Other Sellers on Amazon
& FREE Shipping
90% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
+ $3.99 shipping
83% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the Author
OK
On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt Paperback – June 3, 2014
| Richard Carrier (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Enhance your purchase
- Print length712 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSheffield Phoenix Press Ltd
- Publication dateJune 3, 2014
- Dimensions6.14 x 1.42 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-101909697494
- ISBN-13978-1909697492
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Don't have a Kindle? Compra tu Kindle aquí, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Sheffield Phoenix Press Ltd (June 3, 2014)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 712 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1909697494
- ISBN-13 : 978-1909697492
- Item Weight : 2.16 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.14 x 1.42 x 9.21 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #52,843 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Dr. Richard Carrier is a published historian and philosopher, specializing in the philosophy of naturalism and the intellectual history of Greece and Rome. He's a veteran of the U.S. Coast Guard with a B.A. from U.C. Berkeley in History and Classical Civilizations, and a Ph.D. in ancient history from Columbia University. He has written extensively for the Secular Web and in various periodicals and books, and discussed his views in public all over the country and on TV.
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Specifically, Carrier introduces 49 Elements in the first third of the book, which he refers back to constantly when demonstrating his arguments. This is helpful for both believers and non-believers, as it makes it very clear what the claims are, how they are arrived at, and what sort of discussions would help determine where the truth is on the matter. When we don't know, he's honest enough to say that.
Additionally, he discusses the artful, literary arrangement of Matthew and Luke/Acts, showing how and why these moral tales were constructed, and how unlikely it is that a historical figure with friends and family existed during the founding of Christianity.
Additionally, he takes a look at the Rank/Raglin hero-type, which is a theory born in the early 1900s. Two scholars began to notice the similarities between many past mythical figures, and devised a 22-point system which described common characteristics between known mythical heroes. Jesus fits the list very well, as do a few of the other known fabrications within the bible, such as Moses and Joseph.
Additionally, he explains and sketches the circumstances of pre-Christian Judaism with the accuracy and context of a historian, and makes a convincing analysis of the prophecy within Jewish books that suggests many elements that came to be identified within Christianity. It's surprising how closely the book of Daniel and the Psalms predict exactly what was said to happen. That's the problem with prophecy; when people are aware of it, and are desperately trying to understand the future, a prophecy becomes self-fulfilling simply because people expect it to happen. The actual events, which probably did not happen, are less important than what religious leaders though *should* happen or *should have* happened.
Excellent book!
Carrier convincingly shows how little reliable evidence we have for the historical Jesus. We have almost nothing.
We can basically dispense with almost all of the evidence for the historical Jesus. The Gospels are filled with allegories and magic. There may be historical fact in there somewhere, but we lack reliable means of figuring out what it is. It is unclear whether the later Christian writers knew much about the historical Jesus and there is pervasive corruption and doctoring of the sources. You don’t have to trust Carrier on this—other scholars have shown that later authors tampered extensively with the evidence. The most obvious cases are probably the Josephus interpolations and the fake epistles. The worst part is that we don’t really know how corrupted the evidence is—some of the writings that we think are authentic could very well be fake/manipulated.
Carrier does an excellent job in presenting background evidence that shows how unsurprising it would be if Jesus was only a myth. The cases of King Ludd, the cargo cults, Joseph Smith’s golden plates, and the Roswell UFO crash illustrate how quickly people can come to believe crazy things even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Furthermore, we know that ancient peoples invented deities all of the time and created mystery cults around likely fictional people, like Osiris, Mithras, Attis, etc. Finally, ancient people historicized their gods/divine men (Heracles, Romulus).
The one remaining mystery is Paul’s epistles. In my view, the epistles are likely the only genuine clues that we have. But what are they evidence for? It is clear that Paul knew very little about the historical Jesus and that’s pretty weird (even Bart Ehreman and other defenders of the historicity of Jesus concede that this is puzzling). Yet I’m not entirely sold on Carrier’s interpretation that Paul only believed in a celestial Jesus. Much of the debate between historicists and mythicists on this involves delicate issues of textual interpretation and frankly I don’t put much stock in the reliability of arguments on either side. We just don’t have enough corroborating or contextual evidence to figure out what was going on with Paul.
Now let me turn to three problems with Carrier’s analysis.
First, Carrier has an elaborate theory about the mythical Jesus that involves Jesus descending from “outer space” and then being killed by demons. I’m skeptical that we can deduce that early Christians accepted this story (the Ascension of Isaiah is interesting but hardly conclusive) and, in any event, I don’t see why Carrier needs it. Instead of positing a bizarre celestial Jesus, Carrier could just deny that Jesus existed and argue that people made him up. Sure, the celestial Jesus is ONE possible explanation about how people mythologized Jesus. But why does Carrier need to commit to this strange and complicated story? It is also possible that early Christians thought Jesus was a real flesh and blood person on earth but that they invented this narrative too (analogous to King Arthur or King Ludd). Either way, Jesus could still have been a myth. So, it is unclear to me why Carrier commits himself to a controversial story about how the Jesus myth got started.
Okay, second problem. Why do we have so little evidence that early Christians believed in a celestial Jesus? Carrier’s answer: the historicist faction of Christianity won out and suppressed and altered the evidence. This might be true, but it is very risky to rely on this kind of quasi-conspiracy theory. The problem is that mythicists can cite this story to explain virtually anything. You don’t like something that Paul said? Blame it on the conspiracy. Where is the evidence that people accepted the story in the Ascension of Isaiah? The later Church destroyed it. See the problem? If we go down this road, then even the absence of evidence is evidence that the mythicists are right. It is true that there was tampering but mythicists can rely on the later suppression of evidence to justify whatever they want.
Final problem: I am unconvinced by Carrier’s “prior probability” that Jesus was unlikely to exist because other famous religious figures/divine men (Moses, Heracles, Romulas, etc) didn’t exist. For any of these myths, we can have two hypotheses: (1) the figure in question existed but then became heavily mythologized over time, or (2) the figure didn’t exist but was invented and mythologized. We just don’t know how often (2) happened instead of (1) with regards to religious figures in the ancient world. Perhaps there occasionally were real people who served as the basis of ancient myths. Since we don’t know even approximately how often this happened, I just don’t think we are in a position to assign prior probabilities yet to whether (2) is true for Jesus. At least, there is massive uncertainty here and it seems too quick to conclude that the prior probability that Jesus existed is, say, 33 percent (which is Carrier's number).
To sum up, this is a provocative and fascinating book. As you can see, it made me think more deeply about an important issue and that’s some of the best praise I can give for any book. But, unlike Carrier, I think the evidence requires a suspension of judgment about the existence of Jesus, not a determinate conclusion one way or the other. Anyway, this is a must-read for anyone who is interested in whether Jesus existed.
Top reviews from other countries
I stumbled into this topic during a period of binge-watching YouTube videos featuring NT scholar Bart Ehrman, a former fundamentalist Christian whose studies eventually turned him into an agnostic atheist. In one of these, Ehrman referred to a 'fringe' view among some that Jesus never existed, and quickly dismissed it.
Like many Christians, my first reaction was amazed disbelief that such a wackadoodle theory could be taken seriously. I watched some videos online and some debates.
I occasionally fact-checked the refutations and found that in fact, opponents of Richard Carrier often misrepresented or got their facts wrong. The Trent Horn debate in particular amazed me because Horn insisted that something was written in a text, but when I checked, it wasn't. (Horn claimed that the Life of Adam showed Adam being buried on Earth, Carrier said the text has him buried in the third heaven. Both were insistent, because a lot hangs on it, believe it or not. I checked. Carrier was right.)
Wow - what was going on? How could something I had believed all my life to be a historic fact by a myth? Why couldn't any of these experts demolish Carrier's argument, as I'd expected them to do?
So - I read it for myself. Slowly and carefully, often looking up the footnote references. Every serious argument from scriptures (e.g. Acts, Gospels, Epistles) and from the historical record (Josephus, Tacitus etc) is examined, dissected and evaluated according to Bayes theorem, using the following method:
- how likely is it that this text would look like this if Jesus was a historical figure?
against
- how likely is it that this text would look like this if Jesus began as a myth?
The chapter on the evidence from the gospels is particularly fascinating - a summary of recent scholarship that shows the brilliance of the four evangelists as myth-creators and propagandists.
In the end I was convinced - on the historicity of Jesus, there is indeed reason to doubt.
(Review by Maria, David's wife.)
The chapters are all interlinking, and more like a reference book where evidence is referenced around in different chapters so it's not an easy to read narrative. However it's interesting and has made me think about the topic more so. However the argument made also refers to other books from the author which I cannot cross reference because I haven't got them.
I find the topic very much repetitive throughout and as the argument is made in the first chapters I struggle to comprehend why the book continues. It feels likes I'm reading a thesis or scientific article rather than a book for public consumption.
Has it changed my mind about the historicity of Jesus? Not really, but to be honest it's doesn't make difference to me whether he existed or not. It's a thought provoking book.
If giraffes could speak, God would be a giraffe.
The bibliography is overwhelming (much checked), and testifies to the years of research undertaken in reaching a logical conclusion..
This book is only of use to those with an unshackled world-view.






