Buy new:
$18.95$18.95
FREE delivery: Saturday, Feb 11 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy Used: $12.23
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development (Dover Books on Mathematics) First Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Leather Bound
"Please retry" |
—
| $70.94 | — |
- Kindle
$9.99 Read with Our Free App - Leather Bound
$70.941 New from $70.94 - Paperback
$12.23 - $18.9533 Used from $2.07 7 New from $12.34
Enhance your purchase
But while the importance of the calculus and mathematical analysis ― the core of modern mathematics ― cannot be overemphasized, the value of this first comprehensive critical history of the calculus goes far beyond the subject matter. This book will fully counteract the impression of laymen, and of many mathematicians, that the great achievements of mathematics were formulated from the beginning in final form. It will give readers a sense of mathematics not as a technique, but as a habit of mind, and serve to bridge the gap between the sciences and the humanities. It will also make abundantly clear the modern understanding of mathematics by showing in detail how the concepts of the calculus gradually changed from the Greek view of the reality and immanence of mathematics to the revised concept of mathematical rigor developed by the great 19th century mathematicians, which held that any premises were valid so long as they were consistent with one another. It will make clear the ideas contributed by Zeno, Plato, Pythagoras, Eudoxus, the Arabic and Scholastic mathematicians, Newton, Leibnitz, Taylor, Descartes, Euler, Lagrange, Cantor, Weierstrass, and many others in the long passage from the Greek "method of exhaustion" and Zeno's paradoxes to the modern concept of the limit independent of sense experience; and illuminate not only the methods of mathematical discovery, but the foundations of mathematical thought as well.
- ISBN-100486605094
- ISBN-13978-0486605098
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherDover Publications
- Publication dateJune 1, 1959
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.41 x 0.71 x 7.96 inches
- Print length368 pages
![]() |
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : Dover Publications; First Edition (June 1, 1959)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 368 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0486605094
- ISBN-13 : 978-0486605098
- Item Weight : 13.1 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.41 x 0.71 x 7.96 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #201,579 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #37 in Calculus (Books)
- #137 in Mathematics History
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Within this context, it becomes crystal clear that the old arguments about the relative precedence of Newton and Leibniz are a relatively minor matter. Both of them relied heavily on a very long sequence of earlier developments, and both of them fell very far short of a satisfactory, logically self-consistent, meaningful formalism, which required another 200 years to develop.
This book has about a thousand footnotes. It is very thoroughly researched indeed. Boyer describes how various opposing forces were at work in the development of the calculus. Very important, for example, was the weight of tradition, such as the method of exhaustion of the ancient Greeks, which was held in high esteem. There was a strong resistance to abandonment of geometrical intuition as the basis of calculus, although ultimately a satisfactory axiomatization of the real numbers permitted calculus to be liberated from its geometric origins. Unsatisfactory concepts of infinity and the infinitesimal strongly constrained or encouraged many mathematicians to reject some formulations while accepting others.
One thing which worried me a lot is how much of modern calculus is still taught in the same way as many centuries ago, using ways of thinking which are obsolete, meaningless or logically circular. In fact, one of the themes of this book is how ancient ill-founded concepts have frequently been "rediscovered" and adopted by mathematicians, long after they had been superseded by better-founded concepts.
I ended with the suspicion that our modern-day calculus (or "analysis") is not the end of the road. Even our current calculus is a mixture of intuition, metaphysics, pragmatism and sometimes empty formalism. This book seems to put some of our currently accepted calculus concepts in doubt.
"At this point it may not be undesirable to discuss these ideas, with reference both to the intuitions and speculations from which they were derived and to their final rigorous formulation. This may serve to bring vividly to mind the precise character of the contemporary conceptions of the derivative and the integral, and thus to make unambiguously clear the <I>terminus ad quem</I> of the whole development."
I admit that back in 1939, when this book was originally written, it was common for academics to express themselves in that sort of haughty, impenetrable prose. But that doesn't make it any easier to read today, and it doesn't really provide those people with an excuse for having written that way. Didn't it occur to them that their writing might be read by real human beings? There are plenty of mathematical writers today who can write in real English without sacrificing rigor or depth.
Secondly, I recommend that everyone read the review by the reader from Phoenix (February 7, 2001). In particular, I agree with the criticism that this book takes a backwards approach to the history of Calculus, interpreting each historical idea and contribution in terms of the way we think of those ideas today. As Boyer certainly should have known, the proper way to relate the history of ideas is to place each idea in the context of its own time. Instead, he writes this book as if each ancient mathematician had tried and failed to reach the level of understanding which we superior moderns are now gifted with. I think it is important for a reader to read this book with this defect clearly in mind.
Having got those two criticisms off my chest, however, I have to admit that there is a wealth of interesting material in this book, and I don't know of any other place where it is all gathered together in one volume. If you want a detailed, in-depth account of how mathematicians and philosophers (they used to be the same people!) eventually evolved the ideas and methods of calculus, then this book is probably the best place to find it.
(I just wish the publisher would hire someone to translate it into real English!)
Top reviews from other countries
The title of the book mentions the "conceptual development", and thats were the book excels at, describing how the procedural evolution of maths got to the (invention? discovery?...who knows...) of Calculus.
It has never ceased to amaze me how accurately the differential ecuations describe the real physical fenomena or how Riemanns topology gave Einstein the mathematical foundation needed for his theory 100 years later and so on (if you are intrigued by the inner nature of mathematics DONT buy "Is God a Mathematician", a book more suited for an Oprah show than for someone really interested on the real nature of mathematics). Some reviewers were more critic with certain aspects of the book, fair enough, as humans we are fable, but I seriously doubt a better book on this subject has ever been written. Regrettably there are many books on the history of mathematics but most of them fail, not this one, as someone said , Boyer is the Edward Gibbon of the history of maths.
Thanks Newton, Euler, Rieman, Pitagoras, Pointcare, Leibniz, Cantor...I saw further because I stood on your shoulders.








