider it cramped Microsoft anyway, but it may be that Ballmer's management did much of that without any help. As case studies they have interest, but only the internet chapter really seems to have direct relevance to the rest of the book. These chapters in particular would have benefited from tighter editting as some point keep being repeated.
In summary, worthwhile read with a great story and plenty to think about.
MR M.
4.0 out of 5 stars
VC's and not so useful CEO's.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 27, 2014Verified Purchase
Interesting book about the politics of the silicon valley, VC's and not so useful CEO's.
