Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Holy Fox: The Life of Lord Halifax Paperback – January 1, 1997
| Andrew Roberts (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
- Print length360 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherWeidenfeld & Nicolson History,
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1997
- Dimensions5.47 x 1.22 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-101857994728
- ISBN-13978-1857994728
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : Weidenfeld & Nicolson History, (January 1, 1997)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 360 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1857994728
- ISBN-13 : 978-1857994728
- Item Weight : 1.07 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.47 x 1.22 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,224,577 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Andrew Roberts is a writer, speaker and Minister. He served as Fresh Expressions' Director of Training and co-authored the critically acclaimed fresh! an introduction to fresh expressions and pioneer ministry. He also edits Holy Habits Resources and Bible reading notes for BRF.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
1. His role in Tory intra party power conflicts in the 1920s
2. His role as Viceroy of India
3. His role as the Chamberlain government Foreign Secretary before and after Munich
4. His role as Churchill's Foreign Secretary
5. His appointment and service as Ambassador to the US
In each of these areas Andrew Roberts explains with impressive research and empathetic understanding the views of contemporaries and the later views of historians. Roberts is sympathetic as well as empathetic to Lord Irwin, later Lord Halifax, without glossing over mistakes or errors of judgement, and he tries to be fair to the character of a quite private person who rarely revealed his feelings to others. The "take aways" in each of the areas covered are as follows.
1. Edward Wood was a more effective and determined political operator than given away by his somewhat otherworldly demeanor.
2. In India his fundemental direction was to move India to self governance and Dominion status along the path of Canada and Australia on a time line of years, not decades. That this could not be ultimately done due to the combination of British Imperial pride and racism and rising Indian nationalism does not d1scredit his effort.
3. The positive aspect of appeasment is seen within its historical context. The moral blindness of a highly moral man like Lord Halifax can best be condemned by comparison to the few who did not share it at the time, not in retrospect. However, at the time of the Munich agreement the scales fell from Halifax's eyes and Roberts makes clear he knew very well that it was not "peace in our time" that had been gained but the promise of war soon. Roberts then convincingly holds that Halifax did everything he could in the following month to prepare Britain for war. The decision of Halifax to refuse the Premiership when Chamberlain fell in 1940 is given full and deserved credit.
4. The critical cabinet discussions about peace terms at the time of Dunkirk are dealt with fully and fairly. Roberts argues that Churchill and Halifax had a disagreement about timing and possiblity, not a disagreement about goals - a free, independent and powerful British Empire was the bottom line for both. Roberts is well aware that many British aristocrats would have accepted some level of German domination but certainly not Halifax.
5. The appointment of Halifax to the US Ambassador postion, and his loyal service there, is seen as the demotion it was and the result of both cabinet politics (see item 1) and Churchill's wishes. In light of Roberts' latest book "Masters and Commanders" it seems not entirely coincidental that the departure of Halifax and the appointment of General Alan Brooke as CIGS came in the same month of December, 1941. Churchill seemed to instinctively know he needed a truly strong person to prevent his enthusiasms and ideas from all being implemented but perhaps he could only tolerate one such other figure close to him.
All in all, a really fine work. One is not obligated to agree with all the conclusions and arguments made to accept the great value of this book in further defining the context of thought, actions and values that drove the critical decisions and actions of the 1930s and 40s.
In arguing that this judgment is incorrect, Andrew Roberts has given us an important, and detailed revision of the years leading up the Second World War.
He shows that Halifax saw Hitler in his true colours at the time of the Bad Godesberg meetings, and before the Munich Agreement.
From this time on he worked for a more realistic understanding of Hitler's real aims, and for rearmament and conscription.
Halifax came within a whisker of becoming Prime Minister in May 1940; the job was his to refuse. The Tory Party, and the King both wanted him, and it was argued that his place in House Lords was a barrier that could be removed.
Halifax must have realised himself that he was no war leader, and, inspite of massive doubts within the Tory Party, Halifax supported Churchill's claim.
From then on the story which unfolds is much less well known, and invites a re-assessment of Churchill's reputation.
Churchill - known to Halifax as The Rogue Elephant - needed Halifax to argue against his wilder schemes. The book is particularly important on relations with the Vichy regime, the problems associated with the French Navy, and the differences between Halifax and Churchill on how these should be handled.
It is not now very easy to understand that Britain was alone at this juncture, and that American support was very uncertain.
However, Halifax's attachment to Chamberlain's name made him important enemies, one of whom, Roberts reveals, was newspaper magnate Lord Beaverbrook.
When a new ambassador was needed in Washington, Halifax was not the first name mentioned. Beaverbrook saw to it that his name became prominent, and it is a blot on Churchill's reputation that he went along with this idea, almost certainly to rid him of the one minister in his cabinet who could stand up to him.
It is not pleasant reading.
A less time-specific reason for reading this book is that it portrays a now forgotten era when the aristocracy still dominated government in Britain.
Halifax comes across as a figure who eschewed "short termism" - now the current plague of British politics.
Andrew Roberts confirms his reputation as a major historian.
Top reviews from other countries
Confirms that in late 1939 Admiral John Godfrey was Churchill's protege for the head of the SIS; Halifax prevailed with Menzies. Why was Godfrey dispensable at the NID as early as October 1939?
A deeply unattractive person, he is brought vividly to life in this very understanding and even sympathetic biography. The well-known path from Munich until the start of the war is brought vividly to life - and still manages to sweep one along with excitement even though one knows how it all ended!

