Do the words meta, post-modern, or experimental make you cringe when used to describe books? Then turn back now. I feel the need to say that up front because many people seem to go into this book expecting a horror novel and wind up wasting their money. Just take a look at the genres that goodreads lists this as. Horror, fiction, fantasy, and mystery. With inapt labels like that, it's easy to see how people could get the wrong idea.
This is not a horror novel, nor is it a mystery novel or a fantasy novel. This book is, among many other things, a personal story about the author's parents presented as experimental literary fiction that's thinly veiled as a horror novel. Confused? Good, stay that way for now, and don't think too hard about what I just said. I'm not that into horror novels, and I generally like post-modern and experimental stuff, and I knew what I was getting into when I bought this. Know what you're getting into, that's all I'm trying to say.
Here's the basic concept as clear and concise as I can tell it. There are essentially three narrators that will be addressing you, the reader.
1) Zampano, an old blind man
2) Johnny Truant, a thirty-something druggie
3) The "editors"
Johnny's friend, Lude, knows Zampano because he lives in the same apartment building. The old man, ominously, tells Lude he's going to die soon, and does. After the body is gone, Lude and Johnny sneak into the apartment to take a look around at Zampano's things. They find a crazy manuscript, which Johnny takes home with him.
The manuscript is a non-fiction book/dissertation about a documentary called "The Navidson Record." The Navidson Record is about a famous photojournalist named Will Navidson and his family moving into a new house that is bigger on the inside. When I say non-fiction, I mean it. It reads like a textbook. On every page there are footnotes about other articles and other books that reference this documentary that, by all accounts, doesn't exist (I'll get to this in a second).
It starts out simple at first. After the family returns home from vacation they notice a hallway on the second floor connecting two bedrooms that wasn't there before. They track down a blueprint of the building and see that there is a space between the walls, although it's not supposed to be a finished hallway with doors. Okay, no big deal, maybe they didn't notice the doors before, it's a new house after all and they had just moved in before going on vacation. Then comes the realization that measuring the house through that hallway results in an extra inch that shouldn't exist, and that can't be explained. Then a new door appears, on the first floor this time, that should lead to an empty back yard but instead leads to a long, dark hallway that extends into an endless labyrinth of cavernous, thousand-foot rooms that leads to god knows where and contains god knows what, and the exploration of this door is the main focus of the documentary.
So Johnny finds this manuscript, reads it, edits it, adds his own footnotes relating to research he's done on Zampano's life and the manuscript contents (translations of foreign phrases, for instance), but also personal tangents about his own life and stream of consciousness ramblings. In the prologue where he explains how he found the manuscript, he also says that The Navidson Record doesn't actually exist. Johnny's editors also appear in footnotes and in the first say they have never met Johnny Truant in person, only communicating via letters and rare phone calls. Weird, right?
What follows is 528 pages of an interwoven, multi-layered story. On the one hand, you have Zampano's non-fiction book about this fictitious documentary, which simmers as a slow-paced "found-footage" horror novel that can be unsettling, thought-provoking, but is likely to disappoint hardcore horror fans looking for adrenaline-pumping scares.
Then you have Johnny's story, told through long footnotes, which is more vague and slow to reveal itself, but the basic idea is that although he knows the manuscript is fiction, the act of reading it causes him to lose his marbles. Whether the manuscript or Johnny's brain chemistry is to blame is up to the reader. Whether Johnny is even telling the truth is up to the reader. And, to be honest, Johnny's parts can sometimes be hard to read because he's just pitiable and depressing and the stream of consciousness prose can wear down your focus. It gets Joyce-esque at times, though only for short stretches, because Danielewski is a nice man who wants you to have a good time, unlike Joyce, who hates you and hates fun. Then the "story" part ends, and you have 130 pages of appendices (which you should read) which include things like:
Zampano's writings which are not a part of The Navidson Record
The obituary of Johnny's dad
Childhood letters from Johnny's crazy, institutionalized, long dead mother
Poems
So what does it all mean?
Well, it means a clever and perhaps over-educated man named Mark Danielewski decided to write a novel that experiments with the format of the novel, that pushes the boundaries of what a novel can be and what it can do. While much of it could quite fairly be called a gimmick, and it won't be redefining how all novels are written going forward, it's a gimmick that works, that is unique, that is stimulating, that is discussion-worthy, that makes the world more interesting by existing, and isn't that what good art is supposed to do? It is an unmitigated success at being singular, and because it is singular it will inspire intense love and intense hatred from different people.
It means that while there are answers, you will have to work for them. I mean this both figuratively and literally. On the literal side, there is a letter in the appendices that is written in a simple code, which you will have to translate into a coherent message with pen and paper. And that's a code that is plainly said to be a code. There are other codes that are truly hidden.
Many sections have weird, cluttered layouts that make the act of reading them hard, and make tracking down the right footnote a scavenger hunt. You'll be presented with footnotes that make no sense until you realize the text is broken up over several pages and presented backwards. There are a lot of elements to the story, little throwaway lines and facts that you need to remember, or write down. How did Johnny's dad die. How did Navidson's dad die. Stuff like that. While it's not absolutely necessary, I'd recommend having a notebook handy starting on page one. I have an amazing memory, took notes here and there, and still wish I'd taken more. Like I said, this book is work. It's fun work though, depending on your tastes and personality. I'm an INTP and I loved it. Your mileage may vary.
On the figurative side, the book still won't hold your hand and spell out what it all means in flashing neon. That's up to you to figure out by gathering all the evidence together and deconstructing the book on several different levels by asking yourself what's true and what isn't, what matters and what doesn't, what's literal and what's figurative, what's the metanarrative, what's the subtext. Ultimately it's up to you to decide when you're satisfied with your answer.
While this is nowhere near as open to interpretation as most books you'd label as post-modern or modernist, it is still open to interpretation compared to a typical novel, which isn't open to interpretation at all. There are no easy answers, no definitive answers, but there are satisfying answers that I firmly believe are more or less what the author intended, if you're willing to put in the effort to discover them and have a flexible mind that delights in abstract concepts. Alternatively there are, of course, existing breakdowns of it on the internet that you can turn to for some help, although none I've read have gone far enough into speculation. They present facts and evidence, point out what's true or not, but none of them have drawn the kind of final conclusion that I've drawn. That's how it should be. You should decide for yourself. If none of this sounds like fun to you, I recommend giving this one a pass
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Frequently bought together
This item: House of Leaves: The Remastered Full-Color Edition
$17.36
In Stock
+
Total price: $00
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- House Of Leaves (Turtleback School & Library Binding Edition) by Danielewski, Mark Z. (March 1, 2000) Library Bindingunknown authorPaperback$16.84 shippingGet it as soon as Thursday, Dec 19Only 14 left in stock - order soon.
From the Publisher
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
About the author
This book helped me rediscover the joys of reading¹
I've never been much of a reader. For most of my life, I've had a relatively short attention span and it's consistently given me difficulties when focusing on the words of a page.This book changed all of that.Danielewski's unique style of writing and formatting make this book both compelling and engaging in a way that very few books can even come close to comparing. This book asks, no, *demands* far more from you than just your attention as it outright requires your deliberate participation when it comes to navigating the narrative. Structured like an academic piece of non-fiction², your curiosity is more often than not rewarded when following the breadcrumbs left by the frequent citations and footnotes.³Though like all novels, this book is not without it's ups and downs, in some cases quite literally.⁴ Featuring a narrative that shifts between multiple character perspectives, you follow the story of a man who finds a manuscript about a movie about a house that is ever so *slightly* bigger on the inside than it is on the outside. This novel is at its best when it focuses on the titular house, while at its worst, you're forced to sit in the passenger seat of many drug and alcohol fueled sexcapades that initially do very little to aid the storytelling. That said, these scenes are all a necessary evil to the novel's meta narrative and after finishing the story in it's entirety, I wouldn't change anything about it.House of Leaves is a master class example of liminal horror⁵ that will keep you engaged from beginning to end as you get lost within the halls of the house on Ash Tree Lane. Danielewski has crafted a very specific type of experience within the pages of this book, nearly all 730 pages are memorable in their own way. But don't let the high page count intimidate you, this book goes by a lot faster than you'd think and should be taken slowly in chunks. I personally recommend reading a few chapters every couple of days, really chew and savor the experience, it will be much more memorable this way.And remember, there is no wrong way to read House of Leaves.¹The joys of reading and their discoverability are difficult to quantify; this phrase should be taken as a figure of speech.²Despite the very fictitious nature of Mark Z. Danielewski's House of Leaves, the story's formatting and structure lends itself to be a real world scholarly study of multiple academic works, both fictional and otherwise.³House of Leaves is written in a way that it can be explored through a multitude of methods. Some readers may read it front to back without engaging in the footnotes and appendices until after they've finished the main narrative, presenting the story in a mostly linear fashion with the citations serving as bonus material, while others encourage breaking chronology and getting lost in the novel's lengthy footnotes as they occasionally reference different sections of the book that often prove to be relevant to the current passage, creating a unique non-linear experience for the narrative.⁴House of Leaves features several sections and passages that make use of unique text formatting and typefaces, serving to invoke very specific sensations while reading. To speak any further on the subject could result in a spoiler.⁵Many fans of Danielewski's novel have gone as far as to say House of Leaves went on to inspire several pieces of media within the liminal horror genre.
Top reviews from other countries
Usuario
Casa de hojas. Gran libro
Reviewed in Mexico on June 27, 2024
Usuario
Reviewed in Mexico on June 27, 2024
Images in this review
Gabriel Rafael de Souza
Edição primorosa com história incrível
Reviewed in Brazil on February 24, 2024
Gabriel Rafael de Souza
Reviewed in Brazil on February 24, 2024
São 3 camadas/histórias acontecendo simultaneamente com diferentes níveis de sanidade. A mais profunda delas é de uma família que, ao se mudar para uma nova casa, encontra nela algumas distorções proporcionais absurdas, como um corredor super longo e escuro (que demora 5/1½ para se percorrer inteiro) em uma parede que, externamente, seria impossível sua existência. Essa família, então, cria uma espécie de documentário que teoricamente nunca foi publicado através de gravações.
A segunda camada é o de um senhor cego que supostamente encontra essas fitas com as gravações, as assite e passa a escrever um documento manuscrito formatado como trabalho acadêmico analisando o suposto documentário.
Por fim, a camada mais superficial é a de um tatuador que encontra o documento do senhor, que recentemente faleceu e passa a cumprir o último desejo do falecido: publicar o manuscrito como livro (que no caso é o livro que o leitor tem em mãos). No meio desse compilado dos manuscritos, esse último personagem passa a escrever, com uma máquina de escrever, comentários e fatos sobre a vida dele, isso contribui para o livro apresentar centenas de notas de rodapé.
Tá, mas o que tem de diferente nisso tudo? As três camadas principais (existem mais) ocorrem SIMULTANEAMENTE na MESMA página e devem serem lidas JUNTAS. Conforme o livro passa, a história vai ficando cada vez mais maluca tanto de enredo, quanto de diagramação (que de normal passa a apresentar elementos gráficos diversos) e o mais interessante nisso é que aquela insanidade do senhor começa a passar para a história em si e também ao próprio leitor. Tem páginas com texto em formato de espiral, textos invertidos que devem serem lidos usando um espelho, cartas de uma mulher no manicômio que ao ser aplicado um "código" de descriptografia mostra uma mensagem super perturbadora de como ela está sendo tratada nesse manicômio e por aí vai. Páginas com apenas uma palavra. Páginas com textos espalhados nas margens e um quadrado preto gigante no meio. Isso é só o começo e o melhor de tudo, faz muito sentido com o que está acontecendo na história.
Foi uma leitura SENSACIONAL e arrepiante com momentos inclusive de romance, mas sobretudo com predomínio do medo do desconhecido de tla forma que sua própria casa, antes um local de conforto e lazer, acaba ela própria se tornando um local dúbio a seus olhos, como leitor.
- Em relação a edição:
Adquiri uma edição denominada como "Encadernação Clássica" que nada mais é que a edição bruchura/paperback encadernada em capa dura/hardback pela empresa "TurtleBack Books" que prepara livros para bibliotecas a fim de que os mesmos durem mais tempo e tornem-se mais resistentes.
Images in this review
